A 3-year study of inlays milled from machinable ceramic blocks representing 2 different inlay systems

Quintessence International

Volumn 30, Issue 12, 1999, Pages 829-836

  Thordrup, Marianne ^a   Isidor, Flemming ^a   Hörsted Bindslev, Preben ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AARHUS   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Clinical evaluation; Computer aided design computer aided machining; Copy milling; Inlay

Indexed keywords

CELAY; CEREC;

ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; CERAMICS; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; TOOTH BRUSHING; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

CEMENTATION; CERAMICS; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL POLISHING; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; HUMANS; INLAYS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 0033287680     PISSN: 00336572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Jensen MJ. A two-year clinical study of posterior etched-porcelain resin-bonded restorations. Am J Dent 1988;1:27-33.
2. Herder SM, Roulet J-F. Marginale Adaptation von adhäsiv befestigen Dicor-inlays in vivo. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1988; 43:904-908.
3. Pallesen U. Clinical performance of CEREC restorations: Restorative procedure and preliminary results. In: Mörmann WH (ed). Proceedings of the International Symposium on Computer Restorations. Berlin: Quintessence, 1991:285-300.
4. Isenberg BP, Essig ME, Leinfelder KF. Three-year clinical evaluation of CAD/CAM restorations. J Esthet Dent 1992; 4:173-176.
5. Mörmann W, Krejci I. Computer-designed inlays after 5 years in situ: Clinical performance and scanning electron microscope evaluation. Quintessence Int 1992;23:109-115.
6. Krejci I, Krejci D, Lutz F. Clinical evaluation of a new pressed glass ceramic inlay material over 1.5 years. Quintessence Int 1992;23:181-186.
7. Haas M, Arnetzl G, Wegscheider WA, König K, Bratschko RO. Klinische und werkstoffkundliche Erfahrungen mit Komposit-, Keramik- und Goldinlays. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1992;47:18-22.
8. Van Meerbeek B, Inokoshi S, Willems G, Noack MJ, Braem M, Lambrechts P, et al. Marginal adaptation of four toothcoloured inlay systems in vivo. J Dent 1992;20:18-26.
9. Aberg CH, Van Dijken JWV, Olofsson AL. Three-year comparison of fired ceramic inlays cemented with composite resin or glass ionomer cement. Acta Odontol Scand 1994; 52;140-149.
10. Thordrup M, Isidor F, Hörsted-Bindslev P. A one-year clinical study of toothcolored inlays. Scand J Dent Res 1994; 102:186-192.
11. Van Dijken JW, Hörstedt P. Marginal breakdown of fired ceramic inlays cemented with glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cement or resin composite. J Dent 1994;22:265-272.
12. Tidehag P, Gunne J. A 2-year clinical follow-up study of IPS Empress ceramic inlays. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8: 456-460.
13. Friedl K-H, Schmalz G, Hiller K-A, Saller A. In-vivo evaluation of a feldspathic ceramic system: 2-year results. J Dent 1996;24:25-31.
14. Qualthrough AJE, Wilson NHF. A 3-year clinical evaluation of a porcelain inlay system. J Dent 1996;24:317-323.
15. Isidor F, Brondum K. A clinical evaluation of porcelain inlays. J Prosthet Dent 1995;74:140-144.
16. Hahn R. Experimentelle Untersuchungen zur reproduzierbaren Passgenauigkeit Keramischer Einlagefüllungen. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1990;45:653-656.
17. Hofmann N, Klaiber B, Heners M. Okklusale Randschlussqualität von Cerec-Inlays nach mehrmonatiger Tragedauer. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1990;45:289-292.
18. Sjögren G, Bergman M, Molin M, Bessin C. A clinical examination of ceramic (CEREC) inlays. Acta Odontol Scand 1992;50:171-178.
19. Heymann HO, Bayne SC, Sturdevant JR, Wilder AD, Roberson TM. The clinical performance of CAD-CAM-generated ceramic inlays. A four-year study. J Am Dent Assoc 1996;127:1171-1181.
20. Sjögren G, Molin M, Van Dijken J, Bergman M. Ceramic inlays (Cerec) cemented with either a dual-cured or a chemically cured composite resin luting agent. A 2-year clinical study. Acta Odontol Scand 1995;53:325-330.
21. Inokoshi S, Van Meerbeek B, Willems G, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vanherle G. Marginal accuracy of CAD/CAM inlays made with the original and the updated software. J Dent 1992;20:171-177.
22. Siervo S, Pampalone A, Siervo P, Siervo R. Where is the gap? Machinable ceramic systems and conventional laboratory restorations at a glance. Quintessence Int 1994;25:773-779.
23. Sjögren G. Marginal and internal fit of four different types of ceramic inlays after luting. An in vitro study. Acta Odontol Scand 1995;53:24-28.
24. Siervo S, Bandettini B, Siervo P, Falleni A, Siervo R. The CELAY system: A comparison of fit of direct and indirect fabrication techniques. Int J Prosthodont 1994;7:434-439.
25. Kawai K, Hayashi M, Torii M, Tsuchitani Y. Marginal adaptability and fit of ceramic milled inlays. J Am Dent Assoc 1995;126:1414-1419.
26. Karlsson S, Molin M. Effects of gold and bonded ceramic inlays on the ability to perceive occlusal thickness. J Oral Rehabil 1995;22:9-13.
27. Shearer AC, Thordrup M, Hörsted-Bindslev P, Wilson NHF. A milled ceramic inlay/onlay system: A report from a series of cases. Br Dent J 1998;185:283-286.
28. Mörmann WH, Brandestini M, Lutz F, Barbakow F. Chairside computer-aided direct ceramic inlays. Quintessence Int 1989;20:329-339.
29. Ryge G. The California Dental Association quality evaluation system: A standard for self-assessment. In: Anusavice KJ (ed). Quality Evaluation of Dental Restorations. Chicago: Quintessence, 1989:273-286.
30. Thordrup M, Isidor F, Hörsted-Bindslev P. Comparison of marginal fit and microleakage of ceramic and composite inlays: An in vitro study. J Dent 1994;22:147-153.
31. Hofmann N. Die Herstellung und Eingliederung von computer-gefrästen Keramik-inlays. ZWR 1990;99:530-537.
32. Molin M, Karlsson S. The fit of gold inlays and three ceramic inlay systems. A clinical and in vitro study. Acta Odontol Scand 1993;51:201-206.
33. Mörmann WH, Schug J. Grinding precision and accuracy of fit of CEREC 2 CAD-CIM inlays. J Am Dent Assoc 1997; 128:47-53.
34. Krejci I, Lutz F, Reimer M. Wear of CAD/CAM ceramic inlays: Restorations, opposing cusps and luting cements. Quintessence Int 1994;25:199-207.
35. Suzuki S, Leinfelder KF. Localized wear and marginal integrity of posterior resin composites. Am J Dent 1993; 6:199-203.