Genetic evidence that synaptonemal complex axial elements govern recombination pathway choice in mice

Genetics

Volumn 189, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 71-82

  Li, Xin Chenglin ^b   Bolcun Filas, Ewelina ^a   Schimenti, John C ^a  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELL PROTEIN; RAD54 PROTEIN; SYCP2 PROTEIN; SYCP3 PROTEIN; TRIP13 PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANEUPLOIDY; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CELL MATURATION; CELL SURVIVAL; CELL VIABILITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; FEMALE; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; MALE; MEIOSIS; MITOSIS; MORPHOGENESIS; MOUSE; MUTANT; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR REPROGRAMMING; OOCYTE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SYNAPTONEMAL COMPLEX; YEAST;

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASES; ANIMALS; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CELL SURVIVAL; DNA BREAKS, DOUBLE-STRANDED; DNA REPAIR; FEMALE; GENE KNOCKOUT TECHNIQUES; MALE; MEIOSIS; MICE; MICE, 129 STRAIN; MICE, INBRED C3H; MICE, INBRED C57BL; MICE, SCID; NUCLEAR PROTEINS; OOCYTES; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; SYNAPTONEMAL COMPLEX;

MAMMALIA; MUS;

EID: 80052648779     PISSN: 00166731     EISSN: 19432631     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.111.130674     Document Type: Article

References (100)

1. Allen, J. W., and S. A. Latt, 1976 In vivo BrdU-33258 Hoechst analysis of DNA replication kinetics and sister chromatid exchange formation in mouse somatic and meiotic cells. Chromosoma 58: 325-340.
2. Allen, J. W., and C. W. Gwaltney, 1984 Sister chromatid exchanges in mammalian meiotic chromosomes. Basic Life Sci 29 Pt B: 629-645.
3. Allers, T., and M. Lichten, 2001 Differential timing and control of noncrossover and crossover recombination during meiosis. Cell1 6: 47-57.
4. Anderson, L. K., A. Reeves, L. M. Webb, and T. Ashley, 1999 Distribution of crossing over on mouse synaptonemal complexes using immunofluorescent localization of MLH1 protein. Genetics 151: 1569-1579.
5. Arbel, A., D. Zenvirth, and G. Simchen, 1999 Sister chromatidbased DNA repair is mediated by RAD54, not by DMC1 or TID1. EMBO J. 18: 2648-2658.
6. Bannister, L. A., L. G. Reinholdt, R. J. Munroe, and J. C. Schimenti, 2004 Positional cloning and characterization of mouse mei8, a disrupted allelle of the meiotic cohesin Rec8. Genesis 40: 184-194.
7. Barchi, M., S. Mahadevaiah, M. Di Giacomo, F. Baudat, D. G. de Rooij et al., 2005 Surveillance of different recombination defects in mouse spermatocytes yields distinct responses despite elimination at an identical developmental stage. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25: 7203-7215.
8. Barchi, M., I. Roig, M. Di Giacomo, D. G. de Rooij, S. Keeney et al., 2008 ATM promotes the obligate XY crossover and both crossover control and chromosome axis integrity on autosomes. PLoS Genet. 4: e1000076.
9. Barlow, A., F. Benson, S. West, and M. Hultén, 1997 Distribution of the Rad51 recombinase in human and mouse spermatocytes. EMBO J. 16: 5207-5215.
10. Baudat, F., K. Manova, J. P. Yuen, M. Jasin, and S. Keeney, 2000 Chromosome synapsis defects and sexually dimorphic meiotic progression in mice lacking Spo11. Mol. Cell 6: 989-998.
11. Bellani, M. A., P. J. Romanienko, D. A. Cairatti, and R. D. Camerini- Otero, 2005 SPO11 is required for sex-body formation, and Spo11 heterozygosity rescues the prophase arrest of Atm2/2 spermatocytes. J. Cell Sci. 118: 3233-3245.
12. Bhalla, N., and A. F. Dernburg, 2005 A conserved checkpoint monitors meiotic chromosome synapsis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Science 310: 1683-1686.
13. Bishop, D. K., Y. Nikolski, J. Oshiro, J. Chon, M. Shinohara et al., 1999 High copy number suppression of the meiotic arrest caused by a dmc1 mutation: REC114 imposes an early recombination block and RAD54 promotes a DMC1-independent DSB repair pathway. Genes Cells 4: 425-444.
14. Bolor, H., T. Mori, S. Nishiyama, Y. Ito, E. Hosoba et al., 2009 Mutations of the SYCP3 gene in women with recurrent pregnancy loss. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 84: 14-20.
15. Borner, G. V., N. Kleckner, and N. Hunter, 2004 Crossover/noncrossover differentiation, synaptonemal complex formation, and regulatory surveillance at the leptotene/zygotene transition of meiosis. Cell 117: 29-45.
16. Bugreev, D. V., O. M. Mazina, and A. V. Mazin, 2006 Rad54 protein promotes branch migration of Holliday junctions. Nature 442: 590-593.
17. Burgoyne, P. S., S. K. Mahadevaiah, and J. M. Turner, 2007 The management of DNA double-strand breaks in mitotic G2, and in mammalian meiosis viewed from a mitotic G2 perspective. Bioessays 29: 974-986.
18. Busygina, V., M. G. Sehorn, I. Y. Shi, H. Tsubouchi, G. S. Roeder et al., 2008 Hed1 regulates Rad51-mediated recombination via a novel mechanism. Genes Dev. 22: 786-795.
19. Callender, T. L., and N. M. Hollingsworth, 2010 Mek1 suppression of meiotic double-strand break repair is specific to sister chromatids, chromosome autonomous and independent of Rec8 cohesin complexes. Genetics 185: 771-782.
20. Carballo, J., A. Johnson, S. Sedgwick, and R. Cha, 2008 Phosphorylation of the axial element protein Hop1 by Mec1/Tel1 ensures meiotic interhomolog recombination. Cell 132: 758-770.
21. Chiang, T., F. E. Duncan, K. Schindler, R. M. Schultz, and M. A. Lampson, 2010 Evidence that weakened centromere cohesion is a leading cause of age-related aneuploidy in oocytes. Curr. Biol. 20: 1522-1528.
22. Cortes-Ledesma, F., and A. Aguilera, 2006 Double-strand breaks arising by replication through a nick are repaired by cohesindependent sister-chromatid exchange. EMBO Rep. 7: 919-926.
23. Cromie, G. A., and G. R. Smith, 2007 Branching out: meiotic recombination and its regulation. Trends Cell Biol. 17: 448-455.
24. Cromie, G. A., R. W. Hyppa, A. F. Taylor, K. Zakharyevich, N. Hunter et al., 2006 Single Holliday junctions are intermediates of meiotic recombination. Cell 127: 1167-1178.
25. Daniel, K., J. Lange, K. Hached, J. Fu, K. Anastassiadis et al., 2011 Meiotic homologue alignment and its quality surveillance are controlled by mouse HORMAD1. Nat. Cell Biol. 13: 599-610.
26. De Veaux, L. C., N. A. Hoagland, and G. R. Smith, 1992 Seventeen complementation groups of mutations decreasing meiotic recombination in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Genetics 130: 251-262.
27. Di Giacomo, M., M. Barchi, F. Baudat, W. Edelmann, S. Keeney et al., 2005 Distinct DNA-damage-dependent and-independent responses drive the loss of oocytes in recombination-defective mouse mutants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102: 737-742.
28. Elson, A., Y. Wang, C. J. Daugherty, C. C. Morton, F. Zhou et al., 1996 Pleiotropic defects in ataxia-telangiectasia protein-deficient mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93: 13084-13089.
29. Essers, J., R. W. Hendriks, S. M. Swagemakers, C. Troelstra, J. de Wit et al., 1997 Disruption of mouse Rad54 reduces ionizing radiation resistance and homologous recombination. Cell 89: 195-204.
30. Fukuda, T., K. Daniel, L. Wojtasz, A. Toth, and C. Hoog, 2010 A novel mammalian HORMA domain-containing protein, HORMAD1, preferentially associates with unsynapsed meiotic chromosomes. Exp. Cell Res. 316: 158-171.
31. Fukushima, K., Y. Tanaka, K. Nabeshima, T. Yoneki, T. Tougan et al., 2000 Dmc1 of Schizosaccharomyces pombe plays a rolein meiotic recombination. Nucleic Acids Res. 28: 2709-2716.
32. Getun, I. V., Z. K. Wu, A.M. Khalil, and P. R. Bois, 2010 Nucleosome occupancy landscape and dynamics at mouse recombination hotspots. EMBO Rep. 11: 555-560.
33. Ghabrial, A., and T. Schupbach, 1999 Activation of a meiotic checkpoint regulates translation of Gurken during Drosophila oogenesis. Nat. Cell Biol. 1: 354-357.
34. Goldfarb, T., and M. Lichten, 2010 Frequent and efficient use of the sister chromatid for DNA double-strand break repair during budding yeast meiosis. PLoS Biol. 8: e1000520.
35. Guillon, H., F. Baudat, C. Grey, R. M. Liskay, and B. de Massy, 2005 Crossover and noncrossover pathways in mouse meiosis. Mol. Cell 20: 563-573.
36. Hassold, T., H. Hall and P. Hunt, 2007 The origin of human aneuploidy: where we have been, where we are going. Hum. Mol. Genet. 16 Spec No. 2: R203-208.
37. Heyer, W. D., X. Li, M. Rolfsmeier, and X. P. Zhang, 2006 Rad54: The Swiss army knife of homologous recombination? Nucleic Acids Res. 34: 4115-4125.
38. Hodges, C. A., E. Revenkova, R. Jessberger, T. J. Hassold, and P. A. Hunt, 2005 SMC1beta-deficient female mice provide evidence that cohesins are a missing link in age-related nondisjunction. Nat. Genet. 37: 1351-1355.
39. Hunter, N., and N. Kleckner, 2001 The single-end invasion: an asymmetric intermediate at the double-strand break to double- Holliday junction transition of meiotic recombination. Cell 106: 59-70.
40. Jackson, J. A., and G. R. Fink, 1985 Meiotic recombination between duplicated genetic elements in Saccharomyces cerevesiae. Genetics 109: 303-332.
41. Kadyk, L. C., and L. H. Hartwell, 1992 Sister chromatids are preferred over homologs as substrates for recombinational repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 132: 387-402.
42. Kanda, N., and H. Kato, 1980 Analysis of crossing over in mouse meiotic cells by BrdU labelling technique. Chromosoma 78: 113-121.
43. Kim, K. P., B. M. Weiner, L. Zhang, A. Jordan, J. Dekker et al., 2010 Sister cohesion and structural axis components mediate homolog bias of meiotic recombination. Cell 143: 924-937.
44. Koehler, K. E., J. P. Cherry, A. Lynn, P. A. Hunt, and T. J. Hassold, 2002 Genetic control of mammalian meiotic recombination. I. Variation in exchange frequencies among males from inbred mouse strains. Genetics 162: 297-306.
45. Kouznetsova, A., I. Novak, R. Jessberger, and C. Hoog, 2005 SYCP2 and SYCP3 are required for cohesin core integrity at diplotene but not for centromere cohesion at the first meiotic division. J. Cell Sci. 118: 2271-2278.
46. Lao, J. P., and N. Hunter, 2010 Trying to avoid your sister. PLoS Biol. 8: e1000519
47. Latypov, V., M. Rothenberg, A. Lorenz, G. Octobre, O. Csutak et al., 2010 Roles of Hop1 and Mek1 in meiotic chromosome pairing and recombination partner choice in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol. Cell. Biol. 30: 1570-1581.
48. Li, X. C., and J. C. Schimenti, 2007 Mouse pachytene checkpoint 2 (Trip13) is required for completing meiotic recombination but not synapsis. PLoS Genet. 3: e130.
49. Libby, B. J., L. G. Reinholdt, and J. C. Schimenti, 2003 Positional cloning and characterization of Mei1, a vertebrate-specific gene required for normal meiotic chromosome synapsis in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100: 15706-15711.
50. Lu, W. J., J. Chapo, I. Roig, and J. M. Abrams, 2010 Meiotic recombination provokes functional activation of the p53 regulatory network. Science 328: 1278-1281.
51. Mahadevaiah, S. K., D. Bourc'his, D. G. de Rooij, T. H. Bestor, J. M. Turner et al., 2008 Extensive meiotic asynapsis in mice antagonizes meiotic silencing of unsynapsed chromatin and consequently disrupts meiotic sex chromosome inactivation. J. Cell Biol. 182: 263-276.
52. Matulova, P., V. Marini, R. C. Burgess, A. Sisakova, Y. Kwon et al., 2009 Cooperativity of Mus81.Mms4 with Rad54 in the resolution of recombination and replication intermediates. J. Biol. Chem. 284: 7733-7745.
53. Mazin, A. V., O. M. Mazina, D. V. Bugreev, and M. J. Rossi, 2010 Rad54, the motor of homologous recombination. DNA Repair (Amst.) 9: 286-302.
54. Mazina, O. M., and A. V. Mazin, 2008 Human Rad54 protein stimulates human Mus81-Eme1 endonuclease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105: 18249-18254.
55. Meuwissen, R. L., H. H. Offenberg, A. J. Dietrich, A. Riesewijk, M. van Iersel et al., 1992 A coiled-coil related protein specific for synapsed regions of meiotic prophase chromosomes. EMBO J. 11: 5091-5100.
56. Mills, K. D., D. O. Ferguson, J. Essers, M. Eckersdorff, R. Kanaar et al., 2004 Rad54 and DNA Ligase IV cooperate to maintain mammalian chromatid stability. Genes Dev. 18: 1283-1292.
57. Myers, M., K. L. Britt, N. G. Wreford, F. J. Ebling, and J. B. Kerr, 2004 Methods for quantifying follicular numbers within the mouse ovary. Reproduction 127: 569-580.
58. Niu, H., X. Li, E. Job, C. Park, D. Moazed et al., 2007 Mek1 kinase is regulated to suppress double-strand break repair between sister chromatids during budding yeast meiosis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27: 5456-5467.
59. Niu, H., L. Wan, B. Baumgartner, D. Schaefer, J. Loidl et al., 2005 Partner choice during meiosis is regulated by Hop1-promoted dimerization of Mek1. Mol. Biol. Cell 16: 5804-5818.
60. Niu, H., L. Wan, V. Busygina, Y. Kwon, J. A. Allen et al., 2009 Regulation of meiotic recombination via Mek1-mediated Rad54 phosphorylation. Mol. Cell 36: 393-404.
61. Parvanov, E. D., P. M. Petkov, and K. Paigen, 2010 Prdm9 controls activation of mammalian recombination hotspots. Science 327: 835.
62. Pelttari, J., M. R. Hoja, L. Yuan, J. G. Liu, E. Brundell et al., 2001 A meiotic chromosomal core consisting of cohesin complex proteins recruits DNA recombination proteins and promotes synapsis in the absence of an axial element in mammalian meiotic cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21: 5667-5677.
63. Pittman, D., J. Cobb, K. Schimenti, L. Wilson, D. Cooper et al., 1998 Meiotic prophase arrest with failure of chromosome pairing and synapsis in mice deficient for Dmc1, a germline-specific RecA homolog. Mol. Cell 1: 697-705.
64. Plug, A. W., J. Xu, G. Reddy, E. I. Golub, and T. Ashley, 1996 Presynaptic association of Rad51 protein with selected sites in meiotic chromatin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93: 5920-5924.
65. Raschle, M., S. Van Komen, P. Chi, T. Ellenberger, and P. Sung, 2004 Multiple interactions with the Rad51 recombinase govern the homologous recombination function of Rad54. J. Biol. Chem. 279: 51973-51980.
66. Reinholdt, L., T. Ashley, J. Schimenti, and N. Shima, 2004 Forward genetic screens for meiotic and mitotic recombination-defective mutants in mice. Methods Mol. Biol. 262: 87-107.
67. Reinholdt, L. G., and J. C. Schimenti, 2005 Mei1 is epistatic to Dmc1 during mouse meiosis. Chromosoma 114: 127-134.
68. Revenkova, E., C. Adelfalk, and R. Jessberger, 2010 Cohensin in oocytes: Tough enough for mammalian meiosis? Genes 1: 495-504.
69. Roeder, G. S., 1997 Meiotic chromosomes: it takes two to tango. Genes Dev. 11: 2600-2621.
70. Roeder, G. S., and J. M. Bailis, 2000 The pachytene checkpoint. Trends Genet. 16: 395-403.
71. Roig, I., J. A. Dowdle, A. Toth, D. G. de Rooij, M. Jasin et al., 2010 Mouse TRIP13/PCH2 is required for recombination and normal higher-order chromosome structure during meiosis. PLoS Genet. 6: e1001062.
72. Romanienko, P. J., and R. D. Camerini-Otero, 2000 The mouse Spo11 gene is required for meiotic chromosome synapsis. Mol. Cell 6: 975-987.
73. Rossi, M. J., and A. V. Mazin, 2008 Rad51 protein stimulates the branch migration activity of Rad54 protein. J. Biol. Chem. 283: 24698-24706.
74. Royo, H., G. Polikiewicz, S. K. Mahadevaiah, H. Prosser, M. Mitchell et al., 2010 Evidence that meiotic sex chromosome inactivation is essential for male fertility. Curr. Biol. 20: 2117-2123.
75. Schwacha, A., and N. Kleckner, 1994 Identification of joint molecules that form frequently between homologs but rarely between sister chromatids during yeast meiosis. Cell 76: 51-63.
76. Schwacha, A., and N. Kleckner, 1997 Interhomolog bias during meiotic recombination: meiotic functions promote a highly differentiated interhomolog-only pathway. Cell 90: 1123-1135.
77. Sheridan, S., and D. K. Bishop, 2006 Red-Hed regulation: recombinase Rad51, though capable of playing the leading role, may be relegated to supporting Dmc1 in budding yeast meiosis. Genes Dev. 20: 1685-1691.
78. Shin, Y. H., Y. Choi, S. U. Erdin, S. A. Yatsenko, M. Kloc et al., 2010 Hormad1 mutation disrupts synaptonemal complex formation, recombination, and chromosome segregation in mammalian meiosis. PLoS Genet. 6: e1001190.
79. Sjogren, C., and K. Nasmyth, 2001 Sister chromatid cohesion is required for postreplicative double-strand break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr. Biol. 11: 991-995.
80. Sjogren, C., and L. Strom, 2010 S-phase and DNA damage activated establishment of sister chromatid cohesion-importance for DNA repair. Exp. Cell Res. 316: 1445-1453.
81. Stark, J. M., and M. Jasin, 2003 Extensive loss of heterozygosity is suppressed during homologous repair of chromosomal breaks. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23: 733-743.
82. Sung, P., and H. Klein, 2006 Mechanism of homologous recombination: mediators and helicases take on regulatory functions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 7: 739-750.
83. Tachibana-Konwalski, K., J. Godwin, L. van der Weyden, L. Champion, N. R. Kudo et al., 2010 REC8-containing cohesin maintains bivalents without turnover during the growing phase of mouse oocytes. Genes Dev. 24: 2505-2516.
84. Tarsounas, M., T. Morita, R. E. Pearlman, and P. B. Moens, 1999 RAD51 and DMC1 form mixed complexes associated with mouse meiotic chromosome cores and synaptonemal complexes. J. Cell Biol. 147: 207-220.
85. Tsubouchi, H., and G. S. Roeder, 2006 Budding yeast Hed1 downregulates the mitotic recombination machinery when meiotic recombination is impaired. Genes Dev. 20: 1766-1775.
86. Turner, J. M., S. K. Mahadevaiah, O. Fernandez-Capetillo, A. Nussenzweig, X. Xu et al., 2005 Silencing of unsynapsed meiotic chromosomes in the mouse. Nat. Genet. 37: 41-47.
87. Wang, H., and C. Hoog, 2006 Structural damage to meiotic chromosomes impairs DNA recombination and checkpoint control in mammalian oocytes. J. Cell Biol. 173: 485-495.
88. Ward, J. O., L. G. Reinholdt, W. W. Motley, L. M. Niswander, D. C. Deacon et al., 2007 Mutation in mouse Hei10, an e3 ubiquitin ligase, disrupts meiotic crossing over. PLoS Genet. 3: e139.
89. Watrin, E., and J. M. Peters, 2006 Cohesin and DNA damage repair. Exp. Cell Res. 312: 2687-2693.
90. Wesoly, J., S. Agarwal, S. Sigurdsson, W. Bussen, S. Van Komen et al., 2006 Differential contributions of mammalian Rad54 paralogs to recombination, DNA damage repair, and meiosis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26: 976-989.
91. Wojtasz, L., K. Daniel, I. Roig, E. Bolcun-Filas, H. Xu et al., 2009 Mouse HORMAD1 and HORMAD2, two conserved meiotic chromosomal proteins, are depleted from synapsed chromosome axes with the help of TRIP13 AAA-ATPase. PLoS Genet. 5: e1000702.
92. Wu, H. Y., and S. M. Burgess, 2006 Two distinct surveillance mechanisms monitor meiotic chromosome metabolism in budding yeast. Curr. Biol. 16: 2473-2479.
93. Wu, Z. K., I. V. Getun, and P. R. Bois, 2010 Anatomy of mouserecombination hot spots. Nucleic Acids Res. 38: 2346-2354.
94. Xu, H., M. D. Beasley, W. D. Warren, G. T. van der Horst, and M. J. McKay, 2005 Absence of mouse REC8 cohesin promotes synapsis of sister chromatids in meiosis. Dev. Cell 8: 949-961.
95. Xu, L., B. M. Weiner, and N. Kleckner, 1997 Meiotic cells monitor the status of the interhomolog recombination complex. GenesDev. 11: 106-118.
96. Xu, Y., T. Ashley, E. E. Brainerd, R. T. Bronson, M. S. Meyn et al., 1996 Targeted disruption of Atm leads to growth retardation, chromosomal fragmentation during meiosis, immune defects, and thymic lymphoma. Genes Dev. 10: 2411-2422.
97. Yang, F., R. De La Fuente, N. A. Leu, C. Baumann, K. J. McLaughlin et al., 2006 Mouse SYCP2 is required for synaptonemal complex assembly and chromosomal synapsis during male meiosis. J. Cell Biol. 173: 497-507.
98. Yoshida, K., G. Kondoh, Y. Matsuda, T. Habu, Y. Nishimune et al., 1998 The mouse RecA-like gene Dmc1 is required for homologous chromosome synapsis during meiosis. Mol. Cell 1: 707-718.
99. Yuan, L., J. G. Liu, J. Zhao, E. Brundell, B. Daneholt et al., 2000 The murine SCP3 gene is required for synaptonemal complex assembly, chromosome synapsis, and male fertility. Mol. Cell 5: 73-83.
100. Zickler, D., and N. Kleckner, 1999 Meiotic chromosomes: integrating structure and function. Annu. Rev. Genet. 33: 603-754.