Mcm2 phosphorylation and the response to replicative stress

BMC Genetics

Volumn 13, Issue , 2012, Pages

  Stead, Brent E ^a   Brandl, Christopher J ^a   Sandre, Matthew K ^a   Davey, Megan J ^a  

^a WESTERN UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CDC7 PROTEIN; FLUOROURACIL; HYDROXYUREA; MINICHROMOSOME MAINTENANCE PROTEIN 2; PHLEOMYCIN; PHOSPHOTRANSFERASE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; DNA DAMAGE CHECKPOINT; GENE DELETION; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; GENETIC STABILITY; MUTATION RATE; OXIDATIVE STRESS;

ALLELES; AMINO ACID TRANSPORT SYSTEMS, BASIC; CAFFEINE; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CHROMOSOMAL PROTEINS, NON-HISTONE; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPLICATION; ENZYME INHIBITORS; FLUOROURACIL; GENE DELETION; HYDROXYUREA; MUTATION; OXIDATIVE STRESS; PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN-SERINE-THREONINE KINASES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

EUKARYOTA; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCETALES;

EID: 84860574017     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712156     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2156-13-36     Document Type: Article

References (91)

1. Bell SP, Dutta A. DNA replication in eukaryotic cells. Annu Rev Biochem 2002, 71:333-374.
2. Segurado M, Tercero JA. The S-phase checkpoint: targeting the replication fork. Biol Cell 2009, 101:617-627.
3. Randell JC, Fan A, Chan C, Francis LI, Heller RC, Galani K, Bell SP. Mec1 is one of multiple kinases that prime the Mcm2-7 helicase for phosphorylation by Cdc7. Mol Cell 2010, 40:353-363.
4. Sheu YJ, Stillman B. Cdc7-Dbf4 phosphorylates MCM proteins via a docking site-mediated mechanism to promote S phase progression. Mol Cell 2006, 24:101-113.
5. Stead BE, Brandl CJ, Davey MJ. Phosphorylation of Mcm2 modulates Mcm2-7 activity and affects the cell's response to DNA damage. Nucleic Acids Res 2011, 39:6998-7008.
6. Cortez D, Glick G, Elledge SJ. Minichromosome maintenance proteins are direct targets of the ATM and ATR checkpoint kinases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004, 101:10078-10083.
7. Montagnoli A, Valsasina B, Brotherton D, Troiani S, Rainoldi S, Tenca P, Molinari A, Santocanale C. Identification of Mcm2 phosphorylation sites by S-phase-regulating kinases. J Biol Chem 2006, 281:10281-10290.
8. Yoo HY, Shevchenko A, Dunphy WG. Mcm2 is a direct substrate of ATM and ATR during DNA damage and DNA replication checkpoint responses. J Biol Chem 2004, 279:53353-53364.
9. Bochman ML, Schwacha A. The Mcm complex: unwinding the mechanism of a replicative helicase. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2009, 73:652-683.
10. Forsburg SL. Eukaryotic MCM proteins: beyond replication initiation. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2004, 68:109-131.
11. Moyer SE, Lewis PW, Botchan MR. Isolation of the Cdc45/Mcm2-7/GINS (CMG) complex, a candidate for the eukaryotic DNA replication fork helicase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006, 103:10236-10241.
12. Pacek M, Tutter AV, Kubota Y, Takisawa H, Walter JC. Localization of MCM2-7, Cdc45, and GINS to the site of DNA unwinding during eukaryotic DNA replication. Mol Cell 2006, 21:581-587.
13. Sheu YJ, Stillman B. The Dbf4-Cdc7 kinase promotes S phase by alleviating an inhibitory activity in Mcm4. Nature 2010, 463:113-117.
14. Ishimi Y, Komamura-Kohno Y. Phosphorylation of Mcm4 at specific sites by cyclin-dependent kinase leads to loss of Mcm4,6,7 helicase activity. J Biol Chem 2001, 276:34428-34433.
15. Costa A, Ilves I, Tamberg N, Petojevic T, Nogales E, Botchan MR, Berger JM. The structural basis for MCM2-7 helicase activation by GINS and Cdc45. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2011, 18:471-477.
16. Gambus A, Jones RC, Sanchez-Diaz A, Kanemaki M, van Deursen F, Edmondson RD, Labib K. GINS maintains association of Cdc45 with MCM in replisome progression complexes at eukaryotic DNA replication forks. Nat Cell Biol 2006, 8:358-366.
17. Ilves I, Petojevic T, Pesavento JJ, Botchan MR. Activation of the MCM2-7 helicase by association with Cdc45 and GINS proteins. Mol Cell 2010, 37:247-258.
18. Hall-Jackson CA, Cross DA, Morrice N, Smythe C. ATR is a caffeine-sensitive, DNA-activated protein kinase with a substrate specificity distinct from DNA-PK. Oncogene 1999, 18:6707-6713.
19. Kuranda K, Leberre V, Sokol S, Palamarczyk G, Francois J. Investigating the caffeine effects in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae brings new insights into the connection between TOR, PKC and Ras/cAMP signalling pathways. Mol Microbiol 2006, 61:1147-1166.
20. Reinke A, Chen JC, Aronova S, Powers T. Caffeine targets TOR complex I and provides evidence for a regulatory link between the FRB and kinase domains of Tor1p. J Biol Chem 2006, 281:31616-31626.
21. Wanke V, Cameroni E, Uotila A, Piccolis M, Urban J, Loewith R, De Virgilio C. Caffeine extends yeast lifespan by targeting TORC1. Mol Microbiol 2008, 69:277-285.
22. Saiardi A, Resnick AC, Snowman AM, Wendland B, Snyder SH. Inositol pyrophosphates regulate cell death and telomere length through phosphoinositide 3-kinase-related protein kinases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005, 102:1911-1914.
23. Tercero JA, Diffley JF. Regulation of DNA replication fork progression through damaged DNA by the Mec1/Rad53 checkpoint. Nature 2001, 412:553-557.
24. Weinert TA, Kiser GL, Hartwell LH. Mitotic checkpoint genes in budding yeast and the dependence of mitosis on DNA replication and repair. Genes Dev 1994, 8:652-665.
25. Beranek DT. Distribution of methyl and ethyl adducts following alkylation with monofunctional alkylating agents. Mutat Res 1990, 231:11-30.
26. Seiple L, Jaruga P, Dizdaroglu M, Stivers JT. Linking uracil base excision repair and 5-fluorouracil toxicity in yeast. Nucleic Acids Res 2006, 34:140-151.
27. Moore CW. Cleavage of cellular and extracellular Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA by bleomycin and phleomycin. Cancer Res 1989, 49:6935-6940.
28. Cobb JA, Bjergbaek L, Shimada K, Frei C, Gasser SM. DNA polymerase stabilization at stalled replication forks requires Mec1 and the RecQ helicase Sgs1. EMBO J 2003, 22:4325-4336.
29. Santocanale C, Diffley JF. A Mec1- and Rad53-dependent checkpoint controls late-firing origins of DNA replication. Nature 1998, 395:615-618.
30. Bernstein KA, Shor E, Sunjevaric I, Fumasoni M, Burgess RC, Foiani M, Branzei D, Rothstein R. Sgs1 function in the repair of DNA replication intermediates is separable from its role in homologous recombinational repair. EMBO J 2009, 28:915-925.
31. Clausing E, Mayer A, Chanarat S, Muller B, Germann SM, Cramer P, Lisby M, Strasser K. The transcription elongation factor Bur1-Bur2 interacts with replication protein A and maintains genome stability during replication stress. J Biol Chem 2010, 285:41665-41674.
32. Wu X, Shell SM, Zou Y. Interaction and colocalization of Rad9/Rad1/Hus1 checkpoint complex with replication protein A in human cells. Oncogene 2005, 24:4728-4735.
33. Gralla EB, Valentine JS. Null mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Cu, Zn superoxide dismutase: characterization and spontaneous mutation rates. J Bacteriol 1991, 173:5918-5920.
34. Coppee JY, Rieger KJ, Kaniak A, di Rago JP, Groudinsky O, Slonimski PP. PetCR46, a gene which is essential for respiration and integrity of the mitochondrial genome. Yeast 1996, 12:577-582.
35. Rasmussen AK, Chatterjee A, Rasmussen LJ, Singh KK. Mitochondria-mediated nuclear mutator phenotype in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res 2003, 31:3909-3917.
36. Kouprina N, Kroll E, Bannikov V, Bliskovsky V, Gizatullin R, Kirillov A, Shestopalov B, Zakharyev V, Hieter P, Spencer F, et al. CTF4 (CHL15) mutants exhibit defective DNA metabolism in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 1992, 12:5736-5747.
37. Saccharomyces Genome Database. , http://www.yeastgenome.org
38. Foiani M, Liberi G, Piatti S, Plevani P. Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a model system to study DNA replication. Practical Approach Edited by Cotterill S 1999, 185-200. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, Eukaryotic DNA, Replication A.
39. Lea D, Coulson C. The distribution of the numbers of mutants in bacterial populations. J Genet 1949, 49:264-285.
40. Foster PL. Methods for determining spontaneous mutation rates. Methods Enzymol 2006, 409:195-213.
41. Bairwa NK, Mohanty BK, Stamenova R, Curcio MJ, Bastia D. The intra-S phase checkpoint protein Tof1 collaborates with the helicase Rrm3 and the F-box protein Dia2 to maintain genome stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 2011, 286:2445-2454.
42. Hodgson B, Calzada A, Labib K. Mrc1 and Tof1 regulate DNA replication forks in different ways during normal S phase. Mol Biol Cell 2007, 18:3894-3902.
43. Tourriere H, Versini G, Cordon-Preciado V, Alabert C, Pasero P. Mrc1 and Tof1 promote replication fork progression and recovery independently of Rad53. Mol Cell 2005, 19:699-706.
44. Habraken Y, Sung P, Prakash S, Prakash L. Transcription factor TFIIH and DNA endonuclease Rad2 constitute yeast nucleotide excision repair factor 3: implications for nucleotide excision repair and Cockayne syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996, 93:10718-10722.
45. Sweet DH, Jang YK, Sancar GB. Role of UME6 in transcriptional regulation of a DNA repair gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 1997, 17:6223-6235.
46. Jani NM, Lopes JM. Transcription regulation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae PIS1 gene by inositol and the pleiotropic regulator, Ume6p. Mol Microbiol 2008, 70:1529-1539.
47. Steinfeld I, Shamir R, Kupiec M. A genome-wide analysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae demonstrates the influence of chromatin modifiers on transcription. Nat Genet 2007, 39:303-309.
48. Williams RM, Primig M, Washburn BK, Winzeler EA, Bellis M, Sarrauste de Menthiere C, Davis RW, Esposito RE. The Ume6 regulon coordinates metabolic and meiotic gene expression in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002, 99:13431-13436.
49. Pramila T, Miles S, GuhaThakurta D, Jemiolo D, Breeden LL. Conserved homeodomain proteins interact with MADS box protein Mcm1 to restrict ECB-dependent transcription to the M/G1 phase of the cell cycle. Genes Dev 2002, 16:3034-3045.
50. Sommariva E, Pellny TK, Karahan N, Kumar S, Huberman JA, Dalgaard JZ. Schizosaccharomyces pombe Swi1, Swi3, and Hsk1 are components of a novel S-phase response pathway to alkylation damage. Mol Cell Biol 2005, 25:2770-2784.
51. Vengrova S, Dalgaard JZ. RNase-sensitive DNA modification(s) initiates S. pombe mating-type switching. Genes Dev 2004, 18:794-804.
52. Noguchi E, Noguchi C, McDonald WH, Yates JR, Russell P. Swi1 and Swi3 are components of a replication fork protection complex in fission yeast. Mol Cell Biol 2004, 24:8342-8355.
53. McGlynn P, Lloyd RG. Recombinational repair and restart of damaged replication forks. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2002, 3:859-870.
54. Chang M, Bellaoui M, Boone C, Brown GW. A genome-wide screen for methyl methanesulfonate-sensitive mutants reveals genes required for S phase progression in the presence of DNA damage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002, 99:16934-16939.
55. Putnam CD, Jaehnig EJ, Kolodner RD. Perspectives on the DNA damage and replication checkpoint responses in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. DNA Repair 2009, 8:974-982.
56. Duncker BP, Brown GW. Cdc7 kinases (DDKs) and checkpoint responses: lessons from two yeasts. Mutat Res 2003, 532:21-27.
57. Gabrielse C, Miller CT, McConnell KH, DeWard A, Fox CA, Weinreich M. A Dbf4p BRCA1 C-terminal-like domain required for the response to replication fork arrest in budding yeast. Genetics 2006, 173:541-555.
58. Ogi H, Wang CZ, Nakai W, Kawasaki Y, Masumoto H. The role of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Cdc7-Dbf4 complex in the replication checkpoint. Gene 2008, 414:32-40.
59. Pessoa-Brandao L, Sclafani RA. CDC7/DBF4 functions in the translesion synthesis branch of the RAD6 epistasis group in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 2004, 167:1597-1610.
60. Weinreich M, Stillman B. Cdc7p-Dbf4p kinase binds to chromatin during S phase and is regulated by both the APC and the RAD53 checkpoint pathway. EMBO J 1999, 18:5334-5346.
61. Cline MS, Smoot M, Cerami E, Kuchinsky A, Landys N, Workman C, Christmas R, Avila-Campilo I, Creech M, Gross B, et al. Integration of biological networks and gene expression data using Cytoscape. Nat Protoc 2007, 2:2366-2382.
62. Smoot ME, Ono K, Ruscheinski J, Wang PL, Ideker T. Cytoscape 2.8: new features for data integration and network visualization. Bioinformatics 2011, 27:431-432.
63. Costanzo M, Baryshnikova A, Bellay J, Kim Y, Spear ED, Sevier CS, Ding H, Koh JL, Toufighi K, Mostafavi S, et al. The genetic landscape of a cell. Science 2010, 327:425-431.
64. Alvarez P, Smith A, Fleming J, Solomon F. Modulation of tubulin polypeptide ratios by the yeast protein Pac10p. Genetics 1998, 149:857-864.
65. Ismail N, Ng DTW. Have you HRD? Understanding ERAD Is DOAble!. Cell 2006, 126:237-239.
66. Gregersen N, Bross P. Protein misfolding and cellular stress: an overview. Meth Mol Biol 2010, 648:3-23.
67. Chen Y, Sanchez Y. Chk1 in the DNA damage response: conserved roles from yeasts to mammals. DNA Repair (Amst) 2004, 3:1025-1032.
68. Liu Y, Vidanes G, Lin YC, Mori S, Siede W. Characterization of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae homologue of Schizosaccharomyces pombe Chk1 involved in DNA-damage-induced M-phase arrest. Mol Gen Genet 2000, 262:1132-1146.
69. Rouse J, Jackson SP. Interfaces between the detection, signaling, and repair of DNA damage. Science 2002, 297:547-551.
70. Enemark EJ, Joshua-Tor L. Mechanism of DNA translocation in a replicative hexameric helicase. Nature 2006, 442:270-275.
71. Byun TS, Pacek M, Yee MC, Walter JC, Cimprich KA. Functional uncoupling of MCM helicase and DNA polymerase activities activates the ATR-dependent checkpoint. Genes Dev 2005, 19:1040-1052.
72. Feng W, Collingwood D, Boeck ME, Fox LA, Alvino GM, Fangman WL, Raghuraman MK, Brewer BJ. Genomic mapping of single-stranded DNA in hydroxyurea-challenged yeasts identifies origins of replication. Nat Cell Biol 2006, 8:148-155.
73. Lucca C, Vanoli F, Cotta-Ramusino C, Pellicioli A, Liberi G, Haber J, Foiani M. Checkpoint-mediated control of replisome-fork association and signalling in response to replication pausing. Oncogene 2004, 23:1206-1213.
74. Nedelcheva MN, Roguev A, Dolapchiev LB, Shevchenko A, Taskov HB, Stewart AF, Stoynov SS. Uncoupling of unwinding from DNA synthesis implies regulation of MCM helicase by Tof1/Mrc1/Csm3 checkpoint complex. J Mol Biol 2005, 347:509-521.
75. Sogo JM, Lopes M, Foiani M. Fork reversal and ssDNA accumulation at stalled replication forks owing to checkpoint defects. Science 2002, 297:599-602.
76. You Z, Kong L, Newport J. The role of single-stranded DNA and polymerase alpha in establishing the ATR, Hus1 DNA replication checkpoint. J Biol Chem 2002, 277:27088-27093.
77. Zou L, Elledge SJ. Sensing DNA damage through ATRIP recognition of RPA-ssDNA complexes. Science 2003, 300:1542-1548.
78. Nitani N, Yadani C, Yabuuchi H, Masukata H, Nakagawa T. Mcm4 C-terminal domain of MCM helicase prevents excessive formation of single-stranded DNA at stalled replication forks. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2008, 105:12973-12978.
79. Hanna JS, Kroll ES, Lundblad V, Spencer FA. Saccharomyces cerevisiae CTF18 and CTF4 are required for sister chromatid cohesion. Mol Cell Biol 2001, 21:3144-3158.
80. Miles J, Formosa T. Evidence that POB1, a Saccharomyces cerevisiae protein that binds to DNA polymerase alpha, acts in DNA metabolism in vivo. Mol Cell Biol 1992, 12:5724-5735.
81. Gambus A, van Deursen F, Polychronopoulos D, Foltman M, Jones RC, Edmondson RD, Calzada A, Labib K. A key role for Ctf4 in coupling the MCM2-7 helicase to DNA polymerase alpha within the eukaryotic replisome. EMBO J 2009, 28:2992-3004.
82. Ando A, Nakamura T, Murata Y, Takagi H, Shima J. Identification and classification of genes required for tolerance to freeze-thaw stress revealed by genome-wide screening of Saccharomyces cerevisiae deletion strains. FEMS Yeast Res 2007, 7:244-253.
83. Dudley AM, Janse DM, Tanay A, Shamir R, Church GM. A global view of pleiotropy and phenotypically derived gene function in yeast. Mol Syst Biol 2005, 1(2005):0001.
84. Paulovich AG, Margulies RU, Garvik BM, Hartwell LH. RAD9, RAD17, and RAD24 are required for S phase regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae in response to DNA damage. Genetics 1997, 145:45-62.
85. Toh GW, Lowndes NF. Role of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad9 protein in sensing and responding to DNA damage. Biochem Soc Trans 2003, 31:242-246.
86. Krejci L, Van Komen S, Li Y, Villemain J, Reddy MS, Klein H, Ellenberger T, Sung P. DNA helicase Srs2 disrupts the Rad51 presynaptic filament. Nature 2003, 423:305-309.
87. Veaute X, Jeusset J, Soustelle C, Kowalczykowski SC, Le Cam E, Fabre F. The Srs2 helicase prevents recombination by disrupting Rad51 nucleoprotein filaments. Nature 2003, 423:309-312.
88. Howlett NG, Schiestl RH. Nucleotide excision repair deficiency causes elevated levels of chromosome gain in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. DNA Repair 2004, 3:127-134.
89. Tong A, Boone C. Synthetic Genetic Array (SGA) Analysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae 2005, 171-192. Totowa, NJ, U. S. A: The Humana Press, Inc, Second Edition, Yeast Protocols.
90. Pan X, Yuan DS, Xiang D, Wang X, Sookhai-Mahadeo S, Bader JS, Hieter P, Spencer F, Boeke JD. A robust toolkit for functional profiling of the yeast genome. Mol Cell 2004, 16:487-496.
91. Huang ME, Rio AG, Nicolas A, Kolodner RD. A genomewide screen in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for genes that suppress the accumulation of mutations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003, 100:11529-11534.