Cognitive engagement with a multimedia ERP training tool: Assessing computer self-efficacy and technology acceptance

Information and Management

Volumn 46, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 221-232

  Scott, Judy E ^a   Walczak, Steven ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognitive engagement; Computer self efficacy; ERP; Neural network; Technology acceptance; Training tools

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE ENGAGEMENT; COMPUTER SELF-EFFICACY; ERP; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE; TRAINING TOOLS;

ELECTRIC NETWORK ANALYSIS; ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING; FUZZY SETS; MULTIMEDIA SYSTEMS; NEURAL NETWORKS;

COMPUTER NETWORKS;

EID: 67349233832     PISSN: 03787206     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.im.2008.10.003     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Agarwal R., and Karahanna E. Time flies when you're having fun: cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly 24 4 (2000) 665-694
2. Agarwal R., and Prasad J.A. Conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Information Systems Research 9 2 (1998) 204-215
3. Agarwal R., Sambamurthy V., and Stair R.M. Research report: the evolving relationship between general and specific computer self-efficacy-an empirical assessment. Information Systems Research 11 4 (2000) 418-430
4. Carlson P.J., and Davis G.B. An investigation of media selection among directors and managers: from self to other orientation. MIS Quarterly 22 3 (1998) 335-362
5. Chapman P., and Selvarajah S. Engagement in multimedia training systems. Proceedings of the Thirty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (1999)
6. Coffin R.J., and MacIntyre P.D. Motivational influences on computer-related affective states. Computers in Human Behavior 15 5 (1999) 549-569
7. Compeau D.R., and Higgins C.A. Application of social cognitive theory to training for computer skills. Information Systems Research 6 2 (1995) 118-143
8. Compeau D.R., and Higgins C.A. Computer self-efficacy: development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly 19 2 (1995) 189-211
9. Deng X., Doll W.J., Hendrickson A.R., and Scazzero J.A. A multi-group analysis of structural invariance: an illustration using the technology acceptance model. Information and Management 42 5 (2005) 745-759
10. Durndell A., and Haag Z. Computer self efficacy, computer anxiety, attitudes towards the Internet and reported experience with the Internet, by gender, in an East European sample. Computers in Human Behavior 18 5 (2002) 521-535
11. Hess T.J., Fuller M.A., and Mathew J. Involvement and decision-making performance with a decision aid: the influence of social multimedia, gender, and playfulness. Journal of Management Information Systems 22 3 (2006) 15-54
12. Igbaria M., and Iivari J. The effects of self-efficacy on computer usage. Omega 23 6 (1995) 587-605
13. Johnson R.D., and Marakas G.M. Research report: the role of behavioral modeling in computer skills acquisition: toward refinement of the model. Information Systems Research 11 4 (2000) 418-427
14. Karsten R., and Roth R.M. The relationship of computer experience and computer self-efficacy to performance in introductory computer literacy courses. Journal of Research on Computing in Education 31 1 (1998) 14-24 Fall
15. Marakas G.M., Yi M.Y., and Johnson R.D. The multilevel and multifaceted character of computer self-efficacy: toward clarification of the construct and an integrative framework for research. Information Systems Research 9 2 (1998) 126-163
16. Mathieson K., Peacock E., and Chin W.W. Adoption, diffusion, and infusion of IT: extending the technology acceptance model: the influence of perceived user resources. The Data Base for Advances in Information Systems 32 3 (2001) 86-112
17. Mathieu J.E., Martineau J.W., and Tannenbaum S.I. Individual and situational influences on the development of self-efficacy: implications for training effectiveness. Personnel Psychology 46 (1993) 125-147
18. Mingers J. Combining IS research methods: towards a pluralist methodology. Information Systems Research 12 3 (2001) 240-260
19. Setiono R., Thong J.Y., and Yap C.S. Symbolic rule extraction from neural networks: an application to identifying organizations adopting IT. Information and Management 34 2 (1998) 91-101
20. Staples D.S., Hulland J.S., and Higgins C.A. A self-efficacy theory explanation for the management of remote workers in virtual organizations. Organization Science 10 6 (1999) 758-776
21. Stone R.W., and Henry J.W. The roles of computer self-efficacy and outcome expectancy in influencing the computer end-user's organizational commitment. Journal of End User Computing 15 1 (2003) 38-53
22. Taylor S., and Todd P. Assessing IT usage: the role of prior experience. MIS Quarterly 19 4 (1995) 561-570
23. Taylor S., and Todd P.A. Understanding information technology usage-a test of competing models. Information Systems Research 6 2 (1995) 144-176
24. Thatcher J.B., and Perrewe P.L. An empirical examination of individual traits as antecedents to computer anxiety and computer self-efficacy. MIS Quarterly 26 4 (2002) 381-396
25. Torkzadeh R., Pflughoeft K., and Hall L. Computer self-efficacy, training effectiveness and user attitudes: an empirical study. Behavior and Information Technology 18 4 (1999) 299-309
26. Venkatesh V. Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research 11 4 (2000) 342-365
27. Venkatesh V., Morris M.G., Davis G.B., and Davis F.D. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly 27 3 (2003) 425-478
28. Webster J., and Ho H. Audience engagement in multimedia presentations. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems 28 2 (1997) 63-77
29. Webster J., and Martocchio J.J. Microcomputer playfulness: development of a measure with workplace implications. MIS Quarterly 16 2 (1992) 201-226
30. Yi M.Y., and Hwang Y. Predicting the use of web-based information systems: self-efficacy, enjoyment, learning goal orientation, and the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 59 4 (2003) 431-449