Microscopic mechanism of protein cryopreservation in an aqueous solution with trehalose

Scientific Reports

Volumn 3, Issue , 2013, Pages

  Corradini, Dario ^a   Strekalova, Elena G ^a,c   Eugene Stanley, H ^a   Gallo, Paola ^b  

^a Boston University   (United States)

^b ROMA TRE UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^c Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LYSOZYME; TREHALOSE; WATER;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CRYOPRESERVATION; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; TEMPERATURE;

CRYOPRESERVATION; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; MURAMIDASE; TEMPERATURE; TREHALOSE; WATER;

EID: 84873629098     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep01218     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Franks, F. (Ed.), Biophysics and Biochemistry at Low Temperatures (Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, 1985).
2. Arora, N., Singh, K., Garg, T. & Bilandi, A. A review on the cryopreservation technology and cryoprotectant. J. Pharm. Res. 5, 2087-2090 (2012).
3. Jain, N. K. & Roy, I. Effect of trehalose on protein structure. Prot. Sci. 18, 24-36 (2009).
4. Donnez, J. et al. Livebirth after orthotopic transplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue. Lancet 364, 1405-1410 (2004).
5. Donnez, J. et al. Children born after autotransplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue. A review of 13 live births. Ann. Med. 43, 437-450 (2011).
6. Crowe, J. H., Crowe, L. M. & Jackson, S. A. Preservation of structural and functional activity in lyophilized sarcoplasmic reticulum. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 220, 477-484 (1983).
7. Lee, S. L., Hafeman, A. E., Debenedetti, P. G., Pethica, B. A. & Moore, D. J. Solid-state stabilization of a-chymotrypsion and catalase with carbohydrates. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 45, 5134-5147 (2006). (Pubitemid 44106321)
8. Lins, R. D., Pereira, C. S. & Hu?enberger, P. H. Trehalose-protein interaction in aqueous solution. PROTEINS: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics 55, 177-186 (2004). (Pubitemid 38292845)
9. Cordone, L. et al. Internal dynamics and protein-matrix coupling in trehalose-coated proteins. BBA-Proteins and Proteomics 1749, 252-281 (2005). (Pubitemid 40775867)
10. Magazù, S., Migliardo, F. & Ramirez-Cuesta, A. J. Inelastic neutron scattering study on bioprotectant systems. J. R. Soc. Interface 2, 527-532 (2005).
11. Crowe, J. H. et al. The trehalose myth revisited: Introduction to a symposium on stabilization of cells in the dry state. Cryobiology 43, 89-105 (2001). (Pubitemid 33780248)
12. Robinson, C. H. Cold adaptation in arctic and antarctic fungi. New Phytol. 151, 341-353 (2011).
13. Wang, G. M. & Haymet, A. D. J. Trehalose and other sugar solutions at low temperature: Modulated differential scanning calorimetry (MDSC). J. Phys. Chem. B 102, 5341-5347 (1998). (Pubitemid 128578372)
14. Lee, S. L., Debenedetti, P. G. & Errington, J. R. A computational study of hydration, solution structure, and dynamics in dilute carbohydrate solutions. J. Chem. Phys. 122, 204511 (2005).
15. Lerbret, A., Bordat, P., Affouard, F., Descamps, M. & Migliardo, F. How homogeneous are the trehalose, maltose, and sucrose water solutions? An insight from molecular dynamics simulations. J. Phys. Chem. B 109, 11046-11057 (2005). (Pubitemid 40844543)
16. Branca, C., Magazù, S., Maisano, G. & Migliardo, P. Anomalous cryoprotective effectiveness of trehalose: Raman scattering evidences. J. Chem. Phys. 111, 281-287 (1999).
17. Malsam, J. & Aksan, A. Hydrogen bonding and kinetic/thermodynamic transitions of aqueous trehalose solutions at cryogenic temperatures. J. Phys. Chem. B 113, 6792-6799 (2009).
18. Magno, A. & Gallo, P. Understanding the mechanism of bioprotection: A comparative study of aqueous solutions of trehalose and maltose upon supercooling. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2, 977-982 (2011).
19. Bordat, P., Lerbret, A., Demaret, J.-P., Affouard, F. & Descamps, M. Comparative study of trehalose, sucrose and maltose in water solutions by molecular modelling. Europhys. Lett. 65, 41-47 (2004). (Pubitemid 38069281)
20. Paolantoni, M. et al. Light scattering spectra of water in trehalose aqueous solutions: Evidence for two different solvent relaxation processes. J. Phys. Chem. B 113, 7874-7878 (2009).
21. Lerbret, A. et al. Slowing down of water dynamics in disaccharide aqueous solutions. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 357, 695-699 (2011).
22. Gallina, M. E. et al. Rotational dynamics of trehalose in aqueous solutions studied by depolarized light scattering. J. Chem. Phys. 132, 214508 (2010).
23. Lupi, L., Comez, L., Paolantoni, M., Fioretto, D. & Ladanyi, B. M. Dynamics of biological water: Insights from molecular modeling of light scattering in aqueous trehalose solutions. J. Phys. Chem. B 116, 7499-7508 (2012).
24. Roberts, C. J. & Franks, F. Crystalline and amorphous phases in the binary system water-b-b-trehalose. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 92, 1337-1343 (1996). (Pubitemid 126789719)
25. Pagnotta, S. E., Alegr, A. & Colmenero, J. Dynamical behaviour of highly concentrated trehalose water solutions: a dielectric spectroscopy study. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 14, 2991-2996 (2012).
26. Pagnotta, S. E., McLain, S. E., Soper, A. K., Ricci, M. A. & Bruni, F. Water and trehalose: How much do they interact with each other? J. Phys. Chem. B 114, 4904-4908 (2010).
27. Ball, P. Water as an active constituent in cell biology. Chem. Rev. 108, 74-108 (2008). (Pubitemid 351187472)
28. Teeter, M. M. Water-protein interactions: Theory and experiment. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biophys. Chem. 20, 577-600 (1991).
29. Gregory, R. B. (Ed.) Protein-Solvent Interactions (Marcel Dekker Inc. New York, 1995).
30. Bizzarri, A. R. & Cannistraro, S. Molecular dynamics of water at the protein-solvent interface. J. Phys. Chem. B 106, 6617-6633 (2002). (Pubitemid 35281745)
31. Crowe, J. H., Crowe, L. M. & Chapman, D. Preservation of membranes in anhydrobiotic organisms: The role of trehalose. Science 223, 701-703 (1984).
32. Carpenter, J. F. & Crowe, J. H. An infrared spectroscopic study of the interactions of carbohydrates with dried proteins. Biochemistry 28, 3916-3922 (1989). (Pubitemid 19125443)
33. Green, J. L. & Angell, C. A. Phase relations and vitrification in saccharide-water solutions and the trehalose anomaly. J. Phys. Chem. 93, 2880-2882 (1989).
34. Belton, P. S. & Gil, A. M. IR and Raman spectroscopic studies of the interaction of trehalose with hen egg white lysozyme. Biopolymers 34, 957-961 (1994).
35. Fedorov, M. V., Goodman, J. M., Nerukh, D. & Schumm, S. Self-assembly of trehalose molecules on a lysozyme surface: the broken glass hypothesis. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13, 2294-2299 (2011).
36. Sola-Penna, M. & Meyer-Fernandes, J. R. Stabilization against thermal inactivation promoted by sugars on enzyme sturcture and function: Why is trehalose more effective than other sugars? Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 360, 10-14 (1998). (Pubitemid 29010907)
37. Lerbret et al. How do trehalose, maltose, and sucrose influence some structural and dynamical properties of lysozyme? Insight from molecular dynamics simulations. J. Phys. Chem. B 111, 9410-9420 (2007). (Pubitemid 47280542)
38. Lerbret et al.How strongly does trehalose interact with lysozyme in the solid state? Insights from molecular dynamics simulation and inelastic neutron scattering. J. Phys. Chem. B 116, 11103-11116 (2012).
39. Magazù, S., Migliardo, F., Benedetto, A.,Mondelli, C. & Gonzalez, M. A. Thermal behaviour of hydrated lysozyme in the presence of sucrose and trehalose by EINS. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 357, 664-670 (2011).
40. Bellavia, G., Giuffrida, S., Cottone, G., Cupane, A, & Cordone, L. Protein thermal denaturation and matrix glass transition in different protein-trehalose-water systems. J. Phys. Chem. B 115, 6340-6346 (2011).
41. Gallo, P., Sciortino, F., Tartaglia, P. & Chen, S.-H. Slow dynamics of water molecules in supercooled states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 2730-2733 (1996). (Pubitemid 126639399)
42. Sciortino, F., Gallo, P., Tartaglia, P. & Chen, S.-H. Supercooled water and the kinetic glass transtion. Phys. Rev. E 54, 6331-6343 (1996). (Pubitemid 126587042)
43. Go?ze, W. Complex Dynamics of Glass-Forming Liquids: AMode Coupling Theory (Oxford University Press. New York, 2009).
44. Gallo, P., Rovere, M. & Spohr, E. Supercooled confined water and the mode coupling crossover temperature. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4317-4320 (2000). (Pubitemid 32067803)
45. Gallo, P., Rovere, M. & Spohr, E. Glass transition and layering effects in confined water. A computer simulation study. J. Chem. Phys. 113, 11324-11335 (2000).
46. Gallo, P., Rovere, M. & Chen, S.-H. Dynamic crossover in supercooled confined water: Understanding bulk properties through confinement. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 1, 729-733 (2010).
47. Dirama, T. E., Carri, G. A. & Sokolov, A. P. Role of hydrogen bonds in the fast dynamics of binary glasses of trehalose and glycerol: A molecular dynamics simulation study. J. Chem. Phys. 122, 114505 (2005).
48. Rocchi, C., Bizzarri, A. R. & Cannistraro, S. Water residence times around copper plastocyanin: a molecular dynamics simulation approach. Chem. Phys. 241, 261-276 (1997).
49. Rocchi, C., Bizzarri, A. R.&Cannistraro, S. Water dynamical anomalies evidenced by molecular-dynamics simulations at the solvent-protein interface. Phys. Rev. E 57, 3315-3325 (1998). (Pubitemid 128605870)
50. Perticaroli et al. Broadband depolarized light scattering study of diluted protein aqueous solutions. J. Phys. Chem. B 114, 8262-8269 (2010).
51. Sanders, L. K. et al. Structure and stability of self-assembled actin-lysozyme complexes in salty water. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 108302 (2005).
52. Dirama, T. E., Curtis, J. E., Carry, G. A. & Sokolov, A. P. Coupling between lysozyme and trehalose dynamics: Microscopic insights from molecular-dynamics simulations. J. Chem. Phys. 124, 034901 (2006).
53. Fletcher, G. L., Hew, C. L. & Davies, P. L. Antifreeze Proteins of Teleost Fishes. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 63, 359-390 (2001). (Pubitemid 32304322)
54. Graether, S. P. et al. b-helix struture and ice binding properties of a hyperactive antifreeze protein from an insect. Nature 406, 325-328 (2000).
55. Walters Jr., K. R., Serianni, A. S., Sformo, T., Barnes, B. M. & Duman, J. G. A nonprotein thermal hysteresis-producing xylomannan antifreeze in the freeze-tolerant Alaskan-tolerant Alaskan-beetle Upis ceramboides. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 20210-20215 (2009).
56. Vaney, M. C.,Maignan, S., Riès-Kaut, M. &Ducriux, A. High-resolution structure (1.33A? ) of a HEW lysozyme tetragonal crystal grown in the APCF apparatus. Data and structural comparison with a crystal grown under microgravity from SpaceHab-01 mission. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D 52, 505-517 (1996). (Pubitemid 126516233)
57. MacKerell Jr., A. D., Feig, M. & Brooks, C. L. III. Extending the treatment of backbone energetics in protein force fields: limitations of gas-phase quantum mechanics in reproducing protein conformational distributions in molecular dynamics simulations. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1400-1415 (2004).
58. MacKerell Jr., A. D. et al.All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. J. Phys. Chem. B 102, 3586-3616 (1998). (Pubitemid 128576688)
59. Guvench, O. et al. Additive empirical force field for hexopyranose monosaccharides. J. Comput. Chem. 29, 2543-2564 (2004).
60. Guvench, O., Hatcher, E., Venable, R. M., Pastor, R. W. & MacKerell Jr., A. D. CHARMM additive all-atom force field for glycosidic linkages between hexopyranoses. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 5, 2553-2370 (2009).
61. Berendsen, H. J. C., Grigera, J. R. & Straatsma, T. P. The missing term in effective pair potentials. J. Phys. Chem. 91. 6269-6271 (1987).
62. Berendsen, H. J. C., Postma, J. P. M., van Gunsteren, W. F., DiNola, A. & Haak, J. R.,Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J. Chem. Phys. 81, 3684-3690 (1984).
63. Hess, B., Kutzner, C., van der Spoel, D.&Lindahl, E.GROMACS 4: Algorithms for highly efficient, load-balanced, and scalable molecular simulation. J. Chem. Theory Comp. 4, 435-447 (2008).