Designing system dualities: Characterizing an online professional development community

Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 53-90

  Barab, Sasha A ^a   Makinster, James G ^b   Scheckler, Rebecca ^c  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b HOBART AND WILLIAM SMITH COLLEGES   (United States)

^c VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84871544183     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511805080.007     Document Type: Chapter

References (87)

1. Adler, P. A., &Adler, P. (1997). Membership Roles in Field Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
2. Barab, S. A. (1999). Ecologizing instruction through integrated units. Middle School Journal, 30, 21-28
3. Barab, S. A. (2002). Commentary: Human-field interaction as mediated by mobile computers. In T. Koschmann, R. Hall, & N. Miyake (Eds.), Computer Supported Collaborative Learning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
4. Barab, S. A., Barnett, M., Yamagata-Lynch, L., Squire, K., & Keating, T. (2002). Using activity theory to understand the contradictions characterizing a technology-rich introductory astronomy course. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 9(2), 76-107
5. Barab, S. A., Barnett, M. G., & Squire, K. (2002). Building a community of teachers: Navigating the essential tensions in practice. The Journal of The Learning Sciences, 11(4), 489-542
6. Barab, S. A., Cherkes-Julkowski, M., Swenson, R., Garrett. S., Shaw, R. E., & Young, M. (1999). Principles of self-organization: Ecologizing the learner-facilitator system. The Journal of The Learning Sciences, 8(3&4), 349-390
7. Barab, S. A., &Duffy, T. (2000). From practice fields to communities of practice. In D. Jonassen, & S. M. Land (Eds.), Theoretical Foundations of Learning Environments (pp. 25-56). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
8. Barab, S. A., MaKinster, J. G., Moore, J., Cunningham, D., & the ILF Design Team. (2001). Designing and building an online community: The struggle to support sociability in the Inquiry Learning Forum. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(4), 71-96
9. Barab, S. A., &Schatz, S. (2001, April). Using Activity Theory to Conceptualize Online Community and Using Online Community to Conceptualize Activity Theory. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA
10. Barab, S. A., Squire, K., & Dueber, B. (2000). Supporting authenticity through participatory learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(2), 37-62
11. Benedikt, M. (1991). “Cyberspace” Some proposals. In M. Benedikt (Ed.), Cyberspace: First steps (pp. 119-224). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
12. Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of The Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141-178
13. Chaney-Cullen, T., & Duffy, T. (1998). Strategic Teaching Frameworks: Multimedia to support teacher change. The Journal of The Learning Sciences, 8, 1-40
14. Cochran-Smith, M. &Lytle, S. L. (1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. In A. Iran-Nejad, & Pearson, P. D. (Eds.). Review of Research in Education (pp. 249-305). Washington D.C.: American Educational Research Association
15. Collison, G., Elbaum, B., Haavind, S., &Tinker, R. (2000). Facilitating Online Learning: Effective Strategies for Moderators. Madison, WI: Atwood Publishing
16. Costa, A. L., & Kallick, B. (1993). Through the lens of a critical friend. Educational Leadership, 51(2), 49-52
17. Dewey, J. (1903-1906/1977). Collected Articles, Book Reviews, and Miscellany (Vol. 3). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press
18. Dewey, J. (1909/1965). The Influence of Darwin on Philosophy and Other Essays in Contemporary Thought. Bloomington: Indiana University Press
19. Dewey, J. (1938/1986). Logic: The theory of inquiry. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The Later Works 1925-1953 (Vol. 12, pp. 1-506). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press
20. Dunn, T. G., & Shriner, C. (1999). Deliberate practice in teaching: What teachers do for self-improvement. Teaching & Teacher Education, 15(6), 631-651
21. Eden, C., &Huxham, C. (1996). Action research for the study of organizations. In S. Clegg., C. Hardy, & W. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of Organizational Studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
22. Emerson, R. E., Fretz, R. L., &Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
23. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by Expanding. Helsinki: Orienta-konsultit
24. Engeström, Y. (1993). Developmental studies of work as a testbench of activity theory: The case of primary care medical practice. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding Practice: Perspectives on Activity and Context (pp. 64-103). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press
25. Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R. Punamaki (Eds.), Perspectives on Activity Theory (pp. 19-38). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press
26. Fowler, R. B. (1991). The Dance with Community: The Contemporary Debate in American Political Thought. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas
27. Gardner, John. (1991). Building Community. Washington, D.C.: Independent Sector
28. Geertz, C. (1983). From the native’s point of view: On the nature of anthropological understanding. In C. Geertz (Ed.), Local Knowledge (pp. 55-70). New York: Basic Books
29. Gomez, L., Fishman, B., & Pea, R. (1998). The CoVis Project: Building a large scale science education testbed. Interactive Learning Environments, 6(1-2), 59-92
30. Grills, S. (1998). Doing ethnographic research: Field settings. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
31. Grossman, P., Wineburg, S., &Woolworth, S. (2000). In Pursuit of Teacher Community. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans
32. Hakken, D. (1999). Cyborgs@cyberspace: An Ethnographer Looks to the Future. New York: Routledge
33. Hall, Gene E. (1979). The concerns-based approach to facilitating change. Educational-Horizons, 57(4), 202-208
34. Hansen, D. T. (1995). The Call to Teach. New York: Teacher’s College Press
35. Herring, S., Martinson, A., andScheckler, R. (2001). A Multimodal Web-based Community for Math and Science Educators: A Feminist Critique. National Women’s Studies Association Minneapolis, MN, June 13-17, 2001
36. Hickman, L. A. (1992). John Dewey’s Pragmatic Technology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press
37. Hickman, L. A. (2000, April 10-13). Johndewey.com: What Dewey Would Have Liked - and Disliked - about the Internet. Paper presented at the Philosophy and Education for Democracy International Conference, the Inaugural Conference of the European John Dewey Society, Unical, Aula Magna, Italy
38. Jackson, M. (Ed.). (1996). Things as They Are: New Directions in Phenomenological Anthropology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press
39. Jones, S. (Ed.). (1999). Doing Internet Research. Thousand Oak, CA: Sage
40. Kaufman-Osborn, T. V. (1997). Creatures of Prometheus: Gender and the Politics of Technology. New York: Rowman and Littlefield
41. Kim, A. J. (2000). Community Building: Secret Strategies for Successful Online Communities on the Web. Berkeley, CA: Peachpit Press
42. Kling, R. (2000). Learning about information technologies and social change: The contribution of social informatics. The Information Society, 16(3), 217-232
43. Kuttii, K. (1996). Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. In B. Nardi (Ed.), Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
44. Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2000). Why ‘digital epistemologies’? Re-open, 1(1)
45. Latour, B. (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press
46. Lave, J. (1993). Situating learning in communities of practice. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition (pp. 17-36). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association
47. Lave, J. (1997). The culture of acquisition and the practice of understanding. In D. Kirshner & J. A. Whitson (Eds.), Situated Cognition: Social, Semiotic, and Psychological Perspectives (pp. 63-82). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
48. Lave, J., &Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. New York: Cambridge University Press
49. Lemke, J. (1997). Cognition, context, and learning: A social semiotic perspective. In D. Kirshner & J. A. Whitson (Eds.), Situated Cognition: Social, Semiotic, and Psychological Perspectives (pp. 37-56). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
50. Leont’ev, A. (1974). The problem of activity in psychology. Soviet Psychology, 13(2), 4-33
51. Leont’ev, A. (1981). Problems of the Development of Mind. Moscow: Progress
52. Leont’ev, A. (1989). The problem of activity in the history of Soviet psychology. Soviet Psychology, 27(1), 22-39
53. Lipman, M. (1988). Philosophy Goes to School. Philadelphia: Temple University Press
54. MaKinster, J. G., Barab, S. A., & Keating, T. M. (2001). Design and implementation of an online professional development community: A project-based learning approach. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 5(3). Available at: http://unr.edu/homepage/crowther/ejse/ejsev5n3.html
55. Marcus, G. E. (1998). Ethnography through Thick and Thin. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
56. McNiff, J. (1995). Action Research Principles and Practice. New York: Routledge
57. Nader, L. (2001). Harmony coerced is freedom denied. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 47, July 13, B13-B16
58. Nardi, B. (Ed.). (1996). Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
59. National Research Council. (2000). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press
60. Preece, J. (2000). Online Communities: Designing Usability, Supporting Sociability. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons
61. Putnam, R. (2001). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Touchstone Books
62. Quartz, K. H. (1995). Sustaining new educational communities: Toward a new culture of school reform. In J. Oakes & K. H. Quartz (Eds.), Creating New Educational Communities (ninety-fourth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part 1, pp. 240-254). Chicago: University of Chicago Press
63. Rich, A. (1986). Invisibility in academe (1984). In A. Rich (Ed.), Blood, Bread, and Poetry: Selected Prose, 1979-1985 (pp. 198-201). New York: Norton
64. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in Thinking: Cognitive Development in Social Context. New York: Oxford University Press
65. Roth, W.-M. (1998). Designing Communities. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers
66. Ruopp, R., Gal, S., Drayton, B., &Pfister, M. (1993). LabNet: Toward a Community of Practice. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
67. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1993). Technologies for knowledge-building discourse. Communications of the ACM, 36, 37-41
68. Scheckler, R. (2000). Weaving Feminism, Pragmatism, and Distance Education. Unpublished Dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA
69. Schlager, M. S., Fusco, J., &Schank, P. (2002). Evolution of an on-line education community of practice. In K. A. Renniger & W. Shumar, (Eds.), Building Virtual Communities: Learning and Change in Cyberspace (pp. 129-158). New York: Cambridge University Press
70. Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the Reflective Practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
71. Sergiovanni, T. J. (1994). Building Community in Schools. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
72. Shaffer, C. R., &Anundsen, K. (1993). Creating Community Anywhere: Finding Support and Connection in a Fragmented World. Los Angeles: Tarcher/Perigee
73. Shaw, R. E., Kadar, E., Sim, M., & Repperger, D. W. (1992). The intentional spring: A strategy for modeling systems that learn to perform intentional acts. Journal of Motor Behavior, 24(1), 3-28
74. Smith, M. andKollock, P. (Eds.) (1999). Communities in Cyberspace. London: Routledge
75. Songer, N. B., Lee, H. S., Hartman, M., &McDonald, S. (2001, April). Towards a repertoire of exemplars of classroom science inquiry. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA
76. Stake, R. E. (1983). Program evaluation, particularly responsive evaluation. In G. F. Madaus, M. S. Scriven., and D. L. Stufflebeam (Eds.), Evaluation Models: Viewpoints on Educational and Human Services Evaluation (pp. 287-310). Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing
77. Stake, R. E. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
78. Stringer, E. T. (1996). Action Research: A Handbook for Practitioners. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
79. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
80. Watson, N. (1997). Why we argue about virtual community: A case study of the phish.net fan community. In S. G. Jones (Ed.), Virtual Culture: Identity and Communication in Cybersociety (pp. 102-132). London: Sage
81. Wellman, B. (1999). Networks in the Global Village: Life in Contemporary Communities. Boulder, CO: Westview Press
82. Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic Inquiry: Towards a Sociocultural Practice and Theory of Education. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press
83. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Leaning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
84. Wenger, E., McDermott, R., &Synder, W. M. (2002). Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press
85. Werry, C., &Mowbray, M. (2001). Online Communities: Commerce, Community Action, and the virtual university. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall
86. Westheimer, J. (1998). Among school teachers: Community, autonomy, and ideology in Teachers’ Work. New York: Teachers College Press
87. Wineburg, S., & Grossman, P. (1998). Creating a community of learners among high school teachers. Phi Delta Kappan, 79, 350-353