Gain-scheduling control of teleoperation systems interacting with soft tissues

IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics

Volumn 60, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 946-957

  Cho, Jang Ho ^a   Son, Hyoung Il ^b   Lee, Dong Gun ^c   Bhattacharjee, Tapomayukh ^d   Lee, Doo Yong ^e  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS   (Germany)

^c Samsung Heavy Industries   (South Korea)

^d GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^e Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Gain scheduling control; robotic surgery; teleoperation; transparency

Indexed keywords

CONTROLLERS; LINEAR SYSTEMS; REMOTE CONTROL; SCHEDULING; SURGERY; TRANSPARENCY;

CONTROL ARCHITECTURE; CONTROL SCHEMES; CONVENTIONAL CONTROL; EXPERIMENTAL CONDITIONS; FORCE SENSOR; GAIN SCHEDULING; GAIN SCHEDULING CONTROL; HIGH TRANSPARENCY; HUNT-CROSSLEY MODEL; LINEAR PARAMETER VARYING SYSTEMS; NONLINEAR CHARACTERISTICS; POLYTOPES; ROBOTIC SURGERY; ROBUST STABILITY AND PERFORMANCE; SLAVE ROBOT; SOFT TISSUE; SUBOPTIMAL CONTROLLERS; TELEOPERATION SYSTEMS; TRACKING CAPACITY;

ROBOTICS;

EID: 84868107432     PISSN: 02780046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2012.2189537     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. P. Hokayem and M. Spong, "Bilateral teleoperation: An historical survey," Automatica, vol. 42, no. 12, pp. 2035-2057, Dec. 2006. (Pubitemid 44647199)
2. M. Waibel, Robot Surgery-Reassuring or Scary?, Mar. 2008. [Online]. Available: http://spectrum.IEEE.org/automaton/robotics/robotics-software/robot- surgery-reassuring-or-scary
3. H. I. Son, T. Bhattacharjee, and D. Y. Lee, "Estimation of environmental force for the haptic interface of robotic surgery," Int. J. Med. Robot.Comput. Assist. Surg., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 221-230, Jun. 2010.
4. B. Hannaford, "Adesign framework for teleoperators with kinesthetic feedback," IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 426-434, Aug. 1989.
5. K. Hashtrudi-Zaad and S. Salcudean, "Analysis of control architectures for teleoperation systems with impedance/admittance master and slave manipulators," Int. J. Robot. Res., vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 419-445, Jun. 2001. (Pubitemid 32897719)
6. R. Anderson and M. Spong, "Bilateral control of teleoperators with time delay," IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 494-501, May 1989.
7. A. Aziminejad, M. Tavakoli, R. Patel, and M. Moallem, "Transparent time-delayed bilateral teleoperation using wave variables," IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 548-555, May 2008. (Pubitemid 351663154)
8. L. Bate, C. Cook, and Z. Li, "Reducing wave-based teleoperator reflections for unknown environments," IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 392-397, Feb. 2011.
9. J. Colgate, "Robust impedance shaping telemanipulation," IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 374-384, Aug. 1993.
10. G. Niemeyer and J. Slotine, "Stable adaptive teleoperation," IEEE J. Ocean. Eng., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 152-162, Jan. 1991.
11. B. Yalcin and K. Ohnishi, "Stable and transparent time-delayed teleoperation by direct acceleration waves," IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 57, no. 9, pp. 3228-3238, Sep. 2010.
12. H. Kazerooni, T. Tsay, and K. Hollerbach, "A controller design framework for telerobotic systems," IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 50-62, Mar. 1993.
13. J. Yan and S. Salcudean, "Teleoperation controller design using H∞ optimization with application to motion-scaling," IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 244-258, May 1996. (Pubitemid 126782408)
14. K. Kim, M. Cavusoglu, and W. Chung, "Quantitative comparison of bilateral teleoperation systems using μ-synthesis," IEEE Trans. Robot., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 776-789, Aug. 2007. (Pubitemid 47308115)
15. G. Leung, B. Francis, and J. Apkarian, "Bilateral controller for teleoperators with time delay via μ-synthesis," IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 105-116, Feb. 1995.
16. E. Ishii, H. Nishi, and K. Ohnishi, "Improvement of performances in bilateral teleoperation by using FPGA," IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 1876-1884, Aug. 2007. (Pubitemid 47097236)
17. K. Natori, T. Tsuji, K. Ohnishi, A. Hace, and K. Jezernik, "Time-delay compensation by communication disturbance observer for bilateral teleoperation under time-varying delay," IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 1050-1062, Mar. 2010.
18. L. Barbe, B. Bayle, M. De Mathelin, and A. Gangi, "In vivo model estimation and haptic characterization of needle insertions," Int. J. Robot. Res., vol. 26, no. 11/12, pp. 1283-1301, Nov. 2007. (Pubitemid 350114648)
19. T. Yamamoto, B. Vagvolgyi, K. Balaji, L. Whitcomb, and A. Okamura, "Tissue property estimation and graphical display for teleoperated robot-assisted surgery," in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom., 2009, pp. 4239-4245.
20. W. Rugh and J. Shamma, "A survey of research on gain-scheduling, " Automatica, vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 1401-1425, Oct. 2000.
21. Y. Fung, Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1993.
22. K. Hunt and F. Crossley, "Coefficient of restitution interpreted as damping in vibroimpact," J. Appl. Mech., vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 440-445, Jun. 1975.
23. N. Diolaiti, C. Melchiorri, and S. Stramigioli, "Contact impedance estimation for robotic systems," IEEE Trans. Robot., vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 925-935, Oct. 2005. (Pubitemid 41489343)
24. D. Marhefka and D. Orin, "A compliant contact model with nonlinear damping for simulation of robotic systems," IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern. A, Syst., Humans, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 566-572, Nov. 1999.
25. L. Biagiotti and C. Melchiorri, "Environment estimation in teleoperation systems," Adv. Telerobot., vol. 31, pp. 211-231, 2007.
26. B. Hannaford, "Experimental measurements for specification of surgical mechanisms and understanding of surgical skill," in Proc. Lect. Notes Eur. Summer School Surg. Robot., Montpellier, France, 2003.
27. L. Ljung and I. MathWorks, System Identification Toolbox for Use with MATLAB: User's Guide. Natick, MA: MathWorks, Inc., 1991.
28. P. Apkarian, P. Gahinet, and G. Becker, "Self-scheduled H∞ control of linear parameter-varying systems: A design example," Automatica, vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 1251-1261, Sep. 1995.
29. P. Apkarian and P. Gahinet, "A convex characterization of gain-scheduled H∞ controllers," IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 853-864, May 1995.
30. P. Gahinet and P. Apkarian, "A linear matrix inequality approach to H∞ control," Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 421-448, 1994.
31. H. S. Woo and D. Y. Lee, "Exploitation of the impedance and characteristics of the human arm in the design of haptic interfaces," IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 58, no. 8, pp. 3221-3233, Aug. 2011.
32. P. Gahinet, A. Nemirovskii, A. Laub, and M. Chilali, "The lmi control toolbox," in Proc. IEEE Conf. Decis. Control, 1994, vol. 3, pp. 2038-2041.
33. M. Çavusoglu, A. Sherman, and F. Tendick, "Design of bilateral teleoperation controllers for haptic exploration and telemanipulation of soft environments," IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 641-647, Aug. 2002. (Pubitemid 35372529)
34. G. De Gersem, H. Van Brussel, and F. Tendick, "Reliable and enhanced stiffness perception in soft-tissue telemanipulation," Int. J. Robot. Res., vol. 24, no. 10, pp. 805-822, Oct. 2005. (Pubitemid 41494254)
35. H. I. Son and D. Y. Lee, "Enhancement of kinesthetic perception for microsurgical teleoperation using impedance-shaping," in Proc. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc., 2008, pp. 1939-1942.
36. G. Burdea and F. Brooks, Force and Touch Feedback for Virtual Reality. New York: Wiley, 1996.
37. L. Jones, "Kinesthetic sensing," in Human and Machine Haptics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000.
38. L. Jones and I. Hunter, "A perceptual analysis of stiffness," Exp. Brain Res., vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 150-156, 1990. (Pubitemid 20040424)
39. L. Jones and I. Hunter, "A perceptual analysis of viscosity," Exp. Brain Res., vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 343-351, 1993. (Pubitemid 23220007)