Phylogenomic analyses unravel annelid evolution

Nature

Volumn 471, Issue 7336, 2011, Pages 95-98

  Struck, Torsten H ^a   Paul, Christiane ^b   Hill, Natascha ^b   Hartmann, Stefanie ^a   Hösel, Christoph ^c   Kube, Michael ^d   Lieb, Bernhard ^d   Meyer, Achim ^d   Tiedemann, Ralph ^b   Purschke, Günter ^a   Bleidorn, Christoph ^b,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSNABRÜCK   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

^c MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR MOLECULAR GENETICS   (Germany)

^d JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^e UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID;

ADAPTATION; AMINO ACID; ANNELID; BENTHOS; CLADISTICS; DEEP SEA; DOMINANCE; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENOMICS; LIFE HISTORY; PHYLOGENETICS; RECONSTRUCTION; SPECIES DIVERSITY; TAXONOMY;

ANNELID WORM; ARTICLE; BENTHIC FAUNA; CHAETOPTERID; DEEP SEA; EARTHWORM; ERRANTIA; INTERTIDAL ZONE; LEECH; MORPHOLOGICAL TRAIT; MYZOSTOMID; NONHUMAN; PHYLOGENOMICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIPUNCULA;

ANIMALS; ANNELIDA; EXPRESSED SEQUENCE TAGS; GENOME; GENOMICS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHYLOGENY;

ANIMALIA; ANNELIDA; BILATERIA; CHAETOPTERIDAE; CLITELLATA; EARTHWORMS (SP.); ECHIURA; ERRANTIA; HIRUDINIDA; MYZOSTOMIDA; PLATYNEREIS; POLYCHAETA; SIBOGLINIDAE; SIPUNCULA; TUBICOLAE;

EID: 79952254741     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature09864     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Dordel, J., Fisse, F., Purschke, G. & Struck, T. H. Phylogenetic position of Sipuncula derived from multi-gene and phylogenomic data and its implication for the evolution of segmentation. J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 48, 197-207 (2010).
2. Struck, T. H., Nesnidal, M. P., Purschke, G. & Halanych, K. M. Detecting possibly saturated positions in 18S and 28S sequences and their influence on phylogenetic reconstruction of Annelida (Lophotrochozoa). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 48, 628-645 (2008).
3. Struck, T. H. et al. Annelida phylogeny and the status of Sipuncula and Echiura. BMC Evol. Biol. 7, 57 (2007).
4. McHugh, D. Molecular evidence that echiurans and pogonophorans are derived annelids. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 8006-8009 (1997).
5. Raible, F. et al. Vertebrate-type intron-rich genes in the marine annelid Platynereis dumerilii. Science 310, 1325-1326 (2005). (Pubitemid 41698863)
6. Tessmar-Raible, K. & Arendt, D. Emerging systems: between vertebrates and arthropods, the Lophotrochozoa. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 13, 331-340 (2003). (Pubitemid 36897795)
7. Rivera, A. & Weisblat, D. And Lophotrochozoa makes three: Notch/Hes signaling in annelid segmentation. Dev. Genes Evol. 219, 37-43 (2009).
8. Shain, D. H. Annelids in Modern Biology (Wiley, 2009).
9. Erséus, C. Phylogeny of oligochaetous Clitellata. Hydrobiologia535-536, 357-372 (2005).
10. McHugh, D. Molecular systematics of polychaetes (Annelida). Hydrobiologia 535- 536, 309-318 (2005).
11. Fauvel, P. Polychètes errantes. Faune de France 5, 1-488 (1923).
12. Fauvel, P. Polychètes sédentaires. Faune de France 16, 1-494 (1927).
13. de Quatrefages, A. M. Histoire Naturelle des Annelides, Marine et d'Eau Douce. Annelides et Gephyriens Vol. 1 (Librairie Encyclopédique de Roret, 1866).
14. Day, J. H. A Monograph on the Polychaeta of Southern Africa. Part 1. Errantia (British Museum (Natural History), 1967).
15. Rouse, G. W. & Fauchald, K. Cladistics and polychaetes. Zool. Scr. 26, 139-204 (1997).
16. Eibye-Jacobsen, D. A reevaluation of Wiwaxia and the polychaetes of the Burgess Shale. Lethaia 37, 317-335 (2004). (Pubitemid 39347859)
17. Rouse, G. W. & Pleijel, F. Polychaetes (Oxford Univ. Press, 2001).
18. Bleidorn, C. et al.Onthe phylogenetic position ofMyzostomida: can 77 genes get it wrong? BMC Evol. Biol. 9, 150 (2009).
19. Bleidorn, C. et al. Mitochondrial genome and nuclear sequence data support Myzostomida as part of the annelid radiation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24, 1690-1701 (2007). (Pubitemid 47236686)
20. Eeckhaut, I., Fievez, L. & Mü ller, M. C. M. Larval development of Myzostoma cirriferum (Myzostomida). J. Morphol. 258, 269-283 (2003). (Pubitemid 37488932)
21. Westheide, W. The direction of evolution within the Polychaeta. J. Nat. Hist. 31, 1-15 (1997).
22. Suschenko, D. & Purschke, G. Ultrastructure of pigmented adult eyes in errant polychaetes (Annelida): implications for annelid evolution. Zoomorphology 128, 75-96 (2009).
23. Fauchald, K. & Jumars, P. A. The diet of worms: a study of polychaete feedings guilds. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. Annu. Rev. 17, 193-284 (1979).
24. Christodoulou, F. et al. Ancient animal microRNAs and the evolution of tissue identity. Nature 463, 1084-1088 (2010).
25. Hausdorf, B. et al. Spiralian phylogenomics supports the resurrection of Bryozoa comprising Ectoprocta and Entoprocta. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24, 2723-2729 (2007).
26. Ebersberger, I., Strauss, S. & von Haeseler, A. HaMStR: profile Hidden Markov Model based search for orthologs in ESTs. BMC Evol. Biol. 9, 157 (2009).
27. Birney, E., Clamp, M. & Durbin, R. GeneWise and Genomewise. Genome Res. 14, 988-995 (2004).
28. Katoh, K., Kuma, K.-i., Toh, H. & Miyata, T. MAFFT version 5: improvement in accuracy ofmultiple sequence alignment. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, 511-518 (2005). (Pubitemid 40360980)
29. Hartmann, S.&Vision, T. Using ESTs for phylogenomics: can one accurately infer a phylogenetic tree from a gappy alignment? BMC Evol. Biol. 8, 95 (2008).
30. Smith, S. A. & Dunn, C. W. Phyutility: a phyloinformatics tool for trees, alignments and molecular data. Bioinformatics 24, 715-716 (2008). (Pubitemid 351321218)
31. NCBI dbEST (Expressed Sequence Tags Database) 〈http://www.ncbi.nlm. nih.gov/projects/dbEST/〉 (2010).
32. Helmkampf, M., Bruchhaus, I. & Hausdorf, B. Phylogenomic analyses of lophophorates (brachiopods, phoronids and bryozoans) confirm the Lophotrochozoa concept. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 275, 1927-1933 (2008). (Pubitemid 351915154)
33. Struck, T. H. & Fisse, F. Phylogenetic position of Nemertea derived from phylogenomic data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25, 728-736 (2008). (Pubitemid 351398328)
34. Ribosomal Protein Gene Database 〈http://ribosome.med.miyazaki-u.ac. jp〉 (2010).
35. InParanoid: Eukaryotic Ortholog Groups (100 organisms: 1687023 sequences) 〈http://inparanoid.sbc.su.se/cgi-bin/index.cgi〉 (2010).
36. Abascal, F., Zardoya, R. & Posada, D. ProtTest: selection of best-fit models of protein evolution. Bioinformatics 21, 2104-2105 (2005). (Pubitemid 40668057)
37. Stamatakis, A. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximumlikelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22, 2688-2690 (2006). (Pubitemid 44642609)
38. Pattengale, N. D., Alipour, M., Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P., Moret, B. M. E. & Stamatakis, A. in RECOMB 2009, LNCS 5541 (ed. Batzoglou, S.) 184-200 (Springer, 2009).
39. Lartillot, N.&Philippe, H.A Bayesian mixturemodel for across-site heterogeneities in the amino-acid replacement process. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21, 1095-1109 (2004). (Pubitemid 38658218)
40. Lartillot, N., Brinkmann, H. & Philippe, H. Suppression of long-branch attraction artefacts in the animal phylogeny using a site-heterogeneous model. BMC Evol. Biol. 7, S4 (2007).
41. Rambaut, A. & Drummond, A. J. Tracer v1. 4 〈http://beast.bio.ed. ac.uk/Tracer〉 (2007).
42. Zhou, Y., Rodrigue, N., Lartillot, N. & Philippe, H. Evaluation of the models handling heterotachy in phylogenetic inference. BMC Evol. Biol. 7, 206 (2007).
43. Zrzavý, J., Riha, P., Pialek, L. & Janouskovec, J. Phylogeny of Annelida (Lophotrochozoa): total-evidence analysis ofmorphology and six genes.BMC Evol. Biol. 9, 189 (2009).
44. Rouse, G. W. Trochophore concepts: ciliary bands and the evolution of larvae in spiralian Metazoa. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 66, 411-464 (1999). (Pubitemid 29216039)
45. Hartmann-Schröder, G. Teil 58. Annelida, Borstenwürmer, Polychaeta 2nd edn (Gustav Fischer, 1996).
46. Westheide, W. & Rieger, R. M. Spezielle Zoologie. Erster Teil: Einzeller und Wirbellose Tiere (Gustav Fischer, 1996).
47. Purschke, G., Arendt, D., Hausen, H.&Mü ller, M. C. M. Photoreceptor cells and eyes in Annelida. Arthropod Struct. Dev. 35, 211-230 (2006). (Pubitemid 44883362)
48. Maddison, W. P. & Maddison, D. R. Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version 2 Mesquite Project 〈http://mesquiteproject. org〉 (2009).
49. Purschke, G., Hessling, R. & Westheide, W. The phylogenetic position of the Clitellata and the Echiura-on the problematic assessment of absent characters. J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 38, 165-173 (2000).
50. Wiens, J. J. Does adding characters with missing data increase or decrease phylogenetic accuracy? Syst. Biol. 47, 625-640 (1998). (Pubitemid 128370902)
51. Wiens, J. J., Bonett, R. M. & Chippindale, P. T. Ontogeny discombobulates phylogeny: paedomorphosis and higher-level salamander relationships. Syst. Biol. 54, 91-110 (2005). (Pubitemid 40441165)
52. Bleidorn, C. The role of character loss in phylogenetic reconstruction as exemplified for the Annelida. J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 45, 299-307 (2007). (Pubitemid 47620472)
53. Bleidorn, C., Hill, N., Erséus, C. & Tiedemann, R. On the role of character loss in orbiniid phylogeny (Annelida): molecules vs. morphology. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 52, 57-69 (2009).
54. Struck, T. H. Progenetic species in polychaetes (Annelida) and problems assessing their phylogenetic affiliation. Integr. Comp. Biol. 46, 558-568 (2006). (Pubitemid 44290618)
55. Struck, T. H. Data congruence, paedomorphosis and salamanders. Front. Zool. 4, 22 (2007).