Fracture strength of all-ceramic crowns luted using two bonding methods

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 91, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 247-252

  Attia, Ahmed ^a,b   Kern, Matthias ^b  

^a Horus University   (Egypt)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HYDROFLUORIC ACID; PHOSPHORIC ACID; SILANE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; CONTROLLED STUDY; FORCE; FRACTURE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAXILLA; PREMOLAR TOOTH; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BICUSPID; BORON COMPOUNDS; CERAMICS; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; CROWNS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; HUMANS; HYDROFLUORIC ACID; MATERIALS TESTING; METHACRYLATES; METHYLMETHACRYLATES; PHOSPHORIC ACIDS; RESIN CEMENTS; SILANES; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 1842527538     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2003.12.005     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Cronin R.J., Cagna D.R. An update on fixed prosthodontics. J Am Dent Assoc. 128:1997;425-436.
2. Burke E.J., Qualtrough A.J. Aesthetic inlays. Composite or ceramic. Br Dent J. 22:1994;53-60.
3. Ferrari M., Cagidiaco M.C., Vichi A., Mannocci F., Mason P.N., Mjor I.A. Bonding of all-porcelain crowns: structural characteristics of the substrate. Dent Mater. 17:2001;156-164.
4. Cattell M.J., Chadwick T.C., Knowles J.C., Clarke R.L., Lynch E. Flexural strength optimization of a leucite reinforced glass ceramic. Dent Mater. 17:2001;21-33.
5. Vichi A., Ferrari M., Davidson C.L. Influence of ceramic and cement thickness on the masking of various types of opaque posts. J Prosthet Dent. 83:2000;412-417.
6. Wiedhahn K. Cerec 3 as the first step in digitizing the dental office. Int J Comput Dent. 3:2000;67-71.
7. Kassak H. Cerec 3 in the practice network. Int J Comput Dent. 3:2000;73-77.
8. Kamada K., Yoshida K., Atsuta M. Effect of ceramic surface treatments on the bond of four resin luting agents to a ceramic material. J Prosthet Dent. 79:1998;508-513.
9. Morikawa T., Matsumura H., Alsuta M. Bonding of a mica-based castable ceramic material with a tri-n-butylborane-initiated adhesive resin. J Oral Rehabil. 23:1996;450-455.
10. Aida M., Hayakawa T., Mizokawa K. Adhesion of composite to porcelain with various surface conditions. J Prosthet Dent. 73:1995;464-470.
11. Wolf D.M., Powers J.M., O'Keefe K.L. Bond strength of composite to porcelain treated with new porcelain repair agents. J Dent Mater. 8:1992;158-161.
12. Stangel I., Nathanson D., Hsu C.S. Shear strength of the composite bond to etched porcelain. J Dent Res. 66:1987;1460-1465.
13. Kamada K., Yoshida K., Atsuta M. Effect of ceramic surface treatments on the bond of four resin luting agents to a ceramic material. J Prosthet Dent. 79:1998;508-513.
14. Fan P.L. Porcelain repair materials. Council on dental materials instruments and equipments. J Am Dent Assoc. 122:1991;124-130.
15. Diaz-Arnold A.M., Vargas M.A., Haselton D.R. Current status of luting agents for fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent. 81:1999;135-141.
16. Kao E., Johnston W.M. Fracture incidence on debonding of orthodontic brackets from porcelain veneer laminates. J Prosthet Dent. 66:1999;631-637.
17. Yoshinari M., Derand T. Fracture strength of all-ceramic crowns. Int J Prosthodont. 7:1994;329-338.
18. Strub J.R., Beschnidt M. Fracture strength of 5 different all-ceramic crown systems. Int J Prosthodont. 11:1998;602-609.
19. Chen H.Y., Hickel R., Setcos J.C., Kunzelmann K.H. Effects of surface finish and fatigue testing on the fracture strength of CAD-CAM and pressed ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 82:1999;468-475.
20. Kelly J.R. Clinically relevant approach to failure testing of all-ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 81:1999;652-661.
21. Matsumura H., Kato H., Atusta M. Shear bond strength to feldspathic porcelain of two luting cements in combination with three surface treatments. J Prosthet Dent. 78:1997;511-517.
22. Morikawa T., Matsumura H., Atusta M. Bonding of a mica-based castable ceramic material with a tri-n-butylborane-initiated adhesive resin. J Oral Rehabil. 23:1996;450-455.
23. Magne P., Oh W.S., Pintado M.R., Delong R. Wear of enamel and veneering ceramics after laboratory and chairside finishing procedures. J Prosthet Dent. 82:1999;669-679.
24. Palin W.M., Fleming G.J., Marquis P.M. An evaluation of the technique sensitivity of a hydrothermal low fusing dental ceramic. J Dent. 29:2001;443-449.
25. Neuman P. CAD/CAM-Ceramics. An overview for the Cerec practioner. Int J Comput Dent. 2:1999;45-57.
26. Thompson J.Y., Bayne S.C., Heymann H.O. Mechanical properties of a new mica-based machinable glass ceramic for CAD/CAM restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 76:1996;619-623.
27. Mormann W.H., Bindl A. The Cerec 3. A quantum leap for computer-aided restorations: initial clinical results. Quintessence Int. 31:2000;699-712.
28. Koutayas S.O., Kern M., Ferraresso F., Strub J.R. Influence of design and mode of loading on the fracture strength of all-ceramic resin-bonded fixed partial dentures: an in vitro study in a dual-axis chewing simulator. J Prosthet Dent. 83:2000;540-547.
29. Sjogern G. Marginal and internal fit of four different types of ceramic inlays after luting. Acta Odontol Scand. 53:1995;24-28.
30. Burke F.J. The effect of variations in bonding procedures on fracture resistance of dentin- bonded all-ceramic crowns. Quintessence Int. 26:1995;293-300.