Two Distinct Surveillance Mechanisms Monitor Meiotic Chromosome Metabolism in Budding Yeast

Current Biology

Volumn 16, Issue 24, 2006, Pages 2473-2479

  Wu, Hsin Yen ^a   Burgess, Sean M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

DNA

Indexed keywords

CELL CYCLE PROTEIN; DNA BINDING PROTEIN; NUCLEAR PROTEIN; PROTEIN RAD9; RAD17 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN; SAE2 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; ZIP1 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE;

ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME; CROSSING OVER; GENETICS; MEIOSIS; METABOLISM; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SYNAPTONEMAL COMPLEX;

CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CHROMOSOMES, FUNGAL; CROSSING OVER, GENETIC; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; MEIOSIS; NUCLEAR PROTEINS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SYNAPTONEMAL COMPLEX;

SACCHAROMYCETALES;

EID: 33845405309     PISSN: 09609822     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.10.069     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Keeney S. Mechanism and control of meiotic recombination initiation. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 52 (2001) 1-53
2. Page S.L., and Hawley R.S. Chromosome Choreography: The meiotic ballet. Science 301 (2003) 785-789
3. Roeder G.S., and Bailis J.M. The pachytene checkpoint. Trends Genet. 16 (2000) 395-403
4. Hochwagen A., and Amon A. Checking your breaks: Surveillance mechanisms of meiotic recombination. Curr. Biol. 16 (2006) R217-R228
5. Hochwagen A., Tham W.H., Brar G.A., and Amon A. The FK506 binding protein Fpr3 counteracts protein phosphatase 1 to maintain meiotic recombination checkpoint activity. Cell 122 (2005) 861-873
6. San-Segundo P.A., and Roeder G.S. Pch2 links chromatin silencing to meiotic checkpoint control. Cell 97 (1999) 313-324
7. Lydall D., Nikolsky Y., Bishop D., and Weinert T. A meiotic recombination checkpoint controlled by mitotic checkpoint genes. Nature 383 (1996) 840-843
8. Prinz S., Amon A., and Klein F. Isolation of COM1, a new gene required to complete meiotic double-strand break-induced recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 146 (1997) 781-795
9. McKee A.H., and Kleckner N. A general method for identifying recessive diploid-specific mutations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, its application to the isolation of mutants blocked at intermediate stages of meiotic prophase and characterization of a new gene SAE2. Genetics 146 (1997) 797-816
10. Sym M., Engebrecht J., and Roeder G.S. ZIP1 is a synaptonemal complex protein required for meiotic chromosome synapsis. Cell 72 (1993) 365-378
11. Bhalla N., and Dernburg A.F. A conserved checkpoint monitors meiotic chromosome synapsis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Science 310 (2005) 1683-1686
12. Shinohara M., Sakai K., Ogawa T., and Shinohara A. The mitotic DNA damage checkpoint proteins Rad17 and Rad24 are required for repair of double-strand breaks during meiosis in yeast. Genetics 164 (2003) 855-865
13. Grushcow J.M., Holzen T.M., Park K.J., Weinert T., Lichten M., and Bishop D.K. Saccharomyces cerevisiae checkpoint genes MEC1, RAD17 and RAD24 are required for normal meiotic recombination partner choice. Genetics 153 (1999) 607-620
14. Xu L., Weiner B., and Kleckner N. Meiotic cells monitor the status of the interhomolog recombination complex. Genes Dev. 11 (1997) 106-118
15. Wu H.-Y., and Burgess S.M. Ndj1, a telomere-associated protein, promotes meiotic recombination in budding yeast. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26 (2006) 3683-3694
16. Bishop D.K. RecA homologs Dmc1 and Rad51 interact to form multiple nuclear complexes prior to meiotic chromosome synapsis. Cell 79 (1994) 1081-1092
17. Malone R.E., Haring S.J., Foreman K.E., Pansegrau M.L., Smith S.M., Houdek D.R., Carpp L., Shah B., and Lee K.E. The signal from the initiation of meiotic recombination to the first division of meiosis. Eukaryot. Cell 3 (2004) 598-609
18. Kee K., and Keeney S. Functional interactions between SPO11 and REC102 during initiation of meiotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 160 (2002) 111-122
19. Hunter N., and Kleckner N. The single-end invasion: An asymmetric intermediate at the double-strand break to double-holliday junction transition of meiotic recombination. Cell 106 (2001) 59-70
20. Klapholz S., and Esposito R.E. Isolation of SPO12-1 and SPO13-1 from a natural variant of yeast that undergoes a single meiotic division. Genetics 96 (1980) 567-588
21. Blat Y., Protacio R.U., Hunter N., and Kleckner N. Physical and functional interactions among basic chromosome organizational features govern early steps of meiotic Chiasma formation. Cell 111 (2002) 791-802
22. Smith A.V., and Roeder G.S. The yeast Red1 protein localizes to the cores of meiotic chromosomes. J. Cell Biol. 136 (1997) 957-967
23. Rockmill B., and Roeder G.S. RED1: A yeast gene required for the segregation of chromosomes during the reductional division of meiosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85 (1988) 6057-6061
24. Niu H., Wan L., Baumgartner B., Schaefer D., Loidl J., and Hollingsworth N.M. Partner choice during meiosis is regulated by Hop1-promoted dimerization of Mek1. Mol. Biol. Cell 16 (2005) 5804-5818
25. Schwacha A., and Kleckner N. Interhomolog bias during meiotic recombination: Meiotic functions promote a highly differentiated interhomolog-only pathway. Cell 90 (1997) 1123-1135
26. Zou L., Liu D., and Elledge S.J. Replication protein A-mediated recruitment and activation of Rad17 complexes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100 (2003) 13827-13832
27. Hartwell L.H., and Weinert T.A. Checkpoints: Controls that ensure the order of cell cycle events. Science 246 (1989) 629-634
28. Zhou B.B., and Elledge S.J. The DNA damage response: Putting checkpoints in perspective. Nature 408 (2000) 433-439
29. Usui T., Ogawa H., and Petrini J.H.J. A DNA damage response pathway controlled by Tel1 and the Mre11 complex. Mol. Cell 7 (2001) 1255-1266
30. Barchi M., Mahadevaiah S., Di Giacomo M., Baudat F., de Rooij D.G., Burgoyne P.S., Jasin M., and Keeney S. Surveillance of different recombination defects in mouse spermatocytes yields distinct responses despite elimination at an identical developmental stage. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25 (2005) 7203-7215
31. Odorisio T., Rodriguez T.A., Evans E.P., Clarke A.R., and Burgoyne P.S. The meiotic checkpoint monitoring synapsis eliminates spermatocytes via p53-independent apoptosis. Nat. Genet. 18 (1998) 257-261
32. Page S.L., and Hawley R.S. The genetics and molecular biology of the synaptonemal complex. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 20 (2004) 525-558
33. Egel-Mitani M., Olson L.W., and Egel R. Meiosis in Aspergillus nidulans: Another example for lacking synaptonemal complexes in the absence of crossover interference. Hereditas 97 (1982) 179-187
34. Olson L.W., Edén U., Mitani M.E., and Egel R. Asynaptic meiosis in fission yeast?. Hereditas 89 (1978) 189-199
35. Wolfe J., Hunter B., and Adair W.S. A cytological study of micronuclear elongation during conjugation in Tetrahymena. Chromosoma 55 (1976) 289-308
36. Loidl J., and Scherthan H. Organization and pairing of meiotic chromosomes in the ciliate Tetrahymena thermophila. J. Cell Sci. 117 (2004) 5791-5801
37. Borner G.V., Kleckner N., and Hunter N. Crossover/noncrossover differentiation, synaptonemal complex formation, and regulatory surveillance at the leptotene/zygotene transition of meiosis. Cell 117 (2004) 29-45
38. Perry J., Kleckner N., and Borner G.V. Bioinformatic analyses implicate the collaborating meiotic crossover/chiasma proteins Zip2, Zip3, and Spo22/Zip4 in ubiquitin labeling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102 (2005) 17594-17599
39. Tsubouchi T., Zhao H., and Roeder G.S. The meiosis-specific Zip4 protein regulates crossover distribution by promoting synaptonemal complex formation together with Zip2. Dev. Cell 10 (2006) 809-819
40. Agarwal S., and Roeder G.S. Zip3 provides a link between recombination enzymes and synaptonemal complex proteins. Cell 102 (2000) 245-255
41. Hanson P.I., and Whiteheart S.W. AAA+ proteins: Have engine, will work. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 6 (2005) 519-529
42. Ye Y., Meyer H.H., and Rapoport T.A. Function of the p97-Ufd1-Npl4 complex in retrotranslocation from the ER to the cytosol: Dual recognition of nonubiquitinated polypeptide segments and polyubiquitin chains. J. Cell Biol. 162 (2003) 71-84