Response-to-intervention (RTI) as a model to facilitate inclusion for students with learning and behaviour problems

European Journal of Special Needs Education

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 254-269

  Grosche, Michael ^a   Volpe, Robert J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

^b NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

emotional behavioural disorders; intervention; learning disabilities; prevention; response to intervention

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT; ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR DISORDER; CURRICULUM; DECISION MAKING; DISABLED STUDENT; DYSLEXIA; EARLY INTERVENTION; EDUCATION; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HUMAN; LEADERSHIP; LEARNING DISORDER; MODEL; PARENT; POSITIVE FEEDBACK; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOLOGIST; READING; RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION MODEL; SELF CARE; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SPECIAL EDUCATION; TEACHER;

EID: 84880035314     PISSN: 08856257     EISSN: 1469591X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08856257.2013.768452     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Ardoin, S. P., Witt, J. C., Connell, J. E. and Koenig, J. L. 2005. Application of a Three-Tiered Response to Intervention Model for Instructional Planning, Decision Making, and the Identification of Children in Needs of Services. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23: 280 - 362.
2. Avramidis, E. and Norwich, B. 2002. Teachers' Attitudes Towards Integration/Inclusion: A Review of the Literature. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 17: 129 - 147.
3. Barnett, D. W., Daly, E. J., Jones, K. M. and Lentz, F. E. 2004. Response to Intervention: Empirically Based Special Service Decisions from Single-Case Designs of Increasing and Decreasing Intensity. Journal of Special Education, 38: 66 - 79.
4. Barnett, D. W., Elliot, N., Wolsing, L., Bunger, C. E., Haski, H., McKissick, C. and Vander Meer, C. D. 2006. Response to Intervention for Young Children with Extremely Challenging Behaviors: What it Might Look Like. School Psychology Review, 35: 568 - 582.
5. Batsche, G. M., Kavale, K. A. and Kovaleski, J. F. 2006. Competing Views: A Dialogue on Response to Intervention. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 32: 6 - 19.
6. Berkeley, S., Bender, W. N., Peaster, L. G. and Saunders, L. 2009. Implementation of Response to Intervention: A Snapshot of Progress. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42: 85 - 95.
7. Blum, C. and Bakken, J. P. 2010. " Labeling of Students with Disabilities: Unwanted and Not Needed ". In Current Issues and Trends in Special Education: Identification, Assessment and Instruction, Edited by: Obiakor, F. E., Bakken, J. P. and Rotatori, A. F. 115 - 125. Bingley: Emerald.
8. Brown-Chidsey, R. and Steege, M. W. 2005. Response to Intervention. Principles and Strategies for Effective Practice, New York, NY: Guilford Press.
9. Bryant, D. P., Bryant, B. R., Gersten, R. M., Scammacca, N., Funk, C., Winter, A. Shih, M. 2008. The Effects of Tier 2 Intervention on the Mathematics Performance of First-Grade Students Who are at Risk for Mathematics Difficulties. Learning Disability Quarterly, 31: 47 - 63.
10. Burns, M. K., Appleton, J. J. and Stehouwer, J. D. 2005. Meta-Analytic Review of Responsiveness-to-Intervention Research: Examining Field-Based and Research-Implemented Models. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23: 381 - 394.
11. Burns, M. K., Deno, S. L. and Jimerson, S. R. 2007. " Toward a Unified Response-to-Intervention Model ". In Handbook of Response to Intervention, Edited by: Jimerson, S. R., Burns, M. K. and VanDerHeyden, A. M. 428 - 440. New York, NY: Springer.
12. Chafouleas, S. M., Riley-Tillman, T. C. and Christ, T. J. 2009. Direct Behavior Rating (DBR): An Emerging Method for Assessing Social Behavior within a Tiered Intervention System. Special issue. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 34: 195 - 258.
13. Chang, L. 2003. Variable Effects of Children's Aggression, Social Withdrawal, and Prosocial Leadership as Functions of Teacher Beliefs and Behaviors. Child Development, 74: 535 - 548.
14. Cheney, D., Flower, A. and Templeton, T. 2008. Applying Response to Intervention Metrics in the Social Domain for Students at Risk of Developing Emotional and Behavioral Disorders. Journal of Special Education, 42: 108 - 126.
15. Christ, T. J. 2008. " Best Practices in Problem Analysis ". In Best Practices in School Psychology, Edited by: Thomas, A. and Grimes, J. 159 - 176. Bethesda, MD: NASP.
16. Cummings, K. D., Atkins, T., Allison, R. and Cole, C. 2008. Response to Intervention. Investigating the New Role of Special Educators. Teaching Exceptional Children, 40: 24 - 31.
17. Denton, C. A., Fletcher, J. M., Anthony, J. L. and Francis, D. J. 2006. An Evaluation of Intensive Intervention for Students with Persistent Reading Difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39: 447 - 466.
18. Denton, C. A., Vaughn, S. and Fletcher, J. M. 2003. Bringing Research-Based Practice in Reading Intervention to Scale. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18: 201 - 211.
19. European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education. 2010. Special Needs Education Country Data 2010, Odense: European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education.
20. European Union. 2011. EU Ratifies UN Convention on Disability Rights. http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/11/4.
21. Fairbanks, S., Sugai, G., Guardino, D. and Lathrop, M. 2007. Response to Intervention: Examining Classroom Behavior Support in Second Grade. Exceptional Children, 73: 288 - 310.
22. Ferri, B. A. 2012. Undermining Inclusion? A Critical Reading of Response to Intervention (RTI). International Journal of Inclusive Education, 16: 863 - 880.
23. Fletcher, J. M. and Vaughn, S. 2009. Response to Intervention: Preventing and Remediating Academic Difficulties. Child Development Perspectives, 3: 30 - 37.
24. Frattura, E. and Capper, C. A. 2006. Segregated Programs versus Integrated Comprehensive Service Delivery for all Learners. Remedial and Special Education, 27: 355 - 364.
25. Fuchs, D., Compton, D. L., Fuchs, L. S., Bryant, J. D. and Davis, G. N. 2008. Making "Secondary Intervention" Work in a Three-Tier Responsiveness-to-Intervention Model: Findings from the First-Grade Longitudinal Reading Study of the National Research Center on Learning Disabilities. Reading and Writing, 21: 413 - 436.
26. Fuchs, L. S., Compton, D. L., Fuchs, D., Paulsen, K., Bryant, J. D. and Hamlett, C. L. 2005. The Prevention, Identification, and Cognitive Determinants of Math Difficulty. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97: 493 - 513.
27. Fuchs, D. and Fuchs, L. S. 2006. Introduction to Response to Intervention: What, Why, and How Valid is it?. Reading Research Quarterly, 1: 93 - 99.
28. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Craddock, C., Hollenbeck, K. N., Hamlett, C. L. and Schatschneider, C. 2008. Effects of Small-Group Tutoring with and without Validated Classroom Instruction on at-Risk Students' Math Problem Solving: Are Two Tiers of Prevention Better than One?. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100: 491 - 509.
29. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S. and Stecker, P. M. 2010. The "Blurring" of Special Education in a New Continuum of General Education Placements and Services. Exceptional Children, 76: 301 - 323.
30. Fuchs, D., Mock, D., Morgan, P. L. and Young, C. L. 2003. Responsiveness-to-Intervention: Definitions, Evidence, and Implications for the Learning Disabilities Construct. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18: 157 - 171.
31. Gresham, F. M. 2007. Response to Intervention and Emotional and Behavioral Disorders. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 32: 214 - 222.
32. Hawken, L. S., Vincent, C. G. and Schumann, J. 2008. Response to Intervention for Social Behavior. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 16: 213 - 225.
33. Hoover, J. J. and Patton, J. R. 2008. The Role of Special Educators in a Multitiered Instructional System. Intervention in School and Clinic, 43: 195 - 202.
34. Jimerson, S. R., Burns, M. K. and VanDerHyden, A. M. 2007. " Response to Intervention at School: The Science and Practice of Assessment and Intervention ". In Handbook of Response to Intervention, Edited by: Jimerson, S. R., Burns, M. K. and VanDerHeyden, A. M. 3 - 9. New York, NY: Springer.
35. Kamphaus, R. W., DiStefano, C., Dowdy, E., Eklund, K. and Dunn, A. 2010. Determining the Presence of a Problem: Comparing Two Approaches for Detecting Youth Behavioral Risk. School Psychology Review, 39: 395 - 407.
36. Kauffman, J. M., Bruce, A. and Lloyd, J. W. 2012. " Response to Intervention (RtI) and Students with Emotional and Behavioral Disorders ". In Behavioral Disorders: Practice Concerns and Students with EBD, Edited by: Bakken, J. P., Obiakor, F. E. and Rotatori, A. F. 107 - 128. Bingley: Emerald.
37. Kavale, K. A. 2002. Mainstreaming to Full Inclusion: From Orthogenesis to Pathogenesis of an Idea. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 49: 201 - 214.
38. Kovaleski, J. F. 2007. " Potential Pitfalls of Response to Intervention ". In Handbook of Response to Intervention, Edited by: Jimerson, S. R., Burns, M. K. and VanDerHeyden, A. M. 80 - 89. New York, NY: Springer.
39. Lackaye, T. D. and Margalit, M. 2006. Comparisons of Achievement, Effort, and Self-Perceptions among Students with Learning Disabilities and their Peers from Different Achievement Groups. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39: 432 - 446.
40. Landrum, T. J., Tankersley, M. and Kauffman, J. M. 2003. What is Special about Special Education for Students with Emotional or Behavioral Disorders?. Journal of Special Education, 37: 148 - 156.
41. Le Fevre, D. and Richardson, V. 2002. Staff Development in Early Reading Intervention Programs: The Facilitator. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18: 483 - 500.
42. Lewis, T. J., Jones, S. E. L., Horner, R. H. and Sugai, G. 2010. School-Wide Positive Behavior Support and Students with Emotional/Behavioral Disorders: Implications for Prevention, Identification and Intervention. Exceptionality, 18: 82 - 93.
43. Machek, G. R. and Nelson, J. M. 2010. School Psychologists' Perceptions Regarding the Practice of Identifying Reading Disabilities: Cognitive Assessment and Response to Intervention Considerations. Psychology in the Schools, 47: 230 - 245.
44. McIntosh, K., Frank, J. L. and Spaulding, S. A. 2010. Establishing Research-Based Trajectories of Office Discipline Referrals for Individual Students. School Psychology Review, 39: 380 - 394.
45. McLeskey, J. and Waldron, M. 2011. Educational Programs for Elementary Students with Learning Disabilites: Can they be both Effective and Inclusive?. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 26: 48 - 57.
46. Nilholm, C. 2006. Special Education, Inclusion and Democracy. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 2: 431 - 445.
47. Norwich, B. 2008. What Future for Special Schools and Inclusion? Conceptual and Professional Perspectives. British Journal of Special Education, 35: 136 - 143.
48. Pelham, W. E., Fabiano, G. A. and Massetti, G. M. 2005. Evidence-Based Assessment of ADHD in Children and Adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 34: 449 - 476.
49. Reynolds, C. R. and Shaywitz, S. E. 2009. Response to Intervention: Prevention and Remediaton, Perhaps. Diagnosis, No Child Development Perspectives, 3: 44 - 47.
50. Scruggs, T. E. and Mastropieri, M. A. 1996. Teacher Perceptions of Mainstreaming/Inclusion, 1958-1996: A Research Synthesis. Exceptional Children, 63: 59 - 74.
51. Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A. and McDuffie, K. A. 2007. Co-Teaching in Inclusive Classrooms: A Metasynthesis of Qualitative Research. Exceptional Children, 73: 392 - 416.
52. Severson, H. H., Walker, H. M., Hope-Doolittle, J., Kratochwill, T. R. and Gresham, F. M. 2007. Proactive, Early Screening to Detect Behaviorally at-Risk Students: Issues, Approaches, Emerging Innovations, and Professional Practices. Journal of School Psychology, 45: 193 - 223.
53. Shinn, M. R. 2007a. Identifying Students at Risk, Monitoring Performance, and Determining Eligibility within Response to Intervention: Research on Educational Need and Benefit from Academic Intervention. School Psychology Review, 36: 601 - 617.
54. Shinn, M. R. 2007b. " Using Curriculum-Based Measurement in a Problem-Solving Model ". In Best Practices in School Psychology, Edited by: Thomas, A. and Grimes, J. Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
55. Stanovich, K. E. 2005. The Future of a Mistake: Will Discrepancy Measurement Continue to make the Learning Disabilities Field a Pseudoscience?. Learning Disability Quarterly, 28: 103 - 106.
56. Sugai, G. and Horner, R. H. 2009. Responsiveness-to-Intervention and School-Wide Positive Behavior Supports. Exceptionality, 17: 223 - 237.
57. Talmor, R., Reiter, S. and Feigin, N. 2005. Factors Relating to Regular Education Teacher Burnout in Inclusive Education. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 20: 215 - 229.
58. Torgesen, J. K., Alexander, A. W., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C., Voeller, K. K. S. and Conway, T. 2001. Intensive Remedial Instruction for Children with Severe Reading Disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34: 33 - 58.
59. Tran, L., Sanchez, T., Arellano, B. and Swanson, H. L. 2011. A Meta-Analysis of the RTI Literature for Children at Risk for Reading Disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44: 283 - 295.
60. VanDerHeyden, A. M., Witt, J. C. and Gilbertson, D. 2007. A Multi-Year Evaluation of the Effects of a Response to Intervention (RTI) Model on Identification of Children for Special Education. Journal of School Psychology, 45: 225 - 256.
61. Vaughn, S. and Fuchs, L. S. 2003. Redefining Learning Disabilities as Inadequate Response to Instruction: The Promise and Potential Problems. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18: 137 - 146.
62. Vaughn, S., Linan-Thompson, S. and Hickman, P. 2003. Response to Instruction as a Means of Identifying Students with Reading/Learning Disabilities. Exceptional Children, 69: 391 - 409.
63. Vaughn, S., Wanzek, J., Linan-Thompson, S. and Murray, C. S. 2007. " Monitoring Response to Supplemental Services for Students at Risk for Reading Difficulties: High and Low Responders ". In Handbook of Response to Intervention, Edited by: Jimerson, S. R., Burns, M. K. and VanDerHeyden, A. M. 234 - 243. New York, NY: Springer.
64. Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., Sipay, E. R., Small, S. G., Pratt, A., Chen, R. and Denckla, M. B. 1996. Cognitive Profiles of Difficult-to-Remediate and Readily Remediated Poor Readers: Early Intervention as a Vehicle for Distinguishing between Cognitive and Experiential Deficits as Basic Causes of Specific Reading Disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88: 601 - 638.
65. Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., Small, S. G. and Fanuele, D. P. 2006. Response to Intervention as a Vehicle for Distinguishing between Children with and without Reading Disabilities: Evidence for the Role of Kindergarten and First-Grade Interventions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39: 157 - 169.
66. Volpe, R. J. and Briesch, A. M. 2012. An Investigation of the Generalizability and Dependability of Single Item and Multiple Item Direct Behavior Rating Scales. School Psychology Review, 41: 246 - 261.
67. Volpe, R. J., Briesch, A. M. and Chafouleas, S. M. 2010. Linking Screening for Emotional and Behavioral Problems to Problem-Solving Efforts: An Adaptive Model of Behavioral Assessment. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 35: 240 - 244.
68. Volpe, R. J., Burns, M. K., DuBois, M. and Zaslofsky, A. F. 2011. Computer-Assisted Tutoring: Teaching Letter Sounds to Kindergarten Students using Incremental Rehearsal. Psychology in the Schools, 48: 332 - 342.
69. Volpe, R. J. and Fabiano, G. A. 2013. Daily Behavior Report Cards, New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
70. Volpe, R. J. and Gadow, K. D. 2010. Creating Abbreviated Rating Scales to Monitor Classroom Inattention-Overactivity, Aggression, and Peer Conflict: Reliability, Validity, and Treatment Sensitivity. School Psychology Review, 39: 350 - 363.
71. Wanzek, J. and Vaughn, S. 2008. Response to Varying Amounts of Time in Reading Intervention for Students with Low Response to Intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41: 126 - 142.
72. World Health Organization. 2011. World Report on Disability, Geneva: WHO Press.
73. Zigmond, N., Kloo, A. and Volonino, V. 2009. What, Where, and How? Special Education in the Climate of Full Inclusion. Exceptionality, 17: 189 - 204.