The Impact of Paralogy on Phylogenomic Studies - A Case Study on Annelid Relationships

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 5, 2013, Pages

  Struck, Torsten H ^a  

^a ZOOLOGISCHES FORSCHUNGSMUSEUM ALEXANDER KOENIG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANNELID; ARTICLE; CEREBRATULUS; CLADISTICS; CONTROLLED STUDY; EURYTHOE; EXPRESSED SEQUENCE TAG; MOLECULAR PHYLOGENY; MULTIGENE FAMILY; NEMERTEA; NONHUMAN; OWENIA; PARALOGY; PHYLOGENOMICS; PREDICTION; SCOLOPLOS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; STHENELAIS; TAXONOMIC IDENTIFICATION; TAXONOMIC RANK;

ANIMALS; ANNELIDA; GENOMICS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, NUCLEIC ACID;

EID: 84877130508     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062892     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. Bleidorn C, Vogt L, Bartolomaeus T, (2003) A contribution to sedentary polychaete phylogeny using 18S rRNA sequence data. Journal of Systematic Zoology and Evolutionary Research 41: 186-195.
2. Struck TH, Nesnidal MP, Purschke G, Halanych KM, (2008) Detecting possibly saturated positions in 18S and 28S sequences and their influence on phylogenetic reconstruction of Annelida (Lophotrochozoa). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 48: 628-645.
3. McHugh D, (1997) Molecular evidence that echiurans and pogonophorans are derived annelids. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 94: 8006-8009.
4. McHugh D, (2000) Molecular Phylogeny of the Annelida. Canadian Journal of Zoology 78: 1873-1884.
5. McHugh D, (2005) Molecular systematics of polychaetes (Annelida). Hydrobiologia 535/536: 309-318.
6. Sperling EA, Peterson KJ, Pisani D, (2009) Phylogenetic-Signal Dissection of Nuclear Housekeeping Genes Supports the Paraphyly of Sponges and the Monophyly of Eumetazoa. Mol Biol Evol 26: 2261-2274.
7. Paps J, Baguna J, Riutort M, (2009) Bilaterian Phylogeny: A Broad Sampling of 13 Nuclear Genes Provides a New Lophotrochozoa Phylogeny and Supports a Paraphyletic Basal Acoelomorpha. Mol Biol Evol 26: 2397-2406.
8. Paps J, Baguñà J, Riutort M, (2009) Lophotrochozoa internal phylogeny: new insights from an up-to-date analysis of nuclear ribosomal genes. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 276: 1245-1254.
9. Ruiz-Trillo I, Paps J, Loukota M, Ribera C, Jondelius U, et al. (2002) A phylogenetic analysis of myosin heavy chain type II sequences corroborates that Acoela and Nemertodermatida are basal bilaterians. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99: 1124611251.
10. Wolf YI, Rogozin IB, Koonin EV, (2004) Coelomata and Not Ecdysozoa: Evidence From Genome-Wide Phylogenetic Analysis. Genome Research 14: 29-36.
11. Roy SW, Gilbert W, (2005) Resolution of a deep animal divergence by the pattern of intron conservation. PNAS 102: 4403-4408.
12. Philip GK, Creevey CJ, McInerney JO, (2005) The Opisthokonta and the Ecdysozoa May Not Be Clades: Stronger Support for the Grouping of Plant and Animal than for Animal and Fungi and Stronger Support for the Coelomata than Ecdysozoa. Mol Biol Evol 22: 1175-1184.
13. Irimia M, Maeso I, Penny D, Garcia-Fernandez J, Roy SW, (2007) Rare Coding Sequence Changes are Consistent with Ecdysozoa, not Coelomata. Mol Biol Evol 24: 1604-1607.
14. Roy SW, Irimia M, (2008) Rare Genomic Characters Do Not Support Coelomata: Intron Loss/Gain. Mol Biol Evol 25: 620-623.
15. Holton TA, Pisani D, (2010) Deep Genomic-Scale Analyses of the Metazoa Reject Coelomata: Evidence from Single- and Multigene Families Analyzed Under a Supertree and Supermatrix Paradigm. Genome Biology and Evolution 2: 310-324.
16. Philippe H, Lartillot N, Brinkmann H, (2005) Multigene Analyses of Bilaterian Animals Corroborate the Monophyly of Ecdysozoa, Lophotrochozoa, and Protostomia. Mol Biol Evol 22: 1246-1253.
17. Marletaz F, Martin E, Perez Y, Papillon D, Caubit X, et al. (2006) Chaetognath phylogenomics: a protostome with deuterostome-like development. Current Biology 16: R577-R578.
18. Hallstrom BM, Kullberg M, Nilsson MA, Janke A, (2007) Phylogenomic Data Analyses Provide Evidence that Xenarthra and Afrotheria Are Sister Groups. Mol Biol Evol 24: 2059-2068.
19. Hausdorf B, Helmkampf M, Meyer A, Witek A, Herlyn H, et al. (2007) Spiralian phylogenomics supports the resurrection of Bryozoa comprising Ectoprocta and Entoprocta. Molecular Biology and Evolution 24: 2723-2729.
20. Philippe H, (2007) Acoel Flatworms Are Not Platyhelminthes: Evidence from Phylogenomics. PLoS ONE 2: e717.
21. Roeding F, Hagner-Holler S, Ruhberg H, Ebersberger I, von Haeseler A, et al. (2007) EST sequencing of Onychophora and phylogenomic analysis of Metazoa. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 45: 942-951.
22. Struck TH, Fisse F, (2008) Phylogenetic position of Nemertea derived from phylogenomic data. Molecular Biology and Evolution 25: 728-736.
23. Dunn CW, Hejnol A, Matus DQ, Pang K, Browne WE, et al. (2008) Broad phylogenomic sampling improves resolution of the animal tree of life. Nature 452: 745-750.
24. Ruiz-Trillo I, Roger AJ, Burger G, Gray MW, Lang BF, (2008) A Phylogenomic Investigation into the Origin of Metazoa. Mol Biol Evol 25: 664-672.
25. Hejnol A, Obst M, Stamatakis A, Ott M, Rouse GW, et al. (2009) Assessing the root of bilaterian animals with scalable phylogenomic methods. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 276: 4261-4270.
26. Struck TH, Paul C, Hill N, Hartmann S, Hösel C, et al. (2011) Phylogenomic analyses unravel annelid evolution. Nature 471: 95-98.
27. Kocot KM, Cannon JT, Todt C, Citarella MR, Kohn AB, et al. (2011) Phylogenomics reveals deep molluscan relationships. Nature 477: 452-456.
28. Smith SA, Wilson NG, Goetz FE, Feehery C, Andrade SCS, et al. (2011) Resolving the evolutionary relationships of molluscs with phylogenomic tools. Nature 480: 364-367.
29. von Reumont BM, Jenner RA, Wills MA, Dell'ÄôAmpio E, Pass Gn, et al. (2012) Pancrustacean Phylogeny in the Light of New Phylogenomic Data: Support for Remipedia as the Possible Sister Group of Hexapoda. Molecular Biology and Evolution 29: 1031-1045.
30. Sanderson M, McMahon M, Steel M, (2010) Phylogenomics with incomplete taxon coverage: the limits to inference. BMC Evolutionary Biology 10: 155.
31. Ebersberger I, Strauss S, von Haeseler A, (2009) HaMStR: Profile hidden markov model based search for orthologs in ESTs. BMC Evolutionary Biology 9: 157.
32. Fitch WM, (1970) Distinguishing Homologous from Analogous Proteins. Systematic Biology 19: 99-113.
33. Ebersberger I, Galgoczy P, Taudien S, Taenzer S, Platzer M, et al. (2007) Mapping Human Genetic Ancestry. Mol Biol Evol 24: 2266-2276.
34. Roy SW, (2009) Phylogenomics: Gene Duplication, Unrecognized Paralogy and Outgroup Choice. PLoS ONE 4: e4568.
35. Meusemann K, von Reumont BM, Simon S, Roeding F, Strauss S, et al. (2010) A Phylogenomic Approach to Resolve the Arthropod Tree of Life. Molecular Biology and Evolution 27: 2451-2464.
36. Enright AJ, Dongen SV, Ouzounis CA, (2002) An efficient algorithm for large-scale detection of protein families. Nucleic Acids Research 30: 1575-1584.
37. Li L, Stoeckert CJ Jr, Roos DS, (2003) OrthoMCL: identification of ortholog groups for eukaryotic genomes. Genome Research 13: 2178-2189.
38. Kim K, Kim W, Kim S (2011) ReMark: an automatic program for clustering orthologs flexibly combining a Recursive and a Markov clustering algorithms. Bioinformatics 27 1731-1733.
39. Shi G, Peng M-C, Jiang T, (2011) MultiMSOAR 2.0: An Accurate Tool to Identify Ortholog Groups among Multiple Genomes. PLoS ONE 6: e20892.
40. Gee H, (2003) Ending incongruence. Nature 425: 782.
41. Jeffroy O, Brinkmann H, Delsuc F, Philippe H, (2006) Phylogenomics: the beginning of incongruence? Trends in Genetics 22: 225-231.
42. Evans NM, Holder MT, Barbeitos MS, Okamura B, Cartwright P, (2010) The Phylogenetic Position of Myxozoa: Exploring Conflicting Signals in Phylogenomic and Ribosomal Data Sets. Molecular Biology and Evolution 27: 2733-2746.
43. Philippe H, Brinkmann H, Copley RR, Moroz LL, Nakano H, et al. (2011) Acoelomorph flatworms are deuterostomes related to Xenoturbella. Nature 470: 255-258.
44. Philippe H, Snell EA, Bapteste E, Lopez P, Holland PWH, et al. (2004) Phylogenomics of Eukaryotes: Impact of Missing Data on Large Alignments. Mol Biol Evol 21: 1740-1752.
45. Lartillot N, Brinkmann H, Philippe H, (2007) Suppression of long-branch attraction artefacts in the animal phylogeny using a site-heterogeneous model. BMC Evolutionary Biology 7: S4.
46. Nesnidal MP, Helmkampf M, Bruchhaus I, Hausdorf B, (2010) Compositional Heterogeneity and Phylogenomic Inference of Metazoan Relationships. Molecular Biology and Evolution 27: 2095-2104.
47. Kumar S, Filipski AJ, Battistuzzi FU, Kosakovsky Pond SL, Tamura K, (2012) Statistics and Truth in Phylogenomics. Molecular Biology and Evolution 29: 457-472.
48. Rouse GW, Fauchald K, (1997) Cladistics and polychaetes. Zoologica Scripta 26: 139-204.
49. Struck TH, Schult N, Kusen T, Hickman E, Bleidorn C, et al. (2007) Annelida phylogeny and the status of Sipuncula and Echiura. BMC Evolutionary Biology 7: 57.
50. Rousset V, Pleijel F, Rouse GW, Erséus C, Siddall ME, (2007) A molecular phylogeny of annelids. Cladistics 23: 41-63.
51. Bleidorn C, Vogt L, Bartolomaeus T, (2003) New insights into polychaete phylogeny (Annelida) inferred from 18S rDNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 29: 279-288.
52. Bleidorn C, Podsiadlowski L, Bartolomaeus T, (2006) The complete mitochondrial genome of the orbiniid polychaete Orbinia latreilli (Annelida, Orbiniidae)- a novel gene order for Annelida and implications for annelid phylogeny. Gene 370: 96-103.
53. Colgan DJ, Hutchings PA, Braune M, (2006) A multigene framework for polychaete phylogenetic studies. Organisms, Diversity and Evolution 6: 220-235.
54. Jördens J, Struck TH, Purschke G, (2004) Phylogenetic inference regarding Parergodrilidae and Hrabeiella periglandulata ("Polychaeta". Annelida) based on 18S rDNA, 28S rDNA and COI sequences. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 42: 270-280.
55. Brown S, Rouse GW, Hutchings P, Colgan D, (1999) Assessing the usefullness of histone H3, U2 snRNA and 28S rDNA in analyses of polychaete relationships. Australian Journal of Zoology 47: 499-516.
56. Dordel J, Fisse F, Purschke G, Struck TH, (2010) Phylogenetic position of Sipuncula derived from multi-gene and phylogenomic data and its implication for the evolution of segmentation. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 48: 197-207.
57. Philippe H, Brinkmann H, Lavrov DV, Littlewood DTJ, Manuel M, et al. (2011) Resolving Difficult Phylogenetic Questions: Why More Sequences Are Not Enough. PLoS Biology 9: 3.
58. Philippe H, Derelle R, Lopez P, Pick K, Borchiellini C, et al. (2009) Phylogenomics Revives Traditional Views on Deep Animal Relationships. Current Biology 19: 706-712.
59. Rodríguez-Ezpeleta N, Brinkmann H, Burger G, Roger AJ, Gray MW, et al. (2007) Toward Resolving the Eukaryotic Tree: The Phylogenetic Positions of Jakobids and Cercozoans. Current Biology 17: 1420-1425.
60. Lanterbecq D, Rouse GW, Milinkovitch MC, Eeckhaut I, (2006) Molecular Phylogenetic Analyses Indicate Multiple Independent Emergences of Parasitism in Myzostomida (Protostomia). Systematic Biology 55: 208-227.
61. Birney E, Clamp M, Durbin R, (2004) GeneWise and Genomewise. Genome Research 14: 988-995.
62. Ribosomal Protein Gene Database (2010).
63. Katoh K, Kuma K-I, Toh H, Miyata T, (2005) MAFFT version 5: improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment. Nucleic Acids Research 33: 511-518.
64. Hartmann S, Vision T, (2008) Using ESTs for phylogenomics: Can one accurately infer a phylogenetic tree from a gappy alignment? BMC Evolutionary Biology 8: 95.
65. Stamatakis A, (2006) RAxML-VI-HPC: Maximum Likelihood-based Phylogenetic Analyses with Thousands of Taxa and Mixed Models. Bioinformatics 22: 2688-2690.
66. Felsenstein J, (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
67. Fisher EMC, Beer-Romero P, Brown LG, Ridley A, McNeil JA, et al. (1990) Homologous ribosomal protein genes on the human X and Y chromosomes: Escape from X inactivation and possible implications for turner syndrome. Cell 63: 1205-1218.
68. Zhong M, Hansen B, Nesnidal MP, Golombek A, Halanych KM, et al. (2011) Detecting the symplesiomorphy trap: A multigene phylogenetic analysis for terebelliform annelids. BMC Evolutionary Biology 11: 369.
69. Bleidorn C, Eeckhaut I, Podsiadlowski L, Schult N, McHugh D, et al. (2007) Mitochondrial genome and nuclear sequence data support Myzostomida as part of the annelid radiation. Molecular Biology and Evolution 24: 1690-1701.
70. Hall KA, Hutchings PA, Colgan DJ, (2004) Further phylogenetic studies of the Polychaeta using 18S rDNA sequence data. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 84: 949-960.
71. Schulze A, Cutler EB, Giribet G, (2007) Phylogeny of sipunculan worms: A combined analysis of four gene regions and morphology. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 42: 171-192.
72. Kück P, Meusemann K, (2010) FASconCAT: Convenient handling of data matrices. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 56: 1115-1118.
73. Smith SA, Dunn CW, (2008) Phyutility: a phyloinformatics tool for trees, alignments and molecular data. Bioinformatics 24: 715-716.
74. Martin P, (2001) On the origin of the Hirudinea and the demise of the Oligochaeta. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences 268: 1089-1098.
75. Zrzavy J, Riha P, Pialek L, Janouskovec J, (2009) Phylogeny of Annelida (Lophotrochozoa): total-evidence analysis of morphology and six genes. BMC Evolutionary Biology 9: 189.
76. Passamaneck YJ, Schander C, Halanych KM, (2004) Investigation of molluscan phylogeny using large-subunit and small-subunit nuclear rRNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 32: 25-38.
77. Passamaneck Y, Halanych KM, (2006) Lophotrochozoan phylogeny assessed with LSU and SSU data: Evidence of lophophorate polyphyly. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 40: 20-28.
78. Bleidorn C, (2005) Phylogenetic relationships and evolution of Orbiniidae (Annelida, Polychaeta) based on molecular data. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 144: 59-74.
79. Struck TH, Purschke G, Halanych KM, (2005) A scaleless scale worm: Molecular evidence for the phylogenetic placement of Pisione remota (Pisionidae, Annelida). Marine Biology Research 1: 243-253.
80. Wiklund H, Nygren A, Pleijel F, Sundberg P, (2005) Phylogeny of Aphroditiformia (Polychaeta) based on molecular and morphological data. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 37: 494-502.
81. Andrade SCS, Strand M, Schwartz M, Chen H, Kajihara H, et al. (2012) Disentangling ribbon worm relationships: multi-locus analysis supports traditional classification of the phylum Nemertea. Cladistics 28: 141-159.
82. Campbell LI, Rota-Stabelli O, Edgecombe GD, Marchioro T, Longhorn SJ, et al. (2011) MicroRNAs and phylogenomics resolve the relationships of Tardigrada and suggest that velvet worms are the sister group of Arthropoda. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108: 15920-15924.
83. Rota-Stabelli O, Campbell L, Brinkmann H, Edgecombe GD, Longhorn SJ, et al. (2011) A congruent solution to arthropod phylogeny: phylogenomics, microRNAs and morphology support monophyletic Mandibulata. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 278: 298-306.
84. Kojima S, (1998) Paraphyletic Status of Polychaeta Suggested by Phylogenetic Analysis Based on the Amino Acid Sequences of Elongation Factor-1[alpha]. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 9: 255-261.
85. Erséus C, Kallersjo M, (2004) 18S rDNA phylogeny of Clitellata (Annelida). Zoologica Scripta 33: 187-196.
86. Jamieson BGM, Ferraguti M (2006) Non-leech Clitellata. In: Rouse GW, Pleijel F, editors. Reproductive Biology and Phylogeny of Annelida. Enfield, NH: Science Publishers. 235-392.