All-ceramic partial coverage restorations on natural molars. Masticatory fatigue loading and fracture resistance

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 21-26

  Stappert, Christian F J ^a,b   Guess, Petra C ^c   Chitmongkolsuk, Somsak ^d   Gerds, Thomas ^b   Strub, Jorg R ^c  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^c Arnold and Marie Schwartz Hall of Dental Sciences ^*  (Thailand)

^d MAHIDOL UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM SILICATE; CEREC; IPS E.MAX PRESS; IPS EMPRESS CERAMIC; IPS-EMPRESS CERAMIC; PROCAD CERAMIC; RESIN CEMENT; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; VARIOLINK;

ARTICLE; CERAMICS; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; MASTICATION; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; PATHOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TEMPERATURE; TIME; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ALUMINUM SILICATES; BITE FORCE; CERAMICS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; HUMANS; INLAYS; MATERIALS TESTING; MOLAR; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESIN CEMENTS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TEMPERATURE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 33947420820     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Van Dijken JW. All-ceramic restorations: classification and clinical evaluations. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1999; 20:1115-1124,1126.
2. Blatz MB. Long-term clinical success of all-ceramic posterior restorations. Quintessence Int 2002; 33: 415-426.
3. Heffernan MJ, Aquilino SA, Diaz-Arnold AM, Haselton DR, Stanford CM, Vargas MA. Relative translucency of six all-ceramic systems. Part II: Core and veneer materials. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:10-15.
4. Rosenblum MA, Schulman A. A review of all-ceramic restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1997; 128: 297-307.
5. Roulet JF, Soderholm KJ, Longmate J. Effects of treatment and storage conditions on ceramic/composite bond strength. J Dent Res 1995;74:381-387.
6. Bona AD, Anusavice KJ, DeHoff PH. Weibull analysis and flexural strength of hot-pressed core and veneered ceramic structures. Dent Mater 2003;19:662-669.
7. Hayashi M, Yeung CA. Ceramic inlays for restoring posterior teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003;1:CD003450.
8. Frankenberger R, Petschelt A, Kramer N. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after six years: Clinical behavior. Oper Dent 2000;25:459-465.
9. Pallesen U, van Dijken JW. An 8-year evaluation of sintered ceramic and glass ceramic inlays processed by the Cerec CAD/CAM system. Eur J Oral Sci 2000; 108: 239-246.
10. El-Mowafy O, Brochu J. Longevity and clinical performance of IPS-Empress ceramic restorations - A literature review. J Can Dent Assoc 2002; 68: 233-237.
11. Lehener C, Studer S, Brodbeck U, Schärer P. Six-year clinical results of leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays. Acta Med Dent Helv 1998; 3: 137-146.
12. Kramer N, Frankenberger R. Clinical performance of bonded leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after eight years. Dent Mater 2005; 21: 262-271.
13. Otto T, De Nisco S. Computer-aided direct ceramic restorations: A 10-year prospective clinical study of Cerec CAD/CAM inlays and onlays. Int J Prosthodont 2002; 15: 122-128.
14. Felden A, Schmalz G, Federlin M, Hiller KA. Retrospective clinical investigation and survival analysis on ceramic inlays and partial ceramic crowns: Results up to 7 years. Clin Oral Investig 1998;2:161-167.
15. Studer S, Lehner C, Brodbeck U, Scharer P. Short-term results of IPS-Empress inlays and onlays. J Prosthodont 1996; 5: 277-287.
16. Krejci I, Lutz F, Reimer M, Heinzmann JL. Wear of ceramic inlays, their enamel antagonists, and luting cements. J Prosthet Dent 1993; 69: 425-430.
17. Rosentritt M, Plein T, Kolbeck C, Handel G. In vitro fracture force and marginal adaptation of ceramic crowns fixed on natural and artificial teeth. Int J Prosthodont 2000; 13: 387-391.
18. Bremer BD, Geurtsen W. Molar fracture resistance after adhesive restoration with ceramic inlays or resin-based composites. Am J Dent 2001;14:216-220.
19. Stappert CF, Stathopoulou N, Gerds T, Strub JR. Survival rate and fracture strength of maxillary incisors, restored with different kinds of full veneers. J Oral Rehabil 2005; 32: 266-272.
20. McDonald A. Preparation guidelines for full and partial coverage ceramic restorations. Dent Update 2001; 28: 84-90.
21. Joynt RB, Wieczkowski G Jr, Klockowski R, Davis EL. Effects of composite restorations on resistance to cuspal fracture in posterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1987;57:431-435.
22. Banks RG. Conservative posterior ceramic restorations: A literature review. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 63: 619-626.
23. Abu-Hassan MI, Abu-Hammad OA, Harrison A. Stress distribution associated with loaded ceramic onlay restorations with different designs of marginal preparation. An FEA study. J Oral Rehabil 2000; 27: 294-298.
24. Federlin M, Schmidt S, Hiller KA, Thonemann B, Schmalz G. Partial ceramic crowns: Influence of preparation design and luting material on internal adaptation. Oper Dent 2004; 29: 560-570.
25. Federlin M, Sipos C, Hiller KA, Thonemann B, Schmalz G. Partial ceramic crowns. Influence of preparation design and luting material on margin integrity. A scanning electron microscopic study. Clin Oral Investig 2005; 9: 8-17.
26. Ban S, Anusavice KJ. Influence of test method on failure stress of brittle dental materials. J Dent Res 1990;69:1791-1799.
27. Tinschert J, Zwez D, Marx R, Anusavice KJ. Structural reliability of alumina-, feldspar-, leucite-, mica- and zirconia-based ceramics. J Dent 2000;28:529-535.
28. Ritter JE. Predicting lifetimes of materials and material structures. Dent Mater 1995;11:142-146.
29. Lawn BR, Deng Y, Thompson VP. Use of contact testing in the characterization and design of all-ceramic crown like layer structures: A review. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 86: 495-510.
30. Deng Y, Lawn BR, Lloyd IK. Characterization of damage modes in dental ceramic bilayer structures. J Biomed Mater Res 2002; 63:137-145.
31. Kern M, Strub JR, Lu XY. Wear of composite resin veneering materials in a dual-axis chewing simulator. J Oral Rehabil 1999; 26: 372-378.
32. Krejci I, Reich T, Lutz F, Albertoni M. In vitro testing procedures for the evaluation of dental restorative systems. 1. A computer-controlled mastication simulator. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1990; 100: 953-60 (In German).
33. Anderson DJ. Measurement of stress in mastication. J Dent Res 1956; 35: 664-670.
34. De Boever JA, McCall WD Jr, Holden S, Ash MM Jr. Functional occlusal forces: An investigation by telemetry. J Prosthet Dent 1978;40:326-333.
35. Gibbs CH, Mahan PE, Lundeen HC, Brehnan K, Walsh EK, Sinkewiz SL, Ginsberg SB. Occlusal forces during chewing-influences of biting strength and food consistency. J Prosthet Dent 1981; 46: 561-567.
36. Huang M, Niu X, Shrotriya P, Thompson V, Rekow D, Soboyejo WO. Contact damage of dental multilayers: Viscous deformation and fatigue mechanisms. J Eng Mat Tech 2005;127:33-39.
37. Dietschi D, Maeder M, Meyer JM, Holz J. In vitro resistance to fracture of porcelain inlays bonded to tooth. Quintessence Int 1990; 21: 823-831.
38. Shor A, Nicholls JI, Phillips KM, Libman WJ. Fatigue load of teeth restored with bonded direct composite and indirect ceramic inlays in MOD class II cavity preparations. Int J Prosthodont 2003; 16: 64-69.
39. Stappert CF, Guess PC, Gerds T, Strub JR. All-ceramic partial coverage premolar restorations. Cavity preparation design, reliability and fracture resistance after fatigue. Am J Dent 2005;18:275-280.
40. Yoshinari M, Derand T. Fracture strength of all-ceramic crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1994; 7: 329-338.
41. Strub JR, Beschnidt SM. Fracture strength of 5 different all-ceramic crown systems. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:602-609.
42. Chen HY, Hickel R, Setcos JC, Kunzelmann KH. Effects of surface finish and fatigue testing on the fracture strength of CAD-CAM and pressed-ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 82: 468-475.
43. Brunton PA, Cattell P, Trevor Burke FJ, Wilson NH. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with onlays of three contemporary tooth-colored resin-bonded restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 82: 167-171.
44. Edelhoff D, Sorensen JA. Tooth structure removal associated with various preparation designs for anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 87: 503-509.
45. Felden A, Schmalz G, Hiller KA. Retrospective clinical study and survival analysis on partial ceramic crowns: Results up to 7 years. Clin Oral Investig 2000; 4: 199-205.
46. Van Dijken JW, Hasselrot L, Ormin A, Olofsson AL. Restorations with extensive dentin/enamel-bonded ceramic coverage. A 5-year follow-up. Eur J Oral Sci 2001; 8; 109: 222-229.
47. Korber KH, Ludwig K. [Maximal chewing force as mathematical equivalent of dental restorations]. Dent Lab 1983; 1: 55-60 (In German).