Coevolution at protein complex interfaces can be detected by the complementarity trace with important impact for predictive docking

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 105, Issue 22, 2008, Pages 7708-7713

  Madaoui, Hocine ^a,b   Guerois, Raphaël ^a  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b Ctr d'Affaires La Boursidiere   (France)

Author keywords

Evolution; Prediction; Protein protein interaction

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; COEVOLUTION; COMPLEX FORMATION; MACROMOLECULE; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; MUTATION; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ASSEMBLY; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SCORING SYSTEM; STATISTICS; SURFACE COMPLEMENTARITY TRACE IN COMPLEX HISTORY SCORE; SURFACE PROPERTY; VALIDATION STUDY; BIOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; GENETICS; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; MUTATION; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; PROTEINS;

EID: 45549091203     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0707032105     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Bork P, et al. (2004) Protein interaction networks from yeast to human. Curr Opin Struct Biol 14:292-299.
2. Krogan NJ, et al. (2006) Global landscape of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 440:637-643.
3. Janin J, Chothia C (1990) The structure of protein-protein recognition sites. J Biol Chem 265:16027-16030.
4. Jones S, Thornton JM (1996) Principles of protein-protein interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:13-20.
5. Jones S, Thornton JM (1997) Analysis of protein-protein interaction sites using surface patches. J Mol Biol 272:121-132.
6. Lo Conte L, Chothia C, Janin J (1999) The atomic structure of protein-protein recognition sites. J Mol Biol 285:2177-2198.
7. Shaul Y, Schreiber G (2005) Exploring the charge space of protein-protein association: a proteomic study. Proteins 60:341-352.
8. Jones S, Thornton JM (1997) Prediction of protein-protein interaction sites using patch analysis. J Mol Biol 272:133-143.
9. Zhou HX, Shan Y (2001) Prediction of protein interaction sites from sequence profile and residue neighbor list. Proteins 44:336-343.
10. Fariselli P, Pazos F, Valencia A, Casadio R (2002) Prediction of protein-protein interaction sites in heterocomplexes with neural networks. Eur J Biochem 269:1356-1361.
11. Ofran Y, Rost B (2003) Predicted protein-protein interaction sites from local sequence information. FEBS Lett 544:236-239.
12. Keil M, Exner TE, Brickmann J (2004) Pattern recognition strategies for molecular surfaces: III. Binding site prediction with a neural network. J Comput Chem 25:779-789.
13. Neuvirth H, Raz R, Schreiber G (2004) ProMate: A structure based prediction program to identify the location of protein-protein binding sites. J Mol Biol 338:181-199.
14. Bradford JR, Westhead DR (2005) Improved prediction of protein-protein binding sites using a support vector machines approach. Bioinformatics 21:1487-1494.
15. Aloy P, Ceulemans H, Stark A, Russell RB (2003) The relationship between sequence and interaction divergence in proteins. J Mol Biol 332:989-998.
16. Kim WK, Ison JC (2005) Survey of the geometric association of domain-domain interfaces. Proteins 61:1075-1088.
17. Lukatsky DB, Shakhnovich BE, Mintseris J, Shakhnovich EI (2007) Structural similarity enhances interaction propensity of proteins. J Mol Biol 365:1596-1606.
18. Lichtarge O, Bourne HR, Cohen FE (1996) An evolutionary trace method defines binding surfaces common to protein families. J Mol Biol 257:342-358.
19. Landgraf R, Xenarios I, Eisenberg D (2001) Three-dimensional cluster analysis identifies interfaces and functional residue clusters in proteins. J Mol Biol 307:1487-1502.
20. Pupko T, et al. (2002) Rate4Site: An algorithmic tool for the identification of functional regions in proteins by surface mapping of evolutionary determinants within their homologues. Bioinformatics 18 Suppl 1:S71-S77.
21. Caffrey DR, et al. (2004) Are protein-protein interfaces more conserved in sequence than the rest of the protein surface? Protein Sci 13:190-202.
22. Jimenez JL (2005) Does structural and chemical divergence play a role in precluding undesirable protein interactions? Proteins 59:757-764.
23. Mintseris J, Weng Z (2005) Structure, function, and evolution of transient and obligate protein-protein interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:10930-10935.
24. Duan Y, Reddy BV, Kaznessis YN (2005) Physicochemical and residue conservation calculations to improve the ranking of protein-protein docking solutions. Protein Sci 14:316-328.
25. Chelliah V, Blundell TL, Fernandez-Recio J (2006) Efficient restraints for protein-protein docking by comparison of observed amino acid substitution patterns with those predicted from local environment. J Mol Biol 357:1669-1682.
26. de Vries SJ, van Dijk AD, Bonvin AM (2006) WHISCY: What information does surface conservation yield? Application to data-driven docking. Proteins 63:479-489.
27. Gobel U, Sander C, Schneider R, Valencia A (1994) Correlated mutations and residue contacts in proteins. Proteins 18:309-317.
28. Neher E (1994) How frequent are correlated changes in families of protein sequences? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:98-102.
29. Choi SS, Li W, Lahn BT (2005) Robust signals of coevolution of interacting residues in mammalian proteomes identified by phylogeny-aided structural analysis. Nat Genet 37:1367-1371.
30. Dutheil J, Pupko T, Jean-Marie A, Galtier N (2005) A model-based approach for detecting coevolving positions in a molecule. Mol Biol Evol 22:1919-1928.
31. Pazos F, Helmer-Citterich M, Ausiello G, Valencia A (1997) Correlated mutations contain information about protein-protein interaction. J Mol Biol 271:511-523.
32. Halperin I, Wolfson H, Nussinov R (2006) Correlated mutations: advances and limitations. A study on fusion proteins and on the Cohesin-Dockerin families. Proteins 63:832-845.
33. Reichmann D, et al. (2007) The molecular architecture of protein-protein binding sites. Curr Opin Struct Biol 17:67-76.
34. Kim WK, Bolser DM, Park JH (2004) Large-scale co-evolution analysis of protein structural interlogues using the global protein structural interactome map (PSIMAP). Bioinformatics 20:1138-1150.
35. Gabb HA, Jackson RM, Sternberg MJ (1997) Modelling protein docking using shape complementarity, electrostatics and biochemical information. J Mol Biol 272:106-120.
36. Mayrose I, Graur D, Ben-Tal N, Pupko T (2004) Comparison of site-specific rate-inference methods for protein sequences: Empirical Bayesian methods are superior. Mol Biol Evol 21:1781-1791.
37. Afonnikov DA, Oshchepkov DY, Kolchanov NA (2001) Detection of conserved physicochemical characteristics of proteins by analyzing clusters of positions with co-ordinated substitutions. Bioinformatics 17:1035-1046.
38. Moont G, Gabb HA, Sternberg MJ (1999) Use of pair potentials across protein interfaces in screening predicted docked complexes. Proteins 35:364-373.
39. Sheinerman FB, Honig B (2002) On the role of electrostatic interactions in the design of protein-protein interfaces. J Mol Biol 318:161-177.
40. Dong F, Zhou HX (2006) Electrostatic contribution to the binding stability of protein-protein complexes. Proteins 65:87-102.
41. Man-Kuang Cheng T, Blundell TL, Fernandez-Recio J (2007) pyDock: Electrostatics and desolvation for effective scoring of rigid-body protein-protein docking. Proteins 68:503-515.
42. Chen R, Mintseris J, Janin J, Weng Z (2003) A protein-protein docking benchmark. Proteins 52:88-91.
43. Mintseris J, Weng Z (2003) Atomic contact vectors in protein-protein recognition. Proteins 53:629-639.
44. Altschul SF, et al. (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25:3389-3402.
45. Pazos F, Valencia A (2001) Similarity of phylogenetic trees as indicator of protein-protein interaction. Protein Eng 14:609-614.
46. Jones DT, Taylor WR, Thornton JM (1992) The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences. Comput Appl Biosci 8:275-282.
47. White A, et al. (1978) Principles of Biochemistry (McGraw-Hill, New York).
48. Kyte J, Doolittle RF (1982) A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. J Mol Biol 157:105-132.
49. Vriend G (1990) WHAT IF: A molecular modeling and drug design program. J Mol Graphics 8:52-56, 29.