Ocular response analyzer measurements in keratoconus with normal central corneal thickness compared with matched normal control eyes

Journal of Refractive Surgery

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 209-215

  Fontes, Bruno M ^a,b,c   Ambrósio Jr , Renato ^c,d   Velarde, Guillermo Coca ^e   Nosé, Walton ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b Centro de Microcirurgia and Diagnóstico   (Brazil)

^c REFRACTA RIO   (Brazil)

^d Renato Ambrosio Eye Institute   (Brazil)

^e FLUMINENSE FEDERAL UNIVERSITY   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA THICKNESS; CORNEAL HYSTERESIS; CORNEAL RESISTANCE FACTOR; EYE EXAMINATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; KERATOCONUS; KERATOMETRY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; BIOMECHANICS; CORNEA; CORNEAL TOPOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; ELASTICITY; FEMALE; HUMANS; KERATOCONUS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VISUAL ACUITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79953001274     PISSN: 1081597X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20100415-02     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Doughty MJ, Zaman ML. Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and meta-analysis approach. Surv Ophthalmol. 2000;44(5):367-408. (Pubitemid 30151145)
2. Khachikian SS, Belin MW, Ciolino JB. Intrasubject corneal thickness asymmetry. J Refract Surg. 2008;24(6):606-609. (Pubitemid 351842085)
3. Ehlers N, Hjortdal J. Corneal thickness: measurement and implications. Exp Eye Res. 2004;78(3):543-548. (Pubitemid 38183332)
4. Boote C, Hayes S, Abahussin M, Meek KM. Mapping collagen organization in the human cornea: left and right eyes are structurally distinct. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47(3):901-908. (Pubitemid 46768320)
5. Ambrosio R Jr, Alonso RS, Luz A, Coca Velarde LG. Corneal-thickness spatial profile and corneal-volume distribution: tomographic indices to detect keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32(11):1851-1859. (Pubitemid 44647765)
6. Vinciguerra P, Albè E, Trazza S, Rosetta P, Vinciguerra R, Seiler T, Epstein D. Refractive, topographic, tomographic, and aberrometric analysis of keratoconic eyes undergoing corneal cross-linking. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(3):369-378.
7. Prospero Ponce CM, Rocha KM, Smith SD, Krueger RR. Central and peripheral corneal thickness measured with optical coherence tomography, Scheimpflug imaging, and ultrasound pachymetry in normal, keratoconus-suspect, and post-laser in situ keratomileusis eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35(6):1055-1062.
8. Miranda MA, Radhakrishnan H, O'Donnell C. Repeatability of corneal thickness measured using an Oculus Pentacam. Optom Vis Sci. 2009;86(3):266-272.
9. Luz A, Ursulio M, Castañeda D, Ambrósio R Jr. Corneal thickness progression from the thinnest point to the limbus: study based on a normal and a keratoconus population to create reference values [Portuguese]. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2006;69(4):579-583. (Pubitemid 44445540)
10. Emre S, Doganay S, Yologlu S. Evaluation of anterior segment parameters in keratoconic eyes measured with the Pentacam system. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33(10):1708-1712. (Pubitemid 47419232)
11. Reeves SW, Ellwein LB, Kim T, Constantine R, Lee PP. Keratoconus in the Medicare population. Cornea. 2009;28(1):40-42.
12. McGhee CN. 2008 Sir Norman McAlister Gregg Lecture: 150 years of practical observations on the conical cornea - what have we learned? Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2009;37(2):160-176.
13. Lema I, Romero P, Mato JL, Feijoo ED. Corneal descriptive indices in the fellow eye of unilateral keratoconus. Eye Contact Lens. 2009;35(2):65-68.
14. Khachikian SS, Belin MW. Posterior elevation in keratoconus. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(4):816.
15. Steele TM, Fabinyi DC, Couper TA, Loughnan MS. Prevalence of Orbscan II corneal abnormalities in relatives of patients with keratoconus. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2008;36(9):824-830.
16. Ertan A, Muftuoglu O. Keratoconus clinical findings according to different age and gender groups. Cornea. 2008;27(10):1109-1113.
17. de Sanctis U, Missolungi A, Mutani B, Richiardi L, Grignolo FM. Reproducibility and repeatability of central corneal thickness measurement in keratoconus using the rotating Scheimpflug camera and ultrasound pachymetry. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;144(5):712-718.
18. Hardten DR, Gosavi VV. Photorefractive keratectomy in eyes with atypical topography. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35(8):1437-1444.
19. Dawson DG, Randleman JB, Grossniklaus HE, O'Brien TP, Dubovy SR, Schmack I, Stulting RD, Edelhauser HF. Corneal ectasia after excimer laser keratorefractive surgery: histopathology, ultrastructure, and pathophysiology. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(12):2181-2191.
20. Ucakhan OO, Ozkan M, Kanpolat A. Corneal thickness measurements in normal and keratoconic eyes: Pentacam comprehensive eye scanner versus noncontact specular microscopy and ultrasound pachymetry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32(6):970-977. (Pubitemid 44202394)
21. Rabinowitz YS. Ectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2006;17(5):421-426. (Pubitemid 44319034)
22. Kotecha A, Elsheikh A, Roberts CR, Zhu H, Garway-Heath DF. Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47(12):5337-5347. (Pubitemid 46729154)
23. Nichols JJ, Steger-May K, Edrington TB, Zadnik K; CLEK study group. The relation between disease asymmetry and severity in keratoconus. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004;88(6):788-791. (Pubitemid 38725589)
24. Zadnik K, Steger-May K, Fink BA, Joslin CE, Nichols JJ, Rosenstiel CE, Tyler JA, Yu JA, Raasch TW, Schechtman KB; CLEK Study Group. Between-eye asymmetry in keratoconus. Cornea. 2002;21(7):671-679.
25. Rabinowitz YS. Keratoconus. Surv Ophthalmol. 1998;42(4):297-319.
26. Sun L, Shen M, Wang J, Fang A, Xu A, Fang H, Lu F. Recovery of corneal hysteresis after reduction of intraocular pressure in chronic primary angle-closure glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;147(6):1061-1066.
27. Sullivan-Mee M, Billingsley SC, Patel AD, Halverson KD, All-dredge BR, Qualls C. Ocular Response Analyzer in subjects with and without glaucoma. Optom Vis Sci. 2008;85(6):463-470.
28. Shen M, Fan F, Xue A, Wang J, Zhou X, Lu F. Biomechanical properties of the cornea in high myopia. Vision Res. 2008;48(21):2167-2171.
29. Goldich Y, Barkana Y, Morad Y, Hartstein M, Avni I, Zadok D. Can we measure corneal biomechanical changes after collagen cross-linking in eyes with keratoconus? - a pilot study. Cornea. 2009;28(5):498-502.
30. Goldich Y, Barkana Y, Gerber Y, Rasko A, Morad Y, Harstein M, Avni I, Zadok D. Effect of diabetes mellitus on biomechanical parameters of the cornea. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35(4):715-719.
31. del Buey MA, Cristobal JA, Ascaso FJ, Lavilla L, Lanchares E. Biomechanical properties of the cornea in Fuchs' corneal dystrophy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50(7):3199-3202.
32. Song Y, Congdon N, Li L, Zhou Z, Choi K, Lam DS, Pang CP, Xie Z, Liu X, Sharma A, Chen W, Zhang M. Corneal hysteresis and axial length among Chinese secondary school children: the Xichang Pediatric Refractive Error Study (X-PRES) report no. 4. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;145(5):819-826.
33. Shen M, Wang J, Qu J, Xu S, Wang X, Fang H, Lu F. Diurnal variation of ocular hysteresis, corneal thickness, and intraocular pressure. Optom Vis Sci. 2008;85(12):1185-1192.
34. Kida T, Liu JH, Weinreb RN. Effects of aging on corneal biomechanical properties and their impact on 24-hour measurement of intraocular pressure. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;146(4):567-572.
35. Kamiya K, Hagishima M, Fujimura F, Shimizu K. Factors affecting corneal hysteresis in normal eyes. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008;246(10):1491-1494.
36. González-Meijome JM, Queirós A, Jorge J, Díaz-Rey A, Parafita MA. Intraoffice variability of corneal biomechanical parameters and intraocular pressure (IOP). Optom Vis Sci. 2008;85(6):457-462.
37. Fontes BM, Ambrósio R Jr, Alonso RS, Jardim D, Velarde GC, Nosé W. Corneal biomechanical metrics in eyes with refraction of -19.00 to +9.00 D in healthy Brazilian patients. J Refract Surg. 2008;24(9):941-945.
38. Carbonaro F, Andrew T, Mackey DA, Spector TD, Hammond CJ. The heritability of corneal hysteresis and ocular pulse amplitude: a twin study. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(9):1545-1549.
39. Ortiz D, Piñero D, Shabayek MH, Arnalich-Montiel F, Alió JL. Corneal biomechanical properties in normal, post-laser in situ keratomileusis, and keratoconic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33(8):1371-1375. (Pubitemid 47096684)
40. Kirwan C, O'Keefe M, Lanigan B. Corneal hysteresis and intraocular pressure measurement in children using the reichert ocular response analyzer. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;142(6):990-992. (Pubitemid 44853910)
41. Hager A, Loge K, Füllhas MO, Schroeder B, Grossherr M, Wiegand W. Changes in corneal hysteresis after clear corneal cataract surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;144(3):341-346. (Pubitemid 47331402)
42. Roberts C. The cornea is not a piece of plastic. J Refract Surg. 2000;16(4):407-413. (Pubitemid 30637475)
43. Shirayama-Suzuki M, Amano S, Honda N, Usui T, Yamagami S, Oshika T. Longitudinal analysis of corneal topography in suspected keratoconus. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009;93(6):815-819.
44. Schweitzer C, Roberts CJ, Mahmoud AM, Colin J, Maurice- Tison S, Kerautret J. Screening of forme fruste keratoconus with the ocular response analyzer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51(5):2403-2410.
45. Maeda N. Clinical applications of wavefront aberrometry-a review. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2009;37(1):118-129.
46. Lema I, Sobrino T, Durán JA, Brea D, Díez-Feijoo E. Subclinical keratoconus and inflammatory molecules from tears. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009;93(6):820-824.
47. Luce DA. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31(1):156-162. (Pubitemid 40260703)
48. Kotecha A. What biomechanical properties of the cornea are relevant for the clinician? Surv Ophthalmol. 2007;52(Suppl 2):S109-S114.
49. Dupps WJ Jr. Hysteresis: new mechanospeak for the ophthalmologist. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33(9):1499-1501.
50. Shah S, Laiquzzaman M. Comparison of corneal biomechanics in pre and post-refractive surgery and keratoconic eyes by Ocular Response Analyser. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2009;32(3):129-132.
51. Mollan SP, Wolffsohn JS, Nessim M, Laiquzzaman M, Sivakumar S, Hartley S, Shah S. Accuracy of Goldmann, ocular response analyser, Pascal and TonoPen XL tonometry in keratoconic and normal eyes. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008;92(12):1661- 1665.
52. Shah S, Laiquzzaman M, Bhojwani R, Mantry S, Cunliffe I. Assessment of the biomechanical properties of the cornea with the ocular response analyzer in normal and keratoconic eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48(7):3026-3031. (Pubitemid 351261143)
53. Fontes BM, Ambrósio R Jr, Salomão M, Velarde GC, Nosé W. Biomechanical and tomographic analysis of unilateral keratoconus. J Refract Surg. 2010;26(9):677-681.
54. Wang M. Corneal Topography in the Wavefront Era: A Guide for Clinical Application. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Incorporated; 2006; xvi.
55. Kawamorita T, Uozato H, Kamiya K, Bax L, Tsutsui K, Aizawa D, Shimizu K. Repeatability, reproducibility, and agreement characteristics of rotating Scheimpflug photography and scanning-slit corneal topography for corneal power measurement. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35(1):127-133.
56. Belin MW, Khachikian SS. An introduction to understanding elevation-based topography: how elevation data are displayed - a review. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2009;37(1):14-29.
57. Shah S, Laiquzzaman M, Yeung I, Pan X, Roberts C. The use of the Ocular Response Analyser to determine corneal hysteresis in eyes before and after excimer laser refractive surgery. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2009;32(3):123-128.
58. Moreno-Montañés J, Maldonado MJ, García N, Mendiluce L, Garcia-Gomez PJ, Seguí-Gómez M. Reproducibility and clinical relevance of the ocular response analyzer in nonoperated eyes: corneal biomechanical and tonometric implications. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49(3):968-974.
59. Kirwan C, O'Keefe M. Corneal hysteresis using the Reichert ocular response analyser: findings pre- and post-LASIK and LASEK. Acta Ophthalmol. 2008;86(2):215-218.
60. Pepose JS, Feigenbaum SK, Qazi MA, Sanderson JP, Roberts CJ. Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following LASIK using static, dynamic, and noncontact tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143(1):39-47.
61. Shah S, Laiquzzaman M, Cunliffe I, Mantry S. The use of the Reichert ocular response analyser to establish the relationship between ocular hysteresis, corneal resistance factor and central corneal thickness in normal eyes. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2006;29(5):257-262. (Pubitemid 44743122)
62. Congdon NG, Broman AT, Bandeen-Roche K, Grover D, Quigley HA. Central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis associated with glaucoma damage. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;141(5):868-875.
63. Luce D. Methodology for cornea compensated IOP and corneal resistance factor for the Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:E-Abstract 2266.
64. Wollensak G. Crosslinking treatment of progressive keratoconus: new hope. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2006;17(4):356-360. (Pubitemid 44215044)
65. McMahon TT, Szczotka-Flynn L, Barr JT, Anderson R J, Slaughter ME, Lass JH, Iyengar SK; CLEK Study Group. A new method for grading the severity of keratoconus: the Keratoconus Severity Score (KSS). Cornea. 2006;25(7):794-800. (Pubitemid 44657254)
66. Luce D. ORA waveform analysis and beyond. Presented at: American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery meeting; April 3-8, 2009; San Francisco, California.