Pancrustacean phylogeny in the light of new phylogenomic data: Support for remipedia as the possible sister group of hexapoda

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 1031-1045

  Von Reumont, Bjoern M ^a   Jenner, Ronald A ^b   Wills, Matthew A ^c   Dell'Ampio, Emiliano ^d   Pass, Günther ^d   Ebersberger, Ingo ^d   Meyer, Benjamin ^e   Koenemann, Stefan ^f   Iliffe, Thomas M ^g   Stamatakis, Alexandros ^h   Niehuis, Oliver ^a   Meusemann, Karen ^a   Misof, Bernhard ^a  

^a ZOOLOGISCHES FORSCHUNGSMUSEUM ALEXANDER KOENIG   (Germany)

^b DEPARTMENT OF LIFE SCIENCES   (United Kingdom)

^c University of Bath   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^e UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

^f UNIVERSITY OF SIEGEN   (Germany)

^g TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^h HEIDELBERG INSTITUTE FOR THEORETICAL STUDIES   (Germany)

Author keywords

Crustacea; EST; matrix reduction; orthology prediction; phylogenomics; Remipedia

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CRUSTACEA; EXPRESSED SEQUENCE TAG; LAEVICAUDATA; MALACOSTRACA; MOLECULAR PHYLOGENY; NONHUMAN; ORTHOLOGY; OSTRACODA; PHYLOGENETIC TREE; PHYLOGENOMICS; REMIPEDIA; SAMPLE SIZE; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SISTER GROUP; SPINICAUDATA; TETRACONATA;

ANIMALS; BASE SEQUENCE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; CRUSTACEA; EXPRESSED SEQUENCE TAGS; INSECTS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MODELS, GENETIC; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84857215053     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: 15371719     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msr270     Document Type: Article

References (94)

1. Andrew DR. 2011. A new view of insect-crustacean relationships II. Inferences from expressed sequence tags and comparisons with neural cladistics. Arthropod Struct Dev. 40(4):304-316.
2. Ax P. 1999. Das System der Metazoa II. Ein Lehrbuch der phylogenetischen Systematik. Stuttgart (Germany): Gustav Fischer Verlag.
3. Babbit CC, Patel NH. 2005. Relationships within the Pancrustacea: examining the influence of additional malacostracan 18S and 28S rDNA. In: Koenemann S, Jenner RA, editors. Crustacea and arthropod relationships. London: Taylor and Francis. p. 275-294.
4. Bäcker H, Fanenbruck M, Wägele JW. 2008. A forgotten homology supporting the monophyly of Tracheata: the subcoxa of insects and myriapods re-visited. Zool Anz. 247:185-207.
5. Braband A, Richter S, Hiesel R, Scholtz G. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships within the Phyllopoda (Crustacea, Branchiopoda) based on mitochondrial and nuclear markers. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 25:229-244. (Pubitemid 35343610)
6. Bracken HD, De Grave S, Toon A, Felder DL, Crandall KA. 2010. Phylogenetic position, systematic status, and divergence time of the Procarididea (Crustacea: Decapoda). Zool Scr. 39:198-212.
7. Bracken HD, Toon A, Felder DL, Martin JW, Finley M, Rasmussen J, Palero F, Crandall KA. 2009. The decapod tree of life: compiling the data and moving toward a consensus of decapod evolution. Arthropod Struct Dev. 67:99-116.
8. Carapelli A. 2000. Molecular phylogeny of the apterygotan insects based on nuclear and mitochondrial genes. Pedobiologia 44:361-373. (Pubitemid 30466358)
9. Carapelli A, Liò P, Nardi F, Van Der Wath E, Frati F. 2007. Phylogenetic analysis of mitochondrial protein coding genes confirms the reciprocal paraphyly of Hexapoda and Crustacea. BMC Evol Biol. 7:1-13.
10. Carapelli A, Nardi F, Dallai R, Boore J, Lìo P, Frati F. 2005. Relationships between hexapods and crustaceans based on four mitochondrial genes. In: Koenemann S, Jenner RA, editors. Crustacea and arthropod relationships. Boca Raton (FL): Taylor and Francis, CRC press. p. 295-306.
11. Chevreux B, Pfisterer T, Drescher B, Driesel AJ, Muller WE, Wetter T, Suhai S. 2004. Using the miraEST assembler for reliable and automated mRNA transcript assembly and SNP detection in sequenced ESTs. Genome Res. 14:1147-1159. (Pubitemid 38811551)
12. Cook C, Yue Q, Akam M. 2005. Mitochondrial genomes suggest that hexapods and crustaceans are mutually paraphyletic. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 272:1295-1304. (Pubitemid 41411352)
13. Dell'Ampio E, Szucsich NU, Carapelli A, Frati F, Steiner G, Steinacher A, Pass G. 2009. Testing for misleading effects in the phylogenetic reconstruction of ancient lineages of hexapods: influence of character dependence and character choice in analyses of 28S rRNA sequences. Zool Scr. 38:155-170.
14. Dohle W. 2001. Are the insects terrestrial crustaceansi A discussion of some new facts and arguments and the proposal of the proper name 'Tetraconata' for the monophyletic unit Crustacea + Hexapoda. Ann Soc Entomol Fr (New Series). 37:85-103. (Pubitemid 33592123)
15. Driskell AC, Ané C, Burleigh JG, McMahon MM, O'Meara BC, Sanderson MJ. 2004. Prospects for building the tree of life from large sequence databases. Science 306:1172-1174. (Pubitemid 39488993)
16. Dunn CW, Hejnol A, Matus DQ, et al. (18 co-authors). 2008. Broad phylogenomic sampling improves resolution of the animal tree of life. Nature 452:745-749. (Pubitemid 351522763)
17. Ebersberger I, Strauss S, Von Haeseler A. 2009. HaMStR: profile hidden markov model based search for orthologs in ESTs. BMC Evol Biol. 9:1-9.
18. Emerson MJ, Schram F. 1991. Remipedia; part II, Palaeontology. Proc San Diego Soc Nat Hist. 7:1-52.
19. Ertas B, von Reumont BM, Wägele J, Misof B, Burmester T. 2009. Hemocyanin suggests a close relationship of Remipedia and Hexapoda. Mol Biol Evol. 26:2711-2718.
20. Fanenbruck M, Harzsch S. 2005. A brain atlas of Godzillognomus frondosus Yager, 1989 (Remipedia, Godzilliidae) and comparison with the brain of Speleonectes tulumensis Yager, 1987 (Remipedia, Speleonectidae): implications for arthropod relationships. Arthropod Struct Dev. 34:343-378. (Pubitemid 41258155)
21. Fanenbruck M, Harzsch S, Wägele JW. 2004. The brain of the Remipedia (Crustacea) and an alternative hypothesis on their phylogenetic relationships. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 101:3868-3873. (Pubitemid 38381069)
22. Felsenstein J. 1988. Phylogenies from molecular sequences: inference and reliability. Ann Rev Gen. 22:521-565. (Pubitemid 19156673)
23. Friedrich M, Tautz D. 1995. Ribosomal DNA phylogeny of the major extant arthropod classes and the evolution of myriapods. Nature 376:165-167.
24. Friedrich M, Tautz D. 2001. Arthropod rDNA phylogeny revisited: a consistency analysis using Monte Carlo simulation. Ann Soc Entomol Fr (New Series). 37:21-40.
25. Giribet G, Edgecombe GD, Wheeler WC. 2001. Arthropod phylogeny based on eight molecular loci and morphology. Nature 413:157-161. (Pubitemid 32867875)
26. Glenner H, Thomsen P, Hebsgaard M, Sorensen M, Willerslev E. 2006. Evolution: the origin of insects. Science 314:1883-1884.
27. Green P. 1993-1996. Crossmatch. [cited 2011 Nov 14]. Available from: http://www.incogen.com/public-documents/vibe/details/crossmatch.html.
28. Hartmann S, Vision TJ. 2008. Using ESTs for phylogenomics: can one accurately infer a phylogenetic tree from a gappy alignmenti BMC Evol Biol. 8:95.
29. Harzsch S. 2006. Neurophylogeny: architecture of the nervous system and a fresh view on arthropod phyologeny. Integr Comp Biol. 46:162-194. (Pubitemid 44325380)
30. Harzsch S, Hafner G. 2006. Evolution of eye development in arthropods: phylogenetic aspects. Arthropod Struct Dev. 35:319-340. (Pubitemid 44880196)
31. Harzsch S, Müller C, Wolf H. 2005. From variable to constant cell numbers: cellular characteristics of the arthropod nervous system argue against a sister-group relationship of Chelicerata and 'Myriapoda' but favour the Mandibulata concept. Dev Genes Evol. 215:53-68. (Pubitemid 40305475)
32. Hassanin A. 2006. Phylogeny of Arthropoda inferred from mitochondrial sequences: strategies for limiting the misleading effects of multiple changes in pattern and rates of substitution. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 38:100-116. (Pubitemid 41773277)
33. Heymons R. 1901. Die Entwicklungsgeschichte der Scolopender. Zoologica 33:1-244.
34. Hwang UW, Friedrich M, Tautz D, Park CJ, Kim W. 2001. Mitochondrial protein phylogeny joins myriapods with chelicerates. Nature 413:154-157. (Pubitemid 32867874)
35. Jenner RA. 2010. Higher-level crustacean phylogeny: consensus and conflicting hypotheses. Arthropod Struct Dev. 39:143-153.
36. Jenner RA, ń́ Dhubhghaill C, Ferla MP, Wills MA. 2009. Eumalacostracan phylogeny and total evidence: limitations of the usual suspects. BMC Evol Biol. 9:21.
37. Katoh K, Toh H. 2008. Recent developments in the MAFFT multiple sequence alignment program. Brief Bioinform. 9:286-298. (Pubitemid 351890825)
38. Koenemann S, Jenner RA, Hoenemann M, Stemme T, von Reumont BM. 2010. Arthropod phylogeny revisited, with a focus on crustacean relationships. Arthropod Struct Dev. 39:88-110.
39. Koenemann S, Olesen J, Alwes F, Iliffe TM, Hoenemann M, Ungerer P, Wolff C, Scholtz G. 2009. The post-embryonic development of Remipedia (Crustacea)-additional results and new insights. Dev Genes Evol. 219:131-145.
40. Koenemann S, Schram FR, Bloechl A, Iliffe TM, Hoenemann M, Held C. 2007. Post-embryonic development of remipede crustaceans. Evol Dev. 9:117-121. (Pubitemid 46426878)
41. Kück P. 2009. ALICUT: a Perlscript which cuts ALISCORE identified RSS. Version 2.0 ed. Bonn (Germany): Department of Bioinformatics, Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum A. Koenig (ZFMK). [cited 2011 Nov 14]. Available from: http://www.zfmk.utilities.de.
42. Kück P, Meusemann K. 2010. FASconCAT: convenient handling of data matrices. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 56:1115-1118.
43. Kück P, Meusemann K, Dambach J, Thormann B, von Reumont BM, Waegele JW, Misof B. 2010. Parametric and non-parametric masking of randomness in sequence alignments can be improved and leads to better resolved trees. Front Zool. 7:10.
44. Lavrov D, Brown W, Boore J. 2004. Phylogenetic position of the Pentastomida and (pan)crustacean relationships. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 271:537-544. (Pubitemid 38283149)
45. Lim JT, Hwang UW. 2006. The complete mitochondrial genome of Pollicipes mitella (Crustacea, Maxillopoda, Cirripedia): nonmonophylies of Maxillopoda and Crustacea. Mol Cells. 22:314-322. (Pubitemid 46062296)
46. Mallatt J, Giribet G. 2006. Further use of nearly complete 28S and 18S rRNA genes to classify Ecdysozoa: 37 more arthropods and a kinorhynch. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 40:772-794. (Pubitemid 44163250)
47. Martin J, Davis GE. 2001. An update classification of the recent Crustacea. Nat Hist Mus Los Angel Cty Sci Ser. 39:1-124.
48. Meusemann K, von Reumont BM, Simon S, et al. (16 co-authors). 2010. A phylogenomic approach to resolve the arthropod tree of life. Mol Biol Evol. 27:2451-2464.
49. Meyer B, Misof B. 2010. MARE: matrix reduction-a tool to select optimized data subsets from supermatrices for phylogenetic inference. Zentrum für molekulare Biodiversitätsforschung (zmb) am ZFMK. Version 01-alpha. [cited 2010 Aug 1]. Available from: http://mare.zfmk.de.
50. Misof B, Misof K. 2009. A Monte Carlo approach successfully identifies randomness in multiple sequence alignments: a more objective means of data exclusion. Syst Biol. 58:21-34.
51. Moura G, Christoffersen ML. 1996. The system of the mandibulate arthropods: Tracheata and Remipedia as sistergroups, crustacea non-monophyletic. J Comp Biol. 1:95-113.
52. Nardi F, Spinsanti G, Boore J, Carapelli A, Dallai R, Frati F. 2003. Hexapod origins: monophyletic or paraphyletic? Science 299:1887-1889. (Pubitemid 36356656)
53. Nieselt-Struwe K, Von Haeseler A. 2001. Quartet-mapping, a generalization of the likelihood-mapping procedure. Mol Biol Evol. 18:1204-1219. (Pubitemid 32660667)
54. Olesen J. 2007. Monophyly and phylogeny of Branchiopoda, with focus on morphology and homologies of branchiopod phyllopodus limbs. J Crustac Biol. 27:165-183. (Pubitemid 46732340)
55. Ostlund G, Schmitt T, Forslund K, Köstler T, Messina DN, Roopra S, Frings O, Sonnhammer EL. 2010. InParanoid 7: new algorithms and tools for eukaryotic orthology analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 38:196-203.
56. Ott M, Zola J, Stamatakis A, Aluru S. 2007. Large-scale maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analysis on the IBM BlueGene/L. Proceedings of the 2007 ACM/IEEE conference on Supercomputing. Reno (NV): ACM.
57. Pattengale ND, Alipour M, Bininda-Emonds OR, Moret BM, Stamatakis A. 2010. How many bootstrap replicates are necessary? J Comput Biol. 17:337-354.
58. Philippe H, Brinkmann H, Lavrov DV, Littlewood DT, Manuel M, Worheide G, Baurain D. 2011. Resolving difficult phylogenetic questions: why more sequences are not enough. PLoS Biol. 9:e1000602.
59. Philippe H, Delsuc F, Brinkmann H, Lartillot N. 2005. Phylogenomics. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 36:541-562. (Pubitemid 43068870)
60. Philippe H, Derelle R, Lopez P, et al. (14 co-authors). 2009. Phylogenomics revives traditional views on deep animal relationships. Curr Biol. 19:706-712.
61. Pocock RI. 1893. On the classification of the tracheate Arthropoda. Zool Anz. 16:271-275.
62. Regier J, Shultz J, Kambic R. 2005. Pancrustacean phylogeny: hexapods are terrestrial crustaceans and maxillopods are not monophyletic. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 272:395-401. (Pubitemid 41411102)
63. Regier J, Shultz J, Zwick A, Hussey A, Ball B, Wetzer R, Martin JW, Cunningham CW. 2010. Arthropod relationships revealed by phylogenomic analysis of nuclear protein-coding sequences. Nature 463:1079-1083.
64. Regier JC, Shultz JW. 2001. Elongation factor-2: a useful gene for arthropod phylogenetics. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 20:136-148. (Pubitemid 32656908)
65. Regier JC, Shultz JW, Ganley AR, et al. (12 co-authors). 2008. Resolving arthropod phylogeny: exploring phylogenetic signal within 41 kb of protein-coding nuclear gene sequence. Syst Biol. 57:920-938.
66. Richter S, Olesen J, Wheeler WC. 2007. Phylogeny of Branchiopoda (Crustacea) based on a combined analysis of morphological data and six molecular loci. Cladistics 23:301-336. (Pubitemid 47228542)
67. Richter S, Scholtz G. 2001. Phylogenetic analysis of the Malacostraca (Crustacea). J Zool Syst Evol Res. 39:113-136.
68. Roeding F, Borner J, Kube M, Klages S, Reinhardt R, Burmester T. 2009. A 454 sequencing approach for large scale phylogenomic analysis of the common emperor scorpion (Pandinus imperator). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 53:826-834.
69. Roeding F, Hagner-Holler S, Ruhberg H, Ebersberger I, Von Haeseler A, Kube M, Reinhardt R, Burmester T. 2007. EST sequencing of Onychophora and phylogenomic analysis of Metazoa. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 45:942-951. (Pubitemid 350110621)
70. Rota-Stabelli O, Campbell L, Brinkmann H, Edgecombe GD, Longhorn SJ, Peterson KJ, Pisani D, Philippe H, Telford MJ. 2011. A congruent solution to arthropod phylogeny: phylogenomics, microRNAs and morphology support monophyletic Mandibulata. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 278:298-306.
71. Schram FR. 1986. Crustacea. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
72. Schram FR, Hof CHJ. 1998. Fossils and interrelationships of major crustacean groups. In: Edgecomb GD, editor. Arthropod fossils and phylogeny. New York: Columbia University Press. p. 233-302.
73. Schram FR, Koenemann S. 2001. Developmental genetics and arthropod evolution: part I, on legs. Evol Dev. 3(5):343-354. (Pubitemid 32984018)
74. Shultz JW, Regier JC. 2000. Phylogenetic analysis of arthropods using two nuclear protein-encoding genes supports a crustacean + hexapod clade. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 267:1011-1019. (Pubitemid 30326400)
75. Smit AFA, Hubley R, Green P. 1996-2010. RepeatMasker Open-3.0. [cited 2011 Nov 14]. Available from: http://www.repeatmasker.-org.
76. Smith S, Dunn C. 2008. Phyutility: a phyloinformatics tool for trees, alignments and molecular data. Bioinformatics 24:715-716. (Pubitemid 351321218)
77. Spears T, Abele LG. 1998. Crustacean phylogeny inferred from 18S rDNA. In: Fortey RA, Thomas RH, editors. Arthropod relationships. London: Chapman and Hall. p. 169-187.
78. Stamatakis A. 2006. RaxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22:2688-2690. (Pubitemid 44642609)
79. Stenderup J, Olesen J, Glenner H. 2006. Molecular phylogeny of the Branchiopoda (Crustacea)-multiple approaches suggest a 'diplostracan' ancestry of the Notostraca. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 41:182-194. (Pubitemid 44311546)
80. Strausfeld NJ, Sinakevitch I, Brown SM, Farris S. 2009. Ground plan of insect mushroom body: functional and evolutionary implications. J Comp Neur. 3:265-291.
81. Timmermans M, Roelofs D, Marien J, van Straalen NM. 2008. Revealing pancrustacean relationships: phylogenetic analysis of ribosomal protein genes places Collembola (springtails) in a monophyletic Hexapoda and reinforces the discrepancy between mitochondrial and nuclear markers. BMC Evol Biol. 8:1-10.
82. Toon A, Finley M, Staples J, Crandall KA. 2009. Decapod phylogenetics and molecular evolution. In: Martin JW, Crandall KA, Felder DL, editors. Decapod crustacean phylogenetics. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Publishing. p. 15-29.
83. Ungerer P, Scholtz G. 2008. Filling the gap between identified neuroblasts and neurons in crustaceans adds new support for Tetraconata. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 275:369-376.
84. von Reumont BM, Meusemann K, Szucsich N, et al. (14 co-authors). 2009. Can comprehensive background knowledge be incorporated into substitution models to improve phylogenetic analysesi A case study on major arthropod relationships. BMC Evol Biol. 9:119.
85. Walossek D. 1993. The Upper Cambrian Rehbachiella and the phylogeny of Branchiopoda and Crustacea. Fossils Strata 12:318.
86. Wheeler WC, Giribet G, Edgecombe GD. 2004. Arthropod systematics. The comparative study of genomic, anatomical, and paleontological information. In: Cracraft J, Donoghue MJ, editors. Assembling the tree of life. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 281-295.
87. Wiens JJ, Moen DS. 2008. Missing data and the accuracy of Bayesian phylogenetics. J Syst Evol. 46:307-314.
88. Wills MA. 1998a. A phylogeny of recent and fossil Crustacea derived from morphological characters. In: Fortey RA, Thomas RH, editors. Arthropod relationships. London: Chapman and Hall.
89. Wills MA. 1998b. Crustacean disparity through the Phanerozoic: comparing morphological and stratigraphic data. Biol J Linn Soc. 65:455-500. (Pubitemid 29032383)
90. Wills MA, Briggs DEG, Fortey RA, Wilkinson M. 1995. The significance of fossils in understanding arthropod evolution. Verh Dtsch Zool Ges 88:203-215.
91. Wills MA, Jenner RA, Dhubhghaill CA. 2009. Eumalacostracan evolution: conflict between three sources of data. Arthropod Syst Phylogeny. 67:71-90.
92. Yager J. 1981. Remipedia, a new class of Crustacea from a marine cave in the Bahamas. J Crustac Biol. 1:328-333.
93. Yager J, Schram FR. 1986. Lasionectes-entrichoma, new genus, new species, (Crustacea, Remipedia) from anchialine caves in the Turks-and-Caicos, British West-Indies. Proc Biol Soc Wash. 99:65-70.
94. Zrzavý J, Stys P. 1997. The basic body plan of arthropods: insights from evolutionary morphology and developmental biology. J Evol Biol. 10:353-367.