Marginalization of socioscientific material in science-technology-society science curricula: Some implications for gender inclusivity and curriculum reform

Journal of Research in Science Teaching

Volumn 37, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 426-440

  Hughes, Gwyneth ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042027066     PISSN: 00224308     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200005)37:5<426::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-U     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Aikenhead, G. (1994). Consequences to learning science through STS: A research perspective. In J. Solomon & G. Aikenhead (Eds.), STS education: International perspectives on reform (pp. 169-186). New York: Teachers College Press.
2. Bentley, D., & Watts, M. (1987). Courting the positive virtues: A case for feminist science. In A. Kelly (Ed.), Science for girls (pp. 89-98). Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
3. Bleier, R. (1984.) Science and gender. A critique of biology and its theories on women. Oxford: Pergamon.
4. Butler Kahle, J., Parker, L., Rennie, L., & Riley, D. (1993) Gender differences in science education: Building a model. Educational Psychologist, 28, 379-404.
5. Byrne, E. (1993). Women and science: The Snark syndrome. London: Falmer.
6. Campbell, B., Lazonby, J. Millar, R., Nicolson, P., Ramsden. J., & Waddington, D. (1994). Science: The Salters' approach - a case study of the process of large scale curriculum development. Science Education, 78, 415-447.
7. Carr, W. (1993). Reconstructing the curriculum debate: An editorial introduction. Curriculum Studies, 1, 5-9.
8. Costa, V. (1995). When science is "another world": Relationships between worlds of family, friends, school and science. Science Education, 79, 313-333.
9. Dennick, R. (1993). Analysing multicultural and anti-racist science education. In E. Whitelegg, J. Thomas, & S. Tresman (Eds.), Challenges and opportunities for science education (pp. 139-150). London: Paul Chapman, in association with Open University Press.
10. Driver, R., Leach, J., Miller, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young people's images of science. Buckingham: Open University Press.
11. Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity.
12. Fensham, P. (1988). Approaches to the teaching of STS in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 10, 346-356.
13. Fensham, P. (1993). Reflections on science for all. In E. Whitelegg, J. Thomas, & S. Tresman (Eds.), Challenges and opportunities for science education. London: Paul Chapman, in association with Open University Press.
14. Foucault, M. (1974). The archaeology of knowledge. London: Tavistock.
15. Fox-Keller, E. (1992). Secrets of life: Secrets of death: Essays on language, gender and science. London: Routledge.
16. Harding, S. (1986). The science question in feminism. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
17. Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women's lives. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
18. Harding, J., & Sutoris, M. (1987) An object relations account of the differential involvement of boys and girls in science and technology. In A. Kelly (Ed.), Science for girls (pp. 24-36). Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
19. Hildebrand, G. (1996). Redefining achievement. In C. Gipps & P. Murphy (Eds.), Equity in the classroom: Towards effective pedagogy for girls and boys (pp. 149-173). London: Falmer.
20. Hughes, G. (1997). Not the end of the line: New directions for gender and science education. In D. Thompson (Ed.), Science education in the 21st century (pp. 77-96). Aldershot: Arena.
21. Hughes, G. (1998). Gender, power and resistance in post sixteen science education: The production of student subjectivities within competing curriculum discourses and practices. PhD thesis: University of East London.
22. Jenkins, E. (1994a). Public understanding of science and science education for action. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 26, 601-611.
23. Jenkins, E. (1994b). HPS and school science education: Remediation or reconstruction? International Journal of Science Education, 16, 613-623.
24. Kelly, A. (1987). The construction of masculine science. In A. Kelly (Ed.), Science for girls (pp. 66-77). Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
25. Krugly-Smolska, E. (1995). Cultural influences in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 17, 45-58.
26. Lakin, S., & Wellington, J. (1994). Who will teach the "nature of science"? Teachers' views of science and their implications for science education. International Journal of Science Education, 16, 175-190.
27. Macaskill, C., & Ogborn, J. (1996). Science and technology. School Science Review, 77, 55-61.
28. Millar, R. (1997). Science education for democracy: What can the school curriculum achieve? In R. Levinson & J. Thomas (Eds.), Science today: Problem or crisis? (pp. 87-101). London: Routledge.
29. Oxford and Cambridge Schools Examination Board. (1996). Chemistry (Salters), 9663 GCE.
30. Parker, L., Rennie, L., & Fraser, B. (1996). Introduction and overview. In L. Parker, L. Rennie, & B. Fraser (Eds.), Gender, science and mathematics: Shortening the shadow (pp. xi-xv). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
31. Reiss, M. (1993). Science education for a pluralist society. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
32. Rose, H. (1994). Love, power and knowledge: Towards a feminist transformation of the sciences. Cambridge: Polity.
33. Roth, W.M., McGinn, M., & Bowen, G. (1996). Applications of science and technology studies: Effecting change in science education. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 21, 454-484.
34. Roychoudhury, A., Tippins, D., & Nichols, S. (1995). Gender-inclusive science teaching: A feminist-constructivist approach. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 897-924.
35. Schoneweg Bradford, C., Rubba, R., & Harkness, W. (1995). Views about Science-Technology-Society interactions held by college students in General Education Physics and STS courses. Science Education, 79, 355-373.
36. Sjoberg, S., & Imsen, G. (1988). Gender and science education: I. In Fensham, P. (Ed.), Questions and dilemmas in science education (pp. 218-148). London: Falmer.
37. Solomon, J. (1993). Teaching science, technology and society. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
38. Solomon, J. (1994a). Learning STS and judgements in the classroom: Do boys and girls differ? In J. Solomon & G. Aikenhead (Eds.), STS education: International perspectives on reform (pp. 141-154). New York: Teachers College Press.
39. Solomon, J. (1994b). Conflicts between mainstream science and STS in science education. In J. Solomon & G. Aikenhead (Eds.), STS education: International perspectives on reform (pp. 3-10). New York: Teachers College Press.
40. University of York Science Education Group. (1994a). Chemical storylines. Oxford: Heinemann Educational.
41. University of York Science Education Group. (1994b). Chemical ideas. Oxford: Heinemann Educational.
42. Usher, R., & Edwards, R. (1994). Postmodernism and education. London: Routledge.
43. Vlaeminke, M., Mckeon, F., & Comber, C. (1997). Breaking the mould: An assessment of successful strategies for attracting girls into science, engineering and technology. London: Department of Trade and Industry.
44. Walkerdine, V. (1988). The mastery of reason: Cognitive development and the production of rationality. London: Routledge.
45. Whyte, J. (1985). Girl friendly science and the girl friendly school. In J. Whyte, R. Deem, & M. Cruickshank (Eds.), Girl friendly schooling (pp. 77-92). London: Methuen.
46. Ziman, J. (1980). Teaching and learning about science and society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47. Ziman, J. (1994). The rationale of STS education is in the approach in science education. In J. Solomon & G. Aikenhead (Eds.), STS education: International perspectives on reform (pp. 21-31). New York: Teachers College Press.