Student modeling in orthopedic surgery training: Exploiting symbiosis between temporal Bayesian networks and fine-grained didactic analysis

International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 269-301

  Chieu, Vu Minh ^a   Luengo, Vanda ^b   Vadcard, Lucile ^c   Tonetti, Jérôme ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b UNIV GRENOBLE ALPES   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ GRENOBLE ALPES   (France)

^d GRENOBLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

Computer Based Simulations; Didactic Engineering; Dynamic Bayesian Networks; Intelligent Support; Medical Education; Student Modeling

Indexed keywords

EID: 79951938153     PISSN: 15604292     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3233/JAI-2010-0009     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Albacete P.L., & VanLehn, K. (2000). The Conceptual Helper: An Intelligent Tutoring System for Teaching Fundamental Physics Concepts. In G. Gauthier, C. Frasson, & K. VanLehn (Eds.), Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 564-573). Berlin: Springer (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1839).
2. Anderson, J. R., Boyle, C. F., & Yost, G. (1986). The Geometry Tutor. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 5-20.
3. Anderson, J.R., Farrell, R., & Sauers, R. (1984). Learning to Program in LISP. Cognitive Science, 8, 87-129.
4. Balacheff, N., & Gaudin, N. (2010). Modeling Students' Conceptions: The Case of Function. CBMS Issues in Mathematics Education, 16, 207-234
5. (shortened and edited version of Balacheff, N., & Gaudin, N. (2002). Students Conceptions: An Introduction to a Formal Characterization. Grenoble, France: Les cahiers du laboratoire Leibniz, n°65. Retrieved from http://www leibniz.imag.fr/LesCahiers).
6. Balacheff N., & Margolinas C. (2005). cK¢ Modèle des Connaissance pour le Calcul de Situation Didactiques.In A. Mercier & C. Margolinas (Eds.), Balises pour la Didactique des Mathématiques (pp. 1-32). Grenoble,France: La Pensée Sauvage.
7. Ball, D. L., Thames, M., and Phelps, G. (2008). Content Knowledge for Teaching: What Makes It Special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389-407.
8. Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of Didactic Situations in Mathematics; Didactique des Mathématiques 1970-1990 (N. Balacheff, M. Cooper, R. Sutherland, & V. Warfield, Eds. & Trans.). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
9. Brown, J.S., & Burton, R. (1978). Diagnostic Models for Procedural Bugs in Basic Mathematical Skill. Cognitive Science, 2, 155-192. (Pubitemid 9142778)
10. Burton, R., & Brown, J.S. (1982). An Investigation of Computer Coaching for Informal Learning Activities. In D. Sleeman, & J. Brown (Eds.) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Orlando: Academic Press.
11. Chieu, V.M., Luengo, V., Vadcard, L., & Mufti-Alchawafa, D. (2007). A Framework for Building Intelligent Learning Environments in Ill-defined Domains. International Workshop on AIED Applications in Illdefined Domains, held in conjunction with The 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Marina Del Rey, CA, July 9-13, Web publication (www.cs.pitt.edu/~collinl/AIED07/, no page numbers).
12. Clancey, W.J. (1983). GUIDON. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 10(1), 8-14.
13. Clark, R.E., & Estes, F. (1996). Cognitive Task Analysis. International Journal of Educational Research, 25(5), 403-417.
14. Conati, C., Gertner, A., & VanLehn, K. (2002). Using Bayesian Networks to Manage Uncertainty in Student Modeling. J. of User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 12(4), 371-417.
15. Confrey, J. (1990). A Review of the Research on Students Conceptions in Mathematics, Science, and Programming. In C. Courtney (Eds.) Review of Research in Education (pp. 3-56). American Educational Research Association (Vol. 16).
16. Eraut, M., & du Boulay, B. (2000). Developing the Attributes of Medical Professional Judgement and Competence.Cognitive Sciences Research (paper 518). Retrieved March 25, 2007 from http://www.cogs.susx.ac.uk/users/bend/doh.
17. Gertner, A., & VanLehn, K. (2000). Andes: A Coached Problem Solving Environment for Physics. In G. Gauthier, C. Frasson, & K. VanLehn (Eds.), Proceedings of Fifth International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Springer-Verlag, pp. 133-142.
18. Ghahramani, G. (1998). Learning Dynamic Bayesian Networks. In Adaptive Processing of Sequences and Data Structures, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 168-197.
19. GENIE (2006). Graphical Network Interface. Retrieved March 25, 2007 from http://genie.sis.pitt.edu.
20. Henze, N., & Nejdl, W. (2001). Adaptation in Open Corpus Hypermedia. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12, 325-350.
21. Hersant, M., & Perrin-Glorian, M.J. (2005). Characterization of an Ordinary Teaching Practice with the Help of the Theory of Didactic Situations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 59 (1-3), 113-151. (Pubitemid 41218371)
22. JADE (2006). Java Agent Development Framework. Retrieved March 25, 2007 from http://jade.tilab.com.
23. JENA (2006). A Semantic Web Framework for Java. Retrieved March 25, 2007 from http://jena.sourceforge.net.
24. Joab, M., Guéraud, V., & Auzende, O. (2005). Les Simulations pour la Formation. In M. Grandbastien & J.M. Labat (Eds.), Environnements Informatiques pour l'Apprentissage Humain (pp. 287-310). Paris : Hermès.
25. Kodaganallur, V., Weitz, R. R., & Rosenthal, D. (2005). A Comparison of Model-Tracing and Constraint-Based Intelligent Tutoring Paradigms. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 15, 117-144.
26. Koedinger, K.R., Anderson, J.R., Hadley, W.H., & Mark, M.A. (1997). Intelligent Tutoring Goes to School in the Big City. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 8, 30-43.
27. Lajoie, S.P., Faremo, S., & Wiseman, J. (2001). Identifying Human Tutoring Strategies for Effective Instruction in Internal Medicine. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12, 293-309.
28. Leplat, J. (2000). L'Analyse Psychologique de l'Activité en Ergonomie : Aperçu sur son Evolution, ses Modèles et ses Méthodes. Toulouse : Octarès.
29. Lewis, C. (1982). Using the "Thinking Aloud" Method in Cognitive Interface Design (IBM Research Rep. No.RC9265[#40713]). Yorktown Heights, NY: IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center.
30. Lillehaug, S. I., & Lajoie, S. P. (1998). AI in Medical Education: Another Grand Challenge for Medical Infor- matics. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 12(3), 1-29.
31. Luengo, V., Vadcard, L., Mufti-Alchawafa, D., & Chieu, V.M. (2007). Conceptions and Bayesian Network for an Adaptive Orthopedic Surgery Learning Environment. The Second International Workshop on Personalisation for e-Health, held in conjunction with The 11th International Conference on User Modelling, Corfu, Greece, June 25-29, pp. 39-46.
32. Luengo, V., Mufti-Alchawafa, D., & Vadcard, L. (2004). The Knowledge like the Object of Interaction in an Orthopaedic Surgery-Learning Environment. . In J.C. Lester, R.M. Vicari, & F. Paraguacu (Eds.) Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 108-117). Berlin: Springer (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3220).
33. Margolinas, C., Coulange, L., & Bessot, A. (2005). What Can the Teacher Learn in the Classroom? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 59 (1-3), 205-234. (Pubitemid 41218374)
34. Mayo, M., & Mitrovic A. (2001). Optimising ITS Behaviour with Bayesian Networks and Decision Theory. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12, 124-153.
35. Mislevy, R., & Gitomer, D. (1996). The Role of Probability-Based Inference in an Intelligent Tutoring System. User-Mediated and User-Adapted Interaction, 5, 253-282.
36. Mitrovic, A., & Ohlsson, S. (1999). Evaluation of a Constraint-Based Tutor for a Database Language. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10, 238-256.
37. Mufti-Alchawafa, D., & Luengo V. (2009). Design Implementation and Computer Validation of Didactical Decision Model in a Learning Environment for Orthopaedic. Paper presented at the 2nd International Workshop on Intelligent Support for Exploratory Environments, in conjunction with the 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Brighton, The United Kingdom.
38. Murray, T. (1999). Authoring Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Analysis of the State of the Art. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10, 98-129.
39. Murray, W. (1998). A Practical Approach to Bayesian Student Modeling. In B. Goettle, H. Halff, C. Redfield, & V. Shute (Eds.) Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Springer-Verlag, pp. 424-433. (Pubitemid 128115418)
40. Ohlsson, S. (1994). Constraint-Based Student Modeling. In J. E. Greer, & G. McCalla (Eds.) Student Modeling: The Key to Individualized Knowledge-Based Instruction (pp. 167-189). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
41. Ohlsson, S. (1992). Constraint-based Student Modeling. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 3(4), 429-447.
42. Pastré, P. (1997). Didactique Professionnelle et Développement. Psychologie Française, 42(1), 89-100.
43. Pearl, J. (2000). Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
44. Piaget, J. (1985). Equilibration of Cognitive Structures. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
45. Reye, J. (2004). Student Modelling Based on Belief Networks. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 14, 63-96.
46. Reye, J. (1998). Two-Phase Updating of Student Models Based on Dynamic Belief Networks. In B. Goettle, H. Halff, C. Redfield, & V. Shute (Eds.), Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 274-283). Berlin: Springer (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1452). (Pubitemid 128115403)
47. Rieber, L.P. (2005). Multimedia Learning in Games, Simulations, and Microworlds. In R.E. Mayer (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (pp. 549-567). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
48. Rogers, D.A., Regehr, G., Yeh, K.A., & Howdieshell, T.R. (1998). Computer-assisted Learning versus a Lecture and Feedback Seminar for Teaching a Basic Surgical Technical Skill. American Journal of Surgery, 175(6), 508-510. (Pubitemid 28272981)
49. Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2009). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
50. Sandholm, T.W. (1999): Distributed Rational Decision Making. In G. Weí (Eds.): Multiagent Systems: A Modern Introduction to Distributed Artificial Intelligence (pp. 201-258). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
51. Sasse, M.A. (1991). How to T(r)ap Users' Mental Models. In M.J. Tauber & D. Ackermann, Mental Models and Human-Computer Interaction 2 (pp. 59-79). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.
52. Schoenfeld, A. (1985). Mathematical Problem Solving. New York, NY: Academic Press.
53. Paiva, A., & Self, J. (1995). TAGUS - A User and Learner Modeling Workbench. User Modeling and User- Adapted Interaction, 4(3), 197-226.
54. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
55. Soury-Lavergne, S. (2003). Baghera Assessment Project, Designing a Hybrid and Emergent Educational Society. Grenoble : Les cahiers du laboratoire Leibniz (http://www-leibniz.imag.fr/LesCahiers).
56. Stern, M., Beck, J., & Woolf, B. (1999). Naïve Bayes Classifiers for User Modeling. Center for Knowledge Communication, Computer Science Department, University of Massachusetts.
57. Tonetti, J., Carrat, L., Blendea, S., Merloz, P., & Troccaz, J. (2003). Iliosacral Screw Placement With Ultrasound- Based Navigation versus Conventional Fluoroscopy. Techniques in Orthopaedics, 18(2), 184-191.
58. Vadcard, L. (2003). VOEU Pedagogical Strategy. Final report, VOEU project, IST 1999-13079.
59. Vadcard, L., & Luengo, V. (2005). Réduire l'Ecart entre Formations Théorique et Pratique en Chirurgie : Conception d'un EIAH. In P. Tchounikine, M. Joab, & L. Trouche (Eds.) Environnements Informatiques pour l'Apprentissage Humain (pp. 129-139). Paris : Institut National de Recherche Pédagogique.
60. Vergnaud, G. (1991). La Théorie des Champs Conceptuels. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 10(2/3), 133-170.
61. Vergnaud, G. (1981). Quelques Orientations Théoriques et Méthodologiques des Recherches Françaises en Didactique des Mathématiques. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 2(2), 215-231.
62. Wagner, R.K., Sujan, H., Sujan, M., Rashotte, C.A., & Sternberg, R.J. (1999). Tacit Knowledge in Sales. In R. J. Sternberg & J. A. Horvath, Tacit Knowledge in Professional Practice: Researcher and Practitioner Perspectives (pp. 155-182). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
63. Webber, C. (2004). From Errors to Conceptions - An Approach to Student Diagnosis. In J.C. Lester, R.M. Vicari, & F. Paraguacu (Eds.) Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 710-719). Berlin: Springer (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3220).
64. Weber, G., & Brusilovsky, P. (2001). ELM-ART: An Adaptive Versatile System for Web-based Instruction. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12, 351-384.
65. Wenger, E. (1987). Artificial Intelligence and Tutoring Systems: Computational and Cognitive Approaches to the Communication of Knowledge. Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufman.