Compositional heterogeneity and phylogenomic inference of metazoan relationships

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 27, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 2095-2104

  Nesnidal, Maximilian P ^a   Helmkampf, Martin ^a,c   Bruchhaus, Iris ^b   Hausdorf, Bernhard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

^b BERNHARD NOCHT INSTITUTE FOR TROPICAL MEDICINE   (Germany)

^c ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

compositional bias; Metazoa; phylogenomics

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID; RIBOSOME PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID COMPOSITION; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENOMICS; METAZOON; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; SYSTEMATIC ERROR;

ANIMALS; DATABASES, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY; RIBOSOMAL PROTEINS;

BRYOZOA; DEUTEROSTOMIA; ENTOPROCTA; METAZOA;

EID: 77955950911     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: 15371719     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msq097     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Anderson FE, Cordoba AJ, Thollesson M. 2004. Bilaterian phylogeny based on analyses of a region of the sodium-potassium ATPase a-subunit gene. J Mol Evol. 58:252-268
2. Ax P. 1995. Das System Der Metazoa I. Stuttgart (Germany): G. Fischer.
3. Baguñà J, Martinez P, Paps J, Riutort M. 2008. Back in time: a new systematic proposal for the Bilateria. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B. 363:1481-1491
4. Baurain D, Brinkmann H, Philippe H. 2007. Lack of resolution in the animal phylogeny: closely spaced cladogeneses or undetected systematic errors? Mol Biol Evol. 24:6-9
5. Birney E, Clamp M, Durbin R. 2004. GeneWise and Genomewise. Genome Res. 14:988-995
6. Blanquart S, Lartillot N. 2006. A Bayesian compound stochastic process for modeling nonstationary and nonhomogeneous sequence evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 23:2058-2071
7. Blanquart S, Lartillot N. 2008. A site-and time-heterogeneous model of amino acid replacement. Mol Biol Evol. 25:842-858
8. Brinkmann H, Philippe H. 2008. Animal phylogeny and large-scale sequencing: progress and pitfalls. J Syst Evol. 46:274-286
9. Castresana J. 2000. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol Biol Evol. 17:540-552
10. Cavalier-Smith T. 1998. A revised six-kingdom system of life. Biol Rev. 73:203-266
11. Cohen BL. 2000. Monophyly of brachiopods and phoronids: reconciliation of molecular evidence with Linnaean classification (the subphylum Phoroniformea nov.). Proc R Soc Lond B. 267:225-231
12. Cohen BL, Gawthrop A, Cavalier-Smith T. 1998. Molecular phylogeny of brachiopods and phoronids based on nuclear-encoded small subunit ribosomal RNA gene sequences. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B. 353:2039-2061
13. Cohen BL, Weydmann A. 2005. Molecular evidence that phoronids are a subtaxon of brachiopods (Brachiopoda: Phoronata) and that genetic divergence of metazoan phyla began long before the early Cambrian. Organ Diver Evol. 5:253-273
14. Collins TM, Fedrigo O, Naylor GJP. 2005. Choosing the best genes for the job: the case for stationary genes in genome-scale phylogenetics. Syst Biol. 54:493-500
15. Dayhoff MO, Schwartz RM, Orcutt BC. 1978. A model of evolutionary change in proteins. In: Dayhoff MO, editor. Atlas of protein sequence and structure Vol. 5 Suppl. 3. Washington, DC: National Biomedical Research Foundation. p. 345-352
16. Delsuc F, Brinkmann H, Philippe H. 2005. Phylogenomics and the reconstruction of the tree of life. Nat Rev Genet. 6:361-375
17. Dunn CW, Hejnol A, Matus DQ, et al. (18 co-authors). 2008. Broad phylogenomic sampling improves resolution of the animal tree of life. Nature. 452:745-749
18. Dutheil J, Boussau B. 2008. Non-homogeneous models of sequence evolution in the Bio\+\+ suite of libraries and programs. BMC Evol Biol. 8:255.
19. Embley TM, Van Der Giezen M, Horner DS, Dyal PL, Foster P. 2003. Mitochondria and hydrogenosomes are two forms of the same fundamental organelle. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B. 358:191-203
20. Emig C. 1984. On the origin of the Lophophorata. Z Zool Syst Evolutionsforsch. 22:91-94
21. Foster PG. 2004. Modeling compositional heterogeneity. Syst Biol. 53:485-495
22. Foster PG, Hickey DA. 1999. Compositional bias may affect both DNA-based and protein-based phylogenetic reconstructions. J Mol Evol. 48:284-290
23. Felsenstein J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783-791
24. Giribet G, Distel DL, Polz M, Sterrer W, Wheeler WC. 2000. Triploblastic relationships with emphasis on the acoelo-mates and the position of Gnathostomulida, Cycliophora, Plathelminthes, and Chaetognatha: a combined approach of 18S rDNA sequences and morphology. Syst Biol. 49: 539-562
25. Halanych KM. 2004. The new view of animal phylogeny. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 35:229-256
26. Hausdorf B, Helmkampf M, Meyer A, Witek A, Herlyn H, Bruchhaus I, Hankeln T, Struck TH, Lieb B. 2007. Spiralian phylogenomics supports the resurrection of Bryozoa comprising Ectoprocta and Entoprocta. Mol Biol Evol. 24:2723-2729
27. Hejnol A, Obst M, Stamatakis A, et al. (17 co-authors). 2009. Assessing the root of bilaterian animals with scalable phyloge-nomic methods. Proc R Soc Lond B. 276:4261-4270
28. Helmkampf M, Bruchhaus I, Hausdorf B. 2008. Phylogenomic analyses of lophophorates (brachiopods, phoronids and bryozoans) confirm the Lophotrochozoa concept. Proc R Soc Lond B. 275:1927-1933
29. Hennig W. 1979. Wirbellose I (ausgenommen Gliedertiere). Taschenbuch Der Speziellen Zoologie, 4th ed. Vol.2. Jena, Germany: G. Fischer.
30. Ho SYW, Jermiin LS. 2004. Tracing the decay of the historical signal in biological sequence data. Syst Biol. 53:623-637
31. Jermiin LS, Ho SYW, Ababneh F, Robinson J, Larkum AWD. 2004. The biasing effect of compositional heterogeneity on phyloge-netic estimates may be underestimated. Syst Biol. 53:638-643
32. Jones DT, Taylor WR, Thornton JM. 1992. The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences. Comput Appl Biosci. 8:275-282
33. Katoh K, Misawa K, Kuma K, Miyata T. 2002. MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:3059-3066
34. Katoh K, Toh H. 2008. Recent developments in the MAFFT multiple sequence alignment program. Brief Bioinform. 9:286-298
35. Lartillot N, Philippe H. 2004. A Bayesian mixture model for across-site heterogeneities in the amino-acid replacement process. Mol Biol Evol. 21:1095-1109
36. Lartillot N, Philippe H. 2008. Improvement of molecular phyloge-netic inference and the phylogeny of Bilateria. Philos Trans R Soc B. 363:1463-1472
37. Le SQ, Gascuel O. 2008. An improved general amino acid replacement matrix. Mol Biol Evol. 25:1307-1320
38. Lockhart PJ, Steel MA, Hendy MD, Penny D. 1994. Recovering evolutionary trees under a more realistic model of sequence evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 11:605-612
39. Mallatt J, Winchell CJ. 2002. Testing the new animal phylogeny: first use of combined large-subunit and small-subunit rRNA gene sequences to classify the protostomes. Mol Biol Evol. 19:289-301
40. Nielsen C. 1985. Animal phylogeny in the light of the trochaea theory. Biol J Linn Soc. 25:243-299
41. Nielsen C. 2001. Animal evolution: interrelationships of the living phyla. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42. Paps J, Baguñà J, Riutort M. 2009. Lophotrochozoa internal phylogeny: new insights from an up-to-date analysis of nuclear ribosomal genes. Proc R Soc Lond B. 276:1245-1254
43. Passamaneck Y, Halanych KM. 2006. Lophotrochozoan phylogeny assessed with LSU and SSU data: evidence of lophophorate polyphyly. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 40:20-28
44. Peterson KJ, Eernisse DJ. 2001. Animal phylogeny and the ancestry of bilaterians: inferences from morphology and 18S rDNA gene sequences. Evol Dev. 3:170-205
45. Philippe H, Lartillot N, Brinkmann H. 2005. Multigene analyses of bilaterian animals corroborate the monophyly of Ecdysozoa, Lophotrochozoa, and Protostomia. Mol Biol Evol. 22:1246-1253
46. Philippe H, Telford MJ. 2006. Large-scale sequencing and the new animal phylogeny. Trends Ecol Evol. 21:614-620
47. Phillips MJ, Delsuc F, Penny D. 2004. Genome-scale phylogeny and the detection of systematic biases. Mol Biol Evol. 21:1455-1458
48. Rodríguez-Ezpeleta N, Brinkmann H, Roure B, Lartillot N, Lang BF, Philippe H. 2007. Detecting and overcoming systematic errors in genome-scale phylogenies. Syst Biol. 56:389-399
49. Saitou N, Nei M. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 4:406-425
50. Stamatakis A. 2006. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22:2688-2690
51. Struck TH, Fisse F. 2008. Phylogenetic position of Nemertea derived from phylogenomic data. Mol Biol Evol. 25:728-736
52. Susko E, Roger AJ. 2007. On reduced amino acid alphabets for phylogenetic inference. Mol Biol Evol. 24:2139-2150
53. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S. 2007. MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol. 24:1596-1599
54. Tamura K, Kumar S. 2002. Evolutionary distance estimation under heterogeneous substitution pattern among lineages. Mol Biol Evol. 19:1727-1736
55. Witek A, Herlyn H, Meyer A, Boell L, Bucher G, Hankeln T. 2008. EST based phylogenomics of Syndermata questions monophyly of Eurotatoria. BMC Evol Biol. 8:345.
56. Zrzavý J, Mihulka S, Kepka P. 1998. Bezdëk A. 1998. Tietz D. 1998. Phylogeny of the Metazoa based on morphological and 18S ribosomal DNA evidence. Cladistics 14:249-285