R-U-typing-2-me? Evolving a chat tool to increase understanding in learning activities

International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 117-142

  Fuks, Hugo ^a   Pimentel, Mariano ^a   Pereira De Lucena, Carlos José ^a  

^a PONTIFICAL CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

3C collaboration; Chat; Groupware Development Process; LMS

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746167318     PISSN: 15561607     EISSN: 15561615     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11412-006-6845-3     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (44)

1. Baker, K., Greenberg, S., & Gutwin, C. (2001). Heuristic evaluation of groupware based on the mechanics of collaboration. Proceedings of the 8th IFIP Working Conference on Engineering for Human-Computer Interaction (ECHI'01). Toronto.
2. Baron, N. S. (1984). Computer mediated communication as a force in language change. Visible Language, 18(2), 118-141.
3. Borghoff, U. M., & Schlichter, J. H. (2000). Computer-supported cooperative work: Introduction to distributed applications. New York: Springer.
4. Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 15-42.
5. Conklin, J. (1988). Hypertext: An introduction and survey. In I. Greif (Ed.), Computer supported cooperative work: A book of readings (pp. 423-476). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
6. Cornelius, C., & Boos, M. (2003). Enhancing mutual understanding in synchronous computer-mediated bommunication by training: Trade-offs in dudgmental tasks. Communication Research, 30, 147-177.
7. Crystal, D. (1985). A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics. Oxford: Blackwell.
8. DeSanctis, G., & Gallupe, B. (1987). A foundation for the study of group decision support systems. Management Science, 33(5), 589-609.
9. Ellis, C. A. (2000). An evaluation framework for collaborative systems (Technical Report CU-CS-901-00). Boulder, CO: Colorado University.
10. Ellis, C. A., Gibbs, S. J., & Rein, G. L. (1991). Groupware - Some issues and experiences. Communications of the ACM, 34(1), 38-58.
11. Ferraz, F. G. (2000). Framework Canais de Comunicação. Undergraduate Computer Science Department, Rio de Janeiro: Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro.
12. Filippo, D., Fuks, H., & Lucena, C. J. P. (2005). AulaNetM: Extension of the AulaNet Environment to PDAs. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 10 - Context and Groupware, Proceedings of the Fifth International and Interdisciplinary Conference on Modeling and Using Contex, Paris.
13. Fuks, H., Gerosa, M. A., & Lucena, C. J. P. (2002). The development and application of distance learning on the internet. Open Learning - The Journal of Open and Distance Learning, 17(1), 23-38.
14. Fuks, H., Raposo, A. B., Gerosa, M. A., & Lucena, C. J. P. (2005). Applying the 3C model to groupware development. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems (IJCIS), 14(2-3), 299-328.
15. Garcia, A., & Jacobs, J. (1998). The interactional organization of computer mediated communication in the college classroom. Qualitative Sociology, 21(3), 299-317.
16. Garcia, A., & Jacobs, J. (1999). The eyes of the beholder: Understanding the turn talking system in quasi-synchronous computer mediated communication. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 32(4), 337-367.
17. Gerosa, M. A., Pimentel, M., Fuks, H. & Lucena, C. J. P. (2005). No need to read messages right now: Helping mediators to steer educational forums using statistical and visual information. In G. Stahl & D. Suthers, (Eds.), Proceedings of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning 2005 (pp. 160-169). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18. Gerosa, M. A., Pimentel, M., Raposo, A. B., Fuks, H., & Lucena, C. J. P. (2005). Towards an engineering approach for groupware development: Learning from the AulaNet LMS development. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on CSCW in Design (CSCWiD) (pp. 329-333). Coventry, U.K.
19. Herring, S. (1999). Interactional coherence in CMC. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 4(4). Retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/ vol4/issue4/herring.html
20. Johnson-Lentz, P., & Johnson-Lentz, T. (1982). Groupware: The process and impacts of design choices. In E. B. Kerr & S. R. Hiltz, (Eds.), Computer-mediated communication systems: Status and evaluation. New York: Academic Press.
21. Laurillau, Y., & Nigay, L. (2002). Clover architecture for groupware. Proceedings of the Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) (pp. 236-245). New York: ACM Press.
22. Lonchamp, J. (2005). A structured chat framework for distributed educational settings. In G. Stahl & D. Suthers, (Eds.), Proceedings of Computer-Supported Cooperative Learning (CSCL) 2005 (pp. 403-307). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23. Lucena, C. J. P., Fuks, H., et al. (1998). AulaNet - An environment for the development and maintenance of courses on the web. Proceedings of ICEE'98 - International Conference on Engineering Education. Rio de Janeiro.
24. McAlister, S., Ravenscroft, A., & Scanlon, E. (2004). Combining interaction and context design to support collaborative argumentation using a tool for synchronous CMC. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Special Issue: Developing dialogue for learning, 20(3), 194-204.
25. McGrath, J. E. (1990). Time matters in groups. Intellectual teamwork: Social and technical foundations of cooperative work (pp. 23-61). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26. Mühlpfordt, M., & Wessner, M. (2005). Explicit referencing in chat supports collaborative learning. In G. Stahl & D. Suthers, (Eds.), Proceedings of Computer-Supported Cooperative Learning (CSCL) 2005 (pp. 460-469). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
27. Oikarinen, J., & Reed, D. (1993). Internet relay chat protocol (RFC 1459). Network Working Group. Retrieved from http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1459. html.
28. O'Neill, J., & Martin, D. (2003). Text chat in action. Proceedings of the 2003 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work (pp. 40-49). New York: ACM Press.
29. Pimentel, M. (2002). HiperDiálogo: Ferramenta de bate-papo para diminuir a perda de co-texto. Master's dissertation, Computer Science Department of Federal University of Rio de Janeiro.
30. Pimentel, M., Fuks, H., & Lucena, C. J. P. (2003). Co-text loss in textual chat tools. Proceedings of the 4th International and Interdisciplinary Conference on Modeling and Using Context (pp. 483-490). Stanford.
31. Pimentel, M., Fuks, H., & Lucena, C. J. P. (2004). Mediated chat 2.0: Embbeding coordination into chat tools. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems (pp. 99-103). Hyères: IOS Press.
32. Pimentel, M., Fuks, H., & Lucena, C. J. P. (2005). Mediated chat development process: Avoiding chat confusion on educational debates. In G. Stahl & D. Suthers, (Eds.), Proceedings of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) 2005 (pp. 499-503). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
33. Raposo, A. B., Pimentel, M. G., Gerosa, M. A., Fuks, H., & Lucena, C. J. P. (2004). Prescribing e-learning activities using workflow technologies. Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Computer Supported Activity Coordination (CSAC) (pp. 71-80). http://www.iceis.org/ iceis2004/workshops/csac/ csac2004-cfp.html
34. Rezende, J. L. (2003). Aplicando técnicas de comunicaç ão para a facilitação de debates no ambiente AulaNet. Master's dissertation, Computer Science Department of the Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro.
35. Smith, M., Cadiz, J. J., & Burkhalter, B. (2000). Conversation trees and threaded chats. Proceedings of the 2000 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 97-105). New York: ACM Press.
36. Teufel, S., Sauter, C., Mühlherr, T., & Bauknecht, K. (1995). Computerunterstützte gruppenarbeit. Bonn: Addison-Wesley.
37. Thirunarayanan, M. O. (2000). Cutting down on chat confusion: A proposal for managing instructor-controlled chat systems. Ubiquity, 1(38).
38. Toffler, A. (1970). Future Shock. New York: Random House.
39. Viegas, F. B., & Donath, J. S. (1999). Chat circles. Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM.
40. Vilhjálmsson, H. (2003). Avatar augmented online conversation. Ph.D. dissertation, Program in Media Arts and Sciences, Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
41. Vilhjálmsson, H., & Cassell, J. (1998). BodyChat: Autonomous communicative behaviors in avatars. Proceedings of ACM Autonomous Agents '98 (pp. 269-276), New York: ACM.
42. Werry, C. C. (1996) Linguistic and interactional features of internet relay chat. In S. C. Herring (Ed.). Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 47-63). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
43. Winograd, T. (1989). Groupware: The next wave or another advertising slogan? Proceedings of CompCon 89 (pp. 198-200). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society Press.
44. Zemel, A. (2005). Texts-in-interaction: Collaborative problem-solving in quasi-synchronous computer-mediated communication. In G. Stahl & D. Suthers, (Eds.), Proceedings of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 2005 (pp. 753-757). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.