Marginal fit of heat-pressed vs CAD/CAM processed all-ceramic onlays using a milling unit prototype

Operative Dentistry

Volumn 33, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 644-650

  Reich, S ^a,c   Gozdowski, S ^a   Trentzsch, L ^a   Frankenberger, R ^b   Lohbauer, U ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

^c NONE   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM SILICATE; CEREC; IPS EMPRESS CERAMIC; IPS-EMPRESS CERAMIC;

ARTICLE; CERAMICS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; HEAT; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ALUMINUM SILICATES; CERAMICS; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL MODELS; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; HOT TEMPERATURE; HUMANS; INLAYS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING;

EID: 56849121618     PISSN: 03617734     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2341/07-162     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Yeo IS, Yang JH & Lee JB (2003) In vitro marginal fit of three all-ceramic crown systems The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 90(5) 459-464.
2. McLaren EA (1998) All-ceramic alternatives to conventional metal-ceramic restorations Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry 19(3) 307-308, 310, 312 passim; quiz 326.
3. Tinschert J, Natt G, Hassenpflug S & Spiekermann H (2004) Status of current CAD/CAM technology in dental medicine International Journal of Computerized Dentistry 7(1) 25-45.
4. Raigrodski AJ (2004) Contemporary all-ceramic fixed partial dentures: A review Dental Clinics of North America 48(2) viii, 531-544.
5. Mehl A & Hickel R (1999) Current state of development and perspectives of machine-based production methods for dental restorations International Journal of Computerized Dentistry 2(1) 9-35.
6. Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH, Folwaczny M & Hickel R (2004) Stabilization effects of CAD/CAM ceramic restorations in extended MOD cavities The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 6(3) 239-245.
7. Kramer N, Lohbauer U & Frankenberger R (2000) Adhesive luting of indirect restorations American Journal of Dentistry 13(Spec No) 60D-76D.
8. Burke FJ (2005) Trends in indirect dentistry: 3. Luting materials Dental Update 32(5) 251-254, 257-258, 260.
9. Felden A, Schmalz G & Hiller KA (2000) Retrospective clinical study and survival analysis on partial ceramic crowns: Results up to 7 years Clinical Oral Investigations 4(4) 199-205.
10. Federlin M, Krifka S, Herpich M, Hiller KA & Schmalz G (2007) Partial ceramic crowns: Influence of ceramic thickness, preparation design and luting material on fracture resistance and marginal integrity in vitro Operative Dentistry 32(3) 251-260.
11. Ilie N, Kunzelmann KH & Hickel R (2006) Evaluation of micro-tensile bond strengths of composite materials in comparison to their polymerization shrinkage Dental Materials 22(7) 593-601.
12. Frankenberger R, Petschelt A & Kramer N (2000) Leucitereinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after six years: Clinical behavior Operative Dentistry 25(6) 459-465.
13. Friedl KH, Hiller KA, Schmalz G & Bey B (1997) Clinical and quantitative marginal analysis of feldspathic ceramic inlays at 4 years Clinical Oral Investigations 1(4) 163-168.
14. Bindl A & Mormann WH (2003) Clinical and SEM evaluation of all-ceramic chair-side CAD/CAM-generated partial crowns European Journal of Oral Sciences 111(2) 163-169.
15. Jedynakiewicz NM & Martin N (2001) Functionally-generated pathway theory, application and development in Cerec restorations International Journal of Computerized Dentistry 4(1) 25-36.
16. Martin N & Jedynakiewicz NM (2000) Interface dimensions of CEREC-2 MOD inlays Dental Materials 16(1) 68-74.
17. Denissen H, Dozic A, van der Zel J & van Waas M (2000) Marginal fit and short-term clinical performance of porcelain-veneered CICERO, CEREC, and Procera onlays The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 84(5) 506-513.
18. Sturdevant JR, Bayne SC & Heymann HO (1999) Margin gap size of ceramic inlays using second-generation CAD/CAM equipment Journal of Esthetic Dentistry 11(4) 206-214.
19. Martin N & Jedynakiewicz NM (1999) Clinical performance of CEREC ceramic inlays: A systematic review Dental Materials 15(1) 54-61.
20. Reiss B & Walther W (1991) [Survival rate analysis and clinical follow-up of tooth-colored restorations of CEREC] ZWR 100(5) 329-332.
21. Reiss B (2006) Clinical results of Cerec inlays in a dental practice over a period of 18 years International Journal of Computerized Dentistry 9(1) 11-22.
22. Reiss B & Walther W (2000) Clinical long-term results and 10-year Kaplan-Meier analysis of Cerec restorations International Journal of Computerized Dentistry 3(1) 9-23.
23. Ender A (2005) Cerec 3D Design: Vollkeramische CAD/CAM Inlays, Teilkronen, Kronen und Veneers Konstruktion und Fertigung per Computer Stiftung zur Förderung der Computer-Zahnmedizin, Zürich.
24. Akbar JH, Petrie CS, Walker MP, Williams K & Eick JD (2006) Marginal adaptation of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM composite crowns using two different finish line preparation designs Journal of Prosthodontics 15(3) 155-163.
25. Tsitrou EA, Northeast SE & van Noort R (2007) Evaluation of the marginal fit of three margin designs of resin composite crowns using CAD/CAM Journal of Dentistry 35(1) 68-73.
26. Addi S, Hedayati-Khams A, Poya A & Sjogren G (2002) Interface gap size of manually and CAD/CAM-manufactured ceramic inlays/onlays in vitro Journal of Dentistry 30(1) 53-58.
27. Stappert CF, Denner N, Gerds T & Strub JR (2005) Marginal adaptation of different types of all-ceramic partial coverage restorations after exposure to an artificial mouth British Dental Journal 199(12) 779-783; discussion 777.
28. Lohbauer U, Kramer N, Petschelt A & Frankenberger R (2008) Correlation of in vitro fatigue data and in vivo clinical performance of a glass ceramic material Dental Materials 24(1) 39-44.
29. Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G & Hickel R (2004) Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition Operative Dentistry 29(5) 481-508.