Creating supportive multimedia learning environments

Handbook of Research on Human Performance and Instructional Technology

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 88-105

  Baggio, Bobbe Gaines ^a  

^a LA SALLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84877862078     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60566-782-9.ch005     Document Type: Chapter

References (58)

1. Allen, M. W. (2003). Guide to e-learning: Building interactive, fun and effective learning programs for any company. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2. nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
3. Barab, S., Squire, K., & Dueber, W. (2000). A coevolutionary model for supporting the emergence of authenticity. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(2), 37-62. doi:10.1007/BF02313400
4. Berge, Z. L. (2002). Active, interactive, and reflective elearning. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 3(2), 181-190.
5. Boring, R. L. (2003). Cognitive science: At the crossroads of computers and the mind. Crossroads 2003-10.2. Retrieved January 29, 2006 from http://www.acm.org/crossroads/xrds10-2/intro.html
6. Brown, J., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
7. Chapman, A. (2005). Kolb learning styles: David Kolb's learning styles model and experimental learning theory (ETL). Retrieved January 31, 2006 from http://www.businessballs.com/kol-blearningstyles.htm
8. Clark, D. (1995). Big dog's ISD page. Retrieved February 10, 2006, from http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/hrd/sat.html
9. Clark, D. (2000). Learning styles. Retrieved January 31, 2006 from http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/hrd/learning/styles.html
10. Clark, R. (2003). Learning objects in four instructional architectures. Retrieved January 31, 2006 from http://www.clarktraining.com
11. Clark, R., Nguyen, F., & Sweller, J. (2006). Efficiency in learning evidence-based guidelines to mange cognitive load. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
12. Clark, R. C. (2002). Applying cognitive strategies to instructional design. Performance Improvement, 41(7), 1-14. doi:10.1002/pfi.4140410704
13. nd ed.). Silver Springs, MD: International Society for Performance Improvement.
14. Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2003). E-learning and the science of instruction. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
15. Cognitive Design Solution. (2003). Instructional design: 5- Star instruction-Dr. M. D. Merrill. Retrieved January 31, 2006 from http://www.cognitivedesignsolutions.com/Instruction/5Star.htm
16. Dick, W., Carey, J., & Carey, L. (2001). The Systematic design of instruction. (5th ed.). New York: Longman.
17. Dolezalek, H. (2006). Who has time to design? Training (New York, N.Y.), 43(1), 28.
18. nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass/Pfeifer.
19. nd ed.). Needham, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
20. th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
21. Gayeski, D. (1998, April). Out-of-the-box instructional design. Training & Development.
22. Ginther, D., & Liu, Y. (1999).Cognitive Styles in Distance Education. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration. II, III. Retrieved February 6, 2006, from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/liu23.htm.
23. Gustafson & Branch. (1997). Rapid prototyping. Retrieved February 6, 2006, from http://www.quasar.ualberta.ca/edpy597mappin/readings/m11_Gustafson.htm
24. Hein, G. E. (1991).Constructivist learning theory. Retrieved February 26, 2006, from http://www.exploratorium.edu/ifi/resources/constructiv-istlearning.html
25. Jonassen, D. (2001). Design of constructivist learning environments. Retrieved February 22, 2006, from http://tiger.coe.missouri.edu/~jonassen/courses/CLE/
26. Jonassen, D. H., & Land, S. M. (Eds.). (2000). Theoretical foundations of learning environments. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Jonassen, D. H., & Rohrer-Murphy, L. (1999). Activity theory a framework for designing constructivist learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(1), 61-79. doi:10.1007/BF02299477
28. Key, J. (1997). Research design in occupational education: Experimental research and design. Retrieved January 25, 2006 from http://www.okstate.edu/ag/agedcm4h/academic/aged5980a/5980/newpage2.htm
29. Krug, S. (2000). Don't make me think. Indianapolis, IN: New Riders Publishing.
30. LaMar, Y. (n.d.). Correlational research designs. Retrieved February 15, from http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/tutorial/Lamar/ylamar.htm.
31. Leonard, D. C. (2002). Learning theories. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing.
32. thWorkshop of the Psychology of Programming Interest Group, Brunel University, June (pp.29-44). Retrieved February 6, 2006 from http://www.ppig.org/workshops/14th-programme.html.
33. nd ed.). Atlanta, GA: CEP Press.
34. Mappin, D., Kelley, M., Skaalid, B., & Bratt, S. (1999). Module 11: Rapid prototyping. Retrieved January 30, 2006 from http://www.quasar.ualberta.ca/edpy597mappin/Modules/module11.htm
35. Marchand-Martella, N., Slocum, T., & Martella, R. (2004). Introduction to direct instruction. Boston, MA: Pearson.
36. Mayer, R. E. (2001) Multimedia learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
37. Mayer, R. E., & Reigeluth, C. (1999). Designing instruction for constructivist learning. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional -Design Theories and Models (Vol. 2) (pp.141-159). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
38. Merrill, D. M. (2001). Does your instruction rate 5 stars? Retrieved January 30, 2006 from http://id2.usu.edu/5Star/Index.htm
39. Merrill, D. M. (2002). A pebble-in-the- pond model for instructional design. Retrieved January 31, 2006 from http://www.netg.com/DemoDown-loads/Downloads/A-pebble-in-the-pond.pdf
40. Merrill, D. M. (2002). A pebble-in-the- pond model for instructional design. Performance Improvement, 41(7), 39-43. doi:10.1002/pfi.4140410709
41. Mettetal, G., Jordan, C., & Harper, S. (1997). Attitudes toward a multiple intelligence curriculum. The Journal of Educational Research, 91(2), 115-122.
42. th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
43. Petraglia, J. (1998). The real world on a short leash: The (mis)application of constructivism to the design of educational technology. Educational Technology Research and Development, 46(3), 53-65. doi:10.1007/BF02299761
44. Rathbun, G., Saito, R., & Goodrum, D. (1997, February). In Proceedings of Selected Research and Development Presentations at the 1997 National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology.
45. Reigeluth, C. (1999). Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional design. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
46. Schaffer, S. (2000, October). Learning system design considerations in creating an online learning environment. In Annual Proceedings of Selected Research and Development Papers Presented at the National Convention of Association for Educational Communications and Technology (Vol. 1-2).
47. Snyder, R. (2000). The relationship between learning styles/multiple intelligences and academic achievement of high school students. High School Journal, 83(2), 11-20.
48. Stage, F. K., Muller, P. A., Kinzie, J., & Simmons, A. (1998). Creating learning centered classrooms, what does learning theory have to say? Retrieved February 10, 2006 from http://www.ericfacutly.net/databases/ERICed4222777
49. Tripp, S., & Bichelmeyer, B. (1990). Rapid prototyping: An alternative instructional design strategy. Retrieved February 10, 2006, from http://www.quasar.ualberta.ca/edpy597mappin/readings/m11_Tripp.htm
50. Trochim, W. (2001). The research methods knowledge base. Cincinnati, OH: Atomic Dog Publishing.
51. University of California Berkley. (2005). What is cognitive science. Retrieved January 30, 2006, from http://ls.berkeley.edu/ugis/cogsci/major/about.php.
52. USMC. (2004). Systems approach to training (SAT) overview. Retrieved January 20, 2005, from http://www.tecom.usmc.mil/gtb/sat.htm
53. Van Merrienboer, J. (1997). Training complex skills: A four-component instructional design model for technical training. Engle Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
54. Vaughan, T. (2004). Multimedia: Making it work. New York: McGraw Hill Technology Education.
55. Wilson, B. (1998). Constructivist learning environments: Case studies in instructional design. Engle Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technologies Publications.
56. Wilson, B., Jonassen, D., & Cole, P. (1993). Cognitive approaches to instructional design. In G. M. Piskurich (Ed.), The ASTD handbook of instructional technology. New York: McGraw Hill.
57. Wilson, B. G., & Myers, K. M. (2000). Situated cognition in theoretical and practical context. In D. H Jonassen & S. M Land, (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning environments (pp.57-88). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
58. Windschitl, M. (2002). Framing constructivism in practice as the negotiation of dilemmas: An analysis of the conceptual, pedagogical, cultural, and political challenges facing teachers. Review of Educational Research, 45.