Reproducibility and clinical relevance of the ocular response analyzer in nonoperated eyes: corneal biomechanical and tonometric implications

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 49, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 968-974

  Moreno Montañés, Javier ^a   Maldonado, Miguel J ^a   García, Noelia ^a   Mendiluce, Loreto ^a   García Gómez, Pio J ^a   Seguí Gómez, María ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY CLINIC OF NAVARRA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NAVARRA   (Spain)

^c JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ANALYZER; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA; HUMAN; HYSTERESIS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; OCULAR RESPONSE ANALYZER; OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; TONOMETER; TONOMETRY; VISCOELASTICITY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; ELASTIC TISSUE; FEMALE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; OCULOPLETHYSMOGRAPHY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOMECHANICS; CORNEA; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; ELASTIC TISSUE; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TONOMETRY, OCULAR;

EID: 41949128428     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.07-0280     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Weih LM, Mukesh BN, McCarty CA, Taylor HR. Association of demographic, familial, medical, and ocular factors with intraocular pressure. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119:875-880.
2. Anton A, Moreno-Montañés J, Blazquez F, Alvarez A, Martin B, Molina B. Usefulness of optical coherence tomography parameters of the optic disc and the retinal nerve fiber layer to differentiate glaucomatous, ocular hypertensive, and normal eyes. J Glaucoma. 2007;16:1-8.
3. Moreno-Montañés J, Alvarez-Vidal A, Sainz Gomez C, Rodriguez Conde R. Capa de fibras nerviosas en ojos glaucomatosos: estudio realizado mediante OCT y su comparación con el campo visual. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2002;77:435-441.
4. Herndon LW. Measuring intraocular pressure-adjustments for cor neal thickness and new technologies. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2006;17:115-119.
5. Moreno-Montañés J, Teutsch P, Rodriguez-Conde R, Corcostegui I. Factores relacionados con la asimetría tensional en el síndrome pseudoexfoliativo. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2002;77:309-313.
6. Damji KF, Muni RH, Munger RM. Influence of corneal variables on accuracy of intraocular pressure measurement. J Glaucoma. 2003; 12:69-80.
7. Kohlhaas M, Boehm AG, Spoerl E, Pursten A, Grein HJ, Pillunat LE. Effect of central corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and axial length on applanation tonometry. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006; 124: 471-476.
8. Whitacre MM, Stein R. Sources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometers. Surv Ophthalmol. 1993;38:1-30.
9. Brooks AM, Robertson IF, Mahoney AM. Ocular rigidity and intraocular pressure in keratoconus. Aust J Ophthalmol. 1984;12: 317-324.
10. Whitacre MM, Stein RA, Hassanein K. The effect of corneal thickness on applanation tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol. 1993;115:592-596.
11. Luce DA. Determining in-vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:156-162.
12. Randleman JB. Post-laser in-situ keratomileusis ectasia: current understanding and future directions. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2006;17:406-412.
13. Maldonado MJ. Undersurface ablation of the flap for laser in situ keratomileusis retreatment. Ophthalmology. 2002; 109:1453-1464.
14. Maldonado MJ, Nieto JC, Diez-Cuenca M, Pinero DP. Posterior corneal curvature changes after undersurface ablation of the flap and in-the-bed LASIK retreatment. Ophthalmology. 2006; 113: 1125-1133.
15. Maldonado MJ, Juberias JR, Rodriguez-Conde R. Corneal flap thickness and tissue laser ablation in myopic LASIK. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:1042-1043.
16. Pepose JS, Feigenbaum SK; Qazi MA, Sanderson JP, Roberts CJ. Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following LASIK using static, dynamic, and noncontact tonometry. AmJ Ophthalmol. 2007;143:39-47.
17. Laiquzzaman M, Bhojwani R, Cunliffe I, Shah S. Diurnal variation of ocular hysteresis in normal subjects: relevance in clinical context. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006;34:114-118.
18. Kida T, Liu JH, Weinreb RN. Effect of 24-hour corneal biomechanical changes on intraocular pressure measurement. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sd. 2006;47:4422-4426.
19. Kirwan C, O'Keefe M, Lanigan B. Corneal hysteresis and intraocular pressure measurement in children using the Reichert ocular response analyzer. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;142:990-992.
20. Congdon NG, Broman AT, Bandeen-Roche K, Grover D, Quigley HA. Central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis associated with glaucoma damage. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;141:868-875.
21. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1: 307-310.
22. Kotecha A, Elsheikh A, Roberts CR, Zhu H, Garway-Heath DF. Corneal thickness-and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:5337-5347.
23. Martinez-de-la-CasaJM, Garcia-Feijoo J, Fernandez-Vidal A, Mendez-Hernandez C, Garcia-Sanchez J. Ocular response analyzer versus Goldmann applanation tonometry for intraocular pressure measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:4410-4414.
24. Kakau CET, Wilke K. On repeated tonometry. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1971;49:611-614.
25. Jorge J, González-Méijome JM, Díaz-Rey JA, Almeida JB, Ribeiro P, Parafita MA. Clinical performance of non-contact tonometry by Reichert AT550 in glaucomatous patients. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2003;23:503-506.
26. Baudouin C, Gastaud P. Influence of topical anesthesia on tonometric values of intraocular pressure. Ophthalmologica. 1994; 208:309-313.
27. Dayanir V, Sakarya R, Ozcura F, et al. Effect of corneal drying on central thickness. J Glaucoma. 2004;13:6-8.
28. Moreno-Montañés J, Aliseda D, Lajara J, Gómez E. Variaciones de la tensión ocular en la tonometría repetida de aire. Arch Soc Esp Oftal. 1995;69:135-140.
29. Shih CY, Graff Zivin JS, Trokel SL, Tsai JC. Clinical significance of central corneal thickness in the management of glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:1270-1275.
30. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measurement error. BMJ. 1996;313:744.
31. Bland M. An Introduction to Medical Statistics. 3rd ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2000;268-275.
32. Lin LI. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics. 1989;45:255-268.
33. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;86:420-428.
34. Martinez-de-la-CasaJM, Garcia-FeijooJ, Castillo A, Garcia-Sanchez J. Reproducibility and clinical evaluation of rebound tonometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:4578-4580.
35. Horowitz GS, Byles J, Lee J, D'Este C. Comparison of the Tono-Pen and Goldmann tonometer for measuring intraocular pressure in patients with glaucoma. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2004;32:584-589.
36. Shields MB. The non-contact tonometer: its value and limitations. Surv Ophthalmol. 1980;244:211-219.
37. Lin LI. A note on the concordance correlation coefficient. Biometrics. 2000;56:324-325.
38. Fernandes P, Diaz-Rey JA, Queiros A, et al. Comparison of the ICare rebound tonometer with the Goldmann tonometer in a normal population. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2005;25:436-440.
39. Van der Jagt LH, Jansonius NM. Three portable tonometers, the TGDc-01, the ICARE and the Tonopen XL, compared with each other and with Goldmann applanation tonometry. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2005;25:429-435.
40. Brusini P, Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, Tosoni C, Parisi L. Comparison of ICare tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients. J Glaucoma. 2006;15:213-217.
41. Moreno-Montañés J, Sadaba LM, Heras H. Medición de presión intraocular con el tonómetro Proview®Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2005;80:79-83.
42. Jorge J, Diaz-Rey JA, Gonzalez-Meijome JM, Almeida JB, Parafita MA. Clinical performance of the Reichert AT550: a new noncontact tonometer. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2002;22:560-564.
43. Maldonado MJ. Corneal epithelial alterations resulting from use of chlorine-disinfected contact tonometer after myopic photorefractive keratectomy. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:1546-1549.
44. Maldonado MJ, Rodriguez-Galietero A, Cano-Parra J, Menezo JL, Diaz-LLopis M. Goldmann applanation tonometry using sterile disposable silicone tonometer shields. Ophthalmology. 1996;103: 815-821.
45. Cho P, Lui T. Comparison of the performance of the Nidek NT2000 noncontact tonometer with the Keeler Pulsair 2000 and the Goldmann applanation tonometer. Optom Vis Sci. 1997;74:51-58.
46. Nicastro NJ. Intraocular pressure-the cardiac connection. Ann Ophthalmol. 1991;23:366-372.
47. Kontiola A, Puska P. Measuring intraocular pressure with the Pulsair 3000 and Rebound tonometers in elderly patients without an anesthetic. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2004;242:3-7.
48. Sanchez-Tocino H, Bringas-Calvo R, Iglesias-Cortinas D. Estudio comparativo entre el neumotonómetro de no contacto Canon Tx-10 Y el tonómetro de Goldmann. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2005;80:643-649.
49. Tonnu PA, Ho T, Sharma K, White E, Bunce C, Garway-Heath D. A comparison of four methods of tonometry: method agreement and interobserver variability. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89:847-850.
50. Moreno-Montañés J, Gomez-Demmel E, Lajara-Blesa J, AlisedaPerez DM. Comparative study of three non-contact tonometers and the Goldmann tonometer. Ophthalmologica. 1994;208:115-118.
51. Jonas JB, Stroux A, Velten I, Juenemann A, Martus P, Budde WM. Central corneal thickness correlated with glaucoma damage and rate of progression. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:1269-1274.
52. Ventura AC, Böhnke M, Mojon DS. Central corneal thickness measurements in patients with normal tension glaucoma, primary open angle glaucoma, Pseudoexfoliation glaucoma, or ocular hypertension. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001;85:792-795.
53. Brandt JD, Beiser JA, Gordon MO, Kass MA; Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS) Group. Central corneal thickness and measured IOP response to topical ocular hypotensive medication in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;138:717-722.
54. Daxer, Misof K, Grabner B, Ettl A, Fratzl P. Collagen fibrils in the human corneal stroma: structure and aging. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998;39:644-648.
55. Malik NS, Moss SJ, Ahmed N, et al. Ageing of the human corneal stroma: structural and biochemical changes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1992;11383:222-228.
56. Le A, Mukesh BN, McCarty CA, Taylor HR. Risk factors associated with the incidence of open-angle glaucoma; the visual impairment project. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:3783-3789.
57. Elolia R, Stokes J. Monograph series on aging-related diseases, XI: glaucoma. Chronic Dis Can. 1998;19:157-169.
58. Shah S, Laiquzzaman M, Cunliffe I, Mantry S. The use of the Reichert ocular response analyser to establish the relationship between ocular hysteresis, corneal resistance factor and central cornea thickness in normal eyes. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2006; 29:257-262.
59. Medeiros FA, Weinreb RN. Evaluation of the influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurements using the ocular response analyser. J Glaucoma. 2006;15:364-730.
60. Rouland JF, Berdeaux G, Lafuma A. The economic burden of glaucoma and ocular hypertension: implications for patient management: a review. Drugs Aging. 2005;22:315-321.