Changes in ocular response analyzer parameters after LASIK

Journal of Refractive Surgery

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 279-288

  Chen, Shihao ^a   Chen, Ding ^a   Wang, Jianhua ^b   Lu, Fan ^a   Wang, Qinmei ^a   Qu, Jia ^a  

^a WENZHOU MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI MILLER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CORNEA REFLEX; CORNEA THICKNESS; HUMAN; HYSTERESIS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; KERATOMILEUSIS; MYOPIA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; R FACTOR;

ADULT; ASTIGMATISM; CORNEA; ELASTIC TISSUE; ELASTICITY; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; KERATOMILEUSIS, LASER IN SITU; MYOPIA; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURGICAL FLAPS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77951037882     PISSN: 1081597X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20100218-04     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Lohmann CP, Guell JL. Regression after LASIK for the treatment of myopia: the role of the corneal epithelium. Semin Ophthalmol. 1998;13:79-82.
2. Tervo TM. Iatrogenic keratectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27:490-491.
3. Amoils SP, Deist MB, Gous P, Amoils PM. Iatrogenic keratectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis for less than -4.0 to -7.0 diopters of myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;26:967-977. (Pubitemid 30666650)
4. Reinstein DZ, Sutton HF, Srivannaboon S, Silverman RH, Archer TJ, Coleman DJ. Evaluating microkeratome effi cacy by 3D corneal lamellar fl ap thickness accuracy and reproducibility using Artemis VHF digital ultrasound arc-scanning. J Refract Surg. 2006;22:431-440. (Pubitemid 43736469)
5. Wang J, Thomas J, Cox I, Rollins A. Noncontact measurements of central corneal epithelial and fl ap thickness after laser in situ keratomileusis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:1812-1816. (Pubitemid 38868976)
6. Hoeltzel DA, Altman P, Buzard K, Choe K. Strip extensiometry for comparison of the mechanical response of bovine, rabbit, and human corneas. J Biomech Eng. 1992;114:202-215.
7. Jaycock PD, Lobo L, Ibrahim J, Tyrer J, Marshall J. Interferometric technique to measure biomechanical changes in the cornea induced by refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:175-184. (Pubitemid 40260705)
8. Grabner G, Eilmsteiner R, Steindl C, Ruckhofer J, Mattioli R, Husinsky W. Dynamic corneal imaging. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:163-174.
9. Hollman KW, Emelianov SY, Neiss JH, Jotyan G, Spooner GJ, Juhasz T, Kurtz RM, O'Donnell M. Strain imaging of corneal tissue with an ultrasound elasticity microscope. Cornea. 2002;21:68-73. (Pubitemid 33144407)
10. Aguayo JB, McLennan IJ, Graham C Jr, Cheng HM. Dynamic monitoring of corneal carbohydrate metabolism using high-resolution deuterium NMR spectroscopy. Exp Eye Res. 1988;47:337-343.
11. Pepose JS, Feigenbaum SK, Qazi MA, Sanderson JP, Roberts CJ. Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following LASIK using static, dynamic, and noncontact tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143:39-47.
12. Kirwan C, O'Keefe M, Lanigan B. Corneal hysteresis and intraocular pressure measurement in children using the reichert ocular response analyzer. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;142:990-992. (Pubitemid 44853910)
13. Kirwan C, O'Keefe M. Measurement of intraocular pressure in LASIK and LASEK patients using the Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer and Goldmann applanation tonometry. J Refract Surg. 2008;24:366-370. (Pubitemid 351544003)
14. Kirwan C, O'Keefe M. Corneal hysteresis using the Reichert ocular response analyser: fi ndings pre- and post-LASIK and LASEK. Acta Ophthalmol. 2008;86:215-218.
15. Luce DA. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:156-162.
16. Soergel F, Jean B, Seiler T, Bende T, Mucke S, Pechhold W, Pels L. Dynamic mechanical spectroscopy of the cornea for measurement of its viscoelastic properties in vitro. Ger J Ophthalmol. 1995;4:151-156.
17. Luce D. Methodology for cornea compensated IOP and corneal resistance factor for the Reichert ocular response analyzer. ARVO Meeting Abstracts. 2006;47:2266.
18. Izatt JA, Hee MR, Swanson EA, Lin CP, Huang D, Schuman JS, Puliafi to CA, Fujimoto JG. Micrometer-scale resolution imaging of the anterior eye in vivo with optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994;112:1584-1589.
19. Wang J, Fonn D, Simpson TL. Topographical thickness of the epithelium and total cornea after hydrogel and PMMA contact lens wear with eye closure. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:1070-1074. (Pubitemid 36297823)
20. Maldonado MJ, Ruiz-Oblitas L, Munuera JM, Aliseda D, García-Layana A, Moreno-Montañés J. Optical coherence tomography evaluation of the corneal cap and stromal bed features after laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia and astigmatism. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:81-87. (Pubitemid 30210187)
21. Muscat S, McKay N, Parks S, Kemp E, Keating D. Repeatability and reproducibility of corneal thickness measurements by optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:1791-1795. (Pubitemid 34587022)
22. Ortiz D, Piñero D, Shabayek MH, Arnalich-Montiel F, Alió JL. Corneal biomechanical properties in normal, post-laser in situ keratomileusis, and keratoconic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33:1371-1375. (Pubitemid 47096684)
23. Hjortdal J∅, Møller-Pedersen T, Ivarsen A, Ehlers N. Corneal power, thickness, and stiffness: results of a prospective randomized controlled trial of PRK and LASIK for myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:21-29. (Pubitemid 40260688)
24. Gatinel D, Chaabouni S, Adam PA, Munck J, Puech M, Hoang-Xuan T. Corneal hysteresis, resistance factor, topography, and pachymetry after corneal lamellar fl ap. J Refract Surg. 2007;23:76-84. (Pubitemid 46122700)
25. Sin S, Simpson TL. The repeatability of corneal and corneal epithelial thickness measurements using optical coherence tomography. Optom Vis Sci. 2006;83:360-365. (Pubitemid 43916701)
26. Wang J, Fonn D, Simpson TL, Jones L. The measurement of corneal epithelial thickness in response to hypoxia using optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;133:315-319. (Pubitemid 34171579)
27. Lu F, Xu S, Qu J, Shen M, Wang X, Fang H, Wang J. Central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis during corneal swelling induced by contact lens wear with eye closure. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143:616-622. (Pubitemid 46452521)
28. Hager A, Loge K, Fullhas MO, Schroeder B, Grossherr M, Wiegand W. Changes in corneal hysteresis after clear corneal cataract surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;144:341-346. (Pubitemid 47331402)
29. Bayraktar S, Bayraktar Z. Central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure relationship in eyes with and without previous LASIK: comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometer with pneumatonometer. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2005;15:81-88. (Pubitemid 40462734)
30. Emara B, Probst LE, Tingey DP, Kennedy DW, Willms LJ, Machat J. Correlation of intraocular pressure and central corneal thickness in normal myopic eyes and after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998;24:1320-1325. (Pubitemid 28473551)
31. Siganos DS, Papastergiou GI, Moedas C. Assessment of the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer in monitoring intraocular pressure in unoperated eyes and eyes after LASIK. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:746-751. (Pubitemid 38501466)
32. Liu J, Roberts CJ. Infl uence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement: quantitative analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:146-155. (Pubitemid 40260702)
33. Medeiros FA, Weinreb RN. Evaluation of the infl uence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurements using the ocular response analyzer. J Glaucoma. 2006;15:364-370. (Pubitemid 44434988)
34. Laiquzzaman M, Bhojwani R, Cunliffe I, Shah S. Diurnal variation of ocular hysteresis in normal subjects: relevance in clinical context. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2006;34:114-118. (Pubitemid 43348983)
35. Kida T, Liu JH, Weinreb RN. Effect of 24-hour corneal biomechanical changes on intraocular pressure measurement. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:4422-4426. (Pubitemid 46579368)