Sixth-grade students' epistemologies of science: The impact of school science experiences on epistemological development

Cognition and Instruction

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 349-422

  Smith, Carol L ^a   Maclin, Deborah ^b   Houghton, Carolyn ^b   Hennessey, M Gertrude ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON   (United States)

^b Univ of Massachusetts at Boston ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000030647     PISSN: 07370008     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S1532690XCI1803_3     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy (Project 2061). New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mindblindness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Beeth, M. E. (1998). Teaching science in 5th grade: Instructional goals that support conceptual change. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(10), 1091-1101.
4. Beeth, M. E., & Hewson, P. W. (1999a, March). Facilitating learning of science content and scientific epistemology: Key elements in teaching for conceptual change. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Boston.
5. Beeth, M. E., & Hewson, P. W. (1999b). Learning goals in an exemplary science teacher's practice: Cognitive and social factors in teaching for conceptual change. Science Education, 83, 738-760.
6. Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and educational practice (pp. 229-270). Cambridge, MA: MIT/Bradford Press.
7. Carey, S. (1985a). Are children fundamentally different thinkers and learners from adults? In S. F. Chipman, J. W. Segal, & R. Glaser (Eds.), Thinking and learning skills (Vol. 2, pp. 485-517). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
8. Carey, S. (1985b). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Carey, S. (1991). The nature of science interview. Unpublished manuscript.
10. Carey, S., Evans, R., Honda, M., Jay, E., & Unger, C. (1989). "An experiment is when you try it and see if it works": A study of grade 7 students' understanding of the construction of scientific knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 514-529.
11. Carey, S., & Smith, C. (1993). On understanding the nature of scientific knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 28, 235-251.
12. Chandler, M. (1987). The Othello effect: Essay on the emergence and eclipse of skeptical doubt. Human Development, 30, 137-159.
13. Chandler, M., Boyes, M., & Ball, L. (1990). Relativism and stations of epistemic doubt. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 50, 370-395.
14. Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (in press). Epistemologically authentic scientific reasoning. In K. Crowley, C. D. Schunn, & T. Okada (Eds.), Designing for science: Implications from professional, instructional, and everyday science. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
15. Clement, J. (1993). Using bridging analogies and anchoring intuitions to deal with students' preconceptions in physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(10), 1241-1257.
16. Clement, J., Brown, D., & Zietsman, A. (1989). Not all conceptions are misconceptions: Finding "anchoring conceptions" for grounding instruction on students' intuitions. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 554-565.
17. Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young people's images of science. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
18. Fabricius, W. V., Schwanenflugel, P. J., Kyllomen, P. C., Barclay, C. R., & Denton, S. M. (1989). Developing theories of the mind: Children's and adults' concepts of mental activities. Child Development, 60, 1278-1290.
19. Fischer, K. W. (1980). A theory of cognitive development: The control and construction of hierarchical skills. Psychological Review, 87, 477-531.
20. Gardner, H. (1999). The disciplined mind. New York: Simon & Schuster.
21. Gopnik, A., & Meltzoff, A. (1997). Words and thoughts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. Grosslight, L., Unger, C., Jay, E., & Smith, C. (1991). Understanding models and their use in science: Conceptions of middle and high school students and experts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 799-822.
23. Hammer, D. (1994). Epistemological beliefs in introductory physics. Cognition and Instruction, 12, 151-183.
24. Hennessey, M. G. (1994a). [Classroom essays by 6th-grade students about the nature of science or the nature of learning in Dr. Hennessey's science class]. Unpublished raw data set.
25. Hennessey, M. G. (1994b, May). Conceptual change approach to learning science: The dynamic role of metacognition. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Anaheim, CA.
26. Hennessey, M. G. (1995, September). Students ' epistemological stance: Nature of learning and nature of science. Presentation at the Cognitive Studies and Educational Practice Meetings of the McDonnell Foundation, Nashville, TN.
27. Hennessey, M. G. (in press). Probing the dimensions of metacognition: Implications for conceptual change teaching-learning. In G. M. Sinatra & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Intentional conceptual change. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
28. Hennessey, M. G., & Beeth, M. (1993, April). Students ' reflective thoughts about science content: A relationship to conceptual change learning. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA.
29. Herrenkohl, L. R., & Guerra, M. R. (1998). Participant structures, scientific discourse, and student engagement in fourth grade. Cognition and Instruction, 16(4), 433-475.
30. Hewson, M.,& Hewson, P. (1983). Effect of instruction using students'prior knowledge and conceptual change strategies on science learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 731-743.
31. Hodson, D. (1988). Toward a philosophically more valid science curriculum. Science Education, 72,19-40.
32. Hofer, B., & Pintrich, P. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 88-140.
33. Honda, M. (1994). Linguistic inquiry in the science classroom: "It is science, but it 's not like a science problem in a book." Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
34. Honda, M. (1996, February). Developing an epistemology of science through linguistic inquiry. Paper presented at the American Association for the Advancement of Science Annual Meeting and Science Innovation Exposition, Baltimore.
35. Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence. New York: Basic.
36. King, P., & Kitchener, K. (1994). Developing, reflective judgment: Understanding and promoting intellectual growth and critical thinking in adolescents and adults. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
37. Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. New York: Cambridge University Press.
38. Kuhn, D., Amsel, E., & O'Loughlin, M. (1988). The development of scientific thinking skills. Orlando, FL: Academic.
39. Lampert, M. (1990). Connecting inventions with conventions. In L. Steffe &T. Wood (Eds.), Transforming children's mathematics education (pp. 253-265). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
40. Lederman, N. (1992). Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 331-359.
41. Lehrer, R., Carpenter, S., Schauble, L., & Putz, A. (2000). Designing classrooms that support inquiry. In J. Minstrell & E. van Zee (Eds.), Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science (pp. 80-99). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
42. Metz, K. (1995). Reassessment of developmental constraints on children's science instruction. Review of Educational Research, 65(2), 93-127.
43. Metz, K. (2000). Young children's inquiry in biology: Building the knowledge bases to empower independent inquiry. In J. Minstrell & E. van Zee (Eds.), Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science(pp. 371-404). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
44. Minstrell, J. (1982). Explaining the 'at rest' condition of the object. Physics Teacher, 20, 10-14.
45. Montgomery, D. (1992). Young children's theory of knowing: The development of a folk epistemology. Developmental Review, 12, 410-430.
46. Nadeau, R., & Desautels, J. (1984). Epistemology and the teaching of science. Ottawa, Canada: Science Council of Canada.
47. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
48. Perner, J. (1991). Understanding the representational mind. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books/MIT Press.
49. Roth, W. -M. (1996). Teacher questioning in an open-inquiry learning environment: Interactions of context, content and student responses. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 709-736.
50. Roth, W. -M., & Roychoudhury, A. (1993). The development of science process skills in authentic contexts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 127-152.
51. Schommer, M. (1993). Epistemological development and academic performance among secondary students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 406-411.
52. Schwab, J. (1962). The teaching of science as enquiry. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
53. Smith, C., Maclin, D., Grosslight, L., & Davis, H. (1997). Teaching for understanding: A study of students' preinstruction theories of matter and a comparison of the effectiveness of two approaches to teaching about matter and density. Cognition and Instruction, 15, 317-394.
54. Sodian, B., & Schrempp, I. (1997, March). Metaconceptual knowledge and the development of scientific reasoning skills. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
55. Sodian, B., & Wimmer, H. (1987). Children's understanding of inference as a source of knowledge. Child Development, 58, 424-33.
56. Songer, N. B., & Linn, M. C. (1991). How do students' views of science influence knowledge integration? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), 761-784.
57. Strike, K., & Posner, G. (1985). A conceptual change view of learning and understanding. In L. West & A. Pines (Eds.), Cognitive structure and conceptual change (pp. 211-231). New York: Academic.
58. Taylor, M. (1988). Conceptual perspective-taking: Children's abilitiy to distinguish what they know from what they see. Child Development, 59, 703-718.
59. van Zee, E., & Minstrell, J. (1997). Using questioning to guide student thinking. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6, 227-269.
60. Wellman, H. (1990). The child's theory of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
61. White, B. (1993). ThinkerTools: Causal models, conceptual change, and science education. Cognition and Instruction, 10, 1-100.
62. Wiske, M. S. (1997). Teaching for understanding. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.