Spiralian phylogenomics supports the resurrection of bryozoa comprising ectoprocta and entoprocta

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 24, Issue 12, 2007, Pages 2723-2729

  Hausdorf, Bernhard ^a   Helmkampf, Martin ^a   Meyer, Achim ^b   Witek, Alexander ^b   Herlyn, Holger ^b   Bruchhaus, Iris ^c   Hankeln, Thomas ^b   Struck, Torsten H ^d   Lieb, Bernhard ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

^b JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c BERNHARD NOCHT INSTITUTE FOR TROPICAL MEDICINE   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF OSNABRÜCK   (Germany)

Author keywords

Bryozoa; Ectoprocta; Entoprocta; Metazoa; Phylogenomics; Spiralia

Indexed keywords

RIBOSOME PROTEIN;

ACANTHOCEPHALUS; ANALYTIC METHOD; ANNELID WORM; ARTICLE; BRYOZOA; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECTOPROCTA; ENTOPROCTA; GENOMICS; METAZOON; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOLLUSC; MORPHOLOGY; NEOTROCHOZOA; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; ROTIFERA; SIPUNCULA; SYNDERMATA; TAXONOMY;

ANIMALS; ANNELIDA; BRYOZOA; GENOMICS; MODELS, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY; PLATYHELMINTHS;

ACANTHOCEPHALA (WORMS); ANNELIDA; BRYOZOA; ENTOPROCTA; METAZOA; MOLLUSCA; ROTIFERA; SIPUNCULA; SPIRALIA;

EID: 37549050188     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: 15371719     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msm214     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Abascal F, Zardoya R, Posada D. 2005. ProtTest: selection of best-fit models of protein evolution. Bioinformatics. 21:2104-2105.
2. Aguinaldo AMA, Turbeville JM, Linford LS, Rivera MC, Garey JR, Raff RA, Lake JA. 1997. Evidence for a clade of nematodes, arthropods and other moulting animals. Nature. 387:489-493.
3. Ahlrichs WH. 1995a. Seison annulatus und Seison nebaliae - Ultrastruktur und Phylogenie. Verh dtsch zool Ges. 88.1:155.
4. Ahlrichs WH. 1995b. Zur Ultrastruktur und Phylogenie von Seison nebaliae Grube, 1859 und Seison annulatus Claus, 1876 - Hypothesen zu phylogenetischen Verwandtschaftsverhältnissen innerhalb der Bilateria. Göttingen: Cuvillier.
5. Ahlrichs WH. 1997. Epidermal ultrastructure of Seison nebaliae and Seison annulatus, and a comparison of epidermal structures within the Gnathifera. Zoomorphology. 117:41-48.
6. Ax P. 1985. The position of the Gnathostomulida and Platyhelminthes in the phylogenetic system of the Bilateria. In: Conway Morris S, George JD, Gibson R, Platt HM, editors. The origins and relationships of lower invertebrates. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 168-180.
7. Ax P. 1995. Das System der Metazoa I. Stuttgart (Germany): G. Fischer.
8. Ax P. 1999. Das System der Metazoa II. Stuttgart (Germany): G. Fischer.
9. Bartolomaeus T. 1993. Die Leibeshöhlenverhältnisse und Verwandtschaftsbeziehungen der Spiralia. Verh dtsch zool Ges. 86.1:42.
10. Baurain D, Brinkmann H, Philippe H. 2007. Lack of resolution in the animal phylogeny: closely spaced cladogeneses or undetected systematic errors? Mol Biol Evol. 24:6-9.
11. Birney E, Clamp M, Durbin R. 2004. GeneWise and Genomewise. Genome Res. 14:988-995.
12. Blair JE, Ikeo K, Gojobori T, Hedges SB. 2002. The evolutionary position of nematodes. BMC Evol Biol. 2:7.
13. Blanquart S, Lartillot N. 2006. A Bayesian compound stochastic process for modeling nonstationary and nonhomogeneous sequence evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 23:2058-2071.
14. Bleidorn C, Podsiadlowski L, Bartolomaeus T. 2006. The complete mitochondrial genome of the orbiniid polychaete Orbinia latreillii (Annelida, Orbiniidae) - A novel gene order for Annelida and implications for annelid phylogeny. Gene. 370:96-103.
15. Bleidorn C, Vogt L, Bartolomaeus T. 2003. A contribution to sedentary polychaete phylogeny using 18S rRNA sequence data. J Zool Syst Evol Res. 41:186-195.
16. Boore JL, Staton JL. 2002. The mitochondrial genome of the sipunculid Phascolopsis gouldii supports its association with Annelida rather than Mollusca. Mol Biol Evol. 19:127-137.
17. Brusca RC, Brusca GJ. 2002. Invertebrates, 2nd ed. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates.
18. Castresana J. 2000. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol Biol Evol. 17:540-552.
19. Cavalier-Smith T. 1998. A revised six-kingdom system of life. Biol Rev. 73:203-266.
20. Emschermann P. 1982. Les Kamptozoaires. État actuel de nos connaissances sur leur anatomie, leur développement, leur biologie et leur position phylogénétique. Bull Soc zool Fr. 107:317-344 pl. 1-3.
21. Ewing B, Hillier L, Wendl MC, Green P. 1998. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using Phred. I. Accuracy assessment. Genome Res. 8:175-185.
22. Funch P, Kristensen RM. 1995. Cycliophora is a new phylum with affinities to Entoprocta and Ectoprocta. Nature. 378:711-714.
23. Garey JR, Near TJ, Nonnemacher MR, Nadler SA. 1996. Molecular evidence for Acanthocephala as a subtaxon of Rotifera. J Mol Evol. 43:287-292.
24. Garey JR, Schmidt-Rhaesa A. 1998. The essential role of "minor" phyla in molecular studies of animal evolution. Am Zool. 38:907-917.
25. Ghirardelli E. 1981. I Chaetognati: posizione sistematica, affinità ed evoluzione del phylum. In: Origine dei grande phyla Nazionale dei metazoi. Rome: Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei. p. 191-233.
26. Giribet G, Distel DL, Polz M, Sterrer W, Wheeler WC. 2000. Triploblastic relationships with emphasis on the acoelomates and the position of Gnathostomulida, Cycliophora, Plathelminthes, and Chaetognatha: a combined approach of 18S rDNA sequences and morphology. Syst Biol. 49:539-562.
27. Halanych KM. 2004. The new view of animal phylogeny. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 35:229-256.
28. Halanych KM, Bacheller JD, Aguinaldo AA, Liva SM, Hillis DM, Lake JA. 1995. Evidence from 18S ribosomal DNA that the Lophophorates are protostome animals. Science. 267:1641-1642.
29. Haszprunar G. 1996. The Mollusca: coelomate turbellarians or mesenchymate annelids? In: Taylor JD, editor. Origin and evolutionary radiation of the Mollusca. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 3-28.
30. Haszprunar G. 2000. Is the Aplacophora monophyletic? A cladistic point of view. Am Malacol Bull. 15:115-130.
31. Hatschek B. 1891. Lehrbuch der Zoologie, 3. Lieferung. Jena (Germany): G. Fischer.
32. Helfenbein KG, Boore JL. 2004. The mitochondrial genome of Phoronis architecta - Comparisons demonstrate that phoronids are lophotrochozoan protostomes. Mol Biol Evol. 21:153-157.
33. Helfenbein KG, Fourcade HM, Vanjani RG, Boore JL. 2004. The mitochondrial genome of Paraspadella gotoi is highly reduced and reveals that chaetognaths are a sister group to protostomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 101:10639-10643.
34. Helmkampf M, Bruchhaus I, Hausdorf B. Forthcoming. Multigene analysis of lophophorate and chaetognath phylogenetic relationships. Mol Phylogenet Evol.
35. Hennig W. 1979. Wirbellose I (ausgenommen Gliedertiere). Taschenbuch der Speziellen Zoologie, 4th ed. Volume 2. Jena (Germany): G. Fischer.
36. Herlyn H, Piskurek O, Schmitz J, Ehlers U, Zischler H. 2003. The syndermatan phylogeny and the evolution of acanthocephalan endoparasitism as inferred from 18S rDNA sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 26:155-164.
37. Huang D-Y, Chen J-Y, Vannier J, Saiz Salinas JI. 2004. Early Cambrian sipunculan worms from southwest China. Proc R Soc Lond B. 271:1671-1676.
38. Hughes J, Longhorn SJ, Papadopoulou A, Theodorides K, de Riva A, Mejia-Chang M, Foster PG, Vogler AP. 2006. Dense taxonomic EST sampling and its applications for molecular systematics of the Coleoptera (beetles). Mol Biol Evol. 23:268-278.
39. Jennings RM, Halanych KM. 2005. Mitochondrial genomes of Clymenella torquata (Maldanidae) and Rifta pachyptila (Siboglinidae): evidence for conserved gene order in Annelida. Mol Biol Evol. 22:210-222.
40. Jobb G. 2007. TREEFINDER version of May 2007. Available from Munich, distributed by the author at www.treefinder.de.
41. Jobb G, von Haeseler A, Strimmer K. 2004. TREEFINDER: a powerful graphical analysis environment for molecular phylogenetics. BMC Evol Biol. 4:18.
42. Korschelt E, Heider K. 1893. Lehrbuch der vergleichenden Entwicklungsgeschichte der wirbellosen Thiere. Specieller Theil, 3. Heft. Jena (Germany): G. Fischer.
43. Lartillot N, Philippe H. 2004. A Bayesian mixture model for across-site heterogeneities in the amino-acid replacement process. Mol Biol Evol. 21:1095-1109.
44. Littlewood DTJ, Telford MJ, Clough KA, Rohde K. 1998. Gnathostomulida - An enigmatic metazoan phylum from both morphological and molecular perspective. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 9:72-79.
45. Mackey LY, Winnepenninckx B, De Wachter R, Backeljau T, Emschermann P, Garey JR. 1996. 18S rRNA suggests that Entoprocta are protostomes, unrelated to Ectoprocta. J Mol Evol. 42:552-559.
46. Mallatt J, Winchell CJ. 2002. Testing the new animal phylogeny: first use of combined large-subunit and small-subunit rRNA gene sequences to classify the protostomes. Mol Biol Evol. 19:289-301.
47. Marlétaz F, Martin E, Perez Y, et al. 2006. Chaetognath phylogenomics: a protostome with deuterostome-like development. Curr Biol. 16:R577-R578.
48. Matus DQ, Copley RR, Dunn CW, Hejnol A, Eccleston H, Halanych KM, Martindale MQ, Telford MJ. 2006. Broad taxon and gene sampling indicate that chaetognaths are protostomes. Curr Biol. 16:R575-R576.
49. McHugh D. 1997. Molecular evidence that echiurans and pogonophorans are derived annelids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 94:8006-8009.
50. Nielsen C. 1971. Entoproct life-cycles and the entoproct/ectoproct relationship. Ophelia. 9:209-341.
51. Nielsen C. 1985. Animal phylogeny in the light of the trochaea theory. Biol J Linn Soc. 25:243-299.
52. Nielsen C. 2001. Animal evolution: interrelationships of the living phyla, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
53. Nitsche H. 1869. Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Bryozoen. I-II. Z Wiss Zool. 20:1-36 1-3.
54. Passamaneck YJ, Halanych KM. 2004. Evidence from Hox genes that bryozoans are lophotrochozoans. Evol Dev. 6:275-281.
55. Passamaneck Y, Halanych KM. 2006. Lophotrochozoan phylogeny assessed with LSU and SSU data: evidence of lophophorate polyphyly. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 40:20-28.
56. Peterson KJ, Eernisse DJ. 2001. Animal phylogeny and the ancestry of bilaterians: inferences from morphology and 18S rDNA gene sequences. Evol Dev. 3:170-205.
57. Philip GK, Creevey CJ, McInerney JO. 2005. The Opisthokonta and the Ecdysozoa may not be clades: stronger support for the grouping of plant and animal than for animal and fungi and stronger support for the Coelomata than Ecdysozoa. Mol Biol Evol. 22:1175-1184.
58. Philippe H, Lartillot N, Brinkmann H. 2005. Multigene analyses of bilaterian animals corroborate the monophyly of Ecdysozoa, Lophotrochozoa and Protostomia. Mol Biol Evol. 22:1246-1253.
59. Philippe H, Snell EA, Bapteste E, Lopez P, Holland PWH, Casane D. 2004. Phylogenomics of eukaryotes: impact of missing data on large alignments. Mol Biol Evol. 21:1740-1752.
60. Philippe H, Telford MJ. 2006. Large-scale sequencing and the new animal phylogeny. TREE. 21:614-620.
61. Scheltema AH. 1993. Aplacophora as progenetic aculiferans and the coelomate origin of mollusks as the sister taxon of Sipuncula. Biol Bull. 184:57-78.
62. Schram FR. 1991. Cladistic analysis of metazoan phyla and the placement of fossil problematica. In: Simonetta AM, Conway-Morris S, editors. The early evolution of Metazoa and the significance of problematic taxa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 35-46.
63. Sørensen MV, Funch P, Willerslev E, Hansen AJ, Olesen J. 2000. On the phylogeny of the Metazoa in the light of Cycliophora and Micrognathozoa. Zool Anz. 239:297-318.
64. Staton JL. 2003. Phylogenetic analysis of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 gene from 13 sipunculan genera: intra- and interphylum relationships. Invert Biol. 122:252-264.
65. Stechmann A, Schlegel M. 1999. Analysis of the complete mitochondrial DNA sequence of the brachiopod Terebratulina retusa places Brachiopoda within the protostomes. Proc R Soc Lond B. 266:2043-2052.
66. Strimmer K, Rambaut A. 2002. Inferring confidence sets of possibly misspecified gene trees. Proc R Soc Lond B. 269:137-142.
67. Struck TH, Schult N, Kusen T, Hickman E, Bleidorn C, McHugh D, Halanych KM. 2007. Annelid phylogeny and the status of Sipuncula and Echiura. BMC Evol Biol. 7:57.
68. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. 1994. ClustalW: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:4673-4680.
69. Veuthey AL, Bittar G. 1998. Phylogenetic relationships of fungi, plantae, and animalia inferred from homologous comparison of ribosomal proteins. J Mol Evol. 47:81-92.
70. Waeschenbach A, Telford MJ, Porter JS, Littlewood DTJ. 2006. The complete mitochondrial genome of Flustrellidra hispida and the phylogenetic position of Bryozoa among the Metazoa. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 40:195-207.
71. Zrzavý J, Mihulka S, Kepka P, Bezděk A, Tietz D. 1998. Phylogeny of the Metazoa based on morphological and 18S ribosomal DNA evidence. Cladistics. 14:249-285.