Preserving professional credibility: Grounded theory study of medical trainees' requests for clinical support

BMJ (Online)

Volumn 338, Issue 7691, 2009, Pages 399-401

  Kennedy, Tara J T ^a,b,c   Regehr, Glenn ^a,d,e   Baker, G Ross ^d   Lingard, Lorelei ^a,f,g,h  

^a Wilson Centre for Research in Education   (Canada)

^b HOLLAND BLOORVIEW KIDS REHABILITATION HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^c Stan Cassidy Centre for Rehabilitation   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^e UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK   (Canada)

^f HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHILDREN   (Canada)

^g UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^h UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANADA; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; EDUCATION PROGRAM; EMERGENCY MEDICINE; EVALUATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERNAL MEDICINE; INTERVIEW; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; NURSE; PATIENT CARE; PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; RESIDENT; SCOPE OF PRACTICE; SKILL; TEACHING HOSPITAL; THEORY; VIDEOTAPE;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; DECISION MAKING; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; EMERGENCY MEDICINE; HOSPITALS, TEACHING; HUMANS; INTERNAL MEDICINE; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; ONTARIO; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; STUDENTS, MEDICAL; TEACHING;

EID: 61849141620     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17561833     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.b128     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. American Association of Medical Colleges. Compact between resident physicians and their teachers. 2006. www.aamc.org/meded/residentcompact/
2. AAMC policy guidance on graduate medical education: assuring quality patient care and quality education. Acad Med 2001;78:112-6.
3. Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. General standards of accreditation. 2002. http://rcpsc.medical.org/publications/index.php
4. General Medical Council. The new doctor. London: GMC, 1997.
5. General Medical Council. Standards of training for the foundation programme. 2007. www.gmc-uk.org/education/documents/Standards-for-Training- 270307.pdf
6. Australian Medical Association. AMA position statement: prevocational medical education and training. 2005. www.ama.com.au/web.nsf/doc/WEEN-6JVTW2
7. Pope J. Even top hospitals make mistakes. CBS News 2003, September 29. www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/09/29/health/main575546.shtml
8. Lingard L, Garwood K, Schryer CF, Spafford MM. A certain art of uncertainty: case presentation and the development of professional identity. Soc Sci Med 2003;56:603-16.
9. Sommers PS, Muller JH, Saba GW, Draisin JA, Shore WB. Reflections-on-action: medical students' accounts of their implicit beliefs and strategies in the context of one-to-one clinical teaching. Acad Med 1994;69:S84-6.
10. Konner M. Becoming a doctor. New York: Viking Penguin, 1987.
11. Sinclair S. Making doctors. Oxford: Oxford International Publishers, 1997.
12. Kennedy TJ, Regehr G, Baker GR, Lingard LA. Progressive independence in clinical training: a tradition worth defending? Acad Med 2005;80:S106-11.
13. Glaser B, Strauss A. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine, 1967.
14. Kennedy TJ, Lingard LA. Making sense of grounded theory in medical education. Med Educ 2006;40:101-8.
15. Charmaz K. Grounded theory: objectivist and constructivist methods. In: Denzin N, Lincoln Y, eds. Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2000:509-35.
16. Charmaz K. Grounded theory in the 21st century: applications for advancing social justice studies. In: Denzin N, Lincoln Y, eds. The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2005:507-36.
17. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1998.
18. Morse JM. The significance of saturation. Qual Health Res 1995;5:147-9.
19. Kennedy TJ, Lingard L, Baker GR, Kitchen L, Regehr G. Clinical oversight: conceptualizing the relationship between supervision and safety. J Gen Intern Med 2007;22:1080-5.
20. Hammersley M, Atkinson P. Ethnography: principles in practice, London: Routledge, 1995.
21. Denzin N, Lincoln Y. Introduction: the discipline and practice of qualitative research. In: Denzin N, Lincoln Y, eds. The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2005:1-32.
22. Kelle U. Computer-aided qualitative data analysis: theory, methods, and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2002.
23. Ginsburg S, Regehr G, Lingard L. To be and not to be: the paradox of the emerging professional stance. Med Educ 2003;37:350-7.
24. Ginsburg S, Regehr G, Stern D, Lingard L. The anatomy of the professional lapse: bridging the gap between traditional frameworks and students' perceptions. Acad Med 2002;77:516-22.
25. Odell L, Goswami D, Herrington A. The discourse-based interview: a procedure for exploring the tacit knowledge of writers in nonacademic settings. In: Odell L, Goswami D, eds. Writing in nonacademic settings, New York: Guilford Press, 1985.
26. Burke K. Language as symbolic action: essays on life, literature, and method. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1966.
27. Lingard L, Haber RJ. Teaching and learning communication in medicine: a rhetorical approach. Acad Medcine 1999;74:507-10.
28. King E, Horvath R, Shulkin DJ. Establishing a rapid response team(RRT) in an academic hospital: one year's experience. J Hosp Med 2006;1:296-305.
29. Devita MA, Bellomo R, Hillman K, Kellum J, Rotondi A, Teres D, et al. Findings of the first consensus conference on medical emergency teams. Crit Care Med 2006;34:2463-78.
30. Bosk CL. Forgive and remember: managing medical failure. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2003.
31. Holden JD. Hawthorne effects and research into professional practice. J Eval Clin Pract 2001;7:65-70.
32. Lincoln Y, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1985.