Crossover/noncrossover differentiation, synaptonemal complex formation, and regulatory surveillance at the leptotene/zygotene transition of meiosis

Cell

Volumn 117, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 29-45

  Börner, G Valentin ^a   Kleckner, Nancy ^a   Hunter, Neil ^a,b  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOUBLE STRANDED DNA; FUNGAL PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; COMPLEX FORMATION; CROSSING OVER; DNA STRAND BREAKAGE; FUNGUS MUTANT; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; MEIOSIS; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SYNAPTONEMAL COMPLEX; TEMPERATURE DEPENDENCE; WILD TYPE; YEAST;

FUNGI;

EID: 4344582144     PISSN: 00928674     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00292-2     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Agarwal S., Roeder G.S. Zip3 provides a link between recombination enzymes and synaptonemal complex proteins. Cell. 102:2000;245-255.
2. Alani E., Padmore R., Kleckner N. Analysis of wild-type and rad50 mutants of yeast suggests an intimate relationship between meiotic chromosome synapsis and recombination. Cell. 61:1990;419-436.
3. Albini S.M., Jones G.H. Synaptonemal complex spreading in Allium cepa and A. fistulosum. I. The initiation and sequence of pairing. Chromosoma. 95:1987;324-338.
4. Allers T., Lichten M. Differential timing and control of noncrossover and crossover recombination during meiosis. Cell. 106:2001;47-57.
5. Bishop D.K. RecA homologs Dmc1 and Rad51 interact to form multiple nuclear complexes prior to meiotic chromosome synapsis. Cell. 79:1994;1081-1092.
6. Bishop D.K., Park D., Xu L., Kleckner N. DMC1. a meiosis-specific yeast homolog of E. coli recA required for recombination, synaptonemal complex formation, and cell cycle progression Cell. 69:1992;439-456.
7. Blat Y., Protacio R.U., Hunter N., Kleckner N. Physical and functional interactions among basic chromosome organizational features govern early steps of meiotic chiasma formation. Cell. 111:2002;791-802.
8. Byers B., Goetsch L. Electron microscopic observations on the meiotic karyotype of diploid and tetraploid Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 72:1975;5056-5060.
9. Carpenter A.T. Gene conversion, recombination nodules, and the initiation of meiotic synapsis. Bioessays. 6:1987;232-236.
10. Cha R.S., Kleckner N. ATR homolog Mec1 promotes fork progression, thus averting breaks in replication slow zones. Science. 26:2002;602-606.
11. Chua P.R., Roeder G.S. Zip2, a meiosis-specific protein required for the initiation of chromosome synapsis. Cell. 93:1998;349-359.
12. Colaiacovo M.P., MacQueen A.J., Martinez-Perez E., McDonald K., Adamo A., La Volpe A., Villeneuve A.M. Synaptonemal complex assembly in C. elegans is dispensable for loading strand-exchange proteins but critical for proper completion of recombination. Dev. Cell. 5:2003;463-474.
13. Copenhaver G.P., Housworth E.A., Stahl F.W. Crossover interference in Arabidopsis. Genetics. 160:2002;1631-1639.
14. Darlington C.D. Recent Advances in Cytology. 1937;Blakiston, Philadelphia, PA.
15. de los Santos T., Hunter N., Lee C., Larkin B., Loidl J., Hollingsworth N.M. The Mus81/Mms4 endonuclease acts independently of double-Holliday junction resolution to promote a distinct subset of crossovers during meiosis in budding yeast. Genetics. 164:2003;81-94.
16. Edelmann W., Cohen P.E., Kneitz B., Winand N., Lia M., Heyer J., Kolodner R., Pollard J.W., Kucherlapati R. Mammalian MutS homologue 5 is required for chromosome pairing in meiosis. Nat. Genet. 21:1999;123-127.
17. Egel R. Synaptonemal complex and crossing-over. structural support or interference? Heredity. 41:1978;233-237.
18. Engebrecht J., Hirsch J., Roeder G.S. Meiotic gene conversion and crossing over. their relationship to each other and to chromosome synapsis and segregation Cell. 62:1990;927-937.
19. Fung J.C., Rockmill B., Odell M., Roeder G.S. Imposition of crossover interference through the nonrandom distribution of synapsis initiation complexes. Cell. 116:2004;795-802.
20. Henderson K.A., Keeney S. Tying synaptonemal complex formation to the formation and programmed repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. in press:2004.
21. Holliday R. A mechanism for gene conversion in fungi. Genet. Res. 5:1964;282-304.
22. Hollingsworth N.M., Ponte L., Halsey C. MSH5, a novel MutS homolog, facilitates meiotic reciprocal recombination between homologs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae but not mismatch repair. Genes Dev. 9:1995;1728-1739.
23. Hunt P.A., Hassold T.J. Sex matters in meiosis. Science. 296:2002;2181-2183.
24. Hunter N. Synaptonemal complexities and commonalities. Mol. Cell. 12:2003;533-535.
25. Hunter N., Kleckner N. The single-end invasion. an asymmetric intermediate at the double-strand break to double-Holliday junction transition of meiotic recombination Cell. 106:2001;59-70.
26. Johnson R.D., Jasin M. Sister chromatid gene conversion is a prominent double-strand break repair pathway in mammalian cells. EMBO J. 19:2000;3398-3407.
27. Jones G.H. The control of chiasma distribution. Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol. 38:1984;293-320.
28. Kee K., Keeney S. Functional interactions between SPO11 and REC102 during initiation of meiotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 160:2002;111-122.
29. Keeney S. Mechanism and control of meiotic recombination initiation. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 52:2001;1-53.
30. Kelly K.O., Dernburg A.F., Stanfield G.M., Villeneuve A.M. Caenorhabditis elegans msh-5 is required for both normal and radiation-induced meiotic crossing over but not for completion of meiosis. Genetics. 156:2000;617-630.
31. Lichten M. Meiotic recombination. breaking the genome to save it Curr. Biol. 11:2001;R253-R256.
32. Lydall D., Nikolsky Y., Bishop D.K., Weinert T. A meiotic recombination checkpoint controlled by mitotic checkpoint genes. Nature. 383:1996;840-843.
33. Maguire M.P. The relationship of crossing over to chromosome synapsis in a short paracentric inversion. Genetics. 53:1966;1071-1077.
34. Moens P.B. Lateral element cross connections of the synaptonemal complex and their relationship to chiasmata in rat spermatocytes. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 20:1978;567-579.
35. Moens P.B., Kolas N.K., Tarsounas M., Marcon E., Cohen P.E., Spyropoulos B. The time course and chromosomal localization of recombination-related proteins at meiosis in mouse are compatible with models that can resolve the early DNA-DNA interactions without reciprocal recombination. J. Cell Sci. 115:2002;1611-1622.
36. Nakagawa T., Ogawa H. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae MER3 gene, encoding a novel helicase-like protein, is required for crossover control in meiosis. EMBO J. 18:1999;5714-5723.
37. Novak J.E., Ross-Macdonald P.B., Roeder G.S. The budding yeast Msh4 protein functions in chromosome synapsis and the regulation of crossover distribution. Genetics. 158:2001;1013-1025.
38. Paques F., Haber J.E. Multiple pathways of recombination induced by double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 63:1999;349-404.
39. Rockmill B., Sym M., Scherthan H., Roeder G.S. Roles for two RecA homologs in promoting meiotic chromosome synapsis. Genes Dev. 9:1995;2684-2695.
40. Rockmill B., Fung J.C., Branda S.S., Roeder G.S. The Sgs1 helicase regulates chromosome synapsis and meiotic crossing over. Curr. Biol. 13:2003;1954-1962.
41. Roeder G.S., Bailis J.M. The pachytene checkpoint. Trends Genet. 16:2000;395-403.
42. Rose M.D., Winston F., Hieter P. Methods in Yeast Genetics. 1990;Cold Spring Harbor Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
43. San-Segundo P.A., Roeder G.S. Role for the silencing protein Dot1 in meiotic checkpoint control. Mol. Biol. Cell. 11:2000;3601-3615.
44. Schwacha A., Kleckner N. Identification of double Holliday junctions as intermediates in meiotic recombination. Cell. 83:1995;783-791.
45. Sod-Moriah U.A., Goldberg G.M., Bedrak E. Intrascrotal temperature, testicular histology and fertility of heat-acclimatized rats. J. Reprod. Fertil. 37:1974;263-268.
46. Storlazzi A., Xu L., Cao L., Kleckner N. Crossover and noncrossover recombination during meiosis. timing and pathway relationships Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 92:1995;8512-8516.
47. Storlazzi A., Xu L., Schwacha A., Kleckner N. Synaptonemal complex (SC) component Zip1 plays a role in meiotic recombination independent of SC polymerization along the chromosomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 93:1996;9043-9048.
48. Sym M., Roeder G.S. Crossover interference is abolished in the absence of a synaptonemal complex protein. Cell. 79:1994;283-292.
49. Sym M., Engebrecht J.A., Roeder G.S. ZIP1 is a synaptonemal complex protein required for meiotic chromosome synapsis. Cell. 72:1993;365-378.
50. Tarsounas M., Morita T., Pearlman R.E., Moens P.B. RAD51 and DMC1 form mixed complexes associated with mouse meiotic chromosome cores and synaptonemal complexes. J. Cell Biol. 147:1999;207-220.
51. Tessé S., Storlazzi A., Kleckner N., Gargano S., Zickler D. Localization and roles of Ski8p protein in Sordaria meiosis and delineation of three mechanistically distinct steps of meiotic homolog juxtaposition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 100:2003;12865-12870.
52. von Wettstein D., Rasmussen S.W., Holm P.B. The synaptonemal complex in genetic segregation. Annu. Rev. Genet. 18:1984;331-413.
53. Wach A., Brachat A., Pohlmann R., Philippsen P. New heterologous modules for classical or PCR-based gene disruptions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 10:1994;1793-1808.
54. Webber H.A., Howard L., Bickel S.E. The cohesion protein ORD is required for homolog bias during meiotic recombination. J. Cell Biol. 164:2004;819-829.
55. Zickler D. Development of the synaptonemal complex and the "recombination nodules" during meiotic prophase in the seven bivalents of the fungus Sordaria macrospora Auersw. Chromosoma. 61:1977;289-316.
56. Zickler D., Kleckner N. The leptotene-zygotene transition of meiosis. Annu. Rev. Genet. 32:1998;619-697.
57. Zickler D., Kleckner N. Meiotic chromosomes. integrating structure and function Annu. Rev. Genet. 33:1999;603-754.