Influence of resin cement viscosity on microleakage of ceramic inlays

Dental Materials

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 191-196

  Hahn, P ^a   Attin, T ^a,b   Grofke M ^a   Hellwig, E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Ceramic inlay; Microleakage; Viscosity

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM SILICATE; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; FUCHSINE; IPS EMPRESS CERAMIC; IPS-EMPRESS CERAMIC; POLYMER; RESIN CEMENT;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CERAMICS; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN; ENAMEL; ENDODONTICS; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; IMMERSION; MASTICATION; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; THERMODYNAMICS; TOOTH DISEASE; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; ULTRASTRUCTURE; VISCOSITY;

ALUMINUM SILICATES; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BITE FORCE; CERAMICS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL LEAKAGE; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTIN; HUMANS; IMMERSION; INLAYS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MATERIALS TESTING; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; POLYMERS; REPLICA TECHNIQUES; RESIN CEMENTS; ROSANILINE DYES; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; THERMODYNAMICS; VISCOSITY;

EID: 0035350554     PISSN: 01095641     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00067-1     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Curing contraction of composites and glass-ionomer cements. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59:297-300.
2. Gary SP, Cheung BDS. Reducing marginal leakage of posterior composite resin restorations: a review of clinical techniques. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:286-8.
3. Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R, Meister C, Petschelt A. Curing contraction in thin bonding composite resin layers. In: Mörmann WH, editor. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Computer Restorations. The state of art of the Cerec method. Berlin, Quintessence, 1991. p. 577-90.
4. Lutz F, Krejci I, Barbakow F. Quality and durability of marginal adaptation in bonded composite restorations. Dent Mater 1991;7:107-13.
5. Davidson CL, De Gee AJ. Relaxation of polymerization contraction stresses by flow in dental composites. J Dent Res 1984;63:146-8.
6. Davidson CL. Resisting the curing contraction with adhesive composites. J Prosthet Dent 1986;55:446-7.
7. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of restoration. J Dent Res 1987;66:1636-9.
8. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Increased wall-to-wall curing contraction in thin bonded resin layers. J Dent Res 1989;68:48-50.
9. Lambrechts P, Inokoshi S, Van Meerbeek B, Willems G, Braem M, Van Herle G. Classification and potential of composite luting materials. In: Mörmann WH, editor. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Computer Restorations. The state of art of the Cerec method. Berlin, Quintessence, 1991, p. 61-90.
10. Inokoshi S, Willems G, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Van Herle G. Dual cure luting composites. Part 1: filler particle distribution. J Oral Rehab 1993;20:133-46.
11. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Quantitative determination of stress reduction by flow in composite restorations. Dent Mater 1990;6:167-71.
12. Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Marginal integrity related to bond strength and strain capacity of composite resin restorative systems. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:658-64.
13. Retief DH. Do adhesives prevent microleakage? Int Dent J 1994;44:19-26.
14. Davidson CL, Feilzer AJ. Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage stress in polymer-based restoratives. J Dent 1997;25:435-40.
15. Van Meerbeek B, Perdigao J, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. The clinical performance of adhesives. J Dent 1998;26:1-20.
16. Ebert J, Petschelt A. The Ultrasonic Insertion Technique without the use of a bonding agent. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1996;51:96-100.
17. Kern M, Strub JR, Lü XY. Wear of composite resin veneering materials in a dual axis chewing simulator. J Oral Rehab 1999;26:372-8.
18. Roulet JF, Reich T, Blunck U, Noack M. Quantitative margin analysis in the scanning electron microscope. Scanning Microsc 1989;3:147-58.
19. Al-Salehi SK, Burke FJT. Methods used in dentin bonding tests: an analysis of 50 investigations on bond strength. Quintessence Int 1997;28:717-23.
20. Dietschi D, Magne P, Holz J. An in vitro study of parameters related to marginal and internal seal of bonded restorations. Quintessence Int 1993:24:281-91.
21. Schmalz G, Federlin M, Reich E. Effect of dimension of luting space and luting composite on marginal adaptation of a class II ceramic inlay. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:392-9.
22. Hahn P, Schaller HG, Müllner U, Hellwig E. Marginal leakage in class II-restorations after use of ceramic-inserts in combination with different luting cements. J Oral Rehab 1998;25:567-74.
23. Davidson CL, De Gee AJ, Feilzer AJ. The competition between composite-dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J Dent Res 1984;63:1396-9.
24. Davidson CL, Van Zaghbroek L, Feilzer AJ. Destructive stress in adhesive luting cements. J Dent Res 1991;70:880-2.
25. Alster D, Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Polymerization contraction stress in thin resin composite layers as a function of layer thickness. Dent Mater 1997;13:146-50.