Response to varying amounts of time in reading intervention for students with low response to intervention

Journal of Learning Disabilities

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 126-142

  Wanzek, Jeanne ^a   Vaughn, Sharon ^b  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Learning disabilities; Reading intervention; Response to intervention

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; DYSLEXIA; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING DISORDER; MALE; METHODOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; READING; TEACHING; TIME;

CHILD; DEMOGRAPHY; DYSLEXIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING DISORDERS; MALE; READING; TEACHING; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 42249099318     PISSN: 00222194     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0022219407313426     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Al Otaiba, S., & Fuchs, D. (2002). Characteristics of children who are unresponsive to early literacy intervention: A review of the literature. Remedial and Special Education, 23, 300-316.
2. Al Otaiba, S., & Fuchs, D. (2006). Who are the young children for whom best practices in reading are ineffective?: An experimental and longitudinal study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 441-431.
3. Barnett, D.W., Daly, E.J., Jones, K.M., & Lentz, F.E. (2004). Response to intervention: Empirically based special service decisions from single-case designs of increasing and decreasing intensity. Journal of Special Education, 38, 66-79.
4. Berninger, V.W., Abbott, R.D., Vermeulen, K., Ogier, S., Brooksher, R., Zook, D., et al. (2002). Comparison of faster and slower responders to early intervention in reading: Differentiating features of their language profiles. Learning Disability Quarterly, 25, 59-76.
5. Biancarosa, G., & Snow, C.E. (2004). Reading Next: A vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy. A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellence in Education.
6. Carnine, D.W., Silbert, J., Kame'enui, E.J., & Tarver, S.G. (2004). Direct instruction reading (4 th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill / Prentice Hall.
7. Donovan, M. S., & Cross, C. T. (Eds.). (2002). Minority students in special and gifted education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
8. Dunn, L.M., & Dunn, L.M. (1997). Peabody picture vocabulary test (3 rd ed.). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
9. Elbaum, B., Vaughn, S., Hughes, M.T., & Moody, S.W. (2000). How effective are one-to-one tutoring programs in reading for elementary students at-risk for reading failure? A meta-analysis of the intervention research. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 605-619.
10. Foorman, B.R., Francis, D.J., Fletcher, J.M., Schatschneider, C., & Mehta, P. (1998). The role of instruction in learning to read: Preventing reading failure in at-risk children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 37-55.
11. Fuchs, D., Mock, D., Morgan, P.L., & Young, C.L. (2003). Responsiveness-to-intervention: Definitions, evidence, and implications for the learning disabilities construct. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18, 157-171.
12. Good, R.H., & Kaminski, R.A. (2002). Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (6 th ed.). Eugene, OR: Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement.
13. Hammill, D. (2004). What we know about correlates of reading. Exceptional Children, 70, 453-468.
14. Howell, D.C. (1992). Statistical methods for psychology. Boston: PWS-Kent.
15. Ikeda, M.J., Tilly, W.D., III, Stumme, J., Volmer, L., & Allison, R. (1996). Agency-wide implementation of problem solving consultation: Foundations, current implementation, and future directions. School Psychology Quarterly, 11, 228-243.
16. Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. 1400 et. seq. (2004).
17. Lovett, M., Borden, L., DeLuca, T., Lacarenza, L., Benson, N., & Brackstone, D. (1994). Treating core deficits of developmental dyslexia: Evidence of transfer of learning after phonologically- and strategy-based reading training programs. Developmental Psychology, 30, 805-822.
18. Lovett, M.W., Steinbach, K.A., & Frijters, J.C. (2000). Remediating the core deficits of developmental reading disability: A double-deficit perspective. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 334-358.
19. Marston, D., Muyskens, P., Lau, M., & Canter, A. (2003). Problem-solving model for decision-making with high-incidence disabilities: The Minneapolis experience. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18 (3). 186-200.
20. Mathes, P.G., Denton, C.A., Fletcher, J.M., Anthony, J.L., Francis, D.J., & Schatschneider, C. (2005). The effects of theoretically different instruction and student characteristics on the skills of struggling readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 148-182.
21. McMaster, K.L., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L.S., & Compton, D.L. (2005). Responding to nonresponders: An experimental field trial of identification and intervention methods. Exceptional Children, 71, 445-463.
22. National Center for Education Statistics. (2005). National assessment of educational progress. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved August 11, 2005, from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/ltt/results2004/natreadinginfo.asp
23. National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups. Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
24. Rand Reading Study Group. (2002). Reading for understanding. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation. Available from http://www.rand.org/multi/ achievementforall/
25. Snow, C.E., Burns, M.S., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
26. Swanson, H.L. (1999). Reading research for students with LD: A meta-analysis in intervention outcomes Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 504-532.
27. Swanson, H.L., Trainin, G., Necoechea, D.M., & Hammill, D.D. (2003). Rapid naming, phonological awareness, and reading: A meta-analysis of the correlation evidence. Review of Educational Research, 73, 407-440.
28. Torgesen, J.K. (2000). Individual differences in response to early interventions in reading: The lingering problem of treatment resisters. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 15, 55-64.
29. Torgesen, J.K., Alexander, A.W., Wagner, R.K., Rashotte, C.A., Voeller, K.K.S., & Conway, T. (2001). Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities: Immediate and long-term outcomes from two instructional approaches. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 33-58.
30. Torgesen, J.K., Wagner, R.K., & Rashotte, C.A. (1997). Contributions of phonological awareness and rapid automatic naming ability to the growth of word-reading skills in second- to fifth-grade children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1, 161-185.
31. Torgesen, J.K., Wagner, R.K., Rashotte, C.A., Rose, E., Lindamood, P., Conway, T., et al. (1999). Preventing reading failure in young children with phonological processing disabilities: Group and individual responses to instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 579-593.
32. Vadasy, P.F., Sanders, E.A., Peyton, J.A., & Jenkins, J.R. (2002). Timing and intensity of tutoring: A closer look at the conditions for effective early literacy tutoring. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 17, 227-241.
33. Vaughn, S., Gersten, R., & Chard, D.J. (2000). The underlying message in LD intervention research: Findings from research syntheses. Exceptional Children, 67, 99-114.
34. Vaughn, S., Linan-Thompson, S., Elbaum, B., Wanzek, J., Rodriguez, K.T., Cavanaugh, C.L. et al. (2004). Centers for implementing K-3 behavior and reading intervention models preventing reading difficulties: A three-tiered intervention model. Unpublished report, University of Texas Center for Reading and Language Arts.
35. Vaughn, S., Linan-Thompson, S., & Hickman, P. (2003). Response to instruction as a means of identifying students with reading/learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 69, 391-409.
36. Vaughn, S., Linan-Thompson, S., Kouzekanani, K., Bryant, D.P., Dickson, S., & Blozis, S.A. (2003). Reading instruction grouping for students with reading difficulties. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 301-315.
37. Vaughn, S., Linan-Thompson, S., Murray, C.S., Woodruff, T., Wanzek, J., Scammacca, N., et al. (in press). High and low responders to early reading intervention: Response to intervention Exceptional Children.
38. Vaughn, S., Wanzek, J., Woodruff, A.L., & Linan-Thompson, S. (2007). A three-tier model for preventing reading difficulties and early identification of students with reading disabilities. In D. H. Haager, S. Vaughn, & J. K. Klingner (Eds), Validated reading practices for three tiers of intervention (pp. 11-27). Baltimore: Brookes.
39. Vellutino, F.R., & Scanlon, D.M. (2002). The interactive strategies approach to reading intervention. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 573-635.
40. Vellutino, F.R., Scanlon, D.M., Sipay, E.R., Small, S.G., Pratt, A., Chen, R., et al. (1996). Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 601-638.
41. Wise, B.W., Ring, J., & Olson, R.K. (1999). Training phonological awareness with and without explicit attention to articulation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 72, 271-304.
42. Wolf, M., & Bowers, P.G. (1999). The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexias. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 415-438.
43. Woodcock, R.W. (1987). Woodcock Reading Mastery Test-Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
44. Woodcock, R.W., & Johnson, M.B. (1977). Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery. Allen, TX: DLM Teaching Resources.