Fracture Load of CAD/CAM-Generated Slot-Inlay FPDs

International Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 16, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 653-660

  Bindl, Andreas ^a   Lüthy, Heinz ^a   Mörmann, Werner H ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b NONE   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; CERAMIC PROSTHESIS; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DENTURE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; SHEAR STRENGTH; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ALUMINUM SILICATES; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CERAMICS; COMPOSITE RESINS; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTURE DESIGN; DENTURE, PARTIAL, FIXED; GLASS; HUMANS; INLAYS; MATERIALS TESTING; PLIABILITY; POTASSIUM COMPOUNDS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 0347482410     PISSN: 08932174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Valderhaug J. A 15-year clinical evaluation of fixed prosthodontics. Acta Odontol Scand 1991;49:35-40.
2. Edelhoff D, Sorensen JA. Tooth structure removal associated with various preparation designs for posterior teeth. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2002;22:241-249.
3. Scheller H, Urgell JP, Kultje C, et al. A 5-year multicenter study on implant-supported single crown restorations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:212-218.
4. Kersten S. Strength and marginal fit of full and partial porcelain crowns on Brånemark implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999;10: 1-7.
5. Lutz F, Göhring TN. Fiber-reinforced inlay fixed partial dentures: Maximum preservation of dental hard tissue. J Esthet Dent 2000;3: 164-171.
6. Göhring TN, Mörmann WH, Lutz F. Clinical and scanning electron microscopic evaluation of fiber-reinforced inlay fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:662-668.
7. Göhring TN, Schmidlin PR, Lutz F. Two-year clinical and SEM evaluation of glass-fiber-reinforced inlay fixed partial dentures. Am J Dent 2002;15:35-40.
8. Mörmann WH, Brandestini M. The fundamental inventive principles of Cerec CAD/CIM and other CAD/CAM methods. In: Mörmann WH (ed). CAD/CIM in Aesthetic Dentistry. Berlin: Quintessence, 1996:81-110.
9. Schmalz G, Federlin M, Geurtsen W. Sind Keramik-Inlays und -Veneers wissenschaftlich anerkannt? Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 1994;49:197-208.
10. Reiss B, Walther W. Clinical long-term results and 10-year Kaplan-Meier analysis of Cerec restorations. Int J Comput Dent 2000;3: 9-23.
11. Martin N, Jedynakiewicz NM. Clinical performance of CEREC ceramic inlays: A systematic review. Dent Mater 1999;15:54-61.
12. Otto T. Computer-aided direct ceramic restorations: A 10-year prospective clinical study of Cerec CAD/CAM inlays and onlays. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:122-128.
13. Mörmann WH, Bindl A. The Cerec 3 - A quantum leap for computer-aided restorations: Initial clinical results. Quintessence Int 2000;31:699-712.
14. Neumann G. Bruchfestigkeit Sofort Gefertigter, Minimal Invasiv Verankerter CAD/CAM Slotbrücken [thesis]. Zurich: University of Zurich, 2001.
15. Vaidyanathan TK, Vaidyanathan J, Prasad A. Properties of a new dental porcelain. Scan Microsc 1989;3:1023-1033.
16. Datzmann G. Cerec Vitablocs Mark II machinable ceramic. In: Mörmann WH (ed). Tenth Year Cerec Anniversary Symposium. Berlin: Quintessence, 1996:205-215.
17. Dendry IL. Recent advances in ceramics for dentistry. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1996;7:134-143.
18. Richter B, Mörmann WH. Cerec 3 full-ceramic CAD/CAM inlays and partial crowns. In: Mörmann WH (ed). CAD-CIM Library Vol 4. Zürich: Foundation for the Advancement of Computer-Assisted Dentistry, 2001:77.
19. Craig RC. Restorative Dental Materials, ed 10. St Louis: Mosby, 1997.
20. Helkimo E, Carlsson GE, Helkimo M. Bite force and state of definition. Acta Odontol Scand 1977;35:297-303.
21. Waltimo A, Könönen M. A novel bite force recorder and maximal isometric bite force values for healthy young adults. Scand J Dent Res 1993;101:171-175.
22. Waltimo A, Kemppainen P, Könönen M. Maximal contraction force and endurance of human jaw-closing muscles in isometric clenching. Scand J Dent Res 1993;101:416-421.
23. Körber KH, Ludwig K. Maximale Kaukraft als Berechnungsfaktor zahntechnischer Konstruktionen. Dent Lab 1983;31:55-60.
24. Krejci I. Zahnfarbene Restaurationen - Qualität, Potential und Indikationen. München: Hanser, 1992:58-104.
25. Kelly JR. Clinically relevant approach to failure testing of all-ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:652-661.
26. Kelly JR, Lüthy H, Gougoulakis A, Pober RL, Mörmann WH. Machining effects on feldspathic and glass ceramic: Fractographic analysis. In: Mörmann WH (ed). State of the Art of the Cerec-Method. Berlin: Quintessence, 1991:253-273.
27. Thoma K. Schleifeffizienz und Kantenqualität bei Cerec 3 Inlays, Overlays und Kronen [thesis]. Zurich: University of Zurich, 2001.
28. Grossman DG. Structure and physical properties of Dicor-MGC glass-ceramic. In: Mörmann WH (ed). State of the Art of the Cerec-Method. Berlin: Quintessence, 1991:103-115.
29. van Meerbek B, Willems G, Celis JP, et al. Assessment by nano indentation of the hardness and elasticity of the resin dentin bonding area. J Dent Res 1993;72:1434-1442.
30. Willems G, Celis JP, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vanherle G. Hardness and Young's modulus determined by nano indentation technique of filler particles of dental restoration materials compared with human enamel. J Biomed Mater Res 1993;27:747-755.
31. Xu HHK, Smith DT, Jahanmir S, et al. Indentation damage and mechanical properties of human enamel and dentin. J Dent Res 1998;77:472-480.
32. Randow K, Glantz PO. On cantilever loading of vital and non-vital teeth. An experimental clinical study. Acta Odontol Scand 1986;445:271-277.