Exploring how novice teachers learn to attend to students' thinking in analyzing case studies of classroom teaching and learning

Learning in the Disciplines: ICLS 2010 Conference Proceedings - 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences

Volumn 1, Issue , 2010, Pages 41-48

  Levin, Daniel M ^a   Richards, Jennifer ^b  

^a AMERICAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSROOM TEACHING; SCIENCE TEACHERS;

STUDENTS;

TEACHING;

EID: 84880546404     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Atkin, J. and Coffey, J. E., Eds. (2003). Everyday assessment in the science classroom. Arlington, VA, NSTA Press.
2. Carter, K., Cushing, K., Sabers, D., Stein, P., and Berliner, D. (1988). Expert-novice differences in perceiving and processing visual classroom information. Journal of Teacher Education 39(3): 25-31.
3. Crespo S. (2000). Seeing more than right and wrong answers: Propspective teachers' interpretations of students' mathematical work. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 3: 155-181
4. diSessa, A. A. (1993). Toward an epistemology of phyiscs. Cognition and Instruction 10(2/3): 105-225.
5. Erickson, F. (2007). Some thoughts on "proximal" formative assessment of student learning. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education. G. D. Fenstermacher, National Society for the Study of Education. 186-216.
6. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7. Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist 96(3): 606-633.
8. Hammer, D. (2000). Student resources for learning introductory physics. American Journal of Physics, Physics Education Research Supplement, 68 (1), 52-59
9. Hammer, D., Elby, A., Scherr, R. E., & Redish, E. F. (2005). Resources, framing, and transfer. In J. Maestre (Ed.), Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective (pp. 89-120). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
10. Hammer, D. and Schifter, D. (2001). Practices of inquiry in teaching and research. Cognition and Instruction 19(4): 441-478.
11. Hammer, D. and van Zee, E. (2006). Seeing the science in children's thinking: Case studies of student inquiry in physical science. Portsmouth, NH, Heinemann.
12. Jacobs, V. R., Clement, L. L., Philipp, R. A., Schappelle, B., & Burke, A. (2007). Professional noticing by elementary school teachers of mathematics, American Educational Research Association. Chicago, Illinois.
13. Kazemi, E. and Franke, M. L. (2004). Teacher learning in mathematics: Using student work to promote collective inquiry. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 7: 203-235.
14. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.
15. Levin, D. M. (2008). What secondary science teachers pay attention to in the classroom: Situating teaching in institutional and social systems. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland at College Park.
16. Levin, D. M., & Richards, J. (2009). Developing a professional vision for science education reform teaching, Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the Association for Science Teacher Education. Hartford, CT.
17. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
18. Minsky, M. L. (1986). Society of mind. New York: Simon & Schuster.
19. NCTM (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA.
20. NRC (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC, Committee on Science Learning, Kindergarten through Eighth Grade.
21. Sherin, M. G. and van Es, E. A. (2005). Using video to support teachers' ability to interpret classroom interactions. American Educational Research Association. Montreal, Canada.
22. Star, J. R. and Stickland, S. K. (2008). Learing to observe: Using video to improve mathematics teachers' ability to notice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 11: 107-125.
23. Tannen, D. (1993). Framing in discourse. New York, Oxford University Press.
24. van Es, E. A. and Sherin, M. G. (2008). Mathematics teachers' "learning to notice" in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education 24: 244-276.