Scientific Literacy/ Science Literacy

Handbook of Research on Science Education

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 729-780

  Roberts, Douglas A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85145534167     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203824696-29     Document Type: Chapter

References (122)

1. Agin, M. L. (1974). Education for scientific literacy: A conceptual frame of reference and some applications. Science Education, 58, 403-415.
2. Aikenhead, G. (1994). What is STS science teaching? In J. Solomon and G. Aikenhead (Eds.), STS education: International perspectives on reform (pp. 47-59). New York: Teachers College Press.
3. American Academy of Arts and Sciences. (1983). Scientific literacy. Daedalus, 112(2).
4. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Science for all Americans. Washington, DC: Author.
5. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1990). Science for all Americans. New York:Oxford University Press.
6. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. Washington, DC: Author.
7. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2000). Designs for science literacy. Washington, DC: Author.
8. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2001). Atlas of science literacy. Washington, DC: Author.
9. Atkin, J. M., Bianchini, J. A., and Holthuis, N. I. (1997). The different worlds of Project 2061. In S. A. Raizen and E. D. Britton (Eds.), Bold ventures volume 2: Case studies of U.S. innovations in science education (pp. 131-246). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
10. Bailey, P. (1998). Conceptions of scientific literacy: Making sense of a proposed national science curriculum framework. Alberta Science Education Journal, 30(2), 52-59.
11. Bandiera, M., Caravita, S., Torracca, E., and Vicentini, M. (Eds.). (1999). Research in science education in Europe. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
12. Bartholomew, H., Osborne, J., and Ratcliffe, M. (2004). Teaching students “ideas-about-science”:Five dimensions of effective practice. Science Education, 88, 655-682.
13. Black, P., and Atkin, J. M. (1996). Changing the subject: Innovations in science, mathematics and technology education. London: Routledge.
14. Blades, D. (1997). Procedures of power and curriculum change: Foucault and the quest for possibilities in science education. New York: Peter Lang.
15. Bauer, M., Durant, J., and Evans, G. (1994). European public perception of science. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 6, 163-186.
16. Brennan, R. P. (1992). Dictionary of scientific literacy. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
17. BSCS. (2005). The Natural Selection: The Journal of BSCS, Winter. Colorado Springs, CO: Author.
18. Bybee, R.W. (1997a). Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices. Portsmouth, NH:Heinemann.
19. Bybee, R.W. (1997b). Toward an understanding of scientific literacy. In W. Gräber and C. Bolte (Eds.), Scientific literacy (pp. 37-68). Kiel: IPN.
20. Bybee, R. W., and Ben-Zvi, N. (1998). Science curriculum: Transforming goals to practices. In B. J. Fraser and K. G. Tobin, International handbook of science education (pp. 487-498). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
21. Bybee, R. W., and DeBoer, G. E. (1994). Research on goals for the science curriculum. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 357-387). New York: Macmillan.
22. Carson, R. N. (1998). Science and the ideals of liberal education. In B. J. Fraser and K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 1001-1014). Dordrecht, the Netherlands:Kluwer Academic.
23. Champagne, A. B., and Kouba, V. L. (1997). Communication and reasoning in science literacy. In S. Sjøberg and E. Kallerud (Eds.), Science, technology and citizenship (pp. 75-92). Oslo: NIFU Rapport 7/97.
24. Christensen, C. (2001). Scientific literacy for a risky society. In P. Singh and E. McWilliam (Eds.), Designing educational research: Theories, methods and practices (pp. 141-154). Flaxton, Queensland, Australia: Post Pressed.
25. Council of Ministers of Education, Canada. (1997). Common framework of science learning outcomes K to 12: Pan-Canadian protocol for collaboration on school curriculum for use by curriculum developers. Toronto: Author.
26. DeBoer, G. E. (1991). A history of ideas in science education: Implications for practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
27. DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 582-601.
28. Department of Education, Pretoria. (2002). Revised national curriculum statement for grades R-9 (schools): Natural sciences. Pretoria: Author.
29. De Vos, W., and Reiding, J. (1999). Public understanding of science as a separate subject in secondary schools in the Netherlands. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 711-719.
30. Durant, J. (1994). What is scientific literacy? European Review, 2, 83-89.
31. Eijkelhof, H. (2001). Preface. In O. de Jong, E. R. Savelsbergh, and A. Alblas (Eds.), Teaching for scientific literacy: Context, competency, and curriculum (p. I). CD-ß Series Vol. 38. Utrecht: CD-ß Press, Utrecht University.
32. Eisenhart, M., Finkel, E., and Marion, S. F. (1996). Creating the conditions for scientific literacy:A re-examination. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 261-295.
33. Evans, G., and Durant, J. (1995). The relationship between knowledge and attitudes in the public understanding of science. Public Understanding of Science, 4, 57-74.
34. Fensham, P. J. (1992). Science and technology. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 789-829). New York: Macmillan.
35. Fensham, P. J. (1998). The politics of legitimating and marginalizing companion meanings: Three Australian case stories. In D. A. Roberts and L. Östman (Eds.), Problems of meaning in science curriculum. New York: Teachers College Press.
36. Fitzpatrick, F. L. (Ed.). (1960). Policies for science education. New York: Bureau of Publications, Teachers College, Columbia University.
37. Frey, K., Blänsdorf, K., Kapune, T., Schaefer, G., and Archenhold, F. (Eds.). (1977). Research in science education in Europe: Perspectives, structural problems and documentation 1976. Strasbourg: The Council of Europe; Kiel: IPN; Amsterdam: Swets and Zeitlinger.
38. Gabel, L. L. (1976). The development of a model to determine perceptions of scientific literacy. Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University.
39. Gallagher, J. J., and Harsch, G. (1997). Scientific literacy: Science education and secondary school students: A report of an international symposium. In W. Gräber and C. Bolte (Eds.), Scientific literacy (pp. 13-34). Kiel: IPN.
40. Garrison, J. W. and Lawwill, K. S. (1992). Scientific literacy: For whose benefit? In S. Hills (Ed.), Proceedings of the second international conference on the history and philosophy of science and science education (Vol. I, pp. 337-349). Kingston, Ontario, Canada: Queen’s University.
41. Goodrum, D., Hackling, M., and Rennie, L. (2000). The status and quality of teaching and learning of science in Australian schools: A research report. Canberra: Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.
42. Gräber, W., Nentwig, P., Becker, H., Sumfleth, E., Pitton, A., Wollweber, K., et al. (2001). Scientific literacy: From theory to practice. In H. Behrendt, H. Dahncke, R. Duit, W. Gräber, M. Komorek, and A. Kross (Eds.), Research in science education-Past, present, and future (pp. 61-70). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
43. Hand, B. M., Alvermann, D. E., Gee, J., Guzzetti, B. J., Norris, S. P., Phillips, L. M., et al. (2003). Guest editorial: Message from the “Island Group”: What is literacy in science literacy? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 607-615.
44. Harlen, W. (2001a). The assessment of scientific literacy in the OECD/PISA project. In H. Behrendt, H. Dahncke, R. Duit, W. Gräber, M. Komorek, and A. Kross (Eds.), Research in science education-past, present, and future (pp. 49-60). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
45. Harlen, W. (2001b). The assessment of scientific literacy in the OECD/PISA project. Studies in Science Education, 36, 79-104.
46. Hazen, R. M., and Trefil, J. (1991). Science matters: Achieving scientific literacy. New York: Doubleday.
47. Hirsch, E. D. (1987). Cultural literacy: What every American needs to know. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
48. Hunt, A., and Millar, R. (Eds.). (2000). AS Science for public understanding. Oxford: Heinemann Educational.
49. Hurd, P. D. (1958). Science literacy for American schools. Educational Leadership, 16, 13-16.
50. Hurd, P. D. (1998). Scientific literacy: New minds for a changing world. Science Education, 82, 407-416.
51. Husén, T., and Keeves, J. (1991). Issues in science education: Science competence in a social and ecological context. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
52. Jenkins, E. W. (1990). Scientific literacy and school science education. School Science Review, 71(256), 43-51.
53. Jenkins, E. W. (1997). Scientific and technological literacy: Meanings and rationales. In E. W. Jenkins (Ed.), Innovations in science and technology education (Vol. VI, pp. 11-42). Paris: UNESCO.
54. Johnson, P. G. (1962). The goals of science education. Theory into Practice, 1, 239-244.
55. Klopfer, L. E. (1969). Science education in 1991. The School Review, 77, 199-217.
56. Laugksch, R. C. (2000). Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview. Science Education, 84, 71-94.
57. Lave, J., and Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
58. Layton, D. (1991). Science education and praxis: The relationship of school science to practical action. Studies in Science Education, 19, 43-79.
59. Layton, D. (1994). A school subject in the making? The search for fundamentals. In D. Layton (Ed.), Innovations in science and technology education (Vol. V, 11-28). Paris: UNESCO.
60. Layton, D., Davey, A., and Jenkins, E. (1986). Science for specific social purposes (SSSP): Perspectives on adult scientific literacy. Studies in Science Education, 13, 27-52.
61. Layton, D., Jenkins, E., and Donnelly, J. (1994). Scientific and technological literacy: Meanings and rationales, an annotated bibliography. Leeds: Centre for Studies in Science and Mathematics Education, University of Leeds; and Paris: UNESCO.
62. Layton, D., Jenkins, E. W., Macgill, S., and Davey, A. (1993). Inarticulate science? Perspectives on the public understanding of science and some implications for science education. Nafferton, Driffield, East Yorkshire YO25 0JL, England: Studies in Education Ltd.
63. Marshall, S. P., Scheppler, J. A., and Palmisano, M. J. (Eds.). (2003). Science literacy for the twenty-first century. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
64. Matthews, M. R. (1994). Science teaching: The role of history and philosophy of science. New York:Routledge.
65. Mayer, V. J. (Ed.). (2002). Global science literacy. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
66. McEneaney, E. H. (2003). The worldwide cachet of scientific literacy. Comparative Education Review, 47(2), 217-237.
67. Millar, R. (1996). Towards a science curriculum for public understanding. School Science Review, 77(280), 7-18.
68. Millar, R., and Osborne, J. (Eds.). (1998). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future. King’s College London, School of Education. www.kcl.ac.uk/education
69. Miller, J. D. (1983). Scientific literacy: A conceptual and empirical review. Daedalus, 112(2), 29-48.
70. Miller, J. D. (1992). Toward a scientific understanding of the public understanding of science and technology. Public Understanding of Science, 1, 23-26.
71. Miller, J. D. (1996). Scientific literacy for effective citizenship. In R. E. Yager (Ed.), Science/technology/ society as reform in science education (pp. 185-204). Albany: State University of New York Press.
72. Miller, J. D. (1997). Civic scientific literacy in the United States: A developmental analysis from middle school through adulthood. In W. Gräber and C. Bolte (Eds.), Scientific literacy (pp. 121-142). Kiel: IPN.
73. Miller, J. D. (1998). The measurement of civic scientific literacy. Public Understanding of Science, 7, 1-21.
74. Miller, J. D. (2000). The development of civic scientific literacy in the United States. In D. D. Kumar and D. E. Chubin (Eds.), Science, technology, and society: A sourcebook for research and practice (pp. 21-47). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
75. Miller, J. D., Pardo, R., and Niwa, F. (1997). Public perceptions of science and technology: A comparative study of the European Union, the United States, Japan, and Canada. Madrid: BBV Foundation.
76. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
77. Norris, S. P., and Phillips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87, 224-240.
78. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (1999). Measuring student knowledge and skills: A new framework for assessment. Paris: Author.
79. Orpwood, G. W. F. (1985). Toward the renewal of Canadian science education. I. Deliberative inquiry model. Science Education, 69, 477-489.
80. Orpwood, G. (2000). Diversity of purpose in international assessments: Issues arising from the TIMSS tests of mathematics and science literacy. In D. Shorrocks-Taylor and E. W. Jenkins (Eds.), Learning from others: International comparisons in education (pp. 49-62). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
81. Orpwood, G. (2001). The role of assessment in science curriculum reform. Assessment in Education, 8, 135-151.
82. Orpwood, G., and Garden, R. A. (1998). Assessing mathematics and science literacy. TIMSS Monograph No. 4. Vancouver: Pacific Educational Press.
83. Orpwood, G. W. F., and Souque, J.-P. (1985). Toward the renewal of Canadian science education. II. Findings and recommendations. Science Education, 69, 626-636.
84. Östman, L. (1998). How companion meanings are expressed by science education discourse. In D. A. Roberts and L. Östman (Eds.), Problems of meaning in science curriculum (pp. 54-70). New York: Teachers College Press.
85. Pella, M. O., O’Hearn, G. T., and Gale, C. W. (1966). Referents to scientific literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 4, 199-208.
86. Penick, J. E. (1993). Scientific literacy: An annotated bibliography. Paris: UNESCO.
87. Psillos, D., Kariotoglou, P., Tselfes, V., Hatzikraniotis, E., Fassoulopoulos, G., and Kallery, M., (Eds.). (2003). Science education research in the knowledge-based society. Dordrecht, the Netherlands:Kluwer Academic.
88. Raizen, S. A., and Britton, E. D. (Eds.). (1997). Bold ventures, Volume 2: Case studies in U.S. innovations in science education. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
89. Ratcliffe, M. (1996). Adolescent decision-making, by individuals and groups, about science-related societal issues. In G. Welford, J. Osborne, and P. Scott (Eds.), Research in science education in Europe: Current issues and themes (pp. 126-140). London: Falmer Press.
90. Rennie, L., Goodrum, D., and Hackling, M. (2001). Science teaching and learning in Australian schools: Results of a national study. Research in Science Education, 31, 455-498.
91. Roberts, D. A. (1982). Developing the concept of “curriculum emphases” in science education. Science Education, 66, 243-260.
92. Roberts, D. A. (1983). Science in the schools: Seven alternatives: Vol. 2. Scientific literacy: Towards balance in setting goals for school science programs. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Guidance Centre, University of Toronto (originally published as a discussion paper for the Science Council of Canada, ERIC # ED231673).
93. Roberts, D. A. (1988). What counts as science education? In P. Fensham (Ed.), Development and dilemmas in science education (pp. 27-54). Philadelphia: Falmer Press.
94. Roberts, D. A. (1995). Junior high school science transformed: Analysing a science curriculum policy change. International Journal of Science Education, 17, 493-504.
95. Roberts, D. A. (1998). Analyzing school science courses: The concept of companion meaning. In D. A. Roberts and L. Östman (Eds.), Problems of meaning in science curriculum (pp. 5-12). New York: Teachers College Press.
96. Roberts, D. A. (2000). Review of Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices. Science Education, 84, 123-127.
97. Roberts, D. A. (2003). Scientific literacy: Around and about the globe. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 3, 287-292.
98. Roth, W.-M., and Barton, A. C. (2004). Rethinking scientific literacy. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
99. Roth, W.-M., and Lee, S. (2002). Scientific literacy as collective praxis. Public Understanding of Science, 11, 33-56.
100. Roth, W.-M., and Lee, S. (2004). Science education as/for participation in the community. Science Education, 88, 263-291.
101. Ryder, J. (2001). Identifying science understanding for functional scientific literacy. Studies in Science Education, 36, 1-44.
102. Science Council of Canada. (1984). Science for every student. Hull, Quebec: Supply and Services Canada.
103. Scribner, S. (1986). Literacy in three metaphors. In N. Stein (Ed.), Literacy in American schools:Learning to read and write (pp. 7-22). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
104. Shamos, M. (1995). The myth of scientific literacy. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
105. Shen, B. S. P. (1975). Science literacy and the public understanding of science. In S. B. Day (Ed.), Communication of scientific information (pp. 44-52). Basel, Switzerland: S. Karger AG.
106. Shorrocks-Taylor, D., and Jenkins, E. W. (Eds.). (2000). Learning from others: International comparisons in education. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
107. Shulman, L. S., and Tamir, P. (1973). Research on teaching in the natural sciences. In R. M. W. Travers (Ed.), Second handbook of research on teaching (pp. 1098-1148). Chicago: Rand McNally.
108. Sjøberg, S. (1997). Scientific literacy and school science-Arguments and second thoughts. In S. Sjøberg and E. Kallerud (Eds.), Science, technology and citizenship (pp. 9-28). Oslo: NIFU Rapport 10/97.
109. Sjøberg, S., and Kallerud, E. (Eds.). (1997). Science, technology and citizenship. Oslo: NIFU Rapport 10/97.
110. Solomon, J. (1992). The classroom discussion of STS issues: Public understanding of science in the making. In R. E. Yager (Ed.), The status of science-technology-society reform efforts around the world: ICASE Yearbook 1992 (pp. 67-80). International Council of Associations for Science Education.
111. Solomon, J. (1998). The science curricula of Europe and the notion of scientific culture. In D. A. Roberts and L. Östman (Eds.), Problems of meaning in science curriculum (pp. 166-177). New York: Teachers College Press.
112. Stocklmayer, S. M., Gore, M. M., and Bryant, C. (Eds.). (2001). Science communication in theory and practice. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
113. Thomas, G., and Durant, J. (1987). Why should we promote the public understanding of science? Scientific literacy papers 1, 1-14 (University of Oxford, Department of External Studies).
114. van den Akker, J. (1998). The science curriculum: Between ideals and outcomes. In B. J. Fraser and K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 421-447). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
115. Watson, F. G. (1963). Research on teaching science. In N. L. Gage (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 1031-1059). Chicago: Rand McNally.
116. White, R. (2001). The revolution in research on science teaching. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 457-471). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
117. White, R. T., and Tisher, R. P. (1986). Research on natural sciences. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 874-905). New York: Macmillan.
118. Wickman, P.-O., and Östman, L. (2002). Learning as discourse change: A sociocultural mechanism. Science Education, 86, 601-623.
119. Wynne, B. (1995). Public understanding of science. In S. Jasanoff, G. E. Markle, J. C. Petersen, and T. Pinch (Eds.), Handbook of science and technology studies (pp. 361-388). Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
120. Zeidler, D. L. (Ed.). (2003). The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse in science education. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
121. Zeidler, D. L., and Lewis, J. (2003). Unifying themes in moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse. In D. L. Zeidler (Ed.), The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse in science education (pp. 289-306). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
122. Zeidler, D. L., Osborne, J., Erduran, S., Simon, S., and Monk, M. (2003). The role of argument during discourse about socioscientific issues. In D. L. Zeidler (Ed.), The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse in science education (pp. 97-116). Dordrecht, the Netherlands:Kluwer Academic.