Learner Acceptance of a Multimedia-Based Learning System

International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction

Volumn 29, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 419-437

  Lee, Doo Young ^a   Ryu, Hokyoung ^a  

^a Hanyang University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL INTENTION; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS; MULTIMEDIA PRESENTATION; MULTIMEDIA-BASED LEARNING; PERCEIVED USEFULNESS; SECOND-ORDER CONSTRUCTS; STRUCTURAL EQUATION ANALYSIS; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL;

MULTIMEDIA SERVICES;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 84877846274     PISSN: 10447318     EISSN: 15327590     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10447318.2012.715278     Document Type: Article

References (153)

1. Agarwal, R. and Karahanna, E. 2000. Time files when you're having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly, 24: 665-694.
2. Agarwal, R. and Prasad, J. 1997. The role of innovation characteristics and perceived voluntariness in the acceptance of information technologies. Decision Sciences, 28: 557-582.
3. Agarwal, R., Sambamurthy, V. and Stair, R.M. 2000. Research report: The evolving relationship between general and specific computer self-efficacy: An empirical assessment. Information Systems Research, 11: 418-430.
4. Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M. 1980. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
5. Allen, M., Bourhis, J., Burrell, N. and Mabry, E. 2002. Comparing student satisfaction with distance education to traditional classrooms in higher education: A meta-analysis. The American Journal of Distance Education, 16: 83-97.
6. Anderson, J. C. and Gerbing, D. W. 1988. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103: 411-423.
7. Armitage, C. J. and Conner, M. 2001. Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40: 471-499.
8. Arnone, H. P., Small, R. V., Chauncey, S. A. and McKenna, H. P. 2011. Curiosity, interest and engagement in technology-pervasive learning environments: A new research agenda. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59: 181-198.
9. Baggio, B. G. 2010. " Creating supportive multimedia learning environments ". In Handbook of research on human performance and instructional technology, Edited by: Song, H. and Kidd, T. 88-103. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
10. Bandura, A. 1986. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
11. Bandura, A. 1997. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control, New York, NY: W.H. Freeman.
12. Barnes, S. J. 2011. Understanding use continuance in virtual worlds: Empirical test of a research model. Information & Management, 48: 303-312.
13. Bearden, W. O. and Netemeyer, R. G. 1999. Handbook of marketing scales: Multi-item measures for marketing and consumer behavior research, 2nd Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
14. Bem, D. J. 1972. " Self-perception theory ". In Advances in experimental social psychology, Edited by: Berkowitz, L. 1-62. New York, NY: Academic Press.
15. Bentler, P. M. 1990. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107: 238-246.
16. Bentler, P. M. and Bonett, D. G. 1980. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88: 588-606.
17. Berge, Z. L. 2002. Active, interactive, and reflective e-learning. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 3: 181-190.
18. Bowen, N. K. and Guo, S. 2011. Structural equation modeling, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
19. Browne, M. W. and Cudeck, R. 1993. " Alternative ways of assessing model fit ". In Testing structural equation models, Edited by: Bollen, K. A. and Long, J. S. 136-162. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
20. Carmines, E. G. and Zeller, R. A. 1979. Reliability and validity assessment, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
21. Chang, H. H. and Wang, I. C. 2008. An investigation of user communication behavior in computer mediated environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 24: 2336-2356.
22. Chang, S.-C. and Tung, F.-C. 2008. An empirical investigation of students' behavioural intentions to use the online learning course websites. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39: 71-83.
23. Chapman, P., Selvarajah, S. and Webster, J. 1999. " Engagement in multimedia training systems ". In Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-32), Edited by: Sprague, R. H. 1-9. New York, NY: IEEE.
24. Chau, P. Y. K. 1996. An empirical assessment of a modified technology acceptance model. Journal of Management Information Systems, 13: 185-204.
25. Chau, P. Y. K. and Hu, P. J.-H. 2001. Information technology acceptance by individual professionals: A model comparison approach. Decision Science, 32: 699-719.
26. Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L. and Newsted, P. N. 2003. A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a monte carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Information Systems Research, 14: 189-217.
27. Chou, C. 2003. Interactivity and interactive functions in web-based learning systems: A technical framework for designers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34: 265-279.
28. Christoph, R., Schoenfeld, G. and Tansky, J. 1998. Overcoming barriers to training utilizing technology: The influence of self-efficacy factors on multimedia-based training receptiveness. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 9: 25-38.
29. Clark, J. M. and Paivio, A. 1991. Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3: 149-210.
30. Clark, R. C. and Mayer, R. E. 2003. E-learning and the science of instruction, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
31. Compeau, D. R. and Higgins, C. A. 1995. Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19: 189-211.
32. Conner, M. and Armitage, C. J. 1998. Extending the theory of planned behavior: A review and avenue for further research. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28: 1429-1464.
33. Csikszentmihalyi, M. 1990. Flow: The psychology of optimal experience, New York, NY: Harpers Perennial.
34. Culpan, O. 1995. Attitudes of end-users towards information technology in manufacturing and service industries. Information & Management, 28: 167-176.
35. Daft, R. L. and Lengel, R. H. 1986. Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32: 554-571.
36. Davies, C. H. J. 2002. Student engagement with simulations: A case study. Computers & Education, 39: 271-282.
37. Davis, F. D. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13: 319-340.
38. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P. and Warshaw, P. R. 1992. Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22: 1111-1132.
39. Davis, F. D. 1993. User acceptance of information technology: System characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 38 (3): 475-487.
40. DeVellis, R.F. 2003. Scale development: Theory and applications, 2nd, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
41. Dillon, A. and Morris, M.G. 1996. User acceptance of information technology: Theories and models. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 31: 3-32.
42. Doll, W. J., Xia, W. and Torkzadeh, G. 1994. A confirmation of factor analysis of the end-user computer satisfaction instrument. MIS Quarterly, 18: 453-461.
43. Domagk, S., Schwartz, R. N. and Plass, J. L. 2010. Interactivity in multimedia learning: An integrated model. Computers in Human Behavior, 26: 1024-1033.
44. Downes, J. and McMillan, S. 2000. Defining interactivity: A qualitative identification of key dimensions. New Media and Society, 2: 157-179.
45. Etezadi-Amoli, J. and Farhoomand, A.F. 1996. A structural model of end user computing satisfaction and user performance. Information & Management, 30: 65-73.
46. Fagan, M. H., Neill, S. and Wooldridge, B. R. 2003. An empirical investigation into the relationship between computer self-efficacy, anxiety, experience, support and usage. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 44: 95-104.
47. Festinger, L. 1976. A theory of cognitive dissonance, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
48. Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. 1975. Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
49. Fornell, C. and Larcker, D. F. 1981. Evaluating structural equations with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18: 39-50.
50. Gefen, D., Straub, D. W. and Boudreau, M. 2000. Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4 (7): 1-79.
51. Gist, M. E. 1987. Self-efficacy: Implications for organizational behavior and human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 12: 472-485.
52. Greene, B. and Miller, R. 1996. Influences on achievement: Goals, perceived ability, and cognitive engagement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21: 181-192.
53. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L. and Black, W. C. 1998. Multivariate data analysis, 5th, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
54. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E. and Tatham, R. L. 2006. Multivariate data analysis, 6th, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
55. Harris, O. J. and Hartman, S. J. 2002. Organizational behavior, 2nd, New York, NY: Best Business.
56. Hasan, B. 2006. Delineating the effects of general and system-specific computer self-efficacy beliefs on is acceptance. Information & Management, 43: 565-571.
57. Hill, T., Smith, N. D. and Mann, M. F. 1987. Role of efficacy expectations in predicting the decision to use advanced technologies: The case of computers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72: 307-313.
58. Hoffman, D. L. and Novak, T. P. 1996. Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: Conceptual foundations. Journal of Marketing, 60: 50-68.
59. Hoogeveen, M. 1997. Toward a theory of the effectiveness of multimedia systems. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 9: 151-168.
60. Hsu, M. K., Wang, S. W. and Chiu, K. K. 2009. Computer attitude, statistics anxiety and self-efficacy on statistical software adoption behavior: An empirical study of online MBA learners. Computers in Human Behavior, 25: 412-420.
61. Igbaria, M. and Iivari, J. 1995. The effects of self-efficacy on computer usage. International Journal of Management Science, 23: 587-605.
62. Jablon, J. and Wilkinson, M. 2006. Using engagement strategies to facilitate children's learning and success. Young Children, 61 (2): 12-16.
63. Jacques, R., Preece, J. and Carey, T. 1995. Engagement as a design concept for multimedia. Canadian Journal of Educational Communication, 24 (1): 49-59.
64. Jonassen, D. H., McAleese, T. M. R. and Duffy, T. M. 1993. " A Manifesto for a constructivist approach to technology in higher education ". In The design of constructivistic learning environments: Implications for instructional design and the use of technology, Edited by: Duffy, T. M., Lowyck, J. and Jonassen, D. H. 231-247. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
65. Joo, Y. J., Lim, K. Y. and Kim, E. K. 2011. Online university students' satisfaction and persistence: Examining perceived level of presence, usefulness and ease of use as predictors in a structural model. Computers & Education, 57: 1654-1664.
66. Karaali, D., Gumussoy, C. A. and Calisir, F. 2011. Factors affecting the intention to use a web-based learning system among blue-collar workers in the automotive industry. Computers in Human Behavior, 27: 343-354.
67. Kearsley, G. and Shneiderman, B. 1998. Engagement theory: A framework for technology-based teaching and learning. Educational Technology, 38 (5): 20-23.
68. Keller, J. M. 1983. " Motivational design of instruction ". In Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current status, Edited by: Reigeluth, C. M. 383-434. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
69. Kennedy, G. E. 2004. Promoting cognition in multimedia interactivity research. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 15: 43-61.
70. Kettanurak, V., Ramamurthy, K. and Haseman, W. D. 2001. User attitude as a mediator of learning performance improvement in an interactive multimedia environment: An empirical investigation of the degree of interactivity and learning styles. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 54: 541-583.
71. Kim, D. J., Steinfield, C. and Whitten, P. 2009. The effects of different presentation modalities on a person identification task: A study of wireless multimedia PDA use in a security context. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 25: 134-154.
72. Kinzie, M. B., Delcourt, M. A. B. and Powers, S. M. 1994. Computer technologies: Attitudes and self-efficacy across undergraduate disciplines. Research in Higher Education, 35: 745-768.
73. Kiousis, S. 2002. Interactivity: A concept explication. New Media & Society, 4: 271-291.
74. Kock, N., Verville, J. and Garza, V. 2007. Media naturalness and online learning: Findings supporting both the significant-and no-significant-difference perspectives. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 5: 333-355.
75. Kunnan, A. J. 1998. An introduction to structural equation modeling for language assessment research. Language Testing, 15: 295-332.
76. LaRose, R. and Atkin, D. 1991. Attributes of movie distribution channels and consumer choice. Journal of Media Economics, 4: 3-17.
77. Law, K. M. Y., Lee, V. C. S. and Yu, Y. T. 2010. Learning motivation in e-learning facilitated computer programming courses. Computers & Education, 55: 218-228.
78. Lee, D. Y. and Shin, D.-H. 2011. Effects of spatial ability and richness of motion cue on learning in mechanically complex domain. Computers in Human Behavior, 27: 1665-1674.
79. Lee, M. K. O., Cheung, C. M. K. and Chen, Z. 2005. Acceptance of internet-based learning medium: The role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. Information & Management, 42: 1095-1104.
80. Lei, M. and Lomax, R. G. 2005. The effect of varying degrees of non-normality in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 12: 1-27.
81. Liaw, S.-S. 2002. An Internet survey for perceptions of computers and the World Wide Web: Relationship, prediction, and difference. Computers in Human Behavior, 18: 17-35.
82. Liaw, S.-S. 2008. Investigating students' perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: A case study of the blackboard system. Computers & Education, 51: 864-873.
83. Lin, B. and Hsieh, C.-T. 2001. Web-based teaching and learner control: A research review. Computers & Education, 37: 377-386.
84. Liu, S.-H., Liao, H-L. and Pratt, J. A. 2009. Impact of media richness and flow on e-learning technology acceptance. Computers and Education, 52: 599-607.
85. Liu, X. 2010. Empirical testing of a theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: An exploratory study of educational Wikis. Communication Education, 59: 52-69.
86. Mardia, K. V. 1970. Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika, 57: 519-530.
87. Mayer, R. E. 2005. " Cognitive theory of multimedia learning ". In The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning, Edited by: Mayer, R. E. 31-48. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
88. McFarland, D. J. and Hamilton, D. 2006. Adding contextual specificity to the technology acceptance model. Computers in Human Behavior, 22: 427-447.
89. McMillan, S. J. 2002. " Exploring models of interactivity from multiple research traditions: Users, documents, and systems ". In Handbook of new media, Edited by: Lievrouw, L. and Livingston, S. 162-182. London, UK: Sage.
90. Moon, J. W. and Kim, Y. G. 2001. Extending the TAM for a world-wide-web context. Information & Management, 38: 217-230.
91. Moos, D. C. and Azevedo, R. 2009. Self-efficacy and prior domain knowledge: To what extent does monitoring mediate their relationship with hypermedia learning?. Metacognition and Learning, 4: 197-216.
92. Moreno, R. and Mayer, R.E. 2007. Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19: 309-326.
93. Muthukumar, S. L. 2005. Creating interactive multimedia-based educational courseware: Cognition in learning. Cognition, Technology & Work, 7: 46-50.
94. Neter, J., Kutner, M., Nachtsheim, C. and Wasserman, W. 1996. Applied linear statistical models, 4th, New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
95. Ngai, E., Poon, J. and Chan, Y. 2007. Empirical examination of the adoption of WebCT using TAM. Computers & Education, 48: 250-267.
96. Niederhauser, D. S. and Perkmen, S. 2010. Beyond self-efficacy: Measuring pre-service teachers' instructional technology outcome expectations. Computers in Human Behavior, 26: 436-442.
97. Northrup, P. 2001. A framework for designing interactivity into Web-based instruction. Educational Technology, 41 (2): 31-39.
98. Nov, O. and Ye, C. 2008. Users' personality and perceived ease of use of digital libraries: The case for resistance to change. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59: 845-851.
99. Ong, C.-S. and Lai, J.-Y. 2006. Gender differences in perceptions and relationships among dominants of e-learning acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior, 22: 816-829.
100. Park, S. and Lim, J. 2007. Promoting positive emotion in multimedia learning using visual illustrations. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 16: 141-162.
101. Pastore, R. S. 2010. The effects of diagrams and time-compressed instruction on learning and learners' perceptions of cognitive load. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58: 485-505.
102. Patrick, H., Ryan, A. and Kaplan, A. 2007. Early adolescents' perceptions of the classroom social environments, motivational beliefs, and engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99: 83-98.
103. Paulus, T. M., Horvitz, B. and Shi, M. 2006. Isn't it just like our situation? Engagement and learning in an online story-based environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 54: 355-385.
104. Pintrich, P. R. 2003. " Motivation and classroom learning ". In Handbook of psychology: Educational psychology, Edited by: Reynolds, W. M., Miller, G. J. and Weiner, I. B. 103-122. New York, NY: Wiley.
105. Pintrich, P. R., Schunk, D. H. and Meece, J. L. 2008. Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications, 3rd, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
106. Pituch, K. A. and Lee, Y.-K. 2006. The influence of system characteristics on e-learning use. Computers & Education, 47: 222-244.
107. Plass, J. L., Homer, B. and Hayward, E. 2009. Design factors for educationally effective animations and simulations. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 21: 31-61.
108. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. and Podsakoff, N. P. 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88: 879-903.
109. Potosky, D. 2002. A field study of computer efficacy beliefs as an outcome of training: The role of computer playfulness, computer knowledge, and performance during training. Computers in Human Behavior, 18: 241-255.
110. Proske, A., Narciss, S. and Körndle, H. 2007. Interactivity and learners' achievement in web-based learning. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 18: 511-531.
111. Renkl, A. and Atkinson, R. K. 2007. Interactive learning environments: Contemporary issues and trends. An introduction to the special issue. Educational Psychology Review, 19: 235-238.
112. Roca, J. C. and Gagné, M. 2008. Understanding e-learning continuance intention in the workplace: A self-determination theory perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 24: 1585-1604.
113. Ryan, R. M. and Deci, E. L. 2000. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25: 54-67.
114. Saadé, R. and Bahli, B. 2005. The impact of cognitive absorption on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in on-line learning: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 42: 317-327.
115. Saeed, N., Yang, Y. and Sinnappan, S. 2010. " Effect of media richness on user acceptance of blogs and podcasts ". In Proceedings of 15th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE2010) 137-141.
116. Sánchez, R. A. and Hueros, A. D. 2010. Motivational factors that influence the acceptance of Moodle using TAM. Computers in Human Behavior, 26: 1632-1640.
117. Sansone, C., Fraughton, T., Zachary, J. L., Butner, J. and Heiner, C. 2011. Self-regulation of motivation when learning online: The importance of who, why and how. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59: 199-212.
118. Scott, J. E. and Walczak, S. 2009. Cognitive engagement with a multimedia ERP training tool: Assessing computer self-efficacy and technology acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior, 46: 221-232.
119. Selim, H. M. 2007. Critical success factors for e-learning acceptance: Confirmatory factor models. Computers & Education, 49: 396-413.
120. Serenko, A., Bontis, N. and Detlor, B. 2007. End-user adoption of animated interface agents in everyday work applications. Behaviour & Information Technology, 26: 119-132.
121. Shah, P. and Freedman, E.G. 2003. Visuospatial cognition in electronic learning. Journal of Education Computing Research, 29: 315-324.
122. Shapka, J. D. and Ferrari, M. 2003. Computer-related attitudes and actions of teacher candidates. Computers in Human Behavior, 19: 319-334.
123. Shen, C.-C. and Chuang, H.-M. 2009. An investigation on user communication behavior in an interactive whiteboard technology environment. Proceedings in WSEAS Transactions on Communications,: 184-195.
124. Shin, D-H. 2007. User acceptance of mobile Internet: Implication for convergence technologies. Interacting with Computers, 19: 472-483.
125. Siau, K., Sheng, H. and Nah, F.F-H. 2006. Use of a classroom response system to enhance classroom interactivity. IEEE Transactions on Education, 49: 398-403.
126. Sims, R. 2003. Promises of interactivity: Aligning learner perceptions and expectations with strategies for flexible and online learning. Distance Education, 24: 87-103.
127. Smith, J. R. and Hogg, M. A. 2008. " Social identify and attitudes ". In Attitudes and attitude change, Edited by: Crano, W. and Prislin, R. 337-360. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
128. Straub, E. T. 2009. Understanding technology adoption: Theory and future directions for informal learning. Review of Educational Research, 79: 625-649.
129. Strauss, J. and Frost, R. D. 1999. Selecting instructional technology media for the marketing classroom. Marketing Education Review, 9: 11-20.
130. Sukkar, A. A. and Hasan, H. 2005. Toward a model for the acceptance of internet banking in developing countries. Information Technology for Development, 11: 381-398.
131. Šumak, B., Heričko, M. and Pušnik, M. 2011. A meta-analysis of e-learning technology acceptance: The role of user types and e-learning technology types. Computers in Human Behavior, 27: 2067-2077.
132. Szajna, B. 1994. Software evaluation and choice: Predictive validation of the technology acceptance instrument. MIS Quarterly, 18: 319-324.
133. Teo, H. H., Oh, L. B., Liu, C. and Wei, K. K. 2003. An empirical study of the effects of interactivity on web user attitude. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58: 281-305.
134. Teo, T. 2009. " Evaluating the intention to use technology among student teachers: A structural equation modeling approach ". In International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning Vol. 5, 106-118.
135. Teo, T. 2010. Explaining the intention to use technology among volitional users in education: An evaluation of the technology acceptance model (TAM) using structural equation modeling. International Journal of Instructional Media, 37: 379-389.
136. Teo, T. 2011. Technology acceptance in education: Research and issues, Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
137. Teo, T. and Schaik, P. 2012. Understanding the intention to use technology by preservice teachers: An empirical test of competing theoretical models. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 28: 178-188.
138. Thatcher, J. B. and Perrewé, P. L. 2002. An empirical examination of individual traits as antecedents to computer anxiety and computer self-efficacy. MIS Quarterly, 26: 381-386.
139. Thong, J. Y. L., Hong, S. J. and Tam, K. Y. 2006. The effects of post-adoption beliefs on the expectation-confirmation model for information technology continuance. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64: 799-810.
140. Venkatesh, V. 1999. Creation of favorable user perceptions: Exploring the role of intrinsic motivation. MIS Quarterly, 23: 239-260.
141. Venkatesh, V. 2000. Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information System Research, 11: 342-365.
142. Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F. D. 2000. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46: 186-204.
143. Walker, C. O., Greene, B. A. and Mansell, R. A. 2006. Identification with academics, intrinsic/extrinsic motivation, and self-efficacy as predictors of cognitive engagement. Learning and Individual Differences, 16 (1): 1-12.
144. Wasserman, J. D. and Bracken, B. A. 2003. " Psychometric characteristics of assessment procedures ". In Handbook of psychology: Assessment psychology, Edited by: Graham, J. R. and Naglieri, J. A. 43-66. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
145. Webster, J. and Hackley, P. 1997. Teaching effectiveness in technology-mediated distance learning. Academy of Management Journal, 40: 1282-1309.
146. Webster, J. and Ho, H. 1997. Audience engagement in multimedia presentations. The Data Base for Advances in Information Systems, 28: 63-77.
147. Webster, J., Trevino, L. K. and Ryan, L. 1993. The dimensionality and correlates of flow in human-computer interactions. Computers in Human Behavior, 9: 411-426.
148. Winter, S. J., Chudoba, K. M. and Gutek, B. A. 1998. Attitudes toward computers: When do they predict computer use?. Information & Management, 34: 275-284.
149. Wood, R. E. and Bandura, A. 1989. Social cognitive theory of organizational management. Academy of Management Review, 14: 361-384.
150. Wu, G. 1999. " Perceived interactivity and attitude toward website ". In Proceedings of the 1999 Conference of the American Academy of Advertising, Edited by: Roberts, M. S. 254-262. Gainesville: University of Florida.
151. Yen, D. C., Wu, C.-S., Cheng, F.-F. and Huang, Y.-W. 2010. Determinants of users' intention to adopt wireless technology: An empirical study by integrating TTF with TAM. Computers in Human Behavior, 26: 906-915.
152. Yi, M. Y. and Hwang, Y. 2003. Predicting the use of web-based information systems: self-efficacy, enjoyment, learning goal orientation, and the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59: 431-449.
153. Zhang, D., Zhou, L., Briggs, R. O. and Nunamaker, J. F. 2006. Instructional video in e-learning: Assessing the impact of interactive video on learning effectiveness. Information & Management, 43: 15-27.