Four-body contact potentials derived from two protein datasets to discriminate native structures from decoys

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 68, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 57-66

  Feng, Yaping ^a   Kloczkowski, Andrzej ^a   Jernigan, Robert L ^a  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Contact potential; Delauney tessellation (DT); Four body potential; Two body potential

Indexed keywords

ALANINE; AMINO ACID; ARGININE; ASPARAGINE; ASPARTIC ACID; CYSTEINE; GLUTAMIC ACID; GLUTAMINE; GLYCINE; HISTIDINE; ISOLEUCINE; LEUCINE; LYSINE; METHIONINE; PHENYLALANINE; PROLINE; PROTEIN; SERINE; THREONINE; TRYPTOPHAN; TYROSINE; VALINE;

ALGORITHM; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; DATA ANALYSIS; ENERGY; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, PROTEIN; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEINS;

EID: 34249938371     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.21362     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Friesner RA, Gunn JR. Computational studies of protein folding. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 1996;25:315-342.
2. Sali A, Shakhnovich E, Karplus M. How does a protein fold? Nature 1994;369:248-251.
3. Russ WP, Ranganathan R. Knowledge-based potential functions in protein design. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2002;12:447-452.
4. Pillardy J, Czaplewski C, Liwo A, Lee J, Ripoll DR, Kamierkiewicz R, Odziej S, Wedemeyer WJ, Gibson KD, Arnautova YA, Saunders J, Ye YJ, Scheraga HA. Recent improvements in prediction of protein structure by global optimization of a potential energy function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001;98:2329-2333.
5. Skolnick J, Zhang Y, Arakaki AK, Kolinski A, Boniecki A, Szilagyi A, Kihara D. TOUCHSTONE: a unified approach to protein structure prediction. Proteins 2003;53:469-479.
6. Jernigan RL. Protein folds. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1992;2:248-256.
7. Levitt M, Warshel A. Computer simulation of protein folding. Nature 1975;253:694-698.
8. Levitt M. A simplified representation of protein conformation for rapid simulation of protein folding. J Mol Biol 1976;104:59-107.
9. Zhang J, Chen R, Liang J. Empirical potential function for simplified protein models: combining contact and local sequence-structure descriptors. Proteins 2006;63:949-960.
10. Tanaka S, Scheraga HA. Medium and long range interaction parameters between amino acids for predicting three dimensional structures of proteins. Macromolecules 1976;9:925-950.
11. Miyazawa S, Jernigan RL. Estimation of effective interresidue contact energies from protein crystal structures: Quasi-chemical approximation. Macromolecules 1985;18:534-552.
12. Miyazawa S, Jernigan RL. Residue-residue potentials with a favorable contact pair term and an unfavorable high packing density term, for simulation and threading. J Mol Biol 1996;256:623-644.
13. Bahar I, Jernigan RL. Inter-residue potentials in globular proteins and the dominance of highly specific hydrophilic interactions at close separation. J Mol Biol 1997;266:195-214.
14. Hendlich M, Lackner P, Weitckus S, Floeckner H, Froschauer R, Gottsbacher K, Casari G, Sippl MJ. Identification of native protein folds amongst a large number of incorrect models - the calculation of low-energy conformations from potentials of mean force. J Mol Biol 1990;216:167-180.
15. Maiorov VN, Crippen GM. Contact potential that recognizes the correct folding of globular proteins. J Mol Biol 1992;277:676-888.
16. Skolnick J, Jaroszewski L, Kolinski A, Godzik A. Derivation and testing of pair potentials for protein folding. When is the quasi-chemical approximation correct? Protein Sci 1997;6:676-688.
17. Skolnick J, Kolinski A, Ortiz A. Derivation of protein-specific pair potentials based on weak sequence fragment similarity. Proteins 2000;38:3-16.
18. Mirny LA, Shakhnovich EI. How to derive a protein folding potentials? A new approach to an old problem. J Mol Biol 1996;264:1164-1179.
19. Thomas PD, Dill KA. An interative method for extracting energy-like quantities from protein structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996;93:11628-11633.
20. Tobi D, Shafran G, Linial N, Elber R. On the design and analysis of protein folding potentials. Proteins 2000;40:71-85.
21. Micheletti C, Seno F, Banavar JR, Maritan A. Learning effective amino acid interactions through iterative stochastic techniques. Proteins 2001;42:422-431.
22. Vajda S, Sippl M, Novotny J. Empirical potentials and functions for protein folding and binding. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1997;7:222-228.
23. Godzik A. Knowledge-based potentials for protein folding: what can we learn from known protein structures? Structure 1996;4:363-366.
24. Jernigan RL, Bahar I. Structure-derived potentials and protein simulations. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1996;6:195-209.
25. Sippl MJ. Knowledge-based potentials for proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1995;5:229-235.
26. Hao MH, Scheraga HA, Designing potential energy functions for protein folding. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1999;9:184-188.
27. Miyazawa S, Jernigan RL. Evaluation of short-range interactions as secondary structure energies for protein fold and sequence recognition. Proteins 199936:347-356.
28. Bahar I, Kaplan M, Jernigan RL. Short-range conformational energies, secondary structure propensities, and recognition of correct sequence-structure matches. Proteins 1997;29:292-308.
29. Miyazawa S, Jernigan RL. Identifying sequence-structure pairs undetected by sequence alignments. Protein Eng 2000;13:459-475.
30. Miyazawa S, Jernigan RL. Long- and short-range interactions in native protein structures are consistent/minimally frustrated in sequence space. Proteins 2003;50:35-43.
31. Miyazawa S, Jernigan RL. How effective for fold recognition is a potential of mean force that includes relative orientations between contacting residues in proteins? J Chem Phys 2005;22: 024901.
32. Pokarowski P, Kloczkowski A, Jernigan RL, Kothari NS, Pokarowska M, Kolinski A. Inferring ideal amino acid interaction forms from statistical protein contact potentials. Proteins 2005;59:49-57.
33. Vendruscolo M, Najmanovich R Domany E. Can a pairwise contact potentials stabilize native protein folds against decoys obtained by threading? Proteins 2000;38:134-148.
34. Cater CW, Jr, LeFebvre BC, Cammer SA, Tropsha A, Edgell MH. Four-body potentials reveal protein-specific correlations to stability changes caused by hydrophobic core mutations. J Mol Biol 2001;311:625-638.
35. Betancourt MR, Thirumalai D. Pair potentials for protein folding: choice of reference states and sensitivity of predicted native states to variations in the interaction schemes. Protein Sci 1999;8:361-369.
36. Munson PJ, Singh RK. Statistical significance of hierarchical multi-body potentials based on Delaunay tessellation and their application in sequence-structure alignment. Protein Sci 1997;6:1467-1481.
37. Li X, Liang J. Geometric cooperativity and anticooperativity of three-body interactions in native proteins. Proteins 2005;60: 46-65.
38. Krishnamoorthy B, Tropsha A. Development of a four-body statistical pseudo-potential to discriminate native from nonnative protein conformations. Bioinformatics 2003;19:1540-1548.
39. Spassov VZ, Yan L, Flook PK. The dominant role of side-chain backbone interactions in structural realization of amino acid code. ChiRotor: A side-chain prediction algorithm based on side-chain backbone interactions. Protein Sci 2007;16:1-13.
40. Wang G, Dunbrack RL, Jr. PISCES: a protein sequence culling server. Bioinformatics 2003;19:1589-1591.
41. Cuff JA, Barton GJ. Evaluation and improvement of multiple sequence methods for protein secondary structure prediction. Proteins: Struct FunctGenet 1999;34:508-519.
42. Pearson WR, Lipman DJ. Improved tools for biological sequence comparison. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1988;85:2444-2448.
43. Laskowski RA, MacArthur MW, Moss DS, Thornton JM. PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J Appl Cryst 1993;26:283-291.
44. Hubbard SJ, Thornton JM. NACCESS, Computer Program, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University College London, London; 1993.
45. Samudrala R, Levitt M. Decoys 'R' Us: a database of incorrect conformations to improve protein structure prediction. Protein Sci 2000;9:1399-1401.
46. Simon KT, Bonneau R, Ruczinski I, Baker D. Ab Initio protein structure prediction of CASPIII targets using ROSETTA. Proteins: Struct Funct Genet 1999;3:171-176. Also available at http://depts.washington.edu/bakerpg/decoys/