Interface dimensions of CEREC-2 MOD inlays

Dental Materials

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 68-74

  Martin, N ^a,b   Jedynakiewicz, N M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b ROYAL LIVERPOOL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

CAD CAM; Ceramic; CEREC; Composite; Inlay; Interface

Indexed keywords

CEREC; COMPOMER; DYRACT; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; ONE COAT BOND; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SILICATE; SPECTRUM COMPOSITE RESIN;

ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; CERAMICS; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; PREMOLAR TOOTH; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; VISCOSITY;

BICUSPID; CEMENTATION; CERAMICS; COMPOMERS; COMPOSITE RESINS; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL PORCELAIN; HUMANS; INLAYS; METHACRYLATES; RESIN CEMENTS; SILICATES; VISCOSITY;

EID: 0033759976     PISSN: 01095641     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00089-5     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. G. Datzmann, CEREC Vitablocs Mark II Machinable Ceramic, in: W.H. Mörmann (Ed.), CAD/CIM in aesthetic dentistry, Quintessence, Chicago, 1996, pp. 205-216.
2. D.G. Grossman, Structure and physical properties of Dicor/MGC Glass-ceramic, in: W.H. Mörmann (Ed.), International symposium on computer restorations, Quintessence, Berlin, 1991, pp. 103-115.
3. W.H. Mörmann, M. Brandestini, F. Lutz, F. Barbakow, Chairside computer aided direct ceramic inlays, Quintessence Int. 20 (1989) 329-339.
4. N. Martin, Materials and interfaces in computer-machined ceramic dental restorations. PhD thesis, The University of Liverpool, 1996.
5. U. Pallesen, Clinical evaluation of CAD/CAM ceramic restorations: 6-year report, in: W.H. Mörmann (Ed.), CAD/CIM in aesthetic dentistry, Quintessence, Chicago, 1996, pp. 241-253.
6. J.A. Sorensen, S.P. Avera, T.J. Torres, A comparison of marginal fidelity and microleakage of posterior restorative systems, in: W.H. Mörmann (Ed.), International symposium on computer restorations, Berlin, Quintessence, Chicago, 1991, pp. 275-284.
7. I. Krejci, F. Lutz, M. Reimer, Marginal adaptation and fit of adhesive ceramic inlays, J. Dent. 21 (1993) 39-46.
8. J. Schug, J. Pheiffer, B. Sener, W.H. Mörmann, Schleifprazision und Passgenauigkeit von CEREC 2 inlays, Schweiz. Monatsschr. Zahnmed. 105 (1995) 913-919.
9. W.H. Mörmann, J. Shug, Grinding precision and accuracy of fit of Cerec 2 CAD-CIM inlays, JADA 128 (1997) 47-53.
10. W.H. Mörmann, M. Brandestini, The fundamental inventive principles of CEREC CAD/CIM and other CAD/CAM methods, in: W.H. Mörmann (Ed.), CAD/CIM in aesthetic dentistry, Quintessence, Chicago, 1996, pp. 81-110.
11. N.M. Jedynakiewicz, N. Martin, Extending the clinical scope of the CEREC system, in: W.H. Mörmann (Ed.), CAD/CIM in aesthetic dentistry, Quintessence, Chicago, 1996, pp. 136-141.
12. W.H. Mörmann, I. Krejci, Computer-designed inlays after 5 years in situ: clinical performance and scanning electron microscopic evaluation, Quintessence Int. 23 (2) (1992) 109-115.
13. B. Van Meerbeek, S. Inokoshi, G. Willems, J.M. Noack, M. Braem, P. Lambrechts, J.F. Roulet, G. Vanherle, Marginal adaptation of four tooth coloured inlay systems in-vivo, J. Dent. 20 (1) (1992) 18-26.
14. K. Kawai, B.P. Isenberg, K.F. Leinfelder, Effect of gap dimension on composite cement wear, Quintessence Int. 25 (1994) 53-58.
15. T. Kershbaum, Quality assurance in Cerec restorations, in: W.H. Mörmann (Ed.), CAD/CIM in aesthetic dentistry, Quintessence, Chicago, 1996, pp. 321-333.
16. A.J. Feilzer, A.J. De Gee, C.L. Davidson, Setting stresses in composite resin in relation to the configuration of the restoration, J. Dent. Res. 66 (1987) 1636-1639.
17. A.J. Feilzer, A.J. De Gee, C.L. Davidson, Increased wall-to-wall curing contraction in thin bonded resin layers, J. Dent. Res. 68 (1989) 50-58.
18. C.M. Kemp-Sholte, C.L. Davidson, Marginal sealing of curing contraction gaps in class V composite resin restorations, J. Dent. Res. 67 (1988) 841-845.
19. I. Krejci, F. Lutz, M. Reimer, Marginal adaptation and fit of adhesive ceramic inlays, J. Dent. 21 (1993) 39-46.
20. P. Kamposiora, S.C. Bayne, D.F. Taylor, J.R. Sturdevant, G. Papavasiliou, 2D-FEA of cement effects on interfacial stresses in CAD/CAM inlays, J. Dent. Res. 70 (1999) Abstract 246.
21. K.L. O'Keefe, P.L. Pease, H.K. Herrin, Variables affecting the transmittance of light through porcelain veneer samples, J. Prosthet. Dent. 66 (1991) 434-438.
22. M.J. Besek, W.H. Mörmann, F. Lutz, Curing of Composites under CEREC inlays, in: W.H. Mörmann (Ed.), CAD/CIM in aesthetic dentistry, Quintessence, Chicago, 1996, pp. 347-360.
23. R. Blackman, N. Barghi, E. Duke, Influence of ceramic thickness on the polymerisation of light-cured resin cement, J. Prosthet. Dent. 63 (1990) 295-300.
24. D. Nathanson, F. Hassan, Effect of etched porcelain thickness on resin-porcelain bond strength, J. Dent. Res. 66 (1987) 245.
25. J.M. Fletcher, N. Martin, N.M. Jedynakiewicz, The optical density of machinable ceramics to light at 480 nm, J. Dent. Res. 72 (4) (1999) Abstract 280.
26. K. Warren, An investigation into the microhardness of a light-cured composite when cured through varying thickness of porcelain, J. Oral. Rehab. 17 (1990) 327-334.
27. R. Strang, A. Cummings, K.W. Stephen, Laboratory studies of visible light cured fissure sealents: setting times an depth of polymerisation, J. Oral. Rehab. 13 (1986) 305-309.
28. J.R. Condon, J.L. Ferracane, In vitro wear of composite with varied cure, filler level and filler treatment, J. Dent. Res. 76 (1997) 1405-1411.
29. M.J. Jaarda, R.F. Wang, B.R. Lang, A regression analysis of filler particle content to predict composite wear, J. Prosthet. Dent. 77 (1997) 57-67.
30. K. Shinkai, S. Suzuki, K.F. Leinfelder, Y. Katoh, Effect of gap dimension on wear resistance of luting agents, Am. J. Dent. 8 (1995) 149-151.
31. E.D. Rekow, A review of the developments in dental CAD/CAM systems, Curr. Opin. Dent. 2 (1999) 25-33.
32. P.-R. Liu, B. Isenberg, K. Leinfelder, Evaluating CAD-CAM generated ceramic veneers, JADA 124 (1993) 59-63.