Clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays compared to composite restorations

Operative Dentistry

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 263-272

  Lange, R T ^a   Pfeiffer, P ^a,b  

^a Mb̈nchengladbach ^*  (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DENTIN BONDING AGENT; EVOPRESS; FILTEK Z250; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; PATHOLOGY; PREMOLAR TOOTH; RECURRENT DISEASE; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH BRUSHING; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ADULT; BICUSPID; COLOR; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL CAVITY LINING; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL POLISHING; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INLAYS; MALE; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MOLAR; RECURRENCE; RESIN CEMENTS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 67650142122     PISSN: 03617734     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2341/08-95     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Fradeani M, Aquilano A & Bassein L (1997) Longitudinal study of pressed glass-ceramic inlays for four and a half year The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 78(4)346-353.
2. Roulet JF (1997) Longevity of glass ceramic inlays and amalgam-results up to 6 years Clinical Oral Investigations 1(1)40-46.
3. Krämer N, Frankenberger R, Pelka M & Petschelt A (1999) IPS Empress inlays and onlays after four-years: A clinical study Journal of Dentistry 27(5)325-331.
4. Sjörgen G, Lantto R, Granberg A, Sundstrom BO & Tillberg A (1999) Clinical examination of leucite-reinforced glass- ceramic crowns (Empress) in general practice: A retrospective study The International Journal of Prosthodontics 12(2)122- 128.
5. Sturdevant JR, Bayne SC & Heymann HO (1999) Margin gap size of ceramic inlays using second-generation CAD/CAM equipment Journal of Esthetic Dentistry 11(4)206-214.
6. Addi S, Hedayati-Khams A, Poya A & Sjögren G (2002) Interface gap size of manually and CAD/CAM-manufactured ceramic inlays/onlays in vitro Journal of Dentistry 30(1)53- 58.
7. Mörmann WH & Bindl A (2002) All-ceramic, chairside computer-aided design/computer-aided machining restorations Dental Clinics of North America 46(2)405-426.
8. Kurbad A (2002) Clinical aspects of all-ceramic CAD/CAM restorations International Journal of Computerized Dentistry 5(2-3)183-197.
9. Brackett WW, Browning WD, Brackett MG, Callan RS & Blalock JS (2007) Effect of restoration size on the clinical performance of posterior "packable" resin composites over 18 months Operative Dentistry 32(3)212-216.
10. Perdigão J, Dutra-Correa M, Castilhos N, Carmo AR, Anauate-Netto C, Cordeiro HJ, Amore R & Lewgoy HR (2007) One-year clinical performance of self-etch adhesives in posterior restorations American Journal of Dentistry 20(2)125-133.
11. Bortolotto T, Onisor I & Krejci I (2007) Proximal direct composite restorations and chairside CAD/CAM inlays: Marginal adaptation of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective enamel conditioning Clinical Oral Investigations 11(1)35-43.
12. Erpenstein H, Kerschbaum T & Halfin T (2001) Long-term survival of cast-gold inlays in a specialized dental practice Clinical Oral Investigations 5(3)162-166.
13. Kunzelmann KH, Jelen B, Mehl A & Hickel R (2001) Wear evaluation of MZ 100 compared to ceramic CAD/CAM materials International Journal of Computerized Dentistry 4(3)171-184.
14. Blatz MB (2004) Long-term clinical success of all-ceramic posterior restorations Quintessence International 33(6)415- 426.
15. Otto T & Schneider D (2008) Long-term clinical results of chairside Cerec CAD/CAM inlays and onlays: A case series The International Journal of Prosthodontics 21(1)53-59.
16. Hayashi M, Wilson NH, Yeung CA & Worthington HV (2003) Systematic review of ceramic inlays Clinical Oral Investigations 7(1)8-19.
17. Mota CS, Demarco FF, Camacho GB & Powers JM (2003) Microleakage in ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 5(1)63-70.
18. Arnelund CF, Johansson A, Ericson M, Häger P & Arvidson Fryberg K (2004) Five-year evaluation of two resin-retained ceramic systems: A retrospective study in a general practice setting The International Journal of Prosthodontics 17(3)302-306.
19. Ozturk N, Ozturk B & Aykent F (2004) Microleakage of different cementation techniques in Class V ceramic inlays Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 31(12)1192-1196.
20. Santos C, Mondelli R, Lauris J & Navarro M (2004) Clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays and onlays fabricated with two systems: Two-year clinical follow up Operative Dentistry 29(2)123-130.
21. Krämer N, Ebert J, Petschelt A & Frankenberger R (2006) Ceramic inlays bonded with two adhesives after 4 years Dental Materials 22(1)13-21.
22. da Rosa Rodolpho PA, Cenci MS, Donassollo TA, Loguercio AD & Demarco FF (2006) A clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 17-year findings Journal of Dentistry 34(7)427-435.
23. Akimoto N, Takamizu M & Momoi Y (2007) 10-year clinical evaluation of a self-etching adhesive system Operative Dentistry 32(1)3-10.
24. Frankenberger R, Petschelt A & Krämer N (2000) Leucite- reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after six years: Clinical behavior Operative Dentistry 25(6)459-465.
25. Manhart J, Scheibenbogen-Fuchsbrenner A, Chen HY & Hickel R (2000) A 2-year clinical study of composite and ceramic inlays Clinical Oral Investigations 4(4)192-198.
26. Manhart J, Chen HY, Neuerer P, Scheibenbogen- Fuchsbrunner A & Hickel R (2001) Three-year clinical evaluation of composite and ceramic inlays American Journal of Dentistry 14(2)95-99.
27. El-Mowafy O & Brochu JF (2002) Longevity and clinical performance of IPS-Empress ceramic restorations-a literature review Journal of Canadian Dental Association 68(4)233- 237.
28. Posselt A& Kerschbaum T (2003) Longevity of2328 chairside Cerec inlays and onlays International Journal of Computerized Dentistry 6(3)231-248.
29. Reiss B & Walther W (2000) Clinical long-term results and 10-year Kaplan-Meier analysis of Cerec restorations International Journal of Computerized Dentistry 3(1)9-23.
30. Sjögren G, Molin M & van Dijken JW (2004) A 10-year prospective evaluation of CAD/CAM-manufactured (Cerec) ceramic inlays cemented with a chemically cured or dual- cured resin composite The International Journal of Prosthodontics 17(2)241-246.
31. Opdam NJM, Loomans BAC, Roeters FJM & Bronkhorst EM (2004) Five-year clinical performance of posterior resin composite restorations placed by dental students Journal of Dentistry 32(5)379-383.
32. Iida K, Inokoshi S & Kurosaki N (2003) Interfacial gaps following ceramic inlay cementation vs direct composites Operative Dentistry 28(4)445-452.
33. Mackert JR Jr & Wahl MJ (2004) Are there acceptable alternatives to amalgam? Journal of the California Dental Association 32(7)601-610.
34. Roulet JF & Degrange M (1996) Inlay restorations Journal of the California Dental Association 24(9)48-62.
35. Dalpino PH, Francischone CE, Ishikiriama A & Franco EB (2002) Fracture resistance of teeth directly and indirectly restored with composite resin and indirectly restored with ceramic materials American Journal of Dentistry 15(6)389- 396.
36. Santos C, Mondelli R, Francischone C, Lauris J & Navarro M (2004) Clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays and onlays made with two systems: A one-year follow-up Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 6(4) 333-338.
37. Lutz E, Krejci I & Oldenburg TR (1986) Elimination of polymerization stresses at the margins of posterior composite resin restorations: A new restorative technique Quintessence International 17(12)777-784.
38. Versluis A, Douglas WH, Cross M & Sakaguchi RL (1996) Does an incremental filling technique reduce polymerization shrinkage stresses? Journal of Dental Research 75(3)871- 878.
39. Cvar JF & Ryge G (2006) Reprint of criteria for the clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials Clinical Oral Investigations 10(1)92.
40. Kaplan EL & Meier P (1958) Non-parametric estimation from incomplete observations Journal of the American Statistical Association 53(282)457-481.