Does the responsive classroom approach affect the use of standards-based mathematics teaching practices?: Results from a randomized controlled trial

Elementary School Journal

Volumn 113, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 434-457

  Ottmar, Erin R ^a   Rimm Kaufman, Sara E ^b   Berry, Robert Q ^b   Larsen, Ross A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875510230     PISSN: 00135984     EISSN: 15548279     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/668768     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Abry, T., Brewer, A., Nathanson, L., Sawyer, B., Rimm-Kaufman, S. E. (2010). Classroom practices observation measure. Unpublished measure, University of Virginia.
2. Abry, T., Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., Larsen, R. A., Brewer, A. J. (in press). The influence of implementation fidelity on teacher-student interactions in the context of a randomized controlled trial of the Responsive Classroom approach. Journal of School Psychology.
3. Ashton, P. T. (1985). Motivation and teachers' sense of efficacy. In C. Ames R. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education: Vol. 2. The classroom milieu (pp. 141-174). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
4. Ashton, P. T., Webb, R. (1982, March). Teachers' sense of efficacy: Toward an ecological model. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
5. Aud, S., Hussar, W., Planty, M., Snyder, T., Bianco, K., Fox M, Drake L. (2010). The condition of education 2010 (NCES 2010-028). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
6. Ball, D., Thames, M., Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59, 389-407.
7. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84,191-215.
8. Berry, R. Q., Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., Ottmar, E. R., Walkowiak, T. A., & Merritt, E. G. (2010). The mathematics-scan coding guide. Unpublished measure, University of Virginia.
9. Boaler, J. (1998). Open and closed mathematics: Student experiences and understandings. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29, 41-62.
10. Borko, H., Stecher, B. M., Alonzo, A. C, Moncure, S., & McClam, S. (2005). Artifact packages for characterizing classroom practice: A pilot study. Educational Assessment, 10(2), 73-104.
11. Borman, G. D., & Overman, L. T. (2004). Academic resilience in mathematics among poor and minority students. Elementary School Journal, 104,177-195.
12. Brown, E. T. (2005). The influence of teachers' efficacy and beliefs regarding mathematics instruction in the early childhood classroom. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 26, 239-257.
13. Brown, J., Jones, S., LaRusso, M., & Aber, L. (2010). Improving classroom quality: Teacher influences and experimental impacts of the 4R's program. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(1), 153-167
14. Bruner, J. S. (1966) Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15. Century, J., Rudnick, M., & Freeman, C. (2010). A framework for measuring fidelity of implementation: A foundation for shared language and accumulation of knowledge. American Journal of Evaluation, 31,199-218.
16. Charalambous, C. Y. (2010). Mathematical knowledge for teaching and task unfolding: An exploratory study. Elementary School Journal, 110(3), 247-278.
17. Cobb, P., McClain, K., Lamberg, T., & Dean, C. (2003). Situating teachers' instructional practices in the institutional setting of the school and district. Educational Researcher, 32(6), 13-24.
18. Cobb, P., Wood, T., Yackel, E., Nicholls, J., Wheatley, G., Trigatti, B., & Perlwitz, M. (1991). Assessment of a problem-centered second-grade mathematics project. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22(1), 3-29.
19. Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_Math%20Standards.pdf
20. Durlak, J., Weissberg, R., Dymnicki, A., Taylor, R., & Schellinger, K. (2011). The impact of enhancing students' social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405-432.
21. Enochs, L., Smith, P., & Huinker, D. (2000). Establishing factorial validity of the mathematics teaching efficacy beliefs instrument. School Science and Mathematics, 10,194-202.
22. Franke, M., Webb, N., Chan, A., Ing, M., Freund, D., & Battey, D. (2009). Teacher questioning to elicit students: Mathematical thinking in elementary school classrooms. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(4), 380-392.
23. Fullan, M. (2001). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). New York City: Teachers College, Columbia University.
24. Fuson, K., Carroll, W., & Drueck, J. (2000). Achievement results for second and third graders using the standards-based curriculum everyday mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(3), 277-295.
25. Gibson, S., & Dembo, M. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 569-582.
26. Greenberg, M. M. T. (2010). School-based prevention: Current status and future challenges. Effective Education, 2(1), 27-52.
27. Greeno, J. G., & Hall, R. P. (1997). Practicing representation: Learning with and without representational forms. Phi Delta Kappan, 78, 361-367.
28. Grossman, P., Schoenfeld, A., & Lee, C. (2005). Teaching subject matter. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world (pp. 201-231). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
29. Hackenberg, A. (2010). Mathematical caring relations in action. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(3), 236-273.
30. Hamilton, L., Stecher, B., & Berends, M. (2005). Teachers' responses to standards-based accountability (RAND Working Paper WR-259-EDU). Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
31. Haney, J. J., Czerniak, C. M., & Lumpe, A. T. (1996). Teacher beliefs and intentions regarding the implementation of science education reform strands. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(9), 971-993
32. Haney, J. J., Lumpe, A. T., & Czerniak, C. M. (2002). From beliefs to actions: The beliefs and actions of teachers implementing change. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(3), 171-187.
33. Harcourt Educational Measurement. (2002). Stanford Achievement Test (10th ed.). San Antonio, TX: Author.
34. Hiebert, J., & Grouws, D. A. (2007). The effects of classroom mathematics teaching on students' learning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teachingand learning (pp. 371-404). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
35. Hill, H., Ball, D., Blunk, M., Goffney, M., & Rowan, B. (2008). Validating the ecological assumption: The relationship of measure scores to classroom teaching and student learning. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 5(2-3), 107-117.
36. Hill, H., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. (2005). Effects of teachers' mathematical knowledge forteaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 371-406.
37. Hill, H. C, Schilling, S. G., & Ball, D. L. (2004). Developing measures of teachers' mathematics knowledge for teaching. Elementary School Journal, 105(1), 11-30.
38. Horizon Research. (2000). Validity and reliability information for the LSC classroom observation protocol. Retrieved from http://www.horizon-research.com/LSC/news/cop_validity_2000.pdf
39. Hufferd-Ackles, K., Fuson, K. C, & Sherin, M. G. (2004). Describing levels and components of a math-talk learning community. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(2), 81-116.
40. Hughes, J., & Kwok, O. (2007). Influence of student-teacher and parent-teacher relationships on lower achieving readers' engagement and achievement in the primary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(1), 39-51.
41. Hulleman, C. S., Cordray, D. S. (2009). Moving from the lab to the field: The role of fidelity and achieved relative intervention strength. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2, 88-110.
42. Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (Eds.). (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
43. Livingston, A. (2007). The condition of education 2007 m brief(NCES 2007-066). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
44. McCaffrey, D., Hamilton, L., Stetcher, B., Klein, S., Bugliari, D., & Robyn, A. (2001). Interactions among instructional practices, curriculum, and student achievement: The case of standards-based high school mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32(5), 493-517.
45. McLeod, J., Fisher, J., & Hoover, G. (2003). The key elements of classroom management: Managing time and space, student behavior, and instructional strategies. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
46. Merritt, E., Rimm-Kaufman, S., Berry, R., Wallcowiak, T., & McCracken, E. (2010). A reflection framework for teaching math. Teaching Children Mathematics, 17(4), 238-248.
47. Moyer, P. S. (2001). Are we having fun yet? How teachers use manipulatives to teach mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47(2), 175-197.
48. Muthen, B. O., & Asparouhov, T. (2011) Bayesian SEM: A more flexible representation of substantive theory. Technical report. Retrieved from http://www.statmodel.com/download/BSEMFINAL10212011.pdf
49. Nathanson, L., Sawyer, B., & Rimm-Kaufman, S. E. (2007). Classroom Practices Teacher Survey. Unpublished measure, University of Virginia
50. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
51. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2007). Mathematics teaching today: Improvingpractice, improving student learning. Reston, VA: Author.
52. Northeast Foundation for Children. (2007a). Responsive Classroom institutes level 1 workbook. Greenfield, MA: Author.
53. Northeast Foundation for Children. (2007b). Responsive Classroom institutes level 2 workbook. Greenfield, MA: Author.
54. Northeast Foundation for Children. (2011). About Responsive Classroom. Retrieved from http://www.responsiveclassroom.org/about-responsive-classroom
55. Pianta, R., Belsky, J., Houts, R., Morrison, F., Nichd-Eccrn. (2007). Opportunities to learn in America's elementary classrooms. Science, 315,1795-1796.
56. Pianta R. C, Belsky J., Vandergrift, N., Houts, R., & Morrison, F. J. (2008). Classroom effects on children's achievement trajectories in elementary school. American Educational Research Journal, 45(2), 365-397
57. Pianta, R. C, LaParo, K. M., Hamre, B. K. (2008). Classroom Assessment Scoring System [CLASS] manual: Pre-K. Baltimore: Brookes
58. Raudenbush, S., Bryk, A., Cheong, Y., Congdon, R., & du Toit, M. (2004). HLM 6: Hierarchical linear & nonlinear modeling. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
59. Raver, C. C, Jones, S. M., Li-Grining, C. P., Metzger, M., Champion, K. M., Sardin, L. (2008). Improving preschool classroom processes: Preliminary findings from a randomized trial implemented in Head Start settings. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23,10-26.
60. Remillard, J. T. (2000). Can curriculum materials support teachers' learning? Elementary School Journal, 100, 331-350.
61. Riggs, I. M., & Enochs, L. G. (1990). Toward the development of an elementary teacher's science teaching efficacy belief instrument. Science Education, 74(6), 625-637.
62. Rimm-Kaufman, S. (2004). School transition and school readiness: An outcome of early childhood development. In R. Tremblay, R. Barr, R. Peters (Eds.), Encyclopedia on Early Childhood Development [online]. Montreal, Quebec: Centre of Excellence for Early Childhood Development.
63. Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., Fan, X., Chiu, Y. I., & You, W. (2007). The contribution ofthe Responsive Classroom approach on children's academic achievement: Results from a three year longitudinal study. Journal of School Psychology, 45, 401-421.
64. Ross, J., & Bruce, C. (2007). Professional development effects on teacher efficacy: Results of a randomized field trial. Journal of Educational Research, 101(1), 50-60.
65. Sanders, W. L., & Rivers, J. C. (1996). Cumulative and residual effects of teachers on future student academic achievement. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Value-Added Research and Assessment Center.
66. Sawada, D., Piburn, M. D., Judson, E., Turley, J., Falconer, K., Benford, R., & Bloom, I. (2002). Measuring reform practices in science and mathematics classrooms: The reformed teaching observation protocol. School Science and Mathematics, 102(6), 245-253.
67. Seidel, T., & Shavelson, R. J. (2007). Teaching effectiveness research in the past decade: The role of theory and research design in disentangling meta-analysis results. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 454-499
68. Sherin, M. G. (2002). When teaching becomes learning. Cognition and Instruction, 20(2), 119-150.
69. Sherin, M. G., & Drake, C. (2009). Curriculum strategy framework: Investigating patterns in teachers' use of a reform-based elementary mathematics curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 41(4), 467-500.
70. Shuell, T. J. (1986). Cognitive conceptions of learning. Review of Educational Research, 56(4), 411-436.
71. Spidek, D. J., Giwin, K. B., Salmon, J. M, & MacGyvers, V. L. (2001). Teachers' beliefs and practices related to mathematics instruction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 213-226.
72. Stein, M. K., Engle, R. A., Smith, P. S., & Hughes, E. K. (2008). Orchestrating productive mathematical discussions: Five practices for helping teachers move beyond show and tell. Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 10(4), 313-340.
73. Stein, M. K., Grover, B., & Henningsen, M. (1996). Building student capacity for mathematical thinking and reasoning: An analysis of mathematical tasks used in reform classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 455-488.
74. Stein, M. K., & Lane, S. (1996). Instructional tasks and the development of student capacity to think and reason: An analysis of the relationship between teaching and learning in a reform mathematics project. Educational Research and Evaluation, 2, 50-80.
75. Stein, M. K., Smith, M. S., Henningsen, M. A., & Silver, E. A. (2000). Implementing standards-based mathematics instruction: A casebook for professional development. New York: Teachers College Press.
76. Stuhlman, M., Hamre, B., Downer, J., & Pianta, R. (2009).A practitioner's guide to conducting classroom observations: What the research tells us about choosing and using observational systems. A report to the WT Grant Foundation. Retrieved January 29, 2011, from http://www.wtgrantfdn.org/FUeLibrary/Resources/PractitionersGuide.pdf
77. Sztajn, P. (2003). Adapting reform ideas in different mathematics classrooms: Beliefs beyond mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6(1), 53-75.
78. Utley, J., Moseley, C, & Bryant, R. (2005). Relationship between science and mathematics teaching efficacy of preservice elementary teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 105(2), 82-87.
79. Valli, L., & Buese, D. (2007). The changing roles of teachers in an era of high-stakes accountability. American Educational Research Journal, 44(3), 519-558.
80. Van der Sandt, S. (2007). Research framework on mathematics teacher behavior: Koehler and Grouws' framework revisited. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science, & Technology Education, 3(4), 343-350.
81. Walkowiak, T. A., Berry, R. Q., Meyer, P., McCracken, E. R., & Rimm-Kaufman, S. E. (2010). Introducing an observational measure of mathematics teaching practices: Evidence of validity and score reliability. Manuscript submitted for publication.
82. Weiss, I. R., Pasley, J. D., Smith, P. S., Banilower, E. R., & Heck, D. J. (2003). Looking inside the classroom: A study ofK-12 mathematics and science education in the United States. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research.
83. Wright, S. P., Horn, S. P., & Sanders, W. L. (1997). Teacher and classroom context effects on student achievement: Implications for teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 11,57-67.
84. Yackel, E., Cobb, P., & Wood, T. (1991). Small-group interactions as a source of learning opportunities in second-grade mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22, 390-408.