"Doing the lesson" or "doing science": Argument in high school genetics

Science Education

Volumn 84, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 757-792

  Jiménez Aleixandre, M Pilar ^a   Bugallo Rodríguez, Anxela ^a   Duschl, Richard A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SANTIAGO DE COMPOSTELA   (Spain)

^b KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034311552     PISSN: 00368326     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/1098-237X(200011)84:6<757::AID-SCE5>3.0.CO;2-F     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Álvarez Pérez, V. (1998, September). Argumentation patterns in secondary physics classroom. Paper presented at the Fourth European Science Education Research Association (ESERA) Summer school, Marly-Le-Roi.
2. Applebee, A. (1996). Curriculum as conversation: Transforming traditions of teaching and learning. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
3. Bloome, D., Puro, P., & Theodorou, E. (1989). Procedural display and classroom lessons. Curriculum Inquiry, 19, 265-291.
4. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32-42.
5. Bugallo Rodríguez, A., & Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. (1996. August). Using Toulmin's argument pattern to analyze genetics questions. Paper presented at the Third European Science Education Research Association (ESERA) Summer school. Barcelona.
6. Carey, S., & Smith, C. (1993). On understanding the nature of scientific knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 28, 235-251.
7. Collins, H., & Pinch, T. (1994). The Golem: What everyone should know about science. New York: Cambridge University Press.
8. Connelly, F. M., & Finegold, M. (1977). Scientific enquiry and the teaching of science. Ontario Institute for Studies in Education: Toronto.
9. Driver, R., & Newton, P. (in press). Establishing the norms of scientific argument in classrooms. Science Education.
10. Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young people's images of science. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
11. Dunbar, K. (1995). How scientists really reason: Scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 3265-3395). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Duschl, R. A. (1990). Restructuring science education. The importance of theories and their development. New York: Teachers' College Press.
13. Duschl, R. A., & Gitomer, D. H. (1996, April). Project Sepia design principles. Paper presented at the annual meeting of AERA, New York.
14. Eichinger, D. C., Anderson, C. W., Palincsar, A. S., & David, Y. M. (1991, April). An illustration of the roles of content knowledge, scientific argument, and social norm in collaborative problem solving. Paper presented at the annual meeting of AERA, Chicago.
15. Giere, R. (1988). Explaining science: A cognitive approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16. Hodson, D. (1992). Assessment of practical work. Science and Education, 1, 114-115.
17. Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. (1992). Thinking about theories or thinking with theories? A classroom study with natural selection. International Journal of Science Education, 14, 51-61.
18. Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. (1994). Teaching evolution and natural selection: A look at textbooks and teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 519-535.
19. Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. (1998). Diseño curricular: Indagación y argumentación con el lenguaje de las Ciencias (Curriculum design: Inquiry and argument in science language). Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 16, 203-216.
20. Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., & Díaz de Bustamante, J. (1997, September). Plant, animal or thief? Solving problems under the microscope. Paper presented at the European Science Education Research Association (ESERA) Conference, Roma.
21. Jiménez Aleixandre, M. P., Díaz de Bustamante, J., & Duschl, R. A. (1998, April). Scientific culture and school culture: Epistemic and procedural components. Paper presented at the NARST annual meeting, San Diego CA.
22. Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., Pereiro Muñoz, C., & Aznar Cuadrado, V. (1998). Promoting reasoning and argument about environmental issues. Second ERIDOB Conference, Goteborg.
23. Kelly, G. J., Chen, C., & Crawford, T. (1998). Methodological considerations for studying science-in-the-making in educational settings. Research in Science Education, 28, 23-50.
24. Kelly, G. J., & Crawford, T. (1997). An ethnographic investigation of the discourse processes of school science. Science Education, 81, 533-560.
25. Kelly, G. J., Drucker, S., & Chen, K. (1998). Students' reasoning about electricity: Combining performance assessment with argumentation analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 20, 849-871.
26. Kuhn, D. (1993). Science as argument: Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking. Science Education, 77, 319-337.
27. Kuhn, D., García-Milá, M., Zohar, A., & Andersen, C. (1995). Strategies of knowledge acquisition. Monograph of the Society for Research in Child Development. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28. Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
29. Lemke, J. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
30. Longino, H. (1994). The fate of knowledge in social theories of science. In F. F. Schmitt (Ed.), Socializing epistemology: The social dimensions of knowledge (pp. 135-158). Lanham, MD: Rowan and Littlefield.
31. Mayr, E. (1997). This is Biology. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, Harvard University Press.
32. Ohlsson, S. (1992) The cognitive skill of theory articulation: A neglected aspect of science education? Science and Education, 1, 181-192.
33. Osborne, R., & Freyberg, P. (Eds.). (1985). Learning in science: The implications of children's science. London: Heinemann.
34. Pontecorvo, C., & Girardet, H. (1993). Arguing and reasoning in understanding historical Topics. Cognition and Instruction, 11, 365-395.
35. Siegel, H. (1995). Why should educators care about argumentation? Informal Logic, 17, 159-176.
36. Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. New York: Cambridge University Press.
37. van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R., Henkemans, F. S., Blair, J. A., Johnson, R. H., Krabbe, E. C. W., Plantin, C., Walton, D. N., Willard, C. A., Woods, J., & Zarefsky, D. (1996). Fundamentals of argumentation theory: A handbook of historical backgrounds and contemporary developments. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.