Corneal biomechanics following Epi-LASIK

Journal of Refractive Surgery

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 458-464

  Ryan, Denise S ^a   Coe, Charles D ^a   Howard, Robin S ^a   Edwards, Jayson D ^b   Bower, Kraig S ^a  

^a WALTER REED ARMY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYZER; ARTICLE; ASTIGMATISM; BIOMECHANICS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CORNEA; CORNEA THICKNESS; CORNEAL HYSTERESIS; CORNEAL RESISTANCE FACTOR; EPI LASIK; EXCIMER LASER; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYSTERESIS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; KERATOMILEUSIS; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MYOPIA; OCULAR RESPONSE ANALYZER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; TONOMETRY; VISUAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS;

ADULT; BIOMECHANICS; CORNEA; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; KERATOMILEUSIS, LASER IN SITU; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOPIA; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79960163248     PISSN: 1081597X     EISSN: 19382391     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20110112-01     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Luce DA. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31(1):156-162. (Pubitemid 40260703)
2. Hamilton DR, Johnson RD, Lee N, Bourla N. Differences in the corneal biomechanical effects of surface ablation compared with laser in situ keratomileusis using a microkeratome or femtosecond laser. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34(12):2049-2056.
3. Kirwan C, O'Keefe M. Corneal hysteresis using the Reichert Ocular Response Analyser: findings pre- and post-LASIK and LASEK. Acta Ophthalmol. 2008;86(2):215-218.
4. Chen MC, Lee N, Bourla N, Hamilton DR. Corneal biomechanical measurements before and after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34(11):1886-1891.
5. Pepose JS, Feigenbaum SK, Qazi MA, Sanderson JP, Roberts CJ. Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following LASIK using static, dynamic, and noncontact tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143(1):39-47.
6. Kamiya K, Shimizu K, Ohmoto F. Comparison of the changes in corneal biomechanical properties after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis. Cornea. 2009;28(7):765-769.
7. Dupps WJ Jr. Hysteresis: new mechanospeak for the ophthalmologist. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33(9):1499-1501.
8. Chihara E. Assessment of true intraocular pressure: the gap between theory and practical data. Surv Ophthalmol. 2008;53(3):203-218. (Pubitemid 351685724)
9. Tamburelli C, Giudiceanrea A, Vaiano AS, Caputo CG, Gulla F, Salgarello T. Underestimate of tonometric readings after photorefractive keratectomy increases at higher intraocular pressure levels. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46(9):3208-3213. (Pubitemid 44264306)
10. Gabler B, Winkler von Mohrenfels C, Dreiss AK, Marshall J, Lohmann CP. Vitality of epithelial cells after alcohol exposure during laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy flap preparation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28(10):1841-1846. (Pubitemid 35204643)
11. Oncel B, Dinc UA, Gorgun E, Yalvac BI. Diurnal variation of corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure in normal subjects. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2009;19(5):798-803.
12. Laiquzzaman M, Bhojwani R, Cunliffe I. Diurnal variation of ocular hysteresis in normal subjects. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2006;34(2):114-118.
13. Kynigopoulos M, Schlote T, Kotecha A, Tzamalis A, Pajic B, Haefliger I. Repeatability of intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanical properties measurements by the ocular response analyser. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2008;225(5):357-360. (Pubitemid 352016458)
14. Ortiz D, Piñero D, Shabayek MH, Arnalich-Montiel, Alió JL. Corneal biomechanical properties in normal, post-laser in situ keratomileusis and keratoconic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33(8):1371-1375. (Pubitemid 47096684)
15. Chang DH, Stulting RD. Change in intraocular pressure measurements after LASIK: the effect of the refractive correction and the lamellar flap. Ophthalmology. 2005;112(6):1009-1016. (Pubitemid 40797455)
16. Kirwan C, O'Keefe M. Measurement of intraocular pressure in LASIK and LASEK patients using the Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer and Goldmann applanation tonometry. J Refract Surg. 2008;24(4):366-370. (Pubitemid 351544003)
17. Kohlaas M, Spoerl E, Boehm AG, Pollack K. A correction formula for real intraocular pressure after LASIK for the correction of myopic astigmatism. J Refract Surg. 2006;22(3):263-267.
18. Rosa N, Cennamo G, Breve MA, La Rana A. Goldmann applanation tonometry after myopic photorefractive keratectomy. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1998;76(5):550-554. (Pubitemid 28482380)
19. Garzozi H, Chung H, Lang Y, Kagemann L, Harris A. Intraocular pressure and photorefractive keratectomy: a comparison of three different tonometers. Cornea. 2001;20(1):33-36. (Pubitemid 32038152)