Science Education as/for Participation in the Community

Science Education

Volumn 88, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 263-291

  Roth, Wolff Michael ^a   Lee, Stuart ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2142817078     PISSN: 00368326     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sce.10113     Document Type: Review

References (67)

1. Aikenhead, G. (2001). Integrating Western and Aboriginal sciences: Cross-cultural science teaching. Research in Science Education, 31, 337-355.
2. Aikenhead, G. (2002). Cross-cultural science teaching: Rekindling traditions for aboriginal students. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 3, 287-304.
3. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1989). Science for all Americans: Project 2061. Washington, DC: AAAS.
4. American Association of University Women (AAUW). (1992). Agenda for action. Washington, DC: Author.
5. Barton, A. C. (1998). Margin and center: Intersections of homeless children, science education, and a pedagogy of liberation. Theory into Practice, 37, 296-305.
6. Barton, A. C., & Yang, K. (2000). The culture of power and science education: Learning from Miguel. Journal of Research in Science Education, 37, 871-889.
7. Cajas, F. (1999). Public understanding of science: Using technology to enhance school science in everyday life. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 765-773.
8. Chaiklin, S., & Lave, J. (Eds.). (1993). Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
9. Clarke, J. (1998, April 15). Watershed project fishing for community support. Peninsula News Review, 8.
10. DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 582-601.
11. Eisenhart, M., Finkel, E., & Marion, S. F. (1996). Creating the conditions for scientific literacy: A re-examination. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 261-295.
12. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
13. Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R.-L. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19-38). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
14. Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R., & Punamäki, R.-L. (Eds.). (1999). Perspectives on activity theory. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
15. Epstein, S. (1996). Impure science: AIDS, activism, and the politics of knowledge. Berkeley: University of California Press.
16. Flower, M. J. (2000). Unsettling scientific literacy. Liberal Education, 86(3), 36-45.
17. Foucault, M. (1975). Surveiller et punir: Naissance de la prison [Discipline and punish: Birth of the prison]. Paris: Gallimard.
18. Fourez, G. (1997). Scientific and technological literacy as a social practice. Social Studies of Science, 27, 903-936.
19. Fusco, D., & Barton, A. C. (2001). Representing student achievements in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 337-354.
20. Giroux, H. (1992). Border crossings: Cultural workers and the politics of education. New York: Routledge.
21. Hammrich, P. L. (2002). Gender equity in science and mathematics education: Barriers of the mind. In J. Koch & B. Irby (Eds.), Defining and redefining gender equity in education (pp. 81-98). Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.
22. Hazen, R. M., & Trefil, J. (1991). Science matters: Achieving scientific literacy. New York: Doubleday.
23. Hodson, D. (1999). Going beyond cultural pluralism: Science education for sociopolitical action. Science Education, 83, 775-796.
24. Holzkamp, K. (1983). Grundlegung der Psychologie [Foundations of psychology]. Frankfurt/M: Campus Verlag.
25. Holzkamp, K. (1993). Lernen: Subjektwissenschaftliche Grundlegung [Learning: Subject-centered scientific foundations]. Frankfurt/M: Campus Verlag.
26. Hurd, P. D. (1998). Scientific literacy: New minds for a changing world. Science Education, 82, 407-416.
27. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. Irwin, A., & Wynne, B. (Eds.). (1996). Misunderstanding science? The public reconstruction of science and technology. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
29. Jenkins, E. (1999). School science, citizenship and the public understanding of science. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 703-710.
30. Jenkins, E. (2002). Linking school science education with action. In W.-M. Roth & J. Désautels (Eds.), Science education as/for sociopolitical action (pp. 17-33). New York: Peter Lang.
31. Keller, E. F. (1983). A feeling for the organism. New York: W. H. Freeman.
32. Kolstoe, S. D. (2000). Consensus projects: Teaching science for citizenship. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 645-664.
33. Korpan, C. A., Bisanz, G. L., Bisanz, J., & Henderson, J. M. (1997). Assessing literacy in science: Evaluation of scientific news briefs. Science Education, 81, 515-532.
34. Latour, B. (1988). The pasteurization of France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
35. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
36. Lave, J. (1993). The practice of learning. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 3-32). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
37. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
38. Lavin, L. (2000, August 16). Community youth teams join creek restoration project. Peninsula News Review, 18.
39. Lee, O. (1999). Science knowledge, world views, and information sources in social and cultural contexts: Making sense after a natural disaster. American Educational Research Journal, 36, 187-219.
40. Lee, O., & Fradd, S. H. (1996). Literacy skills in science learning among linguistically diverse students. Science Education, 80, 651-671.
41. Lee, S., & Roth, W.-M. (2001). How ditch and drain become a healthy creek: Representations, translations and agency during the re/design of a watershed. Social Studies of Science, 31, 315-356.
42. Lee, S., & Roth, W.-M. (2002). Learning science in the community. In W.-M. Roth & J. Désautels (Eds.), Science education for/as socio-political action (pp. 37-64). New York: Peter Lang.
43. Lee, S., & Roth, W.-M. (2003). Of traversals and hybrid spaces: Science in the community. Mind, Culture, & Activity, 10, 120-142.
44. Levitt, N. (1999). Prometheus bedeviled: Science and the contradictions of contemporary culture. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
45. Maxwell, N. (1992). What kind of inquiry can best help us create a good world? Science, Technology, & Human Values, 17, 205-227.
46. McDermott, R. P. (1993). The acquisition of a child by a learning disability. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 269-305). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
47. McGinn, M. K., & Roth, W.-M. (1999). Towards a new science education: Implications of recent research in science and technology studies. Educational Researcher, 28(3), 14-24.
48. Medved, M. I., & Oatley, K. (2000). Memories and scientific literacy: Remembering exhibits from a science center. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 1117-1132.
49. National Research Council (NRC). (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
50. National Science Teachers Association (NSTA). (1992). Scope, sequence, and coordination of secondary school science, Vol. I: The content core. A guide for curriculum designers. Washington, DC: Author. (Classroom materials can be downloaded from http://dev.nsta.org/ssc/)
51. Posch, P. (1993). Research issues in environmental education. Studies in Science Education, 21, 21-48.
52. Rabeharisoa, V., & Callon, M. (1999). Le pouvoir des malades [The power of the ill]. Paris: Écoles de Mines.
53. Reimche, J. (1998, December 16). Group is a bridge over troubled waters. Peninsula News Review, 9.
54. Rodriguez, A. J. (1998). Busting open the meritocracy myth: Rethinking equity and student achievement in science. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 4, 195-216.
55. Roth, W.-M. (2002a). Learning in Moussac. In L. M. Richter & R. Engelhart (Eds.), Life of science: Whitebook on educational initiatives in natural sciences and technology (pp. 33-43). Copenhagen: Learning Lab Denmark.
56. Roth, W.-M. (2002b). Taking science education beyond schooling. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 2, 37-48.
57. Roth, W.-M., & Lee, S. (2002a). Breaking the spell: Science education for a free society. In W.-M. Roth & J. Désautels (Eds.), Science education for/as socio-political action (pp. 65-91). New York: Peter Lang.
58. Roth, W.-M., & Lee, S. (2002b). Scientific literacy as collective praxis. Public Understanding of Science, 11, 33-56.
59. Roth, W.-M., & McGinn, M. K. (1998a). Inscriptions: A social practice approach to "representations." Review of Educational Research, 68, 35-59.
60. Roth, W.-M., & McGinn, M. K. (1998b). 〉unDELETE science education: /lives/work/voices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 399-421.
61. Roth, W. M., Riecken, J., Pozzer, L. L., McMillan, R., Storr, B., Tait, D., Bradshaw, G., & Pauluth Penner, T. (in press). Those who get hurt aren't always being heard: Scientist-resident interactions over community water. Science, Technology, & Human Values.
62. Saari, E., & Miettinen, R. (2001). Dynamics of change in research work: Constructing a new research area in a research group. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 26, 300-321.
63. Saxe, G. (1991). Culture and cognitive development. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
64. Scribner, S. (1986). Literacy in three metaphors. In N. Stein (Ed.), Literacy in American schools: Learning to read and write (pp. 7-22). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
65. Shamos, A. (1995). The myth of scientific literacy. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
66. Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, 'translations' and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science, 19, 387-420.
67. Tobin, K., Seiler, G., & Walls, E. (1999). Reproduction of social class in the teaching and learning of science in urban high schools. Research in Science Education, 29, 171-187.