Interactivity and learners' achievement in web-based learning

Journal of Interactive Learning Research

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 511-531

  Proske, Antje ^a   Narciss, Susanne ^a   Körndle, Hermann ^a  

^a DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 39749156328     PISSN: 1093023X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Azevedo, R., & Cromley, J. G. (2004). Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students' learning with hypermedia? Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 523-535.
2. Bandura, A. (1997). Self Efficacy: The exercise of control. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
3. Bannert, M. (2002). Managing cognitive load - Recent trends in cognitive load theory. Learning and Instruction, 12(1), 139-146.
4. Bannert, M. (2004). Designing metacognitive support for hypermedia learning. In H. M. Niegemann, D. Leutner, & R. Brünken (Eds.), Instructional design for multimedia learning (pp. 19-30). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
5. Berge, Z. L. (1999). Interaction in postsecondary web-based learning. Educational Technology, 41(1), 5-11.
6. Borsook, T. K., & Higginbotham-Wheat, N. (1991). Interactivity: What is it and what can it do for computer-based instruction? Educational Technology, 31(5), 11-17.
7. Chen, M. (1995). A methodology for characterizing computer-based learning environments. Instructional Science, 23(1), 183-220.
8. Chen, C., & Rada, R. (1996). Interacting with hypertext: A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Human-Computer Interaction, 11(2), 125-156.
9. Chou, C. (2003). Interactivity and interactive functions in web-based learning systems: A technical framework for designers. Bitish Journal of Educational Technology, 34(3), 265-279.
10. Craik, F, & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 11(6), 671-684.
11. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
12. Dillon, A., & Gabbard, R. (1998). Hypermedia as an educational technology: A review of the quantitative research literature on learner comprehension, control, and style. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 322-349.
13. Gao, T, & Lehman, J. D. (2003), The effects of different levels of interaction on the achievement and motivational perceptions of college students in a web-based learning environment. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 14(4), 367-386.
14. Mayer, R. E. (2003). The promise of multimedia learning: using the same instructional design methods across different media. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 125-139.
15. Mayer, R. E. & Moreno, R. (2002). Aids to computer-based multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 12(1), 107-119.
16. Narciss, S. (2004). The impact of informative tutoring feedback and self-efficacy on motivation and achievement in concept learning. Expetimental Psychology, 51(3), 214-228.
17. Narciss, S., & Körndle, H. (1998). Problems and perspectives for the development of multimedia tools for teaching and learning in the internet. European Psychologist, 3, 219-226.
18. Narciss, S., Proske, A., & Körndle, H. (2007). Promoting self-regulated learning in web-based learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(3), 1126-1144.
19. Northrup, P. (2001). A framework for designing interactivity into web-based instruction. Educafional Technology, 41(2), 31-39.
20. Oliver, R. (1996). Interactions in educational multimedia: The things that matter. In C. McBeath & R. Atkinson (Eds.), The learning superhighway: New world, new worries. Proceedings of Third International Interactive Multimedia Symposium. Retrieved June 11, 2007, from http://elrond.scam.ecu.edu.au/oliver/docs/96/IMMS.pdf
21. Proske, A., Körndle, H., & Narciss, S. (2004). The exercise format editor: A multimedia tool for the design of multiple learning tasks. In H. Niegemann, D. Leutner, & R. Brünken (Eds.), Instructional design for multimedia learning (pp. 149-164). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
22. Rouet, J.-F. (1990). Interactive text processing by inexperienced (hyper-) readers. In A. Rizk, N. Streitz, & J. André (Eds.), Hypertexts: Concepts, systems, and applications (pp. 250-260). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
23. Rouet, J.-F., & Levonen, J. J. (1996). Studying and learning with hypertext: Empirical studies and their implications. In J.-F. Rouet, J. J. Levonen, A. Dillon, & R. J. Spiro (Eds.), Hypertext and Cognition (pp. 9-23). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24. Rouet, J.-F., & Passerault, J. (1999). Analyzing learner-hypermedia interaction: An overview of online methods. Instructional Science, 27(3-4), 201-219.
25. Simons, P. R-J., & deJong, F. P. (1992). Self-regulation and computer-aided instruction. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 41(4), 333-346.
26. Sims, R. (1997). Interactivity: A forgotten art? Retrieved June 11, 2007, from http://www2.gsu.edu/~wwwitr/docs/interact/
27. Wagner, E. D. (1997). Interactivity: From agents to outcomes. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 71, 19-26.
28. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, E. S. (Eds.) (2002). Development of achievement motivation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
29. Yacci, M. (2000). Interactivity demystified: A structural definition. Educational Technology, 40(4), 5-16.