Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) and chemistry education

Chemistry Education Research and Practice

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 59-68

  Burmeister, Mareike ^a   Rauch, Franz ^b   Eilks, Ingo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BREMEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KLAGENFURT   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861618109     PISSN: None     EISSN: 11094028     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1039/c1rp90060a     Document Type: Review

References (73)

1. ACS, (2006), Chemistry in the Community. Fifth edition. Dubuque: Kendall/Hunta.
2. Anastas P. T. and Warner J. C., (1998), Green Chemistry Theory and Practice. New York: Oxford University.
3. Bader H. J., (1992), Less polluting technologies, regrowing resources and recycling: New topics in the teaching of chemistry, Int. Newsl. Chem. Educ., 38, 12.
4. Bader H. J. and Blume R., (1997), Environmental chemistry in classroom experiments. Delhi: IUPAC.
5. Bader H. J., (2003), Nachhaltigkeit und nachhaltiges Arbeiten im Chemieunterricht, Praxis Naturwiss. Chem. Sch., 52(8), 16-20.
6. Benett J. and Lubben F., (2006), Context-based chemistry: The Salters-approach, Int. J. Sci. Educ., 28(9), 999-1015.
7. Borko J., (2004), Professional development and teacher learning: mapping the terrain, Educ. Res., 33(8), 3-15.
8. Bradley J. D., (2005), Chemistry Education for Development. Chemical Education International, 7, Retrieved from the World Wide Web, July 01, 2011, at http://old.iupac.org/publications/cei/vol6/index.html.
9. Breiting S., Mayer M. and Mogensen, F., (2005), Quality criteria for ESD-schools, Vienna: ENSI.
10. Burmeister M. and Eilks I., (2012), An example of learning about plastics and their evaluation as a contribution to Education for Sustainable Development in secondary school chemistry teaching, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 13(2), DOI: 10.1039/c1rp90067f.
11. Centi G. and Perathoner S., (2009), From green to sustainable chemistry. In F. Cavani, G. Centi, S. Perathoner and F. Trifiro (ed.), Sustainable industrial processes (pp. 1-72). Weinheim: Wiley-VCH.
12. De Haan G., (2006), The BLK '21' programme in Germany: a 'Gestaltungskompetenz'-based model for education for sustainable development, Environ. Educ. Res., 12, 19-32.
13. De Haan G., Borman I. and Leicht A., (2010), Special issue: The midway point of the UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development: Where do we stand? Int. Rev. Educ., 56, 199-372.
14. ECCC, (1993), Chemistry for a clean world. The Hague: European Communities Chemistry Council.
15. Eilks I., (2002), Teaching 'Biodiesel': A sociocritical and problem-oriented approach to chemistry teaching, and students' first views on it, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 3, 67-75.
16. Elmose S. and Roth W.-M., (2005), Allgemeinbildung: Readiness for living in a risk society, J. Curr. Stud., 37(1), 11-34.
17. Evans C., Hogarth S. and Parvin J., (2004), Children Challenging Industry: analysis of CCI project data 5 years on. York: University of York.
18. Feierabend T. and Eilks I., (2010), Raising students' perception of the relevance of science teaching and promoting communication and evaluation capabilities using authentic and controversial socio-scientific issues in the framework of climate change, Sci. Educ. Int., 21(3), 176-196.
19. Feierabend T. and Eilks I., (2011), Teaching the societal dimension of chemistry using a socio-critical and problem-oriented lesson plan on bioethanol usage, J. Chem. Educ., 88, 1250-1256.
20. Feierabend T., Jokmin S. and Eilks I., (2011), Chemistry teachers' views on teaching 'Climate Change'-An interview case study from research-oriented learning in teacher education, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 11(1), 85-91.
21. Fensham P. J., (2004), Defining an identity, Dordrecht: Kluwer.
22. Hart P., (2007), Environmental education. In S. K. Abell and N. G Lederman (ed.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 689-728). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23. Hartings M. R. and Fahy D., (2011), Communicating chemistry for public engagement, Nat. Chem., 3, 674-677.
24. Hawkes J., (2001), The fourth pillar of sustainability: culture's essential role in public planning. Melbourne: Common Ground.
25. Heinrich M., Minsch J., Rauch F., Schmidt E. and Vielhaber C., (2007), Bildung und Nachhaltige Entwicklung: eine lernende Strategie ̈ für Osterreich. Munster: Monsenstein and Vannerdat.
26. Hiramatsu A., Takabay K., Utsumi R., Fujii H. and Ogawa H., (2009), A lesson model fostering fine ideas in chemistry concerning biodiesel on the basis of "Education for Sustainable Development": potentialities for collaboration with social studies, Chem. Educ. J., 13, Retrieved from the World Wide Web, July 01, 2011, at http://chem.sci.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp/v13n1/indexE. html.
27. Holbrook J., (1998), Operationalising scientific and technological literacy-a new approach to science teaching, Sci. Educ. Int., 9(1), 13-18.
28. Holbrook J., (2005), Making chemistry teaching relevant. Chem. Educ. Int., 7, Retrieved from the World Wide Web, July 01, 2011, at http://old.iupac.org/publications/cei/vol6/index.html.
29. Holbrook J. and Rannikmae M., (2007), The nature of science education for enhancing scientific literacy, Int. J. Sci. Educ., 29(11), 1347-1362.
30. Holman J., (1986), Science and Technology in Society. General guide for teachers. The Association for Science Education: College Lane. Hatfield: Herts.
31. Hofstein A., Eilks I. and Bybee R., (2011), Societal issues and their importance for contemporary science education: a pedagogical justification and the state of the art in Israel, Germany and the USA, Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ. Published online first January 4, 2011.
32. Hofstein A. and Kesner M., (2006), Industrial chemistry and school chemistry: making chemistry studies more relevant, Int. J. Sci. Educ., 28, 1017-1039.
33. Hugerat M., Schwarz P. and Livneh M., (2006), Microscale chemistry experimentation for all ages. Haifa. AACE.
34. Hutzinger O., (1999), The greening of chemistry-Is it sustainable? Environ. Sci. Poll. Res., 6, 123.
35. Kant I., (1787, reprinted 1956). Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.
36. Karpudewan M., Ismail Z. H. and Mohamed N., (2007), Impact of Green Chemistry experiments on pre-Service teachers' environmental values. Retrieved from the World Wide Web, July 10, 2011, at http://chem.sci.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp/ v10n2/Mageswary/Mageswary-body.html#Anchor354919.
37. Karpudewan M., Ismail Z. H. and Mohamed N., (2009), The integration of Green Chemistry experiments with sustainable development concepts in pre-service teachers' curriculum: experiences from Malaysia, Int. J. Sust. High. Educ., 10(2), 118-135.
38. Klafki W., (2000), Didaktik Analysis as the core for preparation of instruction. In I. Westbury, S. Hopmann and K. Riquarts (ed.). Teaching as a reflective practice: the German Didaktik tradition (pp. 85-108). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
39. Lazlo P., (2006), On the self-image of chemists 1950-2000, HYLE-Int. J. Phil. Chem., 12, 99-130.
40. Luhken A. and Bader H. J., (2003), Energy input from microwaves and ultra sound-examples of new approaches to Green Chemistry. In Royal Society of Chemistry (ed.), Green Chemistry. Cambridge: Royal Chemical Society. http://www.rsc.org/Education/Teachers/Resources/green/docs/microwaves.pdf.
41. Marks R. and Eilks I., (2009), Promoting scientific literacy using a socio-critical and problem-oriented approach to chemistry teaching: concept, examples, experiences, Int. J. Sci. Environ. Educ., 4(3), 231-245.
42. Marks R. and Eilks I., (2010), Research-based development of a lesson plan on shower gels and musk fragrances following a socio-critical and problem-oriented approach to chemistry teaching, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 11(2), 129-141.
43. McKeown R., (2002), The ESD toolkit 2.0. Retrieved from the World Wide Web, July 01, 2011, at http://www.esdtoolkit.org.
44. McKeown R., (2006), Education for sustainable development toolkit. Retrieved from the World Wide Web, July 01, 2011, at http://unesdoc.unesco.org/ images/0015/001524/152453eo.pdf.
45. Millar R., (2006), Twenty-first century science: insights from the design and implementation of a scientific literacy approach in school science, Int. J. Sci. Educ., 28(13), 1499-1521.
46. Meadows D. H., Meadows D., Randers J. and Behrens W. H., (1972), The Limits to Growth, Washington: Potomac Associates.
47. Mogensen F. and Schnack K., (2010), The action competence approach and the 'new' discourse of education for sustainable development, competence and quality criteria, Envrion. Educ. Res., 16(1), 59-76.
48. Obendrauf V., (2008), More small scale hands on experiments for easier teaching and learning. Chem. Educ. Int., 8, Retrieved from the World Wide Web, July 01, 2011, at http://old.iupac.org/publications/cei/vol8/index.html.
49. Pederson J. E. and Totten S., (2001), Beliefs of science teachers towards teaching of science/technological/societal issues: Are we addressing national standards? Bull. Sci. Techn. Soc., 21(5), 376-393.
50. Paden M., (2000), Education for sustainability and environmental education. In K. A. Wheeler and A. P Bijur (ed.), Education for a sustainable future (pp. 7-14). New York: Kluwer.
51. Pilot A. and Bulte A. M. W., (2006), Special issue: Context based chemistry education. Int. J. Sci. Educ., 28(9), 953-1112.
52. Rauch F., (2002), The potential of Education for Sustainable Development for reform in schools, Environ. Educ. Res., 8(1), 43-52.
53. Rauch F., (2004), Education for sustainability: A regulative idea and trigger for innovation. In W. Scott and S. Gough (ed.) Key issues in sustainable development and learning: A critical review (pp. 149-151). London: Roudlege Falmer.
54. Rauch F., (2010), What do regulative ideas in education for sustainable development and scientific literacy as myth have in common? In I. Eilks and B. Ralle (ed.), Contemporary Science Education-Implications from Science Education Research about Orientations, Strategies and Assessment (pp. 35-46). Aachen: Shaker.
55. Roth W.-M. and Lee S., (2004), Science education as/for participation in the community, Sci. Educ., 88(2), 263-291.
56. Sadler T. D. and Zeidler D., (2009), Scientific literacy, PISA, and socioscientific discourse: Assessment for progressive aims of science education, J. Res. Sci. Teach., 46(8), 909-921.
57. Schwartz A. T., (2006), Contextualized chemistry education: The American experience, Int. J. Sci. Educ., 28(9), 977-998.
58. Shallcross T., Robinson J. and Pace P., (ed.) (2006), Creating sustainable environments in our schools. Staffordshire: Trendham Books.
59. Singh M. M., Szafran Z. and Pike R. M., (1999), Microscale chemistry and green chemistry: Complementary pedagogies, J. Chem. Educ., 76, 1684-1687.
60. Solomon J. and Aikenhead G., (ed.) (1994), STS education: international perspectives on reform. New York: Teachers College Press.
61. Spillane J. P., (1999), External reform initiatives and teachers' efforts to reconstruct their practice: the mediating role of teachers' zones of enactment, J. Curr. Stud., 31, 143-175.
62. UN, (1987), Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. Retrieved from the World Wide Web, July 10, 2011 at http://www.un-documents.net/wced-ocf.htm.
63. UN, (2005), Resolution A/60/1. Retrieved from the World Wide Web, July 10, 2011 at http://data.unaids.org/Topics/UniversalAccess/worldsummitoutcome- resolution-24oct2005-en.pdf.
64. UNCED, (1992), Agenda 21. Retrieved from the World Wide Web, July 10, 2011 at http://www.un.org/esa/dsd/agenda21/.
65. UNESCO, (2005a), World decade of education for sustainable development. Retrieved from the World Wide Web, July 10, 2011 at http://www.unesco.org/new/ en/education/themes/leading-the-inter national-agenda/education-for-sustainable- development/.
66. UNESCO, (2005b), Teaching and learning for a sustainable future-a multimedia teacher education programme. Retrieved from the World
67. Wide Web, July 10, 2011, at http://www.unesco.org/education/tlsf/index. htm.
68. UNESCO 2005, Guidelines and recommendations for reorienting teacher education to address sustainability. Retrieved from the World Wide Web, July 10, 2011, at http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001433/143370e.pdf.
69. UNESCO 2006, International implementation scheme. Retrieved from the World Wide Web, July 10, 2011, at http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001486/ 148654e.pdf.
70. Van Aalsvoort J., (2004), Activity theory as a tool to address the problem of chemistry's lack of relevance in secondary school chemistry education, Int. J. Sci. Educ., 26(13), 1635-1651.
71. Ware S. A., (2001), Teaching chemistry from a societal perspective, Pure Appl. Chem., 73(7), 1209-1214.
72. Westbury I., Hopmann S. and Riquarts K., (ed.) (2000), Teaching as a reflective practice. The German Didaktik tradition. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
73. Wheeler K., (2000), Sustainability from five perspectives. In K. A. Wheeler and A. P Bijur (ed.), Education for a sustainable future (p. 2-6). New York: Kluwer.