Geometric cooperativity and anticooperativity of three-body interactions in native proteins

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 60, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 46-65

  Li, Xiang ^a   Liang, Jie ^a  

^a University of Illinois at Chicago   (United States)

Author keywords

3 body potential; Anticooperativity; Cooperativity; Higher order interactions; Many body interactions; Nonadditive coefficient; Nonadditive effects

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; DATA BASE; GEOMETRY; HYDROGEN BOND; HYDROPHOBICITY; IONIZATION; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN MOTIF; PROTEIN STABILITY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEINS;

EID: 19544391428     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.20438     Document Type: Article

References (122)

1. Miyazawa S, Jernigan RL. Residue-residue potentials with a favorable contact pair term and an unfavorable high packing density term. J Mol Biol 1996;256:623-644.
2. Lu H, Skolnick J. A distance-dependent atomic knowledge-based potential for improved protein structure selection. Proteins 2001; 44:223-232.
3. Betancourt MR, Thirumalai D. Pair potentials for protein folding: Choice of reference states and sensitivity of predicted native states to variations in the interaction schemes. Protein Sci 1999;8:361-369.
4. Miyazawa S, Jernigan RL. Estimation of effective interresidue contact energies from protein crystal structures: quasi-chemical approximation. Macromolecules 1985;18:534-552.
5. Sippl M. Boltzmann principle, knowledge-based mean fields and protein folding-an approach to the the computational determination of protein structures. J Comput Aided Mol Des 1993;7:473-501.
6. Simons KT, Ruczinski I, Kooperberg C, Fox B, Bystroff C, Baker D. Improved recognition of native-like protein structures using a combination of sequence-dependent and sequence-independent features of proteins. Proteins 1999;34:82-95.
7. Li X, Hu C, Liang J. Simplicial edge representation of protein structures and alpha contact potential with confidence measure. Proteins 2003;53:792-805.
8. Bonneau R, Baker D. Ab initio protein structure prediction: progress and prospects. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 2001;30: 173-189.
9. Dill KA. Additivity principles in biochemistry. J Biol Chem 1997;272:701-704.
10. Kaya H, Chan HS. Towards a consistent modeling of protein thermodynamic and kinetic cooperativity. how applicable is the transition state picture to folding and unfolding? J Mol Biol 2002;315:899-909.
11. Shimizu S, Chan HS. Anti-cooperativity and cooperativity in hydrophobic interactions: three-body free energy landscapes and comparison with implicit-solvent potential functions for proteins. Proteins 2002;48:15-30.
12. Rank JA, Baker D. A desolvation barrier to hydrophobic cluster formation may contribute to the rate-limiting step in protein folding. Protein Sci 1997;6:347-354.
13. Shimizu S, Chan HS. Anti-cooperativity in hydrophobic interactions: a simulation study of spatial dependence of three-body effects and beyond. J Chem Phys 2001;115:1414-1421.
14. Czaplewski C, Rodziewicz-Motowidlo S, Liwo A, Ripoll DR, Wawak RJ, Scheraga HA. Molecular simulation study of cooperativity in hydrophobic association. Protein Sci 2000;9:1235-1245.
15. Eastwood MP, Wolynes PG. Role of explicitly cooperative interactions in protein folding funnels: a simulation study. J Chem Phys 2001;114:4702-4716.
16. Rossi A, Micheletti C, Seno F, Maritan A. A self-consistent knowledge-based approach to protein design. Biophys J 2001;80: 480-490.
17. Godzik A, Skolnick J. Sequence-structure matching in globular proteins: application to supersecondary and tertiary structure determination. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992;89:12098-12102.
18. Godzik A, Kolinski A, Skolnick J. Topology fingerprint approach to the inverse protein folding problem. J Mol Biol 1992;227:227-238.
19. Krishnamoorthy B, Tropsha A. Development of a four-body statistical pseudo-potential to discriminate native from non-native protein conformations. Bioinformatics 2003;19:1540-1548.
20. Carter CW, LeFebvre BC, Cammer SA, Tropsha A, Edgell MH. Four-body potentials reveal protein-specific correlations to stability changes caused by hydrophobic core mutations. J Mol Biol 2001;311:625-638.
21. Gan HH, Tropsha A, Schlick T. Lattice protein folding with two and four-body statistical potentials. Proteins 2001;43:161-174.
22. Zheng W, Cho SJ, Vaisman II, Tropsha A. A new approach to protein fold recognition based on delaunay tessellation of protein structure. Pac Symp Biocomput 1997;486-497.
23. Singh RK, Tropsha A, Vaisman II. Delaunay tessellation of proteins: four body nearest-neighbor propensities of amino acid residues. J Comput Biol 1996;3:213-221.
24. Munson PJ, Singh RK. Statistical significance of hierarchical multi-body potential based on delaunay tessellation and their application in sequence-structure alignment. Protein Sci 1997;6: 1467-1481.
25. Pace CN. Polar group burial contributes more to protein stability than nonpolar group burial. Biochemistry 2001;40:310-313.
26. Myers JK, Pace CN. Hydrogen bonding stabilizes globular proteins. Biophys J 1996;71:2033-2039.
27. Zhou Y, Linhananta A. Role of hydrophilic and hydrophobic contacts in folding of the second β-hairpin fragment of protein G: molecular dynamics simulation studies of an all-atom model. Proteins 2002;47:154-162.
28. Honda S, Kobayashi N, Munekata E. Thermodynamics of a β-hairpin structure: evidence for cooperative formation of folding nucleus. J Mol Biol 2000;295:269-278.
29. Kobayashi N, Honda S, Yoshii H, Munekata E. Role of side-chains in the cooperative β-hairpin folding of the short c-terminal fragment derived from streptococcal protein G. Biochemistry 2000;39:6564-6571.
30. Kaya H, Chan HS. Energetic components of cooperative protein folding. Phys Rev Lett 2000;85:4823-4826.
31. Liang J. Experimental and computational studies of determinants of membrane-protein folding. Curr Opin Chem Biol 2002; 6:878-884.
32. Adamian L, Jackup R Jr, Binkowski A, Liang J. Higher order interhelical spatial interactions in membrane proteins. J Mol Biol 2003;327:251-272.
33. Xu Y, Xu D, Crawford OH, Einstein Jr. R, Larimer F, Uberbacher E, Unseren MA, Zhang G. Protein threading by PROSPECT: a prediction experiment in CASP3. Protein Eng 1999;12:899-907.
34. Kihara D, Lu H, Kolinski A, Skolnick J. Touchstone: an ab initio protein structure prediction method that uses threading-based tertiary restraints. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001;98:10125-10130.
35. Koehl P, Levitt M. De novo protein design: I. In search of stability and specificity. J Mol Biol 1999;293:1161-1181.
36. Koehl P, Levitt M. De novo protein design: II. Plasticity of protein sequence. J Mol Biol 1999;293:1183-1193.
37. Hu C, Li X, Liang J. Developing optimal non-linear scoring function for protein design. Bioinformatics 2004;20:3080-3098.
38. Li X, Liang J. Computational design of combinatorial peptide library for modulating protein-protein interactions. Pac Symp Biocomput 2005;28-39.
39. Simons KT, Bonneau R, Ruczinski I, Baker D. Ab initio protein structure prediction of CASP III targets using ROSETTA. Proteins 1999;Suppl. 3:171-176.
40. Edelsbrunner H, Mücke EP. Three-dimensional alpha shapes. ACM Trans Graphics 1994;13:43-72.
41. Liang J, Edelsbrunner H, Fu P, Sudhakar PV, Subramaniam S. Analytical shape computing of macromolecules: I. Molecular area and volume through alpha-shape. Proteins 1998;33:1-17.
42. Edelsbrunner H. The union of balls and its dual shape. Discrete Comput Geom 1995;13:415-440.
43. Liang J, Edelsbrunner H, Fu P, Sudhakar PV, Subramaniam S. Analytical shape computing of macromolecules: II. Identification and computation of inaccessible cavities inside proteins. Proteins 1998;33:18-29.
44. Lee B, Richards FM. The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility. J Mol Biol 1971;55:379-400.
45. Edelsbrunner H, Shah N. Incremental topological flipping works for regular triangulations. Algorithmica 1996;15:223-241.
46. Facello MA. Implememntation of a randomized algorithm for delaunay and regular triangulations in three dimensions. Comput Aided Geomet Des 1995;12:349-370.
47. Tsai J, Taylor R, Chothia C, Gerstein M. The packing density in proteins: standard radii and volumes. J Mol Biol 1999;290:253-266.
48. Singh J, Thornton JM. Atlas of protein side-chain interactions. 2 Vols. Oxford, UK: IRL Press; 1992.
49. Adamian L, Liang J. Helix-helix packing and interfacial pairwise interactions of residues in membrane proteins. J Mol Biol 2001;311:891-907.
50. Skolnick J, Kolinski A, Ortiz A. Derivation of protein-specific pair potentials based on weak sequence fragment similarity. Proteins 2000;38:3-16.
51. Hummer G. Hydrophobic force field as a molecular alternative to surface-area models. J Am Chem Soc 1999;121:6299-6305.
52. Petitjean M. On the analytical calculation of van der Waals surfaces and volumes: some numerical aspects. J Comput Chem 1994;15:507-523.
53. Kratky KW. Intersecting disks (and spheres) and statistical mechanics: I. Mathematical basis. J Stat Phys 1981;25:619-634.
54. Edelsbrunner H, Facello M, Fu P, Liang J. Measuring proteins and voids in proteins. In: Proc. 28th Ann. Hawaii Intl Conf Syst Sci. 1995;5:256-264.
55. Eisenberg D, McLachlan AD. Solvation energy in protein folding and binding. Nature 1986;319:199-203.
56. Sun S, Thomas PD, Dill KA. A simple protein folding algorithm using a binary code and secondary structure constraints. Protein Eng 1995;8:769-778.
57. Hobohm U, Sander C. Enlarged representative set of protein structures. Protein Sci 1994;3:522-524.
58. Efron B, Tibshirani RJ. An introduction to the bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall; 1993.
59. Davison AC, Hinkley DV. Bootstrap methods and their applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1997.
60. Stitziel NO, Tseng YY, Pervouchine D, Goddeau D, Kasif S, Liang J. Structural location of disease-associated single-nucleotide polymorphisms. J Mol Biol 2003;327:1021-1030.
61. Riddle D, Santiago J, Grantcharova V, Baker D. Functional rapidly folding proteins from simplified amino acid sequences. Nat Struct Biol 1997;4:805-809.
62. Wang J, Wang W. A computational approach to simplifying the protein folding alphabet. Nat Struct Biol 1999;6:1033-1038.
63. Fan K, Wang W. What is the minimum number of letters required to fold a protein? J Mol Biol 2003;328:921-926.
64. Murphy LR, Wallqvist A, Levy RM. Simplified amino acid alphabets for protein fold recognition and implications for folding. Protein Eng 2000;13:149-152.
65. Rose GD, Geselowitz AR, Lesser GJ, Lee RH, Zehfus MH. Hydrophobicity of amino acid residues in globular proteins. Science 1985;229:834-838.
66. Jones S, Thornton JM. Principles of protein-protein interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996;931:13-20.
67. Conte LL, Chothia C, Janin J. The atomic structure of protein-protein recognition sites. J Mol Biol 1999;2855:2177-2198.
68. Tsai CJ, Lin SL, Wolfson HJ, Nussinov R. Studies of protein-protein interfaces: a statistical analysis of the hydrophobic effect. Protein Sci 1997;61:53-64.
69. Lu H, Lu L, Skolnick J. Development of unified statistical potentials describing protein-protein interactions. Biophys J 2003;843:1895-1901.
70. Sheinerman FB, Norel R, Honig B. Electrostatic aspects of protein-protein interactions. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2000;102:153-159.
71. Xu D, Lin SL, Nussinov R. Protein binding versus protein folding: the role of hydrophilic bridges in protein associations. J Mol Biol 1997;2651:68-84.
72. Sheinerman FB, Honig B. On the role of electrostatic interactions in the design of protein-protein interfaces. J Mol Biol 2002;3181: 161-177.
73. Honig B, Nicholls A. Classical electrostatics in biology and chemistry. Science 1995;2685214:1144-1149.
74. Bogan AA, Thorn KS. Anatomy of hot spots in protein interfaces. J Mol Biol 1998;2801:1-9.
75. Derewenda ZS, Lee L, Derewenda U. The occurrence of C-H...O hydrogen bonds in proteins. J Mol Biol 1995;252:248-262.
76. α-H.. .O=C hydrogen bonds in a collagen triple helix. J Mol Biol 1996;264: 734-742.
77. α-H. . .O hydrogen bond: a determinant of stability and specificity in transmembrane helix interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001;98:9056-9061.
78. Fain B, Xia Y, Levitt M. Design of an optimal Chebyshev-expanded discrimination function for globular proteins. Protein Sci 2002;11:2010-2021.
79. Park BH, Levitt M. Energy functions that discriminate X-ray and near-native folds from well-constructed decoys. J Mol Biol 1996; 258:367-392.
80. Samudrala R, Xia Y, Levitt M, Huang ES. A combined approach for ab initio construction of low resolution protein tertiary structures from sequence. Pac Symp Biocomput 1999; 505-516.
81. Xia Y, Levitt M. Extracting knowledge-based energy functions from protein structures by error rate minimization: comparison of methods using lattice model. J Chem Phys 2000;113:9318-9330.
82. Samudrala R, Moult J. An all-atom distance-dependent conditional probability discriminatory function for protein structure prediction. J Mol Biol 1998;275:895-916.
83. Park BH, Huang ES, Levitt M. Factors affecting the ability of energy functions to discriminate correct from incorrect folds. J Mol Biol 1997;266:831-846.
84. Levitt M, Lifson S. Rifinement of protein conformations using a macromolecular energy minimization procedure. J Mol Biol 1969;46:269-279.
85. Levitt M. Energy refinement of hen egg-white lysozyme. J Mol Biol 1974;82:392-420.
86. Levitt M. Molecular dynamics of native protein: I. Computer simulation of trajectories. J Mol Biol 1983;168:595-620.
87. Levitt M, Hirshberg M, Sharon R, Daggett V. Potential energy function and parameters for simulations of the molecular dynamics of proteins and nucleic acids in solution. Comp Phys Comm 1995;91:215-231.
88. Fletcher R. A new approach to variable metric algorithms. Comput J 1970;13:317-322.
89. Zhou H, Zhou Y. Distance-scaled, finite ideal-gas reference state improves structure-derived potentials of mean force for structure selection and stability prediction. Protein Sci 2002;11:2714-2726.
90. Tanaka S, Scheraga HA. Medium- and long-range interaction parameters between amino acids for predicting three-dimensional structures of proteins. Macromolecules 1976;9:945-950.
91. Wodak SJ, Rooman MJ. Generating and testing protein folds. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1993;3:247-259.
92. Sippl MJ. Knowledge-based potentials for proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1995;5:229-235.
93. Lemer CMR, Rooman MJ, Wodak SJ. Protein-structure prediction by threading methods-evaluation of current techniques. Proteins 1995;23:337-355.
94. Jernigan RL, Bahar I. Structure-derived potentials and protein simulations. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1996;6:195-209.
95. Goldstein R, Luthey-Schulten ZA, Wolynes PG. Protein tertiary structure recognition using optimized Hamiltonians with local interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992;89:9029-9033.
96. Maiorov VN, Grippen GM. Contact potential that pecognizes the correct folding of globular proteins. J Mol Biol 1992;227:876-888.
97. Thomas PD, Dill KA. An iterative method for extracting energy-like quantities from protein structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996;93:11628-1633.
98. Tobi D, Shafran G, Linial N, Elber R. On the design and analysis of protein folding potentials. Proteins 2000;40:71-85.
99. Vendruscolo M, Domanyi E. Pairwise contact potentials are unsuitable for protein folding. J Chem Phys 1998;109:11101-11108.
100. Vendruscolo M, Najmanovich R, Domany E. Can a pairwise contact potential stabilize native protein folds against decoys obtained by threading? Proteins 2000;38:134-148.
101. Bastolla U, Farwer J, Knapp EW, Vendruscolo M. How to guarantee optimal stability for most representative structures in the Protein Data Bank. Proteins 2001;44:79-96.
102. Dima R. I. Banavar JR, Maritan A. Scoring functions in protein folding and design. Protein Sci 2000;9:812-819.
103. Micheletti C, Seno F, Banavar JR, Maritan A. Learning effective amino acid interactions through iterative stochastic techniques. Proteins 2001;42:422-431.
104. Czaplewski C, Rodziewicz-Motowidlo S, Dabal M, Liwo A, Ripoll DR, Scheraga HA. Molecular simulation study of cooperativity in hydrophobic association: clusters of four hydrophobic particles. Biophys Chem 2003;105:339-359.
105. Ghosh T, García AE, S. G. Water-mediated three-particle interactions between hydrophobic solutes: size, pressure, and salt effects. J Phys Chem B 2003;107:612-617.
106. Shimizu S, Chan HS. Reply to "comment on "anti-cooperativity in hydrophobic interac-tions: a simulation study of spatial dependence of three-body effects and beyond.'" J Chem Phys 2002; 116: 2668-2669.
107. Richards FM. The interpretation of protein structures: total volume, group volume distributions and packing density. J Mol Biol 1974;82:1-14.
108. Connolly ML. Solvent-accessible surfaces of proteins and nucleic acids. Science 1983;221:709-713.
109. Banavar JR, Maritan A, Micheletti C, Trovato A. Geometry and physics of proteins. Proteins 2002;47:315-322.
110. Gerstein M, Richards FM. Protein geometry: distance, areas, and volumes. In: Rossmann M, Arnold E, editors. International tables for crystallography (Vol F). Dordrecht, The Netherlands; 2001. p 531-539.
111. Liang J, Dill KA. Are proteins well-packed? Biophys J 2001;81: 751-766.
112. Kauzmann W. Some factors in the interpretation of protein denaturation. Adv Protein Chem 1959;14:1-63.
113. Dill KA. Dominant forces in protein folding. Biochemistry 1990; 29:7133-7155.
114. McDonald IK, Thornton JM. Satisfying hydrogen bonding potential in proteins. J Mol Biol 1994;238:777-793.
115. Jiang L, Lai L. CH...O hydrogen bonds at protein-protein interfaces. J Biol Chem 2002;277:37792-37740.
116. Richardson JS, Richardson DC. Amino acid preferences for specific locations at the ends of alpha helices. Science 1988;240: 1648-1652.
117. Smith J, Pease LG. Reverse turns in peptides and proteins. CRC Crit Rev Biochem 1980;8:315-399.
118. Deber CM, Glibowicka M, Woolley GA. Conformations of proline residues in membrane environments. Biopolymers 1990;29:149-157.
119. Chakrabarti P, Chakrabarti S, C-H...O hydrogen bond involving proline residues in α... helices. J Mol Biol 1998;284:867-873.
120. Papoian GA, Ulander J, Wolynes PG. Role of water mediated interactions in protein-protein recognition landscapes. J Am Chem Soc 2003;125:9170-9178.
121. ten Wolde PR, Chandler D. Drying-induced hydrophobic polymer collapse. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99:6539-6543.
122. Siebert X, Hummer G. Hydrophobicity maps of the N-peptide coiled coil of HIV-1 gp41. Biochemistry 2002;41:2956-2961.