Marginal gap, internal fit, and fracture load of leucite-reinforced ceramic inlays fabricated by CEREC inLab and hot-pressed techniques

Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 20, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 535-540

  Keshvad, Alireza ^a   Hooshmand, Tabassom ^b   Asefzadeh, Farokh ^a   Khalilinejad, Foroogh ^c   Alihemmati, Mohammad ^a   van Noort, Richard ^d  

^a SHAHED UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^b TEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^c ISFAHAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

CAD CAM; CEREC inLab; Glass ceramic; Hot pressed; Leucite reinforced; MOD inlay restorations

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM SILICATE; LEUCITE;

ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTURE; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; PRESSURE; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ALUMINUM SILICATES; CEMENTATION; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL CASTING TECHNIQUE; DENTAL MARGINAL ADAPTATION; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; HUMANS; INLAYS; MATERIALS TESTING; MOLAR; PRESSURE;

EID: 80054709246     PISSN: 1059941X     EISSN: 1532849X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00745.x     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Reich SM, Wichmann M, Rinne H, et al: Clinical performance of large, all-ceramic CAD/CAM-generated restorations after three years. J Am Dent Assoc 2004;135:605-612.
2. Reiss B: Long-term clinical performance of CEREC restorations and the variables affecting treatment success. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2001;22:14-18.
3. Mormann WH, Bindl A: All-ceramic, chair-side computer-aided design/computer-aided machining restorations. Dent Clin North Am 2002;46:405-426.
4. Thordrup M, Isidor F, Hörsted-Bindslev P: A 3-year study of inlays milled from machinable ceramic blocks representing 2 different inlay systems. Quintessence Int 1999;30:829-836.
5. Martin N, Jedynakiewicz NM: Interface dimensions of CEREC-2 MOD inlays. Dent Mater 2000;16:68-74.
6. Denissen H, Dozic A, Van der zel J, et al: Marginal fit and short-term clinical performance of porcelain-veneered CICERO, CEREC, and Procera onlays. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:506-513.
7. Sulaiman F, Chai J, Jameson LM, et al: A comparison of the marginal fit of In-Ceram, IPS Empress, and Procera crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:478-484.
8. Sjögren G: Marginal and internal fit of four different types of ceramic inlays after luting. Acta Odontol Scand 1995;53:24-28.
9. Ohlmann B, Gruber R, Eickemeyer G, et al: Optimizing preparation design for metal-free composite resin crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2008;100:211-219.
10. Tsitrou E, Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M, Pahinis K, et al: Fracture strength of minimally prepared resin bonded CEREC inlays. Oper Dent 2009;34:537-543.
11. Manhart J, Schmidt M, Chen HY, et al: Marginal quality of tooth-colored restorations in class II cavities after artificial aging. Oper Dent 2001;26:357-366.
12. Molin MK, Karlsson SL: A randomized 5-year clinical evaluation of 3 ceramic inlay systems. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:194-200.
13. Lange RT, Pfeiffer P: Clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays compared to composite restorations. Oper Dent 2009;34:263-272.
14. Barnes D, Gingell JC, George D, et al: Clinical evaluation of an all-ceramic restorative system: a 36-month clinical evaluation. Am J Dent 2010;23:87-92.
15. Fasbinder DJ: Restorative material options for CAD/CAM restorations. Compendium 2002;23:911-922.
16. Reich S, Gozdowski S, Trentzsch L, et al: Marginal fit of heat-pressed vs. CAD/CAM processed all-ceramic onlays using a milling unit prototype. Oper Dent 2008;33:644-650.
17. Leinfelder KF, Isenberg BP, Essig ME: A new method for generating ceramic restorations: CAD-CAM system. J Am Dent Assoc 1989;118:703-707.
18. Inokoshi S, van Meerbeek B, Willems G, et al: Marginal accuracy of CAD/CAM inlays made with the original and the updated software. J Dent 1992;20:171-177.
19. Federlin M, Schmidt S, Hiller KA, et al: Partial ceramic crowns: influence of preparation design and luting material on internal adaptation. Oper Dent 2004;29:560-570.
20. Hahn P, Schaller H, Hafner P, et al: Effect of different luting procedures on the seating of ceramic inlays. J Oral Rehabil 2000;27:1-8.
21. Hahn P, Attin T, Gröfke M, et al: Influence of resin cement viscosity on microleakage of ceramic inlays. Dent Mater 2001;17:191-196.
22. Romão W, Miranda WG, Cesar PF, et al: Correlation between microleakage and cement thickness in three class II inlay ceramic systems. Oper Dent 2004;29:212-218.
23. Al-Rabab'ah MA, Macfarlane TV, McCord JF: Vertical marginal and internal adaptation of all-ceramic copings made by CAD/CAM technology. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2008;16:109-115.
24. Nakamura T, Tanaka H, Kinuta S, et al: In vitro study on marginal and internal fit of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns. Dent Mater J 2005;24:456-459.
25. Bindl A, Mörmann WH: Marginal and internal fit of all-ceramic CAD/CAM crown copings on chamfer preparations. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32:441-447.
26. Ausiello P, Rengo S, Davidson CL, et al: Stress distributions in adhesively cemented ceramic and resin composite class II inlay restorations: a 3D-FEA study. Dent Mater 2004;20:862-872.
27. Attia A, Kern M: Influence of cyclic loading and luting agents on the fracture load of two all-ceramic crown systems. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:551-556.
28. Pallis K, Griggs JA, Woody RD, et al: Fracture resistance of three all-ceramic restorative systems for posterior applications. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91:561-569.
29. Oh SC, Dong JK, Luthy H, et al: Strength and microstructure of IPS Empress 2 glass ceramic after different treatments. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:468-472.
30. Dias de Souza GM, Pereira GDS, Dias CTS, et al: Fracture resistance of teeth restored with the bonded amalgam technique. Oper Dent 2001;26:511-515.
31. St-Georges AJ, Sturdevant JR, Swift Jr EJ, et al: Fracture resistance of prepared teeth restored with bonded inlay restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:551-557.
32. Attia A, Kern M: Fracture strength of all-ceramic crowns luted using two bonding methods. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91:247-252.
33. Yoshinari M, Derand T: Fracture strength of all-ceramic crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1994;7:329-338.
34. Tsitrou EA, Helvatjoglu-Antoniades M, van Noort R: A preliminary evaluation of the structural integrity and fracture mode of minimally prepared resin bonded CAD/CAM crowns. J Dent 2010;38:16-22.
35. Cattle MJ, Clarke RL, Lynch EJ: The transverse strength, reliability and microstructural features of four dental ceramics. J Dent 1997;25:399-407.
36. Bindl A, Lüthy H, Mörmann WH: Fracture load of CAD/CAM-generated slot-inlay FPDs. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:653-660.
37. Stappert CF, Guess PC, Chitmongkolsuk S, et al: All-ceramic partial coverage restorations on natural molars. Masticatory fatigue loading and fracture resistance. Am J Dent 2007;20:21-26.
38. Guess PC, Strub JR, Steinhart N, et al: All-ceramic partial coverage restorations-midterm results of a 5-year prospective clinical split mouth study. J Dent 2009;37:627-637.
39. Molin MK, Karlsson SL: A randomized 5-year clinical evaluation of 3 ceramic inlay systems. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:194-200.