Effect of an animated classroom story embedded in online discussion on helping mathematics teachers learn to notice

Journal of the Learning Sciences

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 589-624

  Chieu, Vu Minh ^a   Herbst, Patricio ^a   Weiss, Michael ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b OAKLAND UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052694129     PISSN: 10508406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10508406.2011.528324     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practicebased theory of professional education. In G. Sykes & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3-32). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
2. Ball, D. L., Thames, M., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59, 389-407.
3. Barab, S., Kling, R., & Gray, J. (Eds.). (2004). Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
4. Barab, S., MaKinster, J., & Scheckler, R. (2004). Designing system dualities: Characterizing online community. In S. Barab, R. Kling, & J. Gray (Eds.), Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning (pp. 53-90). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
5. Berliner, D. C., Stein, P., Sabers, D. S., Clarridge, P. B., Cushing, K. S., & Pinnegar, S. (1988). Implications of research on pedagogical expertise and experience in mathematics teaching. In D. A. Grouws & T. J. Cooney (Eds.), Perspectives on research on effective mathematics teaching (pp. 67-95). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
6. Boaler, J., & Humphreys, C. (2005). Connecting mathematical ideas: Middle school video cases to support teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
7. Bren, T. (2005). Transcultural competence in health care practice: The development of shared resources for practitioners. Practice, 17(4), 257-266.
8. Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 141-178.
9. Capozzoli, M., McSweeney, L., & Sinha, D. (1999). Beyond kappa: A review of interrater agreement measures. Canadian Journal of Statistics, 27(1), 3-23.
10. Chazan, D., & Herbst, P. (in press). Animations of classroom interaction: Expanding the boundaries of video records of practice. Teachers' College Record.
11. Chazan, D., Sela, H., & Herbst, P. (submitted). Changes in the doing of word problems in school mathematics. Manuscript submitted for publication.
12. Chieu, V. M., Luengo, V., Vadcard, L., & Tonetti, J. (2010). Student modeling in orthopedic surgery training: Exploiting symbiosis between temporal Bayesian networks and fine-grained didactical analysis. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 20(3).
13. Cohen, D. K. (in press). Teaching: Practice and its predicaments. Cambridge,MA: Harvard University Press.
14. Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37-46.
15. Collins, A. (1992). Toward a design science of education. In E. Scanlon & T. O'Shea (Eds.), New directions in educational technology (pp. 15-22). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
16. Collison, G., Elbaum, B., Haavind, S., & Tinker, R. (2000). Facilitating online learning: Effective strategies for moderators. Madison, WI: Atwood.
17. Connelly, F. M., Clandinin, D. J., & He, M. F. (1997). Teachers' personal practical knowledge in the professional knowledge landscape. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13, 665-674.
18. Copeland, W. D., Birmingham, C., DeMeulle, L., D'Emidio-Caston, M., & Natal, D. (1994). Making meaning in classrooms: An investigation of cognitive processes in aspiring teachers, experienced teachers, and their peers. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 166-196.
19. Crespo, S. (2000). Seeing more than right and wrong answers: Prospective teachers' interpretations of students' mathematical work. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 3(2), 155-181.
20. DeGroot, A. D. (1965). Thought and choice in chess. The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton.
21. Derry, S. J., Pea, R. D., Barron, B., Engle, R. A., Erickson, F., Goldman, R., Sherin, B. L. (2010). Conducting video research in the learning sciences: Guidance on selection, analysis, technology, and ethics. Journal of the Learning Sciences,19, 3-53.
22. Derry, S. J., Seymour, J., Steinkuehler, C., Lee, J., & Siegel, M. (2004). From ambitious vision to partially satisfying reality: An evolving socio-technical design supporting community and collaborative learning in teacher education. In S. A. Barab, R. Kling, & J. Gray (Eds.), Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning (pp. 256-295). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
23. DuRussel, L., & Derry, S. J. (1998, April). Mental models in educational research teams. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
24. Farooq, U., Schank, P., Harris, A., Fusco, J., & Schlager, M. (2007). Sustaining a community computing infrastructure for online teacher professional development: A case study of designing Tapped In. Journal of Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 16, 397-429.
25. Fishman, B. J., & Davis, E. A. (2006). Teacher learning research and the learning sciences. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 535-550). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
26. Fishman, B. L., & Duffy, T. M. (1992). Classroom restructuring: What do teachers really need? Educational Technology Research and Development, 40(3), 95-111.
27. Franke, M. L., & Kazemi, E. (2001). Learning to teach mathematics: Focus on student thinking. Theory Into Practice, 40(2), 102-109.
28. Fuks, H., Pimentel, M., & Pereira de Lucena, C. J. (2006). R-U-typing-2-me? Evolving a chat tool to increase understanding in learning activities. Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(1), 117-142.
29. Furlong, J., & Maynard, T. (1995). Mentoring student teachers: The growth of professional knowledge. London, England: Routledge.
30. Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96, 606-633.
31. Greeno, J. G. (1998). The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. American Psychologist, 53, 5-26.
32. Gunawardena, C. N., Lowe, C. A., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a global on-line debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17, 397-431.
33. Hall, R. (2000). Video recording as theory. In A. E. Kelly, & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 647-664). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. Halpern, D. F. (1996). Thought and knowledge (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
35. Herbst, P., & Chazan, D. (2003). Exploring the practical rationality of mathematics teaching through conversations about videotaped episodes. For the Learning of Mathematics, 23(1), 2-14.
36. Herbst, P., & Chazan, D. (2006). Producing a viable story of geometry instruction: What kind of representation calls forth teachers' practical rationality? In S. Alatorre, J. L. Cortina, M. Sáiz, & A. Méndez (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Annual Meeting of the North American chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 213-220). Mérida, México: Universidad Pedagógica Nacional.
37. Herbst, P., Chazan, D., Chen, C., Chieu, V. M., & Weiss, M. (2011). Using comics-based representations of teaching, and technology, to bring practice to teacher education courses. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 43, 91-103.
38. Herbst, P., Nachlieli, T., & Chazan, D. (2011). Studying the practical rationality of mathematics teaching: What goes into "installing" a theorem in geometry? Cognition and Instruction, 29, 218-255.
39. Hill, H. C., Blunk, M. L., Lewis, J. M., & Ball, D. L. (2008). Mathematical knowledge for teaching and the mathematical quality of instruction: An exploratory study. Cognition and Instruction, 26, 430-511.
40. Hinsz, V. B., Tindale, R. S., & Vollrath, D. A. (1997). The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 43-64.
41. Hughes, J. E., Packard, B. W., & Pearson, P. D. (2000). The role of hypermedia cases on preservice teachers' views of reading instruction. Action in Teacher Education, 22(2A), 24-38.
42. Kensing, F., & Blomberg, J. (1998). Participatory design: Issues and concerns. Journal of Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 7, 167-184.
43. King, K. D. (2001). Conceptually-oriented mathematics teacher development: Improvisation as a metaphor. For the Learning of Mathematics, 21(3), 9-15.
44. Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
45. Lampert, M. (2010). Learning teaching in, from, and for practice: What do we mean? Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1-2), 21-34.
46. Lampert, M., & Ball, D. L. (1998). Teaching, multimedia, and mathematics: Investigations of real practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
47. Larson, B. E., & Keiper, T. A. (2002). Classroom discussion and threaded electronic discussion: Learning in two arenas.Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 2(1). Retrieved from http://www.citejournal.org/vol2/iss1/socialstudies/article1.cfm
48. Le Fevre, D. M. (2004). Designing for teacher learning: Video-based curriculum design. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Using video in teacher education: Advances in research on teaching (Vol. 10, pp. 235-258). London, England: Elsevier.
49. Leinhardt, G., & Ohlsson, S. (1990). Tutorials on the structure of tutoring from teachers. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 2, 21-46.
50. Leinhardt, G., Putnam, R. T., Stein, M., & Baxter, J. (1991). Where subject knowledge matters. In P. Peterson, E. Fennema, & T. Carpenter (Eds.), Advances in research on teaching (pp. 87-113). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
51. Lemke, J. L. (1998). Resources for attitudinal meaning: Evaluative orientations in text semantics. Functions of Language, 5(1), 33-56.
52. Lin, X. D., Schwartz, D. L., & Hatano, G. (2005). Towards teachers' adaptive metacognition. Educational Psychologist, 40, 245-256.
53. Lortie, D. C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
54. Luengo, V., Mufti-Alchawafa, D., & Vadcard, L. (2007). Design of adaptive surgery learning environment with Bayesian network. In Proceedings of the 2007 International Technology, Education and Development Conference [CD]. Valencia, Spain: International Association of Technology, Education and Development.
55. Mestre, J., & Feil, A. (2010). Change blindness as a means of studying expertise in physics. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19, 480-505.
56. Mulgund, S. S., Asdigha, M., Zacharias, G. L., Krishnakumar, K., & Dohme, J. A. (1995). An intelligent tutoring system for simulator-based helicopter flight training. In Proceedings of the 1995 AIAA Flight Simulation Technologies Conference (pp. 121-129). Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
57. Nachlieli, T., & Herbst, P. (2010). Facilitating encounters among teachers with representations of teaching: Two registers. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/64852
58. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
59. Neale, D. C., Carroll, J. M., & Rosson, M. B. (2004). Evaluating computer-supported cooperative work: Models and frameworks. In J. Herbsleb & G. Olson (Eds.), Proceedings of Computer Supported Cooperative Work 2004 (pp. 112-121). New York, NY: ACM Press.
60. Perkins, D. N., & Solomon, G. (1989). Are cognitive skills context-bound? Educational Researcher, 18(1), 16-25.
61. Renninger, K. A., & Shumar,W. (2002). Community building with and for teachers: The Math Forum as a resource for teacher professional development. In K. A. Renninger & W. Shumar (Eds.), Building virtual communities: Learning and change in cyberspace (pp. 60-95). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
62. Renninger, K. A., & Shumar,W. (2004). The centrality of culture and community to participant learning at and with TheMath Forum. In S. A. Barab, R. Kling, & J. H. Gray (Eds.), Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning (pp. 181-209). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
63. Rieber, L. P. (2005). Multimedia learning in games, simulations, and microworlds. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 549-567). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
64. Riel, M., & Polin, L. (2004). Online learning communities: Common ground and critical differences in designing technical environments. In S. A. Barab, R. Kling, & J. H. Gray (Eds.), Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning (pp. 16-50). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
65. Rodgers, C. R. (2002). Seeing student learning: Teacher change and the role of reflection. Harvard Educational Review, 72, 230-253.
66. Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, R., & Archer, W. (2001). Methodological issues in the content analysis of computer conference transcripts. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12, 8-22.
67. Ruopp, R. R., Gal, S., Drayton, B., & Pfister, M. (1993). LabNet: Toward a community of practice. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
68. Sabers, D. S., Cushing, K. S., & Berliner, D. C. (1991). Differences among teachers in a task characterized by simultaneity, multidimensionality, and immediacy. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 63-88.
69. Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D., & Hamilton, E. (2003). The handbook of discourse analysis. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
70. Schlager, M., & Fusco, J. (2004). Teacher professional development, technology, and communities of practice: Are we putting the cart before the horse? In S. A. Barab, R. Kling, & J. H. Gray (Eds.), Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning (pp. 120-153). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
71. Seago, N., Mumme, J., & Branca, N. (2004). Learning and teaching linear functions: Video cases for mathematics professional development, 6-10. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
72. Shavelson, R. (1983). Review of research on teachers' pedagogical judgments, plans, and decisions. The Elementary School Journal, 83, 392-413.
73. Sherin, M. G. (2004). New perspectives on the role of video in teacher education. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Using video in teacher education (pp. 1-28). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
74. Shulman, L. (1986). Just in case: Reflections on learning from experience. In J. A. Colbert, P. Desberg, & K. Trimble (Eds.), The case for reflection: Contemporary approaches for using case methods (pp. 197-217). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
75. Smith, J. (1994). Collective intelligence in computer-based collaborations. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
76. Star, J. R., & Strickland, S. K. (2008). Learning to observe: Using video to improve preservice teachers' ability to notice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(2), 107-125.
77. van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2002). Learning to notice: Scaffolding new teachers' interpretations of classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10, 571-596.
78. van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2008). Mathematics teachers' "learning to notice" in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 244-276.
79. Wang, J., & Hartley, K. (2003). Video technology as a support for teacher education reform. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 11(1), 105-138.
80. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
81. Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. M. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
82. Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
83. Westerman, D. A. (1991). Expert and novice teacher decision making. Journal of Teacher Education, 42(4), 292-305.
84. Wise, A. F., Padmanabhan, P., & Duffy, T. M. (2009, April). Connecting online learners with diverse local practices: The design of effective common reference points for conversation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.