The meaning of 'relevance' in science education and its implications for the science curriculum

Studies in Science Education

Volumn 49, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 1-34

  Stuckey, Marc ^a   Hofstein, Avi ^b   Mamlok Naaman, Rachel ^b   Eilks, Ingo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BREMEN   (Germany)

^b WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (Israel)

Author keywords

curriculum; curriculum emphasis; educational reform; interest; motivation; relevance; scientific literacy

Indexed keywords

EID: 84882257100     PISSN: 03057267     EISSN: 19408412     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03057267.2013.802463     Document Type: Review

References (127)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science. 1963. Science - A process approach, Washington, DC: AAAS.
2. American Association for the Advancement of Science. 1993. Benchmarks for science literacy, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
3. Aikenhead, G. S. (2003). Review of research on humanistic perspectives in science curricula. Paper presented at the ESERA conference, Nordwijkerhoud, The Netherlands.
4. Bandura, A. 1986. Social foundation of thought and action: A social cognitive theory, Englewood, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
5. Ben-Chaim, D. and Zoller, U. 1991. The STS outlook profiles of Israeli high school students and their teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 13: 447 - 458.
6. Bennett, J. and Lubben, F. 2006. Context-based Chemistry: The Salters approach. International Journal of Science Education, 28: 999 - 1015.
7. Biological Science Curriculum Study. 1963. Biology Sciences: An inquiry into life, New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace & World.
8. Bradley, J. D. (2005). Chemistry education for development. chemical education international, 7. Retrieved July 01, 2011, from the World Wide Web at http://old.iupac.org/publications/cei/vol6/index.html
9. Bruner, J. 1996. The culture of education, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
10. Burmeister, M., Rauch, F. and Eilks, I. 2012. Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) and secondary chemistry education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 13: 59 - 68.
11. Bybee, R. W. 1997a. " Toward an understanding of scientific literacy ". In Scientific literacy - an international symposium, Edited by: Gräber, W. and Bolte, C. 37 - 68. Kiel: IPN.
12. Bybee, R. W. (1997b). The sputnik era: Why is this educational reform different from all other reforms? Retrieved November 01, 2012, from the World Wide Web at www.nas.edu/sputnik/bybee1.htm
13. Bybee, R. W. and De Boer, G. 1994. " Goals for the science curriculum ". In Handbook of research on science teaching and learning, Edited by: Gabel, D. 357 - 387. Washington, DC: NSTA.
14. Bybee, R., Fensham, P. J. and Laurie, R. 2009. Special issue: Scientific literacy and contexts in PISA science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46: 861 - 960.
15. Byrne, M. and Johnstone, A. 1988. How to make science relevant. School Science Review, 70: 35 - 43.
16. Childs, P. E. (2006, May). Relevance, relevance, relevance. Physical Sciences Magazine, p. 14.
17. De Boer, G. 2000. Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37: 582 - 601.
18. De Haan, G. 2006. The BLK '21' programme in Germany: A 'Gestaltungskompetenz'-based model for education for sustainable development. Environmental Education Research, 12: 19 - 32.
19. De Jong, O. 2006. Making chemistry meaningful: Conditions for successful context-based teaching. Educacion Quimica, 17: 215 - 226.
20. Dewey, J. 1956. The child and the curriculum, and the school and society, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
21. Dewey, J. (1973). Education as a social function. In S. D. Sieber & D. D. Wilder (Eds.), The school in society (pp. 28-33). New York, NY: The Free Press.
22. Dillon, J. 2009. On scientific literacy and curriculum reform. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 4: 201 - 213.
23. Dori, Y. J. and Herscoviz, O. 2005. Case-based long-term professional development of science teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 27: 1413 - 1446.
24. EC High Level Group. (2004). Increasing human resources for science and technology in Europe. Report presented at the conference 'Europe needs more scientists'. Brussels: European Commission.
25. EC High Level Group on Science Education. 2007. Science education now: A renewed pedagogy for the future of Europe, Brussels: European Commission.
26. Eilks, I., Nielsen, J. A., & Hofstein, A. (in press). Learning about the role of science in public debate as an essential component of scientific literacy. In C. Bruguière, P. Clément, & A. Tiberghien (Eds.), Book of selected presentations, ESERA Conference Lyon 2011. Dordrecht: Springer.
27. Eilks, I., Rauch, F., Ralle, B. and Hofstein, A. 2013. " How to balance the chemistry curriculum between science and society ". In Chemistry teaching - a studybook, Edited by: Eilks, I. and Hofstein, A. 1 - 36. Rotterdam: Sense.
28. Eijkelhof, H. M. C., & Kortland, J. (1988). Broadening the aims of physics education: experiences in the PLON project. In P. J. Fensham (Ed.), Development and dilemmas in science education (pp. 282-305). London: Falmer Press.
29. Elmose, S. and Roth, W.-M. 2005. Allgemeinbildung: Readiness for living in a risk society. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37: 11 - 34.
30. Feierabend, T. and Eilks, I. 2011. Teaching the societal dimension of chemistry using a socio-critical, problem-oriented lesson plan based on bioethanol usage. Journal of Chemical Education, 88: 1250 - 1256.
31. Feng, S.-L. and Tuan, H.-L. 2005. Using ARCS model to promote 11th graders' motivation and achievement in learning about acids and bases. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3: 463 - 484.
32. Fensham, P. J. (1976). Social contentionin chemistry courses. Chemistry in Britain, 12, 148-151).
33. Fensham, P. J. 1993. Academic influence on school science curricula. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 17: 411 - 412.
34. Fensham, P. J. (2000). Providing suitable content in the 'science for all' curriculum. In R. Millar, J. Leach, & J. Osborne (Eds.), Improving science education: The contribution of research (pp. 147-164). Birmingham: Open-University Press.
35. Fensham, P. J. 2004. Increasing the relevance of science and technology education for all students in the 21st century. Science Education International, 15: 7 - 26.
36. Finlay, G. C. 1962. The physical science study committee. The School Review, 70: 63 - 81.
37. Freire, P. 1998. Teachers as cultural workers - letters to those who dare teach, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
38. Gilbert, J. K. 2006. On the nature of 'context' in chemical education. International Journal of Science Education, 28: 957 - 976.
39. Goodman, J. 1988. Constructing a practical philosophy of teaching: A study of pre-service teachers' professional perspectives. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4: 121 - 137.
40. Harms, N., & Yager, R. E. (1981). What research says to the science teacher (Vol. 3). Washington, DC: NSTA.
41. Hofstein, A., Eilks, I. and Bybee, R. 2011. Societal issues and their importance for contemporary science education: A pedagogical justification and the state of the art in Israel, Germany and the USA. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9: 1459 - 1483.
42. Hofstein, A. and Kempa, R. F. 1985. Motivating aspects in science education: An attempt at an analysis. European Journal of Science Education, 7: 221 - 229.
43. Hofstein, A. and Kesner, M. 2006. Industrial chemistry and school chemistry: Making chemistry studies more relevant. International Journal of Science Education, 28: 1017 - 1039.
44. Hofstein, A., Mamlok-Naaman, R. and Rosenberg, O. 2006. " Varying instructional methods and assessment of students in high school chemistry ". In Assessment in science, Edited by: McMahon, M., Simmons, P., Sommers, R., De Baets, D. and Crawley, F. 139 - 148. Arlington, TX: NSTA.
45. Hofstein, A. and Walberg, H. J. 1995. " Instructional strategies ". In Improving science education, Edited by: Fraser, B. J. and Walberg, H. J. 70 - 89. Chicago, IL: NSSE.
46. Hofstein, A. and Yager, R. E. 1982. Social issues as organizers for science education in the 80's. School Science and Mathematics, 82: 539 - 547.
47. Hofstein, A. and Yager, R. E. 1986. Features of a quality curriculum for school science. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 18: 133 - 146.
48. Holbrook, J. 1998. Operationalising scientific and technological literacy - a new approach to science teaching. Science Education International, 9: 13 - 18.
49. Holbrook, J. 2003. Increasing relevance of science education: The way forward. Science Education International, 14: 5 - 13.
50. Holbrook, J. 2005. Making chemistry teaching relevant. Chemical Education International, 6
51. Holbrook, J. 2008. Introduction to the special issue of science education international devoted to PARSEL. Science Education International, 19: 257 - 266.
52. Holbrook, J. and Rannikmäe, M. 2007. The nature of science education for enhancing scientific literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 29: 1347 - 1362.
53. Holbrook, J. and Rannikmäe, M. 2009. The meaning of scientific literacy. International Journal of Science and Environmental Education, 4: 275 - 288.
54. Holman, J. (1986). Science and technology in society. General guide for teachers. Hatfield Herts: The Association for Science Education.
55. Hughes, G. 2000. Marginalization of socioscientific material in science-technology-society science curricula: Some implications for gender inclusivity and curriculum reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37: 426 - 440.
56. Hurd, P. D. 1970. Scientific enlightenment for an age of science. The Science Teacher, 37: 13 - 16.
57. Hurd, P. D. 1998. Linking science education to the workplace. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 7: 329 - 355.
58. Jenkins, E. W. 2005. Important but not for me: students' attitudes towards secondary school science in England. Research in Science & Technological Education, 23: 41 - 57.
59. Jones, J. and Young, D. J. 1995. Perceptions of the relevance of mathematics and science: An Australien study. Research in Science Education, 25: 3 - 18.
60. Kahl, S. and Harms, N. 1981. " Project synthesis: Purpose, organization and procedures ". In What research says to the science teacher (Vol. 3), Edited by: Harms, N. and Yager, R. E. Washington, DC: NSTA.
61. Karplus, R. 1964. The science improvement study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2: 293 - 303.
62. Keeves, J. and Aikenhead, G. 1995. " Science curricula in a changing world ". In Improving science education, Edited by: Fraser, B. J. and Walberg, H. J. 13 - 41. Chicago, IL: NSSE.
63. Keller, J. M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In. C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories: An overview of their current status (pp. 386-434). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
64. Keller, J. M. 1987. Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development, 10: 2 - 10.
65. Keller, J. M. and Kopp, T. 1987. " An application of the ARCS model of motivational design ". In Instructional-design theories in action: Lessons illustrating selected theories and models, Edited by: Reigeluth, C. M. 289 - 320. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
66. Kempa, R. F. (1983). Developing new perspectives in chemical education. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference in Chemistry, Education, and Society, Montpellier (pp. 34-42).
67. King, D. 2012. New perspectives on context-based chemistry education: Using a dialectical sociocultural approach to view teaching and learning. Studies in Science Education, 48: 51 - 87.
68. King, D., & Ritchie, S. M. (2012). Learning science through real world contexts. In B. J. Fraser, K. G. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 69-80). Dordrecht: Springer.
69. Klafki, W. 2000a. " The significance of classical theories of Bildung for a contemporary concept of Allgemeinbildung ". In Teaching as a reflective practice: The German Didaktik tradition, Edited by: Westbury, I., Hopmann, S. and Riquarts, K. 85 - 108. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
70. Klafki, W. 2000b. " Didaktik analysis as the core for preparation of instruction ". In Teaching as a reflective practice: The German Didaktik tradition, Edited by: Westbury, I., Hopmann, S. and Riquarts, K. 85 - 108. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
71. Knamiller, G. 1984. The struggle for relevance of science education in developing countries. Studies in Science Education, 11: 60 - 78.
72. Krapp, A. and Prenzel, M. 2011. Research on interest in science: Theories, methods, and findings. International Journal of Science Education, 33: 27 - 50.
73. Leont'ev, A. N. 1978. Activity, consciousness, and personality, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
74. Levitt, K. E. 2001. An analysis of elementary teachers' beliefs regarding the teaching and learning of science. Science Education, 86: 1 - 22.
75. Luft, J., Ortegaz, I. and Wong-Kavas, S. 2009. NSTA's state of science education survey, Washington, DC: NSTA.
76. Lumpe, A. T., Honey, J. J. and Czerniak, C. M. 2000. Assessing teachers' beliefs about their science teaching context. Journal of Research In Science Teaching, 37: 275 - 292.
77. Lyons, T. 2006. Different countries, same science classes: Students' experiences of school science in their own words. International Journal of Science Education, 28: 591 - 613.
78. Mandler, D., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Blonder, R., Yayon, M. and Hofstein, A. 2012. High-school chemistry teaching through environmentally oriented curricula. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 13: 80 - 92.
79. Marks, R. and Eilks, I. 2009. Promoting scientific literacy using a sociocritical and problem-oriented approach to chemistry teaching: Concept, examples, experiences. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 4: 231 - 245.
80. Marks, R. and Eilks, I. 2010. Research-based development of a lesson plan on shower gels and musk fragrances following a socio-critical and problem-oriented approach to chemistry teaching. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 11: 129 - 141.
81. Marks, R., Otten, J. and Eilks, I. 2010. Writing news spots about science - a way to promote scientific literacy. School Science Review, 92: 99 - 108.
82. Matthews, M. R. 1994. Science teaching - the role of history and philosophy of science, New York, NY: Routledge.
83. Merril, R. J. and Ridgeway, D. W. 1969. The CHEMStudy story, San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
84. Morrison, P. and Walcott, C. 1963. Enlightened opportunism: An informal account of the elementary science summer study of 1962. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1: 48 - 53.
85. National Commission on Excellence in Education. 1983. A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. The Elementary School Journal, 84: 112 - 130.
86. Newton, D. P. 1988a. Relevance and science education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 20: 7 - 12.
87. Newton, D. P. 1988b. Making science education relevant, London: Kogan Page.
88. Newton, L. D. and Newton, D. P. 1991. How relevant are primary science schemes of work?. Innovations in Education & Training International, 28: 43 - 54.
89. Novak, J. D. and Gowin, D. B. 1984. Learning how to learn, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
90. National Research Council. 1996. National science education standards, Washington, DC: National Academy.
91. National Science Teachers Association (NSTA). 1991. Position statement, Washington, DC: NSTA.
92. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 1998. Instrument design: A framework for assessing scientific literacy, Arnhem: Programme for International Students Assessment.
93. Ogborn, J. 2004. " Science and technology: What do we teach? ". In Quality in teacher education and training, Edited by: Michelini, M. 69 - 84. Udine: Forum.
94. Osborne, J. and Dillon, J. 2008. Science education in Europe: Critical reflections, London: The Nuffield Foundation.
95. Osborne, J., Simon, S. and Collins, S. 2003. Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25: 1049 - 1079.
96. Pederson, J. E. and Totten, S. 2001. Beliefs of science teachers towards teaching of science/technological/societal issues: Are we addressing national standards). Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 21: 376 - 393.
97. Pella, M. O. 1967. Scientific literacy and the high school curriculum. School Science and Mathematics, 67: 346 - 356.
98. Ramsden, J. M. 1998. Mission impossible? Can anything be done about attitudes to science?. International Journal of Science Education, 20: 125 - 137.
99. Rannikmäe, M., Teppo, M. and Holbrook, J. 2010. Popularity and relevance of science education literacy: Using a context-based approach. Science Education International, 21: 116 - 125.
100. Ratcliffe, M. & Grace, M. (2003). Science education for citizenship: Teaching socio-scientific issues. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
101. Roberts, D. A. 1982. Developing the concept of 'Curriculum Emphasis' in science education. Science Education, 66: 243 - 251.
102. Roberts, D. A. 1988. " What counts as science education ". In Development and dilemma in science education, Edited by: Fensham, P. 27 - 54. Barcecome: Falmer.
103. Roberts, D. A. 2007. " Scientific literacy/science literacy ". In Handbook of research in science education, Edited by: Abell, S. K. and Lederman, N. G. 729 - 780. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
104. Roth, W.-M. and Lee, S. 2004. Science education as/for participation in the community. Science Education, 88: 263 - 291.
105. Rutherford, F. J. and Ahlgren, A. 1991. Science for all Americans: The project 2061, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
106. Sadler, T. D. 2004. Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research Science Teaching, 41: 513 - 536.
107. Sadler, T. D. 2011. Socio-scientific issues in the classroom, Dordrecht: Springer.
108. Sadler, T. D. and Zeidler, D. 2009. Scientific literacy, PISA, and socioscientific discourse: Assessment for progressive aims of science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46: 909 - 921.
109. Schollum, B. and Osborne, R. 1985. " Relating the new to the familiar ". In Learning in science, Edited by: Osborne, R. and Freyberg, P. 51 - 65. London: Heinemann.
110. Schreiner, C. and SjØberg, S. 2004. Relevance of science education: Sowing the Seeds of ROSE, Oslo: Acta Didactica.
111. Shamos, M. H. (1995). The myth of scientific literacy. New Brunswick: Rutgers.
112. Schwab, J. J. 1973. The practical 3: Translation into curriculum. School Review, 81: 501 - 522.
113. Shwartz, Y., Ben-Zvi, R. and Hofstein, A. 2006. Chemical literacy: What does it mean to scientists and school teachers?. Journal of Chemical Education, 83: 1557 - 1561.
114. Simon, S. and Amos, R. 2011. " Decision making and use of evidence in a socio-scientific problem on air quality ". In Socio-scientific issues in the classroom: Teaching, learning and research, Edited by: Sadler, T. D. Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/s11191-011-9401-0
115. Sjöström, J. (2011). Towards Bildung-oriented science education. Science & Education, doi:10.1007/s11191-011-9401-0. Published online: October 25, 2011. online first.
116. Solomon, J. and Aikenhead, G., eds. 1994. STS education: International perspectives on reform, New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
117. Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 2004. " Relevance theory ". In The handbook of pragmatics, Edited by: Horn, L. R. and Ward, G. 607 - 632. Oxford: Blackwell.
118. Teixeira, E. S., Greca, I. M. and Freire, O. 2012. The history and philosophy of science in physics teaching: A research synthesis of didactic interventions. Science & Education, 21: 771 - 796.
119. Turner, J. and Paris, S. G. 1995. How literacy tasks influence children's motivation for literacy. The Reading Teacher, 48: 662 - 673.
120. Van Aalsvoort, J. 2004. Activity theory as a tool to address the problem of chemistry's lack of relevance in secondary school chemistry education. International Journal of Science Education, 26: 1635 - 1651.
121. Van Berkel, B. 2005. The structure of current school chemistry: A quest for conditions for escape, Utrecht: CD-ß Press.
122. Ware, S. A. 2001. Teaching chemistry from a societal perspective. Pure and Applied Chemistry, 73: 1209 - 1214.
123. Westbroek, H. B., Klaassen, K., Bulte, A. M. W. and Pilot, A. 2005. Characteristics of meaningful chemistry education. Research and the Quality of Science Education, Part, 2: 67 - 76.
124. Westbroek, H. B., Klaassen, K., Bulte, A. M. W. and Pilot, A. 2010. Providing students with a sense of purposely adapting professional practice. International Journal of Science Education, 32: 603 - 627.
125. Wheeler, K. (2000). Sustainability from five perspectives. In K. A. Wheeler & A. P. Bijur (Eds.), Education for a sustainable future (pp. 2-6). New York, NY: Kluwer.
126. Yager, R. E. 1993. Science-technology-society as reform. School Science and Mathematics, 93: 145 - 151.
127. Young, M. and Glanfield, K. 1998. Science in post-compulsory education: Towards a framework for a curriculum of the future. Studies in Science Education, 32: 1 - 20.