Tissue property estimation and graphical display for teleoperated robot-assisted surgery

Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 4239-4245

  Yamamoto, Tomonori ^a   Vagvolgyi, Balazs ^a   Balaji, Kamini ^a   Whitcomb, Louis L ^a   Okamura, Allison M ^a  

^a Johns Hopkins University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL ROBOTS; DIAGNOSIS; ESTIMATION; PHANTOMS; ROBOTS; STIFFNESS; SURGERY; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; TISSUE;

GRAPHICAL DISPLAYS; GRAPHICAL OVERLAYS; HUNT-CROSSLEY MODEL; INTERPOLATION TECHNIQUES; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; RECURSIVE LEAST SQUARE (RLS); SURGICAL PROCEDURES; TELEOPERATED ROBOTS;

ROBOTIC SURGERY;

EID: 84940416256     PISSN: 10504729     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ROBOT.2009.5152674     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. F. W. Mohr, V. Falk, A. Diegeler, T. Walther, J. F. Gummert, J. Bucerius, S. Jacobs, and R. Autschbach, “Computer-enhanced”robotic” cardiac surgery: experience in 148 patients,” The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, vol. 121, no. 5, pp. 842–853, 2001.
2. M. Mahvash, J. Gwilliam, R. Agarwal, B. Vagvolgyi, L.-M. Su, D. D. Yuh, and A. M. Okamura, “Force-feedback surgical teleoperator: Controller design and palpation experiments,” in 16th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environments and Teleoperator Systems, pp. 465–471, 2008.
3. H. Mayer, I. Nagy, A. Knoll, E. U. Braun, R. Bauernschmitt, and R. Lange, “Haptic feedback in a telepresence system for endoscopic heart surgery,” Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 459–470, 2007.
4. M. Tavakoli, R. Patel, M. Moallem, and A. Aziminejad, Haptics for Teleoperated Surgical Robotic Systems (New Frontiers in Robotics series). World Scientific Publishing Company, 2008.
5. A. M. Okamura, L. N. Verner, C. E. Reiley, and M. Mahvash, “Haptics for robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery,” in Proceedings of the International Symposium Robotics Research, Hiroshima, Japan, Nov. 26-29, 2007.
6. A. M. Okamura, “Haptic feedback in robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery,” Current Opinion in Urology, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 102–107, 2009.
7. R. Corteso, J. Park, and O. Khatib, “Real-time adaptive control for haptic telemanipulation with kalman active observers,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 987–999, 2006.
8. R. Corteso, W. Zarrad, P. Poignet, O. Company, and E. Dombre, “Haptic control design for robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery,” in IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 454–459, 2006.
9. G. De Gersem, H. V. Brussel, and J. V. Sloten, “Enhanced haptic sensitivity for soft tissues using teleoperation with shaped impedance reflection,” in World Haptics Conference (WHC) CD-ROM Proceedings, 2005.
10. S. Misra and A. M. Okamura, “Environment parameter estimation during bilateral telemanipulation,” in 14th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environments and Teleoperator Systems, pp. 301–307, 2006.
11. X. Wang, P. X. Liu, D. Wang, B. Chebbi, and M. Meng, “Design of bilateral teleoperators for soft environments with adaptive environmental impedance estimation,” in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 1127–1132, 2005.
12. N. Diolaiti, C. Melchiorri, and S. Stramigioli, “Contact impedance estimation for robotic systems,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 925–935, 2005.
13. K. Hunt and F. Crossley, “Coefficient of restitution interpreted as damping in vibroimpact,” ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 440–445, 1975.
14. S. Misra, K. T. Ramesh, and A. M. Okamura, “Modeling of tool-tissue interactions for computer-based surgical simulation: A literature review,” Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 463–491, 2008.
15. M. B. Colton and J. M. Hollerbach, “Identification of nonlinear passive devices for haptic simulations,” in WHC’05: Proceedings of the First Joint Eurohaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, (Washington, DC, USA), pp. 363–368, IEEE Computer Society, 2005.
16. L. J. Love and W. J. Book, “Environment estimation for enhanced impedance control,” in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 1854–1858, 1995.
17. K. Hashtrudi-Zaad and S. E. Salcudean, “Adaptive transparent impedance reflecting teleoperation,” in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 1369–1374, 1996.
18. H. Seraji and R. Colbaugh, “Force tracking in impedance control,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 97–117, 1997.
19. S. K. Singh and D. O. Popa, “An analysis of some fundamental problems in adaptive control of force and impedance behavior: Theory and experiments,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 912–921, 1995.
20. T. Yamamoto, M. Bernhardt, A. Peer, M. Buss, and A. M. Okamura, “Multi-estimator technique for environment parameter estimation during telemanipulation,” in IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, pp. 217–223, 2008.
21. D. Erickson, M. Weber, and I. Sharf, “Contact stiffness and damping estimation for robotic systems,” The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 41–57, 2003.
22. J. Leven, D. Burschka, R. Kumar, G. Zhang, S. Blumenkranz, X. Dai, M. Awad, G. D. Hager, M. Marohn, M. Choti, C. Hasser, and R. H. Taylor, “Davinci canvas: A telerobotic surgical system with integrated, robot-assisted, laparoscopic ultrasound capability,” in Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI), pp. 811–818, 2005.
23. J. Ophir, S. Alam, B. Garra, F. Kallel, E. Konofagou, T. Krouskop, C. Merritt, R. Righetti, R. Souchon, S. Srinivasan, and T. Varghese, “Elastography: Imaging the elastic properties of soft tissues with ultrasound,” in Journal of Medical Ultrasonics, vol. 29, pp. 155–171, 2002.
24. P. S. Wellman, E. P. Dalton, D. Krag, K. A. Kern, and R. D. Howe, “Tactile imaging of breast masses first clinical report,” Archives of Surgery, vol. 136, pp. 204–208, 2001.
25. A. P. Miller, W. J. Peine, J. S. Son, and Z. T. Hammoud, “Tactile imaging system for localizing lung nodules during video assisted thoracoscopic surgery,” in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 2996–3001, 2007.
26. M. Kaneko, C. Toya, and M. Okajima, “Active strobe imager for visualizing dynamic behavior of tumors,” in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 3009–3014, 2007.
27. J. Dargahi, S. Najarian, and R. Ramezanifard, “Graphical display of tactile sensing data with application in minimally invasive surgery,” Canadian Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 151–155, 2007.
28. A. L. Trejos, J. Jayender, M. T. Perri, M. D. Naish, R. V. Patel, and R. A. Malthaner, “Experimental evaluation of robot-assisted tactile sensing for minimally invasive surgery,” in IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, pp. 971–976, 2008.
29. K. Althoefer, D. Zbyszewski, H. Liu, P. Puangmali, L. Seneviratne, B. Challacombe, P. Dasgupta, and D. Murphy, “Air-cushion force sensitive probe for soft tissue investigation during minimally invasive surgery,” in IEEE Conference on Sensors, pp. 827–830, 2008.
30. M. Mahvash and A. M. Okamura, “Enhancing transparency of a position-exchange teleoperator,” in Second Joint Eurohaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems (World Haptics), pp. 470–475, 2007.
31. P. Hacksel and S. Salcudean, “Estimation of environment forces and rigid-body velocities using observers,” in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 931–936, 1994.