From evidence to action: A seamless process in formative assessment?

Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 24-31

  Heritage, Margaret ^a   Kim, Jinok ^a   Vendlinski, Terry ^a   Herman, Joan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Formative assessment; Teacher knowledge

Indexed keywords

EID: 69949124662     PISSN: 07311745     EISSN: 17453992     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-3992.2009.00151.x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2000). Interweaving content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach: Knowing and using mathematics. In J. Boaler (Ed Multiple perspectives on the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 83 104). Westport, CT : Ablex.
2. Ball, D. L., Lubienski, S., & Mewborn, D. (2001). Research on teaching mathematics: The unsolved problem of teachers' mathematical knowledge. In V. Richardson (Ed Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 433 456). New York : Macmillan.
3. Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. New York : Open University Press.
4. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 5 (1 7 73.
5. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2004). The formative purpose: Assessment must first promote learning. In M. Wilson (Ed Towards coherence between classroom assessment and accountability: Part II. 103rd yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (1st ed., pp. 20 50). Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
6. Brennan, R. L. (2001). Generalizability theory. New York : Springer-Verlag.
7. Gong, B. (2006). Establishing learning goals for formative assessment. Presentation at the Reidy Interactive Lecture Series, Nashua, NH.
8. Gong, B. (2007). Learning progressions: Sources and implications for assessment. Presentation at the CCSSO, Large-Scale Assessment Conference, Nashville, TN.
9. Heritage, M. (2008). Learning progressions: Supporting instruction and formative assessment. Washington, DC : Chief Council of State School Officers.
10. Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers' mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42 (2 371 406.
11. Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (Eds. 2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC : National Academies Press.
12. Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers' understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum.
13. National Research Council (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC : National Academies Press.
14. Pellegrino, J., Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, R. (Eds. 2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Washington, DC : National Academies Press.
15. Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119 144.
16. Schifter, D. (Ed. 1996). What's happening in math class, vol. 2: Reconstructing professional identities. New York : Teachers College Press.
17. Shavelson, R. J., & Webb, N. M. (1991). Generalizability theory: A primer. Newbury Park, CA : Sage.
18. Shepard, L. (2005). Formative assessment: Caveat emptor. Paper presented at the ETS Invitational Conference, The Future of Assessment: Shaping Teaching and Learning, New York.
19. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15 (2 4 14.
20. Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap. New York : The Free Press.
21. Wiliam, D. (2006). Formative assessment: Getting the focus right. In M. Heritage & A. L. Bailey (Eds Educational Assessment, 11 (3&4 pp. 283 289). Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum.
22. Wiliam, D., & Thompson, M. (2007). Integrating assessment with learning: What will it take to make it work In C. A. Dwyer (Ed The future of assessment: Shaping, teaching, and learning. Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum.
23. Wilson, M. R., & Bertenthal, M. W. (Eds. 2005). Systems for state science assessment. Washington, DC : National Academies Press.
24. Wilson, S., Shulman, L., & Rickert, A. (1987). 150 ways of knowing: Representations of knowledge in teaching. In J. Calderhead (Ed Explaining teachers' thinking (pp. 14 124). London : Cassell.