Towards Bildung-Oriented Chemistry Education

Science and Education

Volumn 22, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 1873-1890

  Sjöström, Jesper ^a  

^a MALMÖ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84879895647     PISSN: 09267220     EISSN: 15731901     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11191-011-9401-0     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. Aikenhead, G. (2003). Chemistry and physics instruction: Integration, ideologies, and choices. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice, 4(2), 115-130.
2. Aikenhead, G. (2006). Science education for everyday life: Evidence-based practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
3. Aksela, M. (2010). Evidence-based teacher education: Becoming a lifelong research-oriented chemistry teacher. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice, 11, 84-91.
4. Atkins, P., & Jones, L. (2008). Chemical principles: The quest for insight (4th ed.). New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
5. Barke, H.-D., Hazari, A., & Yitbarek, S. (2009). Misconceptions in chemistry: Addressing perceptions in chemical education. Berlin: Springer.
6. Bauer, W. (2003). On the relevance of Bildung for democracy. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 35(2), 212-225.
7. Baumann, Z. (1991). Modernity and ambivalence. Cambridge: Polity Press.
8. Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.
9. Böschen, S., Lenoir, D., & Scheringer, M. (2003). Sustainable chemistry: Starting points and prospects. Naturwissenschaften, 90, 93-102.
10. Brandt, W. W. (2003). Chemistry Beyond Positivism. In J. E. Early (Ed.), Chemical explanation: Characteristics, development, autonomy (pp. 335-344) (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 988).
11. Broman, K., Ekborg, M., & Johnels, D. (2011). Chemistry in crisis? Perspectives on teaching and learning chemistry in Swedish upper secondary schools. NorDiNa: Nordic Studies in Science Education, 7(1), 43-53.
12. Bryce, T. G. K. (2010). Sardonic science? The resistance to more humanistic forms of education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 5, 591-612.
13. Bulte, A., Westbroek, H., Klaassen, K., & Pilot, A. (2002). Developmental research: Healthy and poisonous effects of substances. In B. Ralle & I. Eilks (Eds.), Research in chemical education: What does this mean?. Aachen: Shaker Verlag.
14. Casper, M. J. (Ed.). (2003). Synthetic planet: Chemical politics and the hazards of modern life. New York: Routledge.
15. Christensen, C. (2009). Risk and school science education. Studies in Science Education, 45(2), 205-223.
16. Cross, R. T., & Price, R. F. (1992). Teaching science for social responsibility. Sydney: St. Louis Press.
17. Cullen, W. R. (2008). Is arsenic an aphrodisiac? The sociochemistry of an element. Cambridge: RSC Publishing.
18. De Vos, W., Bulte, A., & Pilot, A. (2002). Chemistry curricula for general education: Analysis and elements of a design. In J. K. Gilbert, et al. (Eds.), Chemical education: Towards research-based practice. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
19. Do, C. H., & Jin, J.-I. (2004). Public's perception of chemistry. Page 90 in the Abstract book of the 18th International Conference on Chemical Education-Chemistry Education for the Modern World, held in Turkey August 2004.
20. Dupré, J. (2001). Human nature and the limits of science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21. Early, J. E. (2004). Would introductory chemistry courses work better with a new philosophical basis? Foundations of Chemistry, 6, 137-160.
22. Ekberg, M. (2007). The parameters of the risk society: A review and exploration. Current Sociology, 55(3), 343-366.
23. Elam, M., & Bertilsson, M. (2003). Consuming, engaging and confronting science: The emerging dimensions of scientific citizenship. European Journal of Social Theory, 6(2), 233-251.
24. Elmose, S., & Roth, W.-M. (2005). Allgemeinbildung: Readiness for living in risk society. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(1), 11-34.
25. Englund, T. (2000). Rethinking democracy and education: Towards an education of deliberative citizens. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(2), 305-313.
26. Erduran, S., Bravo, A. A., & Naaman, R. M. (2007). Developing epistemologically empowered teachers: Examining the role of philosophy of chemistry in teacher education. Science & Education, 16, 975-989.
27. Eriksson, I., Ståhle, Y., & Lindberg, V. (2011). Formelskrivning eller vardagsförståelse: Skilda betoningar i finlandssvenska och svenska kemiklassrum. In I. Eriksson (Ed.), Kemiundervisning, text och textbruk i finlandssvenska och svenska skolor-en komparativ tvärvetenskaplig studie. Stockholm: Stockholms Universitets Förlag (in Swedish).
28. Gilbert, J. (2006). On the nature of "context" in chemical education. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 957-976.
29. Gilbert, J., & Treagust, D. (2009a). Towards a coherent model for macro, submicro and symbolic representations in chemical education. Chapter 14 in Gilbert & Treagust (2009c).
30. Gilbert, J., & Treagust, D. (2009b). Macro, submicro and symbolic representations and the relationship between them: Key models in chemical education. Introduction in Gilbert & Treagust (2009c).
31. Gilbert, J., & Treagust, D. (Eds.). (2009c). Multiple representations in chemical education. Berlin: Springer.
32. Good, R., & Shymansky, J. (2001). Nature-of-science literacy in benchmarks and standards: Post-modern/relativist or modern/realist? Science & Education, 10, 173-185.
33. Gräber, W. (2002). Chemistry education's contribution to scientific literacy: An example. In B. Ralle & I. Eilks (Eds.), Research in chemical education: What does this mean?. Aachen: Shaker.
34. Hodson, D. (2003). Time for action: Science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 645-670.
35. Hofstein, A., Eilks, I., & Bybee, R. (2011). Societal issues and their importance for contemporary science education: A pedagogical justification and the state-of-the-art in Israel, Germany, and the USA. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, published on-line 11 January 2011.
36. Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2007). The nature of science education for enhancing scientific literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1347-1362.
37. Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2009). The meaning of scientific literacy. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4(3), 275-288.
38. Jakobsson, G. (2003). Vardagskemi [Everyday-life chemistry], Lund: Studentlitteratur (in Swedish).
39. Jamison, A. (2001). Science, technology and the quest for sustainable development. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 13(1), 9-22.
40. Jensen, B. B., & Schnack, K. (2006). The action competence approach in environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 12(3-4), 471-486.
41. Johnstone, A. (1982). Macro- and micro-chemistry. School Science Review, 64, 377-379.
42. Jong, O. D., & Taber, K. S. (2007). Teaching and learning the many faces of chemistry. In S. Abell & N. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education. London: LEA.
43. Klafki, W. (2005). Dannelsesteori og didaktik: Nye studier. 2nd Ed., Århus: Klim (in Danish). Title of the German original: "Neue Studien zur Bildungstheorie und Didaktik" (1996).
44. Koker, M. (2007). The science education for public understanding program (SEPUP): A short history of issue-oriented science. Accessed on the Web 6 September 2011.
45. Kolstø, S. D. (2006). Patterns in students' argumentation confronted with a risk-focused socio-scientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 28(14), 1689-1716.
46. Kouns, M. (2010). Inga IG i Kemi A! En språkdidaktisk studie av en kemilärares undervisningsstrategier i en gymnasieklass med elever med svenska som andraspråk. Licentiate Thesis, Malmö University (in Swedish).
47. Krageskov Eriksen, K. (2002). The future of tertiary chemical education: A bildung focus. HYLE: International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry, 8, 35-48.
48. Laugksch, R. (2000). Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview. Science Education, 84, 71-94.
49. Løvlie, L., & Standish, P. (2002). Introduction: Bildung and the idea of a liberal education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 36(3), 317-340.
50. Mahaffy, P. (2004). The future shape of chemistry education. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice, 5(3), 229-245.
51. Marks, R., Bertram, S., & Eilks, I. (2008). Learning chemistry and beyond with a lesson plan on potato crisps, which follows a socio-critical and problem-oriented approach to chemistry lessons: A case study. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice, 9, 267-276.
52. Marks, R., & Eilks, I. (2009). Promoting scientific literacy using a sociocritical and problem-oriented approach to chemistry teaching: Concepts, examples, experiences. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4(3), 231-245.
53. Marks, R., & Eilks, I. (2010). Research-based development of a lesson plan on shower gels and musk fragrances following a socio-critical and problem-oriented approach to chemistry teaching. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice, 11, 129-141.
54. McGregor, S. (1999). Towards a rationale for integrating consumer and citizenship education. Journal of Consumer Studies & Home Economics, 23, 207-211.
55. Meijer, M. R., Bulte, A. M. W., & Pilot, A. (2009). Structure-property relations between macro and micro representations: Relevant meso-levels in authentic tasks. Chapter 9 in Gilbert & Treagust (2009c).
56. Mogensen, F., & Schnack, K. (2010). The action competence approach and the 'new' discourses of education for sustainable development, competence and quality criteria. Environmental Education Research, 16(1), 59-74.
57. Norris, S. P. (1997). Intellectual independence for non-scientists and other content-transcendent goals. Science Education, 81, 239-258.
58. Norris, S. P., & Philips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87, 224-240.
59. Östman, L. (1996). Discourses, discursive meanings and socialization in chemistry education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 28(1), 37-55.
60. Paulsen, A. C. (2006). Naturfag i skolen i et kritisk demokratisk dannelsesperspektiv [Science subjects in school in a critical-democratic Bildung-perspective]. NorDiNa: Nordic Studies in Science Education, 2(4), 69-84 (in Danish).
61. Pedretti, E., Bencze, L., Hewitt, J., Romkey, L., & Jivraj, A. (2008). Promoting issues-based STSE perspectives in science teacher education: Problems of identity and ideology. Science & Education, 17, 941-960.
62. Roberts, D. A. (1998). Analyzing school science courses: The concept of companion meaning. In D. A. Roberts & L. Östman (Eds.), Problems of meaning in science curriculum. New York: Teachers College Columbia University.
63. Roberts, D. A. (2007). Scientific literacy/science literacy. In S. Abell & N. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education. London: LEA.
64. Roth, W.-M., McGinn, M. K., & Bowen, G. M. (1996). Applications of science and technology studies: Effecting change in science education. Science, Technology & Human Values, 21(4), 454-484.
65. Schnack, K. (2008). Participation, education, and democracy: Implications for environmental education, health education, and education for sustainable development. In A. Reid, B. Bruun Jensen, J. Nikel, & V. Simovska (Eds.), Participation and learning: Perspectives on education and the environment, health and sustainability (pp. 181-196). Berlin: Springer.
66. Schummer, J. (1997). Chemistry managers coping with environmentalists' criticism. HYLE: International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry, 3, 109-110.
67. Schummer, J. (1999). Coping with the growth of chemical knowledge: Challenges for chemistry documentation, education, and working chemists. Educacion Quimica, 10, 92-101.
68. Shwartz, Y., Ben-Zvi, R., & Hofstein, A. (2005). The importance of involving high-school chemistry teachers in the process of defining the operational meaning of 'chemical literacy'. International Journal of Science Education, 27(3), 323-344.
69. Sjöström, J. (2006). Beyond classical chemistry: Subfields and metafields of the molecular sciences. Chemistry International, 28(September-October), 9-15.
70. Sjöström, J. (2007). The discourse of chemistry (and beyond). HYLE: International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry, 13(2), 83-97.
71. Skovsmose, O. (2001). Landscapes of investigation. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik (ZDM), 33(4), 123-132.
72. Stafford, S. P. (2006). Data, information, knowledge, and wisdom. In Knowledge management, organizational intelligence and learning, and complexity, from Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS). www. eolss. net. Accessed 22 February 2006.
73. Stenmark, M. (2001). Scientism: Science, ethics and religion. Ashgate: Aldershot.
74. Talanquer, V. (2011). Macro, submicro, and symbolic: The many faces of the chemistry 'triplet'. International Journal of Science Education, 33(2), 179-195.
75. Tsaparlis, G. (2009). Learning at the macro level: The role of practical work. Chapter 5 in Gilbert & Treagust (2009c).
76. Turner, S. (2008). School science and its controversies; or, whatever happened to scientific literacy? Public Understanding of Science, 17, 55-72.
77. van Aalsvoort, J. (2004). Logical positivism as a tool to analyse the problem of chemistry's lack of relevance in secondary school chemical education. International Journal of Science Education, 26(9), 1151-1168.
78. van Berkel, B., Pilot, A., & Bulte, A. (2009). Micro-macro thinking in chemical education: Why and how to escape. Chapter 2 in Gilbert & Treagust (2009c).
79. Vásquez-Levy, D. (2002). Bildung-centred Didaktik: A framework for examining the educational potential of subject matter. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34(1), 117-128.
80. Vesterinen, V.-M., Aksela, M., & Sundberg, M. (2009). Nature of chemistry in the national frame curricula for upper secondary education in Finland, Norway and Sweden. NorDiNa: Nordic Studies in Science Education, 5(2), 200-212.
81. Wallace, R. G. (2003). Rethinking the education of chemists: The odyssey is over, time for action. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice, 4, 83-96.
82. Ware, S. (2001). Teaching chemistry from a societal perspective. Pure and Applied Chemistry, 73(7), 1209-1214.
83. Whitesides, G. M. (2004). Assumptions: Taking chemistry in new directions. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 43, 3632-3641.
84. Wimmer, M. (2003). Ruins of Bildung in a knowledge society: Commenting on the debate about future of Bildung. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 35(2), 167-187.
85. Ziman, J. (2001). Getting scientists to think about what they are doing. Science and Engineering Ethics, 7, 165-176.
86. Zoller, U. (2004). Chemistry and environmental education. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice, 5, 95-97.